SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 9070: Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with AMD's RDNA 4.0-based Radeon RX 9070, landing at the 81st percentile overall among all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The Core i7-13790F sits in the 93rd percentile across all CPUs, while the RX 9070 holds the 69th percentile among GPUs, making this a lopsided pairing where processing headroom substantially exceeds graphics throughput in synthetic workloads. The data shows a desktop-class build with a clear emphasis on compute-heavy tasks, though gaming expectations must be inferred from benchmark scores rather than direct FPS measurements, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It operates at a 2.10 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that indicates efficient power delivery for a chip of this core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the processor's strong multi-threaded workload performance.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the high-performance desktop tier. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 35,404 in multi-core and 4,998 in single-core tests. The multi-core figure reflects the 16-core/24-thread configuration's ability to sustain heavy parallel loads, while the single-core score of 4,998 demonstrates strong per-thread efficiency—critical for lightly-threaded applications and gaming. Cinebench R20 scores of 14,869 multi-core and 2,099 single-core follow the same pattern, and Cinebench R15 results of 3,568 multi-core and 503 single-core round out the rendering benchmarks.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's compute versatility. The multi-thread score of 44,737 and single-thread score of 4,212 show balanced performance across both scaling regimes. Integer math scores 151,416, floating-point math reaches 110,512, and extended instructions hit 34,828—all indicating strong general-purpose arithmetic capability. Data compression scores 567,473, while data encryption reaches 31,703, and random string sorting achieves 58,607, suggesting solid performance in data-heavy workloads. The physics score of 3,017 and prime number finding score of 207 round out the computational profile.

The average benchmark score of 63,080 places the i7-13790F at the 93rd percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62,839 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63,331 (0.4% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62,738 (0.5% behind). These deltas are minimal—within a fraction of a percent—meaning the i7-13790F performs essentially on par with current-generation mobile and embedded chips, despite being a desktop part from an earlier generation. For real workloads, this means rendering, compilation, data processing, and scientific computing tasks will all see competitive throughput, with the 24 threads providing ample parallelism for multi-threaded applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die—a transistor density of 151.0 million per mm². The GPU houses 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 56 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds reach 1,330 MHz base, 2,070 MHz game, and 2,520 MHz boost, with memory running at 2,518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, providing ample headroom for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

Synthetic benchmark results show a mixed picture for the RX 9070. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 6,290, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 131,539 and Vulkan scores 58,705. PassMark results include a G3D score of 25,381, GPU compute at 14,737, and G2D at 1,280. Legacy DirectX tests show 343 in DX9, 281 in DX11, 141 in DX10, and 74 in DX12—these lower scores likely reflect driver optimization priorities for modern APIs rather than raw capability deficiencies. The pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance, while FP32 and FP16 both reach 36.13 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, suggesting balanced compute for both precision formats.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 23,877 places it at the 69th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals reveal an interesting competitive landscape: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23,736 (0.6% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24,063 (0.8% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23,628 (1.1% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24,170 (1.2% behind). These deltas are all within 1.2%, meaning the RX 9070 performs at parity with these older or mobile-class parts in aggregate benchmarks, despite being a newer desktop architecture. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide substantial capacity for 4K textures and complex scenes, while the 56 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 220 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU indicates moderate power requirements for the performance class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 81 places this build in the upper tier of tested configurations, but the CPU and GPU percentiles reveal a significant imbalance: the processor at 93rd percentile vastly outperforms the graphics card at 69th percentile. This suggests the RX 9070 is the primary bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions, while the i7-13790F provides substantial headroom for compute tasks that the GPU cannot fully utilize.

In CPU-bound scenarios—such as physics simulations, data compression, or single-threaded applications—the i7-13790F's 93rd percentile ranking means it will rarely limit performance. The 65 W TDP and 24 threads allow sustained multi-core operation without thermal throttling in adequately cooled systems. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the RX 9070's 69th percentile becomes the limiting factor. The 0.6% to 1.2% deltas between the RX 9070 and its nearest rivals indicate that it performs within a narrow band of similarly-classed GPUs, meaning users should expect graphics performance consistent with that tier rather than the CPU's elite standing.

The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means bottleneck analysis relies on benchmark scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,404 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,290 suggest that in balanced workloads—such as modern games that use both CPU and GPU intensively—the GPU will likely saturate before the CPU reaches its limits. For productivity tasks that are purely CPU-bound, the processor's 93rd percentile ensures near-top-tier performance, while the GPU's 69th percentile caps graphics-intensive output. This pairing favors users prioritizing compute performance over raw gaming frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13790F support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the i7-13790F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory bus, though ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the PCIe generation and lane configuration of the i7-13790F?

A: The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

Q: Does the Radeon RX 9070 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 9070 includes 56 ray tracing cores based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 9070?

A: The RX 9070 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth at 20.1 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How does the i7-13790F compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The i7-13790F scores 63,080 on average benchmarks, while the Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173, a delta of -0.1%, indicating essentially identical performance.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the RX 9070?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 9070 is 550 W, given its 220 W TDP and dual 8-pin power connector requirements.

Q: What display outputs does the RX 9070 provide?

A: The GPU includes 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, supporting modern display configurations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 63,080 places it at the 93rd percentile, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 35,404 and single-core at 4,998 being the standout figures. The GPU's average score of 23,877 sits at the 69th percentile, with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 6,290 and PassMark G3D at 25,381 as key metrics. Combined, these produce an 81st percentile overall ranking for the build.

The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show it within 0.5% of four competing processors, confirming that the i7-13790F is a top-tier performer in its class. The GPU's nearest rival comparisons show it within 1.2% of four older or mobile GPUs, indicating that the RX 9070's raw benchmark performance aligns with previous-generation high-end parts rather than current-generation flagships. The combined picture is a build with exceptional CPU headroom and adequate but not class-leading GPU performance. For users who run CPU-intensive applications—compilers, renderers, scientific simulations—the i7-13790F will deliver near-best-in-class results. For GPU-intensive tasks, the RX 9070 provides solid mid-to-high-tier performance that will handle most workloads but may not satisfy enthusiasts seeking maximum graphical output.

Gaming Performance

This exact CPU+GPU combination has no measured FPS data available in the FACT PACK. Consequently, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results.

Based on the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and strong single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 4,998, PassMark single-thread 4,212), the i7-13790F will not bottleneck modern game engines in most scenarios. Its 24 threads provide ample capacity for background tasks and streaming while gaming. The RX 9070's 69th percentile GPU ranking, combined with its 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles, with 4K gaming possible but likely requiring settings adjustments in demanding games. The 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 56 RT cores indicate capable ray-traced performance, though the 69th percentile suggests it will trail top-tier GPUs in ray tracing workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,290 and PassMark G3D of 25,381 point to overall gaming performance in the upper-mid range—sufficient for smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions, but not matching the CPU's elite standing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13790F uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel controller. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, ensuring compatibility with the RX 9070's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, and the GPU's 220 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU means the build has manageable power requirements.

The RX 9070 requires dual 8-pin power connectors and a dual-slot cooler, fitting standard ATX cases. The 2x 8-pin configuration is common, and the 550 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for additional components. The motherboard socket 1700 supports 13th-gen Intel processors, and the platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allows users to choose memory based on budget and performance preferences. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking provides ample headroom for more powerful graphics cards without introducing a CPU bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more DDR4 or DDR5 memory (supported up to the platform's limits) or faster storage via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would complement the existing performance profile. The CPU's 65 W TDP also suggests that a modest air cooler suffices, keeping the upgrade path cost-effective.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs Intel's Core i7-13790F—a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 93rd percentile CPU ranking—with AMD's Radeon RX 9070, an RDNA 4.0 GPU holding a 69th percentile GPU ranking. The combined 81st percentile places this configuration in the upper tier of tested builds, though the CPU clearly outclasses the GPU in relative performance.

The i7-13790F's architecture, with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 33 MB L3 cache, makes it a powerhouse for multi-threaded productivity, while the RX 9070's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide solid graphics capability for its class. The build's desktop form factor supports standard components, and the 65 W CPU TDP plus 220 W GPU TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU indicate a system that balances performance with power efficiency. Overall, this is a compute-first desktop configuration where CPU-bound tasks shine, and graphics performance is adequate but secondary. The 81st percentile combined ranking reflects a system that exceeds average performance but does not reach the top tier reserved for high-end GPU pairings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over maximum gaming frame rates. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 threads and 35,404 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while data analysts and scientists running simulations or processing large datasets will find the 93rd percentile CPU performance valuable. Content creators—particularly video editors and 3D artists—will appreciate the CPU's rendering capabilities, though the GPU's 69th percentile may limit GPU-accelerated rendering throughput.

Students and small business users running multi-threaded applications, virtualization, or database workloads will find the i7-13790F's compute power well-suited to their needs, and the RX 9070 provides adequate graphics for general productivity and light creative work. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions will see solid performance in most titles, given the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and modern RDNA 4.0 architecture, but those seeking 4K ultra settings or maximum ray tracing fidelity should look to higher-tier GPUs. The build's 65 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP also make it suitable for users conscious of power consumption who still require substantial compute capability. Users who frequently run CPU-bound tasks—batch processing, code compilation, scientific computing—will extract the most value from this configuration, while those whose workloads are primarily GPU-bound should consider reallocating budget toward a more powerful graphics card.