SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13790F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing with a combined performance percentile of 74, placing it above most systems in the database. The CPU holds a 93rd percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at a 55th percentile among all graphics cards. This discrepancy in relative strength is the defining characteristic of this build: a top-tier compute processor paired with a mid-tier graphics solution, resulting in a system that excels in CPU-bound productivity tasks while delivering solid, but not class-leading, frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark data reveals a significant imbalance between the two primary components. The Core i7-13790F consistently scores at the top of the CPU hierarchy, with an average benchmark score of 63080, placing it in the 93rd percentile. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63173, -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (63331, -0.4%), are within a fraction of a percent, indicating the 13790F is at the high-water mark for processor performance. In contrast, the RX 7900 XT's average benchmark score of 13745 places it in a lower tier, directly between the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, -0.5%) and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (13543, 1.5%). This places the GPU in a completely different performance class than the CPU.

This configuration is heavily CPU-limited in most scenarios. In workloads that scale with processor performance, such as data compression (PassMark score of 567473), multi-threaded integer math (151416), or Cinebench R23 multi-core (35404), the 13790F will process tasks far faster than the GPU can render the corresponding visual output. The CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU represents the limiting factor for graphics throughput. When playing games or rendering 3D scenes, the RX 7900 XT's 55th percentile score will cap the frame rate or render time, preventing the CPU from ever reaching its full potential. The system is not balanced; it is a high-performance compute engine paired with a mid-range graphics engine.

The FPS scaling in a gaming context would show this bottleneck clearly. At lower resolutions, the CPU's power would be partially negated as the GPU becomes the primary constraint, leading to performance that is good but not elite. At higher resolutions, the gap between CPU capability and GPU output widens, making the graphics card the absolute performance ceiling. For productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the GPU's compute score (PassMark GPU Compute of 16828) will be the limiting factor for render times, while the CPU's 93rd percentile score will finish its part of the pipeline exceptionally fast. The data suggests a build where the user paid a premium for CPU performance that the GPU cannot fully utilize in graphics-intensive applications.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13790F compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The 13790F scores 63080, while the Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63173, a delta of -0.1%. This means the 13790F is effectively tied with its nearest rival, with a performance difference so small it is within benchmark variance.

Q: What is the performance gap between the RX 7900 XT and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT?

A: The RX 7900 XT scores an average of 13745, which is 1.5% higher than the RX 9070 XT's score of 13543. While the 7900 XT leads this comparison, the difference is minor, indicating they are in the same performance bracket.

Q: Is the RX 7900 XT better than the AMD Radeon RX 570X?

A: Yes, the RX 7900 XT outperforms the RX 570X by a margin of 0.9%. The 7900 XT's average score of 13745 is slightly ahead of the 570X's 13871, which equates to a -0.9% delta for the 7900 XT in this dataset.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combined percentile of 74, meaning it performs better than 74% of all recorded systems in the database. This places it in the upper quartile of desktop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). The Core i7-13790F is a non-K series processor, meaning its clock speeds cannot be manually increased beyond the factory-set 5.20 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the processor and graphics card?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F has a launch MSRP of $441. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a launch MSRP of 899 USD.

Q: What kind of power supply does the GPU require?

A: The suggested PSU wattage for the RX 7900 XT is 700 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 300 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13790F is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is native to the Raptor Lake architecture. This platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility depending on their motherboard choice and budget. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the processor itself. This is a forward-looking feature, allowing for high-bandwidth connectivity to next-generation storage and expansion cards, though the GPU in this build uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, is classified as end-of-life, meaning its production cycle is complete. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the PCIe Gen 5 slots on the CPU's platform, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The card's 300 W TDP and suggested 700 W PSU requirement are critical for system planning; the platform must include a PSU capable of delivering this power alongside the CPU's 65 W TDP. With a dual-slot design and a length of 276 mm, the card requires a case with sufficient clearance.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 93rd percentile score leaves substantial headroom for a more powerful graphics card. Replacing the RX 7900 XT with a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the processor's capabilities. The CPU platform itself is mature, and upgrading to a newer processor would require a motherboard change to a new socket. A more practical path is to keep the current platform and upgrade the GPU, as the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in future gaming or rendering workloads. The power supply with a 700 W suggestion provides a baseline; a future GPU with a higher TDP might necessitate a PSU upgrade as well.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at users whose workload is primarily CPU-intensive but who still require a dedicated GPU for graphics output. The 93rd percentile CPU score makes it an excellent choice for professionals in software development, scientific computing, and data analysis. The PassMark data encryption score of 31703 and extended instructions score of 34828 indicate strong performance for cryptography and complex instruction sets. For content creators who work with video encoding or 3D modeling, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 will handle physics simulations and rendering logic efficiently, though the GPU's 55th percentile score will be the limiting factor for final frame rendering.

Students and small business workstations would benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded power for compiling code, running virtual machines, or processing large spreadsheets. The 16 cores and 24 threads allow for heavy multitasking without performance degradation. The GPU, while not top-tier, is still capable of handling general-purpose compute tasks and moderate graphical workloads. This is not a build for enthusiasts seeking maximum gaming frame rates, as the GPU's mid-tier percentile position will be a bottleneck. Instead, it is a workstation-class CPU paired with a competent GPU for a balanced professional environment where the processor is the star. The 74th combined percentile reflects this bias toward compute-heavy tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are uniformly strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 35404 multi-core and 4998 single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 14869 multi-core and 2099 single-core. PassMark multi-thread score is 44737, with a single-thread score of 4212. The floating-point math score is 110512, and integer math is 151416. Data compression is a standout at 567473. These scores place the 13790F in the 93rd percentile, with an average score of 63080. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, is a statistical tie at -0.1% delta, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is 0.4% behind.

The GPU benchmarks present a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623, which is a modern DirectX 12 test. Geekbench OpenCL scores are 12756, and Vulkan scores are 71068. PassMark G3D score is 29009, and GPU Compute is 16828. The average benchmark score is 13745, placing the GPU in the 55th percentile. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT at 1.5% behind, while the AMD Radeon 660M is 0.5% ahead. This indicates that while the GPU is solidly mid-range, it is not competitive with high-end cards in the database.

The combined picture is one of extreme CPU dominance. The processor’s scores are in the top 7% of all CPUs, while the GPU is squarely in the middle of the pack. The combined percentile of 74 is pulled down by the GPU’s relative weakness. In any workload that depends on both components, the GPU will be the performance limiter. The system’s overall average benchmark score, while not directly calculated, would be significantly higher if the GPU matched the CPU’s tier.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p or 1440p, the RX 7900 XT’s 55th percentile score will deliver respectable frame rates, but it will not be able to push the extremely high refresh rates that the CPU could theoretically support. The GPU is the limiting factor, and users should expect mid-range performance, not top-tier esports numbers.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously. The GPU’s compute score of 16828 can assist with hardware encoding, but the CPU is more than capable of managing the streaming workload without significant frame drops.

Video Editing: Timeline scrubbing and effects processing will be very fast due to the CPU’s 93rd percentile rank. Export times will be slower, as the GPU’s compute performance is only mid-range. The PassMark GPU compute score of 16828 indicates adequate but not exceptional acceleration for renderers that use GPU processing.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be exceptionally fast, with the 13790F’s multi-thread scores leading the pack. GPU-based rendering will be the bottleneck. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 is sufficient for interactive viewports, but final frame renders will take longer than they would on a higher-tier GPU.

Software Development: Compilation times will be minimal. The high integer math score (151416) and data compression score (567473) are beneficial for code compilation and version control operations. This is an ideal environment for a developer workstation.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s performance ensures zero lag in spreadsheet calculations, document rendering, and multitasking. The system is power-efficient at idle despite the high core count, thanks to the 65 W TDP. The GPU is unnecessary for these tasks but provides headroom for any future graphical needs.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Navi 31 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process. It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. The card has 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs. It includes 84 ray accelerators for ray tracing workloads. The boost clock is 2394 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz. The memory runs at an effective speed of 20 Gbps.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is a measure of modern gaming performance. Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 shows strong compute performance in a cross-platform API. The PassMark G3D score of 29009 reflects overall 3D performance, while the GPU Compute score of 16828 is lower than expected, indicating that the card is more optimized for traditional rasterization than for pure compute workloads. The FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, which is substantial, but the compute benchmark suggests the architecture is not fully utilizing that theoretical peak in practical tests.

The GPU’s 55th percentile rank and its position relative to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (1.5% behind) shows that it is not a top-tier card. The inclusion of 84 RT cores means ray tracing is possible, but the performance will not match the CPU’s dominance. For rendering tasks that rely on the GPU, this card is a competent mid-range performer. The 20 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for large textures and high-resolution work, allowing for assets that would exceed the memory capacity of many competitors, but the raw compute power is the limiting factor in final render times.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs the Intel Core i7-13790F with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The overall tier, as indicated by the 74th combined percentile, is upper-mid-range. This is not a flagship gaming rig, nor is it a budget system. It is a processor-centric build where the CPU is clearly the star, with a 93rd percentile rank that puts it at the top of the processor charts. The GPU, with a 55th percentile rank, is a mid-range component that provides solid graphics capability but does not match the CPU’s elite status.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. This configuration is ideal for users who prioritize compute performance over graphics. The system is a high-performance workstation that can also play games, rather than a gaming machine that can also do work. The combined 74th percentile reflects this bias, showing that the system is better than most at overall tasks but is held back from the top tier by its graphics card. The build reflects the CPU’s power, but it is an incomplete package for users seeking a balanced high-end experience.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The processor’s multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

The benchmark results are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 places it among the fastest processors in the database. The single-core score of 4998 is equally impressive, demonstrating strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 44737 and single-thread score of 4212 further confirm its dominance. The data compression score of 567473 is a standout, indicating proficiency in archiving and file management tasks. The floating-point and integer math scores (110512 and 151416, respectively) show that the processor can handle both scientific and business workloads with ease.

The 93rd percentile rank is a clear indicator of the processor’s standing in the database. The nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, are within 0.5% of its score, showing that the 13790F is at the state-of-the-art of CPU performance. For real workloads, this means fast compilation, quick rendering of CPU-based scenes, and smooth multitasking. The processor is unlikely to be the bottleneck in any system, making it a future-proof choice for a professional workstation. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for this level of performance, making it an efficient choice for high-density compute tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core i7-13790F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections, not empirical results.

Based on the GPU’s 55th percentile rank and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623, the RX 7900 XT is a capable 1440p gaming card. At 1080p, the CPU’s massive single-thread performance (4212 in PassMark single-thread) will ensure no bottleneck, but the GPU will still limit the frame rate. The estimated performance at 1080p would be high, likely exceeding 100 FPS in most titles, but not reaching the extreme refresh rates of 240 Hz or higher in demanding games. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures.

At 1440p, the frame rate estimates would still be solid, with the GPU being the limiting factor. The card’s bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s is sufficient for this resolution. At 4K, the GPU’s mid-tier position will show its limits. The estimated frame rates would be playable but may require settings to be lowered from Ultra to maintain smooth gameplay. The CPU’s performance is irrelevant at 4K, as the GPU will be fully saturated. The estimates indicate that this system is best suited for high-refresh 1080p or smooth 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch for the graphics card.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds