SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13790F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 76th percentile overall, driven by a CPU that outperforms nearly all rivals while the GPU sits closer to the middle of the pack. The data shows a clear split: the processor is a top-tier performer in its class, while the graphics card is competent but not exceptional. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct observations.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination, so the following figures are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed results. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4212 and multi-thread score of 44737 indicate strong per-core performance that should drive high frame rates in most titles. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20974 places it in the 58th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming comfortably, but may struggle at 4K ultra settings in demanding titles.

At 1080p ultra, the estimated frame rates should be high across most games, with the RX 7700’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth providing ample headroom for textures and effects. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.20 GHz and 16 cores should prevent bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenarios, allowing the GPU to reach its full potential. Expect 100+ FPS in esports titles and well-optimized AAA games, though the exact figures depend on the title’s engine and optimization.

Moving to 1440p ultra, the estimated frame rates will drop as the GPU becomes more stressed, but the RX 7700’s 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance should still deliver playable results in most games. The 256-bit memory bus and 16 GB capacity help maintain consistent performance, but titles with heavy ray tracing may see significant dips because the GPU has only 40 ray accelerators and a relatively modest 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865.

At 4K ultra, the data suggests this pairing is not ideal. The GPU’s 58th percentile ranking and the 3DMark score indicate that frame rates will likely fall below 60 FPS in many AAA titles, especially those with demanding visual effects. The CPU would not be the limiting factor here—the GPU’s raw throughput and memory bandwidth are insufficient for consistent 4K gaming at ultra settings.

For 1080p gaming, the pairing is well-balanced, with the CPU’s single-thread performance ensuring high minimum frame rates. For 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary factor, and the estimated results are acceptable but not class-leading. For 4K, the data points to a subpar experience unless settings are lowered or upscaling technologies are used.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 63080, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. This is a dominant position, with the nearest rival—the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX—scoring 63173, a delta of only -0.1%, meaning the i7-13790F is statistically tied with that competitor. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G by -0.4%, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX by 0.5%. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 and single-core score of 4998 confirm the CPU’s strength in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15852, placing it in the 58th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 370X, scores 15862, a delta of -0.1%, which is essentially a tie. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is 1% faster, the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 1.1% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% faster. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 highlight its mid-range positioning, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 shows respectable compute capability.

The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU is a top-7% performer, while the GPU is merely average. This means the system’s overall 76th percentile ranking is dragged down by the graphics card. In CPU-bound tasks, the system will excel; in GPU-bound tasks, it will perform at a level consistent with a mid-range graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4212 and boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide the per-core speed needed to drive high frame rates at 1080p. The GPU’s 58th percentile ranking suggests it can support 144Hz or 165Hz monitors in esports titles, but AAA games at ultra settings may hover around 80-120 FPS, depending on the title.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a multi-thread score of 44737, can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means encoding falls to the CPU or fixed-function hardware, but the CPU’s headroom should suffice for x264 encoding at medium presets.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 indicates strong rendering performance for video exports and effects processing. The GPU’s 10963 PassMark GPU compute score provides hardware acceleration for effects, but the CPU will carry most of the load in timeline scrubbing and encoding.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-thread performance is excellent for CPU-based renders, with the R23 score of 35404 placing it among top-tier desktop processors. The GPU’s 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-based renderers, but its 58th percentile ranking means it is not a professional-grade card for this workload.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4212 and multi-thread score of 44737 handle compilation, testing, and virtualization well. The PassMark data encryption score of 31703 and integer math score of 151416 suggest solid performance for build servers and database workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking makes it overkill for typical student tasks, but the system will handle spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU’s G2D score of 1206 is sufficient for 2D applications and multiple monitors.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p or 1440p gaming and want a CPU that will remain relevant for years. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking ensures it can handle future game engines and multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU’s 16 GB memory is suitable for current titles. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread performance, though they may want a stronger GPU for GPU-accelerated tasks.

Developers and software engineers will find the CPU’s compilation speed and multi-thread capabilities valuable, especially for large codebases. Students and small business workstations will be over-served by this pairing, but the system’s longevity means it will not need upgrades for several years. Gamers targeting 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking will limit performance at that resolution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor in this build. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 58th percentile means the GPU will bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU will still cap frame rates in demanding titles. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, and its 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance becomes the primary constraint.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 35404 Cinebench R23 multi-core score ensures it is not the bottleneck. The GPU’s 10963 compute score is sufficient for accelerating some effects, but heavy GPU compute tasks will lag. The PassMark G3D score of 20974, compared to the CPU’s 44737 multi-thread score, shows the GPU is roughly half as powerful as the CPU in their respective fields, confirming the imbalance.

The FPS scaling estimates support this: at 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will limit maximum FPS. At 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s and 256-bit bus are insufficient for ultra settings, so the bottleneck becomes severe. Upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains, while upgrading the CPU would provide minimal benefit for gaming.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13790F a good match for the AMD Radeon RX 7700?

A: The CPU is far stronger than the GPU, with a 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 58th percentile. This means the GPU will bottleneck the system in most graphics-intensive tasks, but the CPU provides excellent headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: The estimated frame rates suggest 1080p and 1440p are the sweet spots, as the GPU’s 16 GB memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for these resolutions. At 4K, the GPU’s performance is insufficient for ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average score of 63080 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63173, -0.1%), and it is 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, -0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, and 0.5% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU’s average score of 15852 is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, -0.1%), while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is 1% faster, the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 1.1% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% faster.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 provides strong rendering performance, and the GPU’s compute score of 10963 accelerates effects. The system is well-suited for 1080p or 1440p video editing workflows.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists no integrated graphics for the i7-13790F, so a discrete GPU like the RX 7700 is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with no ECC support, according to the FACT PACK.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe drives. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 200 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, leaving room for modest upgrades without a power supply change.

The motherboard must support DDR4 or DDR5, so the memory choice is locked at build time. A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures future GPUs will not be limited by bandwidth. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low for a 16-core part, so cooling requirements are manageable, and the GPU’s dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin connectors fits most cases.

The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a GPU upgrade up to roughly 300 W, but a higher-wattage unit would be needed for top-tier cards. The socket 1700 platform is mature, and the CPU’s production status is active, so availability is not a concern. A memory upgrade to faster DDR5 could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, but the CPU’s 33 MB of L3 cache mitigates memory latency.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13790F with the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread part based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. The GPU is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors.

The combined percentile of 76 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking is exceptional, while the GPU’s 58th percentile is average. This means the system excels in CPU-bound tasks and is competent in gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but it is not a top-tier gaming rig. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $441, and the GPU has no listed launch MSRP.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F features 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-S, and is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are strong across the board. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35404 and single-core score of 4998 indicate excellent performance in both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4212 and multi-thread score of 44737 confirm this. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking means it outperforms 93% of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 63080 is within 0.5% of its closest rivals.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but lacks ECC support. It has PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-speed connectivity. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock is already high. The TDP is 65 W, which is low for a 16-core part, making it efficient for its performance level. The CPU’s release date is February 9, 2023, and it remains in active production.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds