SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 9060: A Desktop Pairing Analyzed

This build combines Intel's 16-core Core i7-13790F with AMD's Radeon RX 9060, a desktop configuration that lands at the 76th percentile overall among all tested CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile against all processors, while the GPU reaches only the 59th percentile against all graphics cards — an asymmetry that shapes every workload discussion below. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the dataset, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores, not direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, so gaming expectations must be derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4212 and its Cinebench R23 single-core result of 4998 indicate strong per-core performance, which typically translates to solid frame pacing in games that rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17631 places it just below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (which scores 16129, making the RX 9060 about 0.7% higher), suggesting 1080p and 1440p gaming is the realistic target zone.

For esports titles and less demanding games, the combination of high CPU single-core strength and the GPU's 2990 MHz boost clock should push triple-digit frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle most current titles at 1080p, but higher resolutions or texture-heavy games may strain the frame buffer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 — a modern DirectX 12 workload — suggests the GPU can manage contemporary rendering pipelines, though the 59th percentile ranking means it is not a high-end rasterizer.

At 1440p, the data implies playable but not exceptional performance. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s are mid-range figures; combined with the CPU's PassMark physics score of 3017 (which feeds game physics and AI), the pairing should hold 60 FPS in many titles but will likely require settings adjustments in the most demanding releases. The CPU's 33 MB of shared L3 cache helps with draw calls and streaming, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is the more likely constraint at higher resolutions.

Ray tracing performance is a question mark. The GPU includes 28 ray accelerators (RT cores), but with only 1792 shading units and the 59th percentile standing, the data does not suggest strong RT headroom. Titles with heavy ray-traced effects will likely see significant frame drops; gamers who prioritize RT should treat this as a 1080p RT-capable card with modest expectations. The DirectX 12 Ultimate API support (12_2) confirms feature compatibility, but compatibility does not equal performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13790F compare to its nearest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 63080, which sits 0.1% below the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63173) and 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (62839). It is effectively a statistical tie with all four nearest rivals, whose scores range from 62738 to 63331.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 ranks at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129, which the RX 9060 trails by 0.7%.

Q: Does this build support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in motherboard and RAM selection, though the platform's memory controller determines the exact speed capabilities.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combination ranks at the 76th percentile overall among all tested desktop pairings, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide, and what generation?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), which supports modern high-bandwidth GPUs and NVMe storage. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement and recommended PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 132 W and the suggested PSU is 300 W, with a single 8-pin power connector required. This is a modest power draw for a desktop graphics card.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked via multiplier adjustment. Boost behavior is fixed at the factory-specified 5.20 GHz maximum.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4998 and PassMark single-thread score of 4212 should keep frame rates high in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU's 2990 MHz boost clock and 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handle the rasterization. The 59th GPU percentile suggests 144Hz+ is achievable in esports titles, but AAA games may hover closer to 60-100 FPS depending on optimization.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 44737 and Cinebench R23 multicore result of 35404 indicate that x264 encoding at medium presets should not cripple game performance, though the locked multiplier limits tuning. The GPU has no dedicated NVENC-style encoder mentioned in the data, so CPU-based streaming is the primary path.

Video editing: The multicore performance here is strong — Cinebench R20 multicore at 14869 and R15 at 3568 — which accelerates rendering and export times in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's OpenCL score of 88183 provides GPU acceleration for effects and color grading, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit very large timelines or 4K+ compositing.

3D rendering: The CPU's 35404 Cinebench R23 multicore score is the star, handling CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray efficiently. The GPU's FP32 of 21.43 TFLOPS and 28 RT cores offer some GPU rendering capability, but the 59th percentile GPU ranking means it is not a primary render engine; expect hybrid CPU-GPU workflows to favor the CPU heavily.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 567473 and integer math score of 151416 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and testing. The 16 cores handle parallel builds well, and the 33 MB L3 cache helps with frequent small data accesses common in developer workflows.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical productivity. The CPU's single-core performance makes document processing and spreadsheet work effortless, but the GPU's 1002 PassMark G2D score (2D graphics) is modest — office tasks do not benefit from the RX 9060's gaming-oriented design. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a desk setup.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh play and occasionally dabble in 1440p, where the CPU's top-tier single-core performance (93rd percentile) prevents bottlenecks while the GPU's mid-range standing (59th percentile) caps ultimate visual fidelity. Content creators who split time between CPU-heavy rendering and GPU-accelerated effects will find the 16-core CPU a workhorse, though the 8 GB GPU memory is a limitation for large projects.

Software developers building on multi-threaded codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and high integer math scores, especially those who also game on the same machine. Students in engineering or computer science programs benefit from the CPU's compile speed and the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support for graphics coursework, though the locked multiplier means no overclocking tinkering.

Small business workstations handling data processing, virtualization, or moderate CAD work can leverage the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 44737 and data encryption score of 31703. The GPU adds little for Excel-style workloads but supports dual displays via its 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. Gamers at 4K should look elsewhere — the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are not aligned with that resolution.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it relatively power-efficient for its core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 93rd percentile overall. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35404 is the headline figure — it demonstrates strong multi-threaded throughput that rivals much higher-TDP processors. The single-core R23 score of 4998 is equally impressive, showing that the 5.20 GHz boost clock delivers real per-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4212 confirms this.

The PassMark suite reveals workload-specific strengths: data compression at 567473 and integer math at 151416 are exceptional, while floating-point math at 110512 is solid but less dominant. The extended instructions score of 34828 and data encryption of 31703 indicate good SIMD and cryptographic throughput. The find prime numbers score of 207 is a weaker point, suggesting the CPU is less optimized for certain integer-heavy algorithms.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus adds flexibility, but the lack of ECC memory (eccMemory: false) rules out certain workstation error-checking scenarios. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide modern I/O, though the locked multiplier means no overclocking headroom. The 10 nm process node is mature, and the active production status suggests ongoing availability.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the Navi 44 chip using RDNA 4.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The GPU's 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs produce a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), which is unusual and indicates no dedicated FP16 acceleration path. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing hardware, though their count is modest.

Benchmark data places this GPU at the 59th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 is a modern metric suggesting competent DX12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 is strong, but the Vulkan score of 39476 is notably lower — a discrepancy that hints at driver or architecture inefficiencies in Vulkan workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 17631 and GPU compute score of 9919 are mid-range figures.

The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 ensure broad software compatibility. The 132 W TDP with a 300 W suggested PSU and single 8-pin connector make it easy to power. The dual-slot cooler and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface are modern standards. The 4 nm process gives it a density of 149.2M transistors per mm², indicating a compact, efficient design.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 63080 places it at the 93rd percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, scores 63173 — a 0.1% difference that is within noise. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 trails by 0.4%, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G leads by 0.4% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX trails by 0.5%. This CPU is squarely in a competitive cluster with no meaningful separation.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 16014 places it at the 59th percentile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, leading by 0.7%. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and RX 7700 both trail by 1%, and the Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 2.1%. This puts the RX 9060 in a tight pack with older and newer mid-range cards.

The combined picture shows a CPU that dominates its GPU counterpart in relative standing. The 93rd vs. 59th percentile gap suggests the processor is capable of driving far more powerful graphics cards than the RX 9060. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this imbalance — the pairing is held back by the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks, while CPU-bound workloads excel. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3568 and single-core of 503 reinforce the CPU's strength, while the GPU's PassMark DirectX 9 score of 280 and DirectX 12 score of 44 show variable legacy API performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing Intel's Core i7-13790F with AMD's Radeon RX 9060. The CPU is a 16-core Raptor Lake processor with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is an 8 GB RDNA 4.0 card with a 2990 MHz boost. The combined percentile of 76 places it in the upper-midrange tier of all tested pairings.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking makes it a top-tier processor in absolute terms, rivaling much newer designs like the Core Ultra 7 265HX. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking is decidedly midrange, comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti from a previous generation. This creates a config where the CPU is capable of feeding a higher-end GPU without bottlenecking, but the included GPU limits overall system performance.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 132 W GPU TDP combine for a modest total power draw, making this a relatively efficient desktop pairing. The 300 W suggested PSU is easily satisfied by most quality power supplies. The platform supports DDR4 or DDR5, offering memory flexibility, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure future storage and expansion compatibility.

The release timeline shows the CPU launched in February 2023 at a launch MSRP of $441, while the GPU launched in August 2025, making this a pairing of a mature platform with a newer graphics card. The production status of both components is active, indicating ongoing availability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 59th percentile means the processor has significant headroom that the RX 9060 cannot utilize. In CPU-bound games at 1080p with low graphics settings, the GPU will saturate first, capping frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35404 and PassMark multithread of 44737 dominate the GPU's compute capabilities, so tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing will be limited by the processor, not the graphics card. The GPU's OpenCL score of 88183 helps in some compute tasks, but the CPU is the primary workhorse.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but informative. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 and PassMark G3D of 17631 are modest figures that align with a 59th percentile ranking, while the CPU's single-thread scores suggest it can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles. In practice, this means the GPU will bottleneck at high refresh rates (144Hz+), while the CPU will bottleneck in multi-threaded rendering workloads.

The 8 GB VRAM is another bottleneck vector. At 1440p or with high-resolution textures, the GPU will run out of memory before either component reaches its compute limit, causing stutter or texture pop-in. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is also modest for a modern GPU, potentially limiting performance in bandwidth-sensitive games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. This platform is mature, with the CPU released in February 2023, and the upgrade path within this socket is limited to other 12th and 13th Gen Intel processors. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) provide ample bandwidth for current GPUs and NVMe drives, but there is no headroom for additional high-speed devices beyond the primary GPU and storage.

The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with older slots and forward-compatible with newer platforms. The 132 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU mean the current power supply has headroom — most 500-650W units can handle a more powerful GPU. The single 8-pin power connector suggests the card is not power-hungry, and upgrading to a higher-end GPU would require a PSU check.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has demonstrated it can drive higher-tier graphics cards. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking means it would not bottleneck an RTX 4070-class or faster card in most scenarios. Alternatively, adding more system memory (if currently using less than the platform maximum) would benefit memory-intensive workloads, given the CPU's support for both DDR4 and DDR5.

The platform's age is a consideration. The LGA 1700 socket is near the end of its lifecycle, so future CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change. The GPU, released in August 2025, is newer and could carry over to a new platform. The 4 nm GPU process is efficient, and the card's modest power draw means it could operate in a smaller form factor build if desired.