SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: A Balanced 1080p and 1440p Desktop Duo

This pairing combines a 16-core Raptor Lake CPU with an 8 GB Ampere GPU, producing a desktop build that lands in the 76th percentile overall against all measured combinations. The CPU is the standout component, ranking in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This creates a system where the processor clearly outclasses the graphics card, yet the combination remains coherent for mainstream gaming and productivity workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13790F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the foundation for 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop processors. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself, which is a forward-looking feature for storage and expansion cards. ECC memory is not supported, so this platform is not aimed at workstation environments requiring error-correcting memory.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is notably low for a 16-core, 24-thread processor. This modest power envelope means a wide range of air coolers and lower-capacity liquid coolers can handle the thermal load, and it also keeps system power requirements reasonable. The GPU, however, has a 200 W TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 550 W for the entire system. Builders should select a power supply that comfortably exceeds this 550 W figure to accommodate transient loads and future upgrades. The GPU uses a single 12-pin power connector, so an adapter or a power supply with native 12-pin support may be necessary.

Looking forward, the most sensible upgrade path for this platform is a higher-tier Raptor Lake CPU, as the Socket 1700 socket and chipset are shared across the 13th-generation lineup. A CPU with a higher boost clock or more cache would capitalize on the existing motherboard and memory infrastructure. However, since the multiplier is locked, overclocking headroom is minimal, making a CPU swap the primary route to more performance. On the GPU side, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with any modern graphics card, so upgrading to a more powerful Ampere or newer generation GPU would be straightforward, provided the power supply is upgraded accordingly.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system is well-equipped to push high frame rates in competitive titles. The CPU's single-thread performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4998 — is strong enough to feed fast-paced games, while the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can handle the rendering load. At 1440p, frame rates will be lower due to the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, but the system remains viable for medium-high settings in many titles. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiter, and high-refresh 4K is not realistic with this pairing.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder is not detailed in the fact pack, but the presence of 152 tensor cores and 38 RT cores suggests dedicated hardware for AI and ray tracing tasks. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads simultaneously. A Passmark multi-thread score of 44737 indicates that the CPU can handle game encoding offloads, and the 33 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain smooth performance during multi-tasking.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 — makes it a capable processor for video editing timelines, 4K footage, and rendering previews. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing projects, and the 256-bit memory bus provides a 448.0 GB/s bandwidth for texture and buffer transfers. The Passmark GPU compute score of 10006 indicates decent acceleration for effects and color grading, though larger projects may strain the VRAM capacity.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering workloads, this system excels. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14869 and the Passmark integer math score of 151416 demonstrate strong processing capabilities for ray tracing and physics simulations. The GPU can accelerate rendering via its 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 suggests moderate performance compared to higher-end GPUs.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis tasks benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads. The Passmark data compression score of 567473 and data encryption score of 31703 indicate strong throughput for build processes and secure coding workflows. The 33 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data, which is beneficial for large codebases. The platform's DDR5 support further enhances memory bandwidth for compilation tasks.

Student and Office Work: For everyday productivity, this system is overkill but efficient. The CPU's 65 W TDP means low power draw during light workloads, and the Passmark single-thread score of 4212 ensures snappy response in office applications. The GPU's 989 Passmark G2D score indicates adequate 2D performance for desktop rendering and spreadsheet tasks. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, but the RTX 3060 Ti covers this role effectively.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is a substantial 3.10 GHz difference between idle and peak frequencies. The CPU is built on a 257 mm² die and uses a hybrid architecture, though the fact pack does not specify the exact P-core and E-core configuration. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which is generous for a desktop processor.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4998 places it among the top single-core performers, while the multi-core score of 35404 is nearly seven times higher, demonstrating strong scaling across its 16 cores. The Passmark multi-thread score of 44737 and the average benchmark score of 63080 confirm its position in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX with an average score of 63173 (0.1% slower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G with 63331 (0.4% faster), indicating that the 13790F is competitive with newer and more power-efficient designs.

The CPU's performance in specialized workloads is notable. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 207 is relatively low, suggesting that pure integer-heavy single-thread loops are not its strongest suit. However, the floating-point math score of 110512 and the extended instructions score of 34828 show robust SIMD and AVX performance. The data compression score of 567473 is exceptionally high, indicating strong memory bandwidth and cache efficiency for data-heavy tasks. The 24 threads provide ample parallelism for multi-threaded applications, and the lack of a multiplier unlock means users must rely on the factory boost behavior.

Gaming Performance

Since the fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking suggest that the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming workloads, while the GPU will often be the limiting factor.

1080p Ultra Settings: Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 20349 and the CPU's strong single-thread performance, this system is estimated to achieve 60-100 FPS in most modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings. Esports titles like competitive shooters could exceed 144 FPS, given the CPU's high boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM may be sufficient for 1080p textures, but some games with ultra-high texture packs could exceed this capacity, causing stutter.

1440p Ultra Settings: At 1440p, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16.20 TFLOPS of compute are estimated to deliver 40-70 FPS in demanding titles. The 8 GB VRAM becomes a more significant constraint here, as 1440p textures often require more memory. Games with ray tracing enabled will see further performance drops, as the 38 RT cores are not sufficient for high-quality ray tracing at this resolution.

4K Ultra Settings: This system is not recommended for 4K ultra gaming. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking places it below many current-gen competitors, and 4K rendering would likely result in sub-30 FPS in most AAA titles. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for 4K textures, and the GPU's pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s is insufficient for high-resolution rendering.

Ray Tracing: The GPU's 38 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the performance is modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 suggests that ray tracing workloads will be playable only at 1080p with DLSS enabled. The 152 tensor cores support DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p medium-high settings, who want a CPU that will remain relevant for several years. The 16-core, 24-thread processor provides exceptional multi-threaded performance for content creation, making this a dual-purpose build for gamers who also edit videos or render 3D scenes. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, and its 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video projects will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 44737. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the data compression score of 567473 and the 24 threads. Students and office workers will find the system more than adequate, though they may be paying for performance they do not need.

Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for simulation, financial modeling, or data analysis would benefit from this CPU-GPU pairing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for CUDA-accelerated workloads, and the platform's DDR5 support ensures future memory bandwidth. However, the lack of ECC memory support is a limitation for mission-critical applications. The GPU is end-of-life, so businesses should consider this when planning long-term support.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is based on the Ampere architecture and uses the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process node. It packs 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It features 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This yields a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but can be a constraint at higher resolutions or with large textures. The GPU's pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s are moderate for its class. The FP32 compute performance of 16.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicates balanced compute capabilities.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 2626 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 78927 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 47784 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score of 20349 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (1.4% faster). The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 78 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 163, suggesting that the GPU's DX12 performance may not be fully optimized. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking means it is a mid-range performer, capable of handling mainstream gaming but not high-end 4K or heavy ray tracing.

The GPU is dual-slot and measures 242 mm in length, requiring a power supply of 550 W. It uses a single 12-pin power connector and provides display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and APIs. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current titles at 1080p, but future games may require more memory for ultra settings.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system ranks in the 76th percentile of all measured desktop combinations, reflecting a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 63080 places it in the 93rd percentile, with nearest rivals within a narrow 0.5% margin. This indicates that the Core i7-13790F is a top-tier processor, competitive with newer mobile and embedded chips like the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (0.4% slower) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (0.5% faster).

The GPU's average benchmark score of 16129 places it in the 59th percentile, with its nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% faster) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (1.4% faster). The GPU's scores show a wide variation across tests: the Passmark G3D score of 20349 is strong, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 78 is weak, suggesting inconsistent performance across different APIs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 indicate that compute workloads perform better than some gaming-specific tests.

The CPU's individual benchmark scores provide a detailed picture: Cinebench R15 multi-core of 3568 and single-core of 503, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 14869 and single-core of 2099, and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35404 and single-core of 4998. The Passmark scores include data compression of 567473, data encryption of 31703, extended instructions of 34828, find prime numbers of 207, floating-point math of 110512, integer math of 151416, multi-thread of 44737, physics of 3017, random string sorting of 58607, and single-thread of 4212. These scores indicate a CPU that excels in compression, encryption, and multi-threaded workloads, while its single-thread performance is also strong.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the dominant component, capable of handling the most demanding multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU provides competent but not exceptional graphics performance. The 76th percentile combined ranking places this build above the majority of desktop systems, but enthusiasts seeking high-end gaming performance would need a more powerful GPU.

FAQ

Q: Does this system support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, allowing builders to choose either memory type depending on their motherboard and budget.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and why does it matter?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is low for a 16-core processor. This means it can be cooled by a wide range of standard air coolers and does not require a high-end liquid cooling solution.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. Builders should select a power supply that exceeds this figure to ensure stable operation and accommodate any future upgrades.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 63080 is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, indicating it is competitive with newer processors.

Q: Is the GPU's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for modern games?

A: The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming and most 1440p titles, but some games with ultra-high texture packs may exceed this capacity, causing performance issues.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3060 Ti has 38 RT cores that provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance is modest and may require DLSS for playable frame rates.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is a high frequency for a 65 W TDP processor, enabling strong single-threaded performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The primary bottleneck in this system is the GPU, which ranks in the 59th percentile compared to the CPU's 93rd percentile. This imbalance means that in gaming scenarios, the RTX 3060 Ti will limit frame rates long before the CPU runs out of headroom. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 and Passmark multi-thread score of 44737 vastly exceed what most games require, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios.

In multi-threaded productivity workloads, the CPU is clearly the dominant component, and the GPU's role is secondary. The CPU's data compression score of 567473 and integer math score of 151416 indicate that it can handle demanding compute tasks, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in GPU-accelerated rendering or large datasets.

The FPS scaling in gaming will be largely determined by the GPU's performance. At 1080p, the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS of compute and 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are sufficient for high frame rates, but at 1440p and above, the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity become constraints. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions, but it also means that upgrading the GPU would unlock significant additional gaming performance.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 200 W TDP create a system that is not power-hungry, but the GPU's 550 W suggested PSU indicates that the power supply should be sized with headroom. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that real-world gaming performance could vary, but the benchmark scores consistently show a CPU that outperforms the GPU by a wide margin. For users prioritizing gaming, a stronger GPU would be the first upgrade; for users prioritizing productivity, the current CPU is already a strong performer.