SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake-S architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. With a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, this chip pairs a high-frequency design with substantial multi-threading capacity, making it a versatile component for both single-threaded responsiveness and heavily parallel workloads. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 16-core part, suggesting efficient power management, though the processor does not have an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking headroom is limited to what the platform allows.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. That large L3 pool is critical for workloads that repeatedly access the same data sets, as it reduces the need to pull information from system memory. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, which gives builders flexibility when selecting a motherboard and RAM, though the lack of ECC support means this is squarely aimed at mainstream consumer and enthusiast use rather than mission-critical servers.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that punches well above its efficiency-oriented TDP. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35,404 in multi-core and 4,998 in single-core — the latter being exceptional for a chip with a 2.10 GHz base clock, clearly demonstrating that the 5.20 GHz boost is sustained aggressively when needed. The Cinebench R20 results of 14,869 multi-core and 2,099 single-core follow the same pattern, while the older R15 test shows 3,568 multi-core and 503 single-core. These numbers collectively indicate a chip that excels at both bursty single-thread tasks and long-running multi-threaded jobs, which is a rare combination in the desktop market.

PassMark results reinforce this interpretation. The multi-thread score of 44,737 and single-thread score of 4,212 are both strong, but the specialized tests are more revealing. Data compression hits 567,473, floating-point math reaches 110,512, and integer math scores 151,416 — all indicating that the i7-13790F is not just fast in synthetic rendering benchmarks but also in real-world data manipulation and calculation tasks. The extended instructions score of 34,828 suggests solid SIMD performance for workloads that leverage modern instruction sets, while the find prime numbers score of 207 is comparatively low, hinting that certain integer-heavy algorithms may not scale perfectly with the core count.

The processor's 93rd percentile ranking against all CPUs places it firmly in the top tier of desktop silicon. Its average benchmark score of 63,080 is nearly indistinguishable from its closest rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63,173, -0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62,839, +0.4%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (63,331, -0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (62,738, +0.5%). What this tells us is that the i7-13790F, despite being a 13th-gen part, is still competitive with newer mobile and embedded processors in aggregate performance — the differences are within noise. For a desktop chip released in February 2023, this longevity is notable.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-13790F's average benchmark score of 63,080 places it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 93% of processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, scores 63,173 — a difference of just 0.1%, which is effectively a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is 0.4% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is 0.5% behind the i7-13790F. This clustering suggests that the 13790F sits at the edge of a performance plateau where generational improvements have become incremental rather than transformative.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers an average benchmark score of 17,208, placing it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT with a score of 17,083 (0.7% ahead of the RTX 3070), followed by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 at 17,037 (1.0% ahead) and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17,019 (1.1% ahead). The NVIDIA Tesla K40c trails by 1.5% at 17,468. These are remarkably close margins, indicating that the RTX 3070, while no longer at the current-generation, still holds its own against newer mid-range parts.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, which puts the system in the upper quarter of all desktop configurations. The divergence between the CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 61st percentile is immediately visible and foreshadows a potential imbalance: the processor is capable of feeding a much faster graphics card than the RTX 3070. In CPU-bound workloads, this system will shine; in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will set the ceiling.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 for the RTX 3070 is modest by modern standards, reflecting the card's age. Geekbench scores are more encouraging: OpenCL reaches 112,821 and Vulkan hits 21,022, showing that compute workloads can still extract substantial performance from the Ampere architecture. PassMark G3D scoring of 22,214 and GPU compute of 11,195 further contextualize the card's capabilities, while the DirectX 11 score of 182 versus DirectX 12 of 85 indicates that the card is better optimized for older APIs — a common trait for this generation.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination — no rows exist in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field. Consequently, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements. This distinction matters because real-world gaming performance depends on driver maturity, game engine quirks, and CPU-GPU communication, none of which synthetic benchmarks fully capture.

Based on the CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 61st percentile, the expected gaming experience is one where the processor will rarely be the limiting factor. The RTX 3070's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings in most titles, though the 8 GB capacity may become a constraint at 4K with ultra textures in newer games. The GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 46 RT cores suggest that ray tracing effects are feasible but not at maximum quality settings in demanding titles.

For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the combination of the i7-13790F's 5.20 GHz boost clock and the RTX 3070's 1,725 MHz boost clock should deliver well above 144 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, where the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,998 in Cinebench R23 will dominate. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more stressed, and frame rates will likely dip to the 80-120 FPS range in AAA games, depending on optimization. At 4K, the RTX 3070's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will be the binding constraints, with estimates suggesting 40-60 FPS in visually intensive titles at high (not ultra) settings.

The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are inherently uncertain, but the percentile gap between CPU and GPU strongly implies that users upgrading from a weaker processor will see immediate gains in CPU-bound scenarios, while those expecting the RTX 3070 to push 4K ultra will be disappointed. The system is best positioned for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the balance is most favorable.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a specific user: someone who needs exceptional processing power for productivity or content creation but is willing to accept a mid-tier GPU for gaming. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and 16-core/24-thread configuration make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, video editors rendering timelines, 3D artists running simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets. The PassMark data compression score of 567,473 and encryption score of 31,703 indicate strong performance for file archiving and secure data handling, which benefits IT professionals and small business workstations.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p who prioritize high frame rates over maximum graphical fidelity will find this system capable, but those targeting 4K ultra settings should look elsewhere — the RTX 3070's 61st percentile ranking simply does not support that ambition. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded muscle for compilation and simulation tasks, while the modest 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements manageable for dorm-room builds. Small business workstations handling accounting software, database queries, or virtual machines will benefit from the 24 threads and 33 MB L3 cache.

The launch MSRP of $441 for the CPU and $499 for the GPU positions this historically as a mid-high-end pairing, though current market pricing may differ. The key takeaway is that this build prioritizes compute capability over graphics performance, making it a sensible choice for professionals who game occasionally rather than gamers who occasionally work.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the i7-13790F's 5.20 GHz boost clock and 4,998 single-core Cinebench R23 score will drive frame rates well above 144 FPS in competitive titles, with the RTX 3070's 165.6 GPixel/s pixel rate handling the rendering. At 1440p, expect 100+ FPS in most games at high settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in in the most demanding titles.

Streaming: The 24 threads and 44,737 PassMark multi-thread score provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, though the RTX 3070's 184 tensor cores could offload this via NVENC. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures that simultaneous gaming and encoding will not cause stutters, even in CPU-heavy titles.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35,404 and PassMark floating-point of 110,512 indicate strong performance in timeline scrubbing, rendering, and effects processing. The i7-13790F can handle 4K multi-track edits without proxy files, though export times will still be slower than higher-core-count workstation parts.

3D rendering: The 16 cores and 24 threads excel in CPU-based rendering engines like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The 33 MB L3 cache reduces memory stalls, and the 65 W TDP allows sustained all-core boosts without thermal throttling in a capable air cooler. This is a primary strength of the build.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 4,212 in PassMark and 4,998 in Cinebench R23 accelerate compilation of large projects, while the multi-thread score of 44,737 speeds up parallel build steps. The data encryption score of 31,703 is useful for secure development workflows.

Student and office work: For document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing, this CPU is massively overprovisioned, but the 65 W TDP and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support make it a power-efficient choice for a desktop that stays on all day. The RTX 3070 is unnecessary for these tasks but does not detract from the experience.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, packing 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² die with a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GA104 chip features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines — a configuration that delivers 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 14 Gbps effective across a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but increasingly marginal for 4K textures.

The RT and tensor core counts — 46 and 184 respectively — are what separate this from non-RTX cards. Ray tracing performance is present but not class-leading; the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 suggests that the card can handle DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads but will struggle with heavy ray-traced scenes at high resolutions. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can dramatically improve frame rates in supported games by rendering at lower resolutions and upscaling, partially compensating for the raw compute limitations.

The GPU's 61st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 17,208 place it just above the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083, 0.7% behind) and just below the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468, 1.5% ahead). This is a tight cluster, meaning the RTX 3070 is competitive with modern mid-range cards but offers no headroom over them. The 220 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU are modest for this performance class, and the dual-slot design with a single 12-pin power connector simplifies installation in most cases.

The card's End-of-life production status is a key consideration. Released in August 2020, the RTX 3070 is now several generations old, and its 8 GB VRAM is the most obvious limitation for future games. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 165.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are still respectable, but the card lacks the memory capacity and bandwidth of newer parts. For compute workloads, the OpenCL score of 112,821 and Vulkan score of 21,022 show that the card is still capable, but the DirectX 12 score of 85 (versus 182 for DirectX 11) suggests that driver optimization for newer APIs has not fully materialized.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i7-13790F's socket and does it support DDR5?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, giving builders choice in platform configuration.

Q: How does the i7-13790F compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The i7-13790F's average benchmark score is 63,080, which is just 0.1% behind the Core Ultra 7 265HX's 63,173 — a statistically negligible difference.

Q: What is the RTX 3070's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the RTX 3070 still competitive against newer GPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 17,208 places it at the 61st percentile, roughly on par with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083, 0.7% difference) and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468, 1.5% difference).

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The i7-13790F has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Can the RTX 3070 handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162 suggests ray tracing performance is modest.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 77, placing it in the upper quarter of desktop configurations, though the CPU's 93rd percentile is much higher than the GPU's 61st percentile.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of the Intel Core i7-13790F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, combining a 93rd-percentile CPU with a 61st-percentile GPU. The combined percentile of 77 reflects a system that is overall above average but with a clear imbalance: the processor is overkill for the graphics card in gaming scenarios, while the graphics card is the bottleneck in GPU-intensive workloads. This is not a balanced 50/50 split; it is a CPU-first build with a capable but not exceptional GPU attached.

The i7-13790F's 16 cores, 24 threads, and 65 W TDP make it a power-efficient workhorse for productivity and content creation, while the RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM and 20.31 TFLOPS provide solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The launch MSRP was $441 for the CPU and $499 for the GPU, reflecting their original positioning as premium components. In the current market, this pairing sits in the upper-midrange, offering more compute capability than most gaming rigs but less graphics headroom than high-end builds.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly identifies the RTX 3070 as the limiting component in gaming workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 61st percentile means that in most games, the graphics card will be saturated before the processor breaks a sweat. The 5.20 GHz boost clock and 4,998 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensure that even the most CPU-thirsty titles will not max out the processor, leaving headroom for background tasks like streaming or recording.

In compute-heavy workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 35,404 multi-core Cinebench R23 score and 44,737 PassMark multi-thread score will dominate rendering and compilation, while the GPU's 11,195 PassMark compute score and 112,821 OpenCL score may or may not keep pace depending on the specific application. For GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., CUDA in Blender or Octane), the RTX 3070 will be the bottleneck; for CPU-based rendering, the i7-13790F will shine.

The lack of measured FPS data prevents precise bottleneck quantification, but the percentile differential of 32 points (93 vs 61) is a strong indicator. In esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's headroom means frame rates will be GPU-limited, but the GPU's 165.6 GPixel/s pixel rate is sufficient for high refresh. In 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering in VRAM-heavy titles, making the CPU irrelevant in those scenarios. For a balanced system, the RTX 3070 is the weak link; upgrading the GPU would yield the largest gaming performance gains.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform offers a defined upgrade path. The i7-13790F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, meaning users can choose between affordable DDR4 or faster DDR5 depending on motherboard selection. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-compatible with the fastest NVMe SSDs and GPUs, though the RTX 3070 only uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is remarkably low for its performance class, meaning that any capable air cooler will suffice, and the power supply requirement is modest. The GPU's 220 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU mean that the system as a whole will run comfortably on a mid-range power supply, leaving headroom for minor upgrades. However, the i7-13790F has a locked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option — users seeking clock headroom would need a different processor.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, given the CPU's headroom. The processor's 93rd percentile ranking means it can feed a significantly faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 33 MB L3 cache and 16 cores will remain relevant for years, and the DDR5 memory support ensures that the platform can scale with faster RAM. The production status of the RTX 3070 is End-of-life, so users should plan for a GPU replacement within a couple of generations, while the CPU can persist for several more years. The Intel Socket 1700 platform, however, is not forward-compatible with newer CPU generations, so a full platform upgrade (CPU, motherboard, and possibly memory) would be required for the next major CPU leap.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds