SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 7400 — Platform Analysis

This pairing combines a 16-core, 24-thread Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with an entry-level AMD RDNA 3 graphics card, creating an unusual configuration where CPU capability vastly outstrips GPU performance. The i7-13790F sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 63080, placing it within 0.5% of rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, while the RX 7400 languishes in the 17th GPU percentile with an average score of 2467 — a delta of roughly 1.8% against the Intel HD Graphics 610. This is a desktop build where the processor is clearly the dominant component, and the data reflects a system designed for compute-heavy tasks rather than graphical performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is built on the Raptor Lake-S architecture using Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB shared L3 cache. This memory structure supports both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with PCIe Gen 5 available through 20 CPU lanes. The processor carries a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 16-core part, and it is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking headroom is limited by design.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the i7-13790F scores 35404 points in multi-core and 4998 in single-core. The multi-core figure places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, competitive with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX which scores 63173 on average (a -0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at 62839 (a 0.4% delta). The R20 results tell a similar story: 14869 multi-core and 2099 single-core. PassMark tests reinforce this split — the processor achieves 151416 in integer math, 110512 in floating-point math, and 44737 in multithreaded performance, while single-thread scores reach 4212. Data compression hits 567473, encryption reaches 31703, and extended instructions score 34828.

The single-core score of 4998 in R23 is respectable but not class-leading, suggesting the 5.20 GHz boost clock helps in lightly-threaded tasks yet does not dominate the field. The real story is the 16-core configuration: for workloads that scale across cores — rendering, compilation, scientific computation — the i7-13790F delivers performance that rivals newer mobile and embedded parts from both Intel and AMD, as evidenced by the tight deltaPct margins against the Core Ultra 7 255HX and Ryzen AI 7 450G. The 33 MB L3 cache is a notable asset for data-intensive applications, reducing memory latency and improving throughput in repeated access patterns. The 2.10 GHz base clock is conservative, but the boost to 5.20 GHz provides a wide dynamic range that suits bursty workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The asymmetry between CPU and GPU performance defines this build's character. The i7-13790F's 93rd CPU percentile contrasts sharply with the RX 7400's 17th GPU percentile, a gap that appears in nearly every workload category. In CPU-bound scenarios — data processing, video encoding, software compilation — the processor operates near its full potential, with benchmark scores like 35404 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 44737 in PassMark multi-thread indicating no meaningful bottleneck from the GPU. However, in graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's capabilities are largely idle.

The combined percentile of 55 reflects this imbalance, sitting near the midpoint of all desktop configurations. This is not a system where FPS scaling will improve with CPU headroom; the RX 7400's PassMark G3D score of 11897 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 indicate that the GPU will saturate long before the CPU does. For gaming at high resolutions or with demanding settings, the RX 7400's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance, and the i7-13790F's multi-core muscle will remain underutilized. The data suggests that in mixed workloads — for instance, gaming while streaming or rendering while compiling — the CPU can handle the auxiliary tasks without impacting GPU performance, but the reverse is not true: the GPU cannot accelerate CPU-limited workflows.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a target scenario. The RX 7400's 17th GPU percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 place it far below the threshold for high-refresh 1080p gaming, and the i7-13790F's single-core score of 4998 in R23 cannot compensate for GPU limitations. Expect frame rates well below 144 FPS in modern titles at ultra settings.

Streaming: The i7-13790F's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding streams while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 44737 and data compression score of 567473 indicate that x264 or x265 encoding at reasonable presets will not tax the CPU to the point of stuttering, even with the GPU already at its limit. This is a viable scenario, though the GPU's modest output will cap game quality.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export will benefit from the CPU's 35404 R23 multi-core score. The 33 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 support help with large media files, and the 567473 data compression score suggests efficient handling of codecs. The GPU's 5152 PassMark compute score is adequate for hardware-accelerated effects but not for heavy 3D compositing.

3D rendering: This is the strongest scenario. The i7-13790F's 16 cores deliver 35404 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the 93rd percentile and within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. Blender, V-Ray, and similar CPU-based renderers will scale well across all 24 threads, and the 65 W TDP means sustained loads are thermally manageable. The GPU's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 28 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the CPU carries the workload.

Software development: Compilation and build times benefit directly from the 24 threads. PassMark integer math at 151416 and extended instructions at 34828 indicate strong performance in code generation and optimization passes. The 2 MB L2 per core helps with frequent small data accesses, and the 33 MB L3 reduces cache misses in large projects.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance of 4212 in PassMark single-thread handles office suites and web browsing with ease, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low. The GPU's 1209 PassMark G2D score is sufficient for 2D desktop tasks, and the 17th GPU percentile is no hindrance for document editing or spreadsheets.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13790F uses Intel Socket 1700, a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in RAM choice. The dual-channel memory bus and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provide a modern foundation, though the RX 7400's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface means the GPU does not take full advantage of the available PCIe bandwidth. The 65 W TDP is low for a 16-core part, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W, so the total system power draw is modest — a capable air cooler would suffice for the CPU, and a 500-600 W PSU would offer headroom for future upgrades.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The i7-13790F has significant headroom for a more powerful graphics card; its 93rd CPU percentile means it can feed a GPU several tiers above the RX 7400 without bottlenecking. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus of the RX 7400 are entry-level, and a move to a higher-tier Radeon RX 7000 series card or a competing NVIDIA part would unlock the CPU's potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The platform itself — Socket 1700, DDR5, PCIe Gen 5 — is not the limiting factor; the GPU is. The CPU's 20 PCIe lanes support Gen 5 devices, so a modern NVMe SSD or a future high-bandwidth GPU would be accommodated, though the RX 7400's x8 interface is a bottleneck for data transfer.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need substantial CPU compute power but have modest graphical requirements. The i7-13790F's 93rd CPU percentile makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, and content creators rendering video or 3D scenes — all of which benefit from the 35404 R23 multi-core score and 44737 PassMark multi-thread result. The RX 7400, with its 17th GPU percentile, serves basic display output and light 2D acceleration, so this is not a gaming rig or a workstation for GPU-accelerated rendering.

Small business workstations handling databases, spreadsheets, and document processing would find the CPU's single-thread performance of 4212 PassMark and 2099 R20 single-core more than adequate, while the 65 W TDP keeps operating costs low. Students in engineering or computer science programs would benefit from the compilation and simulation performance without needing a high-end GPU. Gamers at 1080p with low settings might find the RX 7400 sufficient for esports titles, but the data suggests this is not the intended use case — the CPU is the star, and the GPU is an afterthought.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the Navi 33 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm process from TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are 1452 MHz base, 2200 MHz game, and 2300 MHz boost, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card's TDP is 43 W, requires a 1x 6-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results place the RX 7400 in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 2467. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103, and PassMark results show 11897 in G3D, 5152 in GPU compute, and lower scores in specific APIs: 176 in DirectX 9, 97 in DirectX 11, 44 in DirectX 12, and 59 in DirectX 10. These numbers are within 2% of the AMD Radeon 8040S, NVIDIA GeForce 710M, and Intel HD Graphics 610, indicating that the RX 7400 is in the entry-level tier despite its modern architecture. The 28 RT cores and 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 suggest some capability for ray-traced effects and compute workloads, but the low pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s limit its effectiveness in modern games.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is a bottleneck for high-resolution textures, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will struggle with 1440p or high-detail assets. The 2200 MHz game clock is reasonable for the architecture, but the 128-bit bus and 64 ROPs cap fill-rate performance. For rendering tasks, the 32.97 TFLOPS FP16 and 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 provide some compute throughput, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 5152 indicates that the card is not a primary compute device — it is a display adapter with modest acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are the highlight of this pairing. The i7-13790F achieves 35404 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4998 in single-core, 14869 in R20 multi-core and 2099 in single-core, and 3568 in R15 multi-core with 503 in single-core. PassMark results include 44737 in multi-thread, 4212 in single-thread, 151416 in integer math, 110512 in floating-point math, 567473 in data compression, 31703 in encryption, and 34828 in extended instructions. The average benchmark score of 63080 places the CPU in the 93rd percentile, with nearest rivals — Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX at 63173 (-0.1%), AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G at 63331 (-0.4%), and Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62738 (0.5%) — all within a fraction of a percent.

The GPU benchmarks are far more modest. The RX 7400 scores 1103 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 11897 in PassMark G3D, 5152 in GPU compute, and 1209 in G2D. The average GPU score is 2467, putting it in the 17th percentile, with nearest rivals being AMD Radeon 8040S at 2440 (1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2433 (1.4%), and Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2425 (1.8%). The combined percentile of 55 reflects the imbalance — the CPU pulls the system up, but the GPU drags it down. The data shows a processor that outperforms 93% of all CPUs while the GPU outperforms only 17% of GPUs, a configuration that is compute-strong but graphically weak.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a high-end 16-core Intel Raptor Lake processor with an entry-level AMD RDNA 3 GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking places it among the top 7% of processors, while the GPU's 17th percentile places it near the bottom 17% of graphics cards. The combined percentile of 55 indicates that the overall system sits around the midpoint of all desktop builds — a reflection of the extreme disparity between components rather than a balanced configuration.

The i7-13790F is a released, active production processor from February 2023 with a launch MSRP of $441, while the RX 7400 is a newer GPU from August 2025 based on the Navi 33 chip. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 43 W TDP mean the system is power-efficient, and the 200 W suggested PSU for the GPU indicates low total power draw. This is not a balanced gaming build — it is a CPU-centric workstation where the GPU serves as a basic display output and light acceleration device. The tier from the percentiles is clear: top-tier CPU, bottom-tier GPU, mid-tier overall.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13790F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so overclocking headroom is limited. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the maximum achievable under load.

Q: What memory types can this build use?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel bus is available for either type.

Q: How does the RX 7400 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 7400's average benchmark score of 2467 is within 1.1% to 1.9% of the AMD Radeon 8040S, NVIDIA GeForce 710M, and Intel HD Graphics 610, placing it in the 17th GPU percentile.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in gaming?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The RX 7400's 17th percentile and 1103 3DMark Steel Nomad score will limit frame rates, while the i7-13790F's 93rd percentile and 35404 R23 multi-core score will remain largely idle in most games.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 55, meaning this configuration outperforms 55% of all desktop builds, despite the CPU being in the 93rd percentile and the GPU in the 17th percentile.

Q: What is the power requirement for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a 43 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 200 W, with a single 6-pin power connector required.

Q: When was the CPU released, and what is its launch MSRP?

A: The CPU was released on February 9, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $441. The GPU was released on August 7, 2025, with no launch MSRP provided.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The performance picture is dominated by the GPU's 17th percentile ranking and the CPU's 93rd percentile, which means gaming performance will be constrained almost entirely by the RX 7400.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 and PassMark G3D score of 11897, the RX 7400 is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in modern titles, with frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range depending on the game's optimization. Esports titles with light graphical demands might approach 60-100 FPS at 1080p low settings, but the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors in games with high-resolution textures or demanding effects. At 1440p, the estimates drop significantly — the 128-bit memory bus and 64 ROPs are insufficient for consistent 60 FPS in most modern games, and the 17th GPU percentile confirms this is an entry-level graphics solution. The CPU's single-core score of 4998 in R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, but this is moot given the GPU's limited capabilities.

For ray-traced gaming, the RX 7400's 28 RT cores and 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 offer some support, but the low pixel rate suggests that enabling ray tracing will result in substantial frame rate drops. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support is present, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 indicates weak API performance. Overall, this is not a gaming-focused build — the estimated FPS figures are modest, and the data strongly suggests that any gaming use case would be secondary to the CPU's compute strengths.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds