SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of an Intel Core i7-13790F with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM presents a striking asymmetry in raw compute capability versus graphics throughput. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU occupies only the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This 36-percentile gap strongly suggests that the graphics card will be the limiting factor in most workloads, particularly gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

Examining synthetic benchmarks, the CPU's average benchmark score of 63080 places it within 0.5% of several competitors including the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, while the GPU's average score of 15199 shows it trading blows with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% faster) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (0.6% faster). The data indicates that in CPU-bound scenarios—such as physics calculations, data compression, or single-threaded productivity tasks—the processor will deliver top-tier performance. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the RTX 3050 OEM will cap overall system output.

The PassMark physics score of 3017 and multithread score of 44737 demonstrate exceptional computational throughput, but these strengths cannot compensate for the GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput when frame generation or pixel shading dominates. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU could theoretically feed frames at a much higher rate than the GPU can render, creating a scenario where the RTX 3050 OEM operates at near 100% utilization while the i7-13790F remains underutilized. At 1440p or 4K, this imbalance worsens, as the GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 128-bit bus become increasingly strained.

For productivity workloads that leverage both components—such as video encoding or GPU-accelerated effects—the bottleneck shifts depending on the specific task. The CPU's 33 MB L3 cache and 16 cores handle multi-threaded workloads efficiently, but the GPU's 2304 shading units and 72 tensor cores will bottleneck any task requiring parallel graphics processing. The data suggests this is a CPU-overpowered, GPU-underpowered pairing, which is unusual for a balanced desktop build.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, built on the Ampere architecture with a GA106 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process, contains 12,000 million transistors across a 276 mm² die. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 14 Gbps effective across a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is modest by modern standards, particularly when compared to the GPU's nearest rivals—the AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 0.2% higher in average benchmarks, indicating comparable overall performance despite architectural differences.

Clock speeds are set at a 1515 MHz base and 1755 MHz boost, producing pixel and texture rates of 56.16 GPixel/s and 126.4 GTexel/s respectively. The FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS matches the FP16 rate at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for a card in this tier. The 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, though the modest compute throughput means these features will be best utilized at lower resolutions or with quality compromises.

Benchmark results paint a mixed picture. The PassMark G3D score of 11857 places the GPU in the 57th percentile, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 indicate reasonable compute performance for its class. However, the DirectX scores are telling: DirectX 11 at 86, DirectX 12 at 58, and DirectX 9 at 137. These low DirectX scores suggest the card struggles with modern API overhead, potentially due to driver optimization or architectural limitations. The G2D score of 973 is particularly weak, indicating poor 2D performance that could affect desktop compositing and productivity applications.

The GPU's 130 W TDP and suggested 300 W PSU make it power-efficient, but this efficiency comes at the cost of raw performance. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the 8 GB frame buffer, though the 128-bit bus limits memory-intensive operations. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitor connectivity. The card is dual-slot, 242 mm long, and requires a single 8-pin power connector.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13790F delivers exceptional CPU performance across all major benchmark suites. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 35404 in multi-core and 4998 in single-core tests. The R20 results show 14869 multi-core and 2099 single-core, while R15 yields 3568 multi-core and 503 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 63080. The closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, scores 63173, a mere 0.1% difference, indicating the i7-13790F remains competitive with newer architectures.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's strength. The multithread score of 44737, integer math score of 151416, and floating point math score of 110512 demonstrate robust computational abilities. Data compression scores 567473, while data encryption reaches 31703. Extended instructions score 34828, and random string sorting hits 58607. The single-thread score of 4212 and physics score of 3017 round out the profile.

The GPU, by contrast, shows more modest results. Its average benchmark score of 15199 places it at the 57th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (0.6% faster) and the AMD Radeon 680M (0.5% slower). The PassMark G3D score of 11857 and GPU compute score of 5779 indicate mid-range performance, while the Geekbench scores suggest OpenCL and Vulkan workloads are handled reasonably well.

The combined picture reveals a system with extraordinary processing power but limited graphics capability. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 57th percentile creates a combined percentile of 75 for the pairing. This means the system as a whole outperforms 75% of all configurations, but the GPU drags down what could otherwise be a top-tier build. For users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks—software compilation, data analysis, virtualization—this pairing excels. For gaming or GPU rendering, the RTX 3050 OEM will consistently be the performance ceiling.

# Who Should Build It

The data suggests this pairing suits users whose workloads are predominantly CPU-bound but who still require a capable discrete GPU for occasional graphics tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, with PassMark integer math scoring 151416 and multithread scoring 44737. Students in engineering or computer science fields running simulations or data analysis would find the CPU's 93rd percentile performance more than adequate, while the GPU handles visualization and basic rendering tasks.

Content creators working with codecs and compression would appreciate the data compression score of 567473 and encryption score of 31703. However, video editors relying on GPU acceleration would find the RTX 3050 OEM's modest FP32 throughput limiting. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing but may struggle with 4K timelines or complex effects.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications would find this system overqualified on the CPU side but adequately served on the GPU side. The G2D score of 973 indicates acceptable desktop performance, though not exceptional. Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings would find the RTX 3050 OEM capable, but those targeting 1440p or high refresh rates would need a stronger GPU.

The CPU's locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) means overclocking is not available, but the 65 W TDP suggests efficient sustained operation. The launch MSRP of $441 for the CPU alone indicates this is not a budget-oriented build, despite the GPU's more modest positioning.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13790F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The i7-13790F has an average benchmark score of 63080, which is 0.1% lower than the Core Ultra 7 265HX's score of 63173. This difference is negligible in real-world terms, making them effectively equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199. This places it in the mid-range tier, comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% faster) and RTX 2060 (0.6% faster).

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). The CPU runs at a 2.10 GHz base clock with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and users cannot manually increase the multiplier beyond factory settings.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it sufficient?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and light content creation but may limit performance in VRAM-heavy applications at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The i7-13790F uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. It requires a single 8-pin power connector.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries. All gaming performance figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and the CPU's exceptional single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 4998), the system should handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most modern titles. The RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can maintain playable frame rates at 1080p, but the 128-bit bus may cause stuttering in texture-heavy games. At 1440p, the GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would likely produce lower frame rates, requiring reduced settings for smooth gameplay.

The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and strong single-core scores indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution. The 16 cores and 24 threads also provide headroom for background tasks, streaming, or recording while gaming. However, the GPU's 57th percentile ranking means it will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, particularly in games with demanding graphics engines or high draw distances.

Ray tracing performance, supported by 18 RT cores, will be modest at best. The 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits ray-traced workloads, so users should expect to disable ray tracing or play at reduced resolutions. DLSS, enabled by the 72 tensor cores, may help recover some performance, but the overall GPU compute headroom is limited.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system can likely drive 60-100 FPS in esports titles and older games, but AAA releases may dip below 60 FPS at high settings. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures consistent frame pacing, but the GPU's 57th percentile ranking caps overall output. For 144Hz or higher refresh monitors, users would need to reduce settings or accept lower frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 44737, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC capabilities (implied by the 72 tensor cores and Ampere architecture) could offload encoding, but the modest FP32 throughput may cause minor performance dips in GPU-bound games.

Video editing: The CPU excels at this workload, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 35404 and PassMark data compression hitting 567473. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit timeline responsiveness with 4K footage or complex effects. Export times would benefit from the CPU, but real-time preview may suffer.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would be excellent, given the strong multi-core scores. GPU rendering would be limited by the RTX 3050 OEM's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 and 18 RT cores, making it suitable for light workloads but inadequate for production-level rendering.

Software development: Compilation times will be short thanks to the CPU's 16 cores and high single-thread performance. The GPU handles IDE rendering and basic graphics fine, with a G2D score of 973. Virtualization and container workloads would benefit from the 24 threads.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures snappy performance, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM handles multiple monitors and productivity applications without strain.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs Intel's Core i7-13790F, a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor from the 13th generation, with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, an Ampere-architecture GPU from the 30-series. The CPU offers 16 cores and 24 threads with a 2.10 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU provides 2304 shading units, 72 tensor cores, and 18 RT cores with 8 GB GDDR6 memory.

The combined percentile of 75 indicates this system outperforms 75% of all configurations in the database. However, the significant gap between the CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile defines this as a CPU-first build with a secondary graphics component. The CPU's launch MSRP was $441, positioning it as a premium processor, while the GPU's end-of-life status suggests it may be a budget-conscious choice or a component carried over from a previous system.

This is not a balanced gaming rig, nor is it a workstation-class GPU system. It is best characterized as a high-performance productivity desktop with entry-level-to-midrange gaming capability. The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP keep overall power requirements modest, with a suggested 300 W PSU.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F, part of the Raptor Lake-S family built on Intel's 10 nm process, features 16 cores and 24 threads. The die spans 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. This configuration produces an average benchmark score of 63080, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs.

Cinebench results demonstrate strong scaling: R15 multi-core scores 3568 versus 503 single-core, R20 multi-core scores 14869 versus 2099 single-core, and R23 multi-core scores 35404 versus 4998 single-core. The multi-core-to-single-core ratios indicate efficient thread utilization across the 16 cores. PassMark tests reinforce this, with multithread scoring 44737, integer math 151416, floating point math 110512, and data compression 567473.

The 5.20 GHz boost clock provides excellent single-thread responsiveness, crucial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The 2.10 GHz base clock, combined with a 65 W TDP, suggests power-efficient operation under normal loads. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though no memory bandwidth figure is provided. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes offers high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards.

The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, scores 63173 (0.1% higher), while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63331 (0.4% higher). This places the i7-13790F in elite company, with performance essentially matching newer mobile and embedded processors. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means no manual overclocking, but the high boost clock already delivers near-maximum performance.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This platform flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5, though the exact memory bandwidth is not specified. PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe SSDs and expansion cards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The 130 W GPU TDP and suggested 300 W PSU leave headroom for system components, but a significant GPU upgrade would require a stronger power supply. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, allowing for a wide range of cooling solutions.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. Replacing the RTX 3050 OEM with a higher-tier graphics card would dramatically improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, as the CPU has substantial headroom to feed a more powerful GPU without becoming the limiting factor. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance indicates it will remain competitive for several years, making GPU upgrades the most impactful path forward.

Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 (or higher-speed DDR5) could benefit memory-sensitive workloads, though the CPU's 33 MB L3 cache mitigates some memory latency concerns. Storage expansion via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe would fully utilize the CPU's lane bandwidth. The platform's production status is active, suggesting ongoing driver and BIOS support for the 13th generation architecture.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds