SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13790F

63,080 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13790F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 represents a distinct split in performance philosophy: a top-tier 93rd-percentile CPU driving a mid-range 63rd-percentile GPU. The combined build percentile sits at 78, indicating a system that is substantially more capable on the compute side than in graphics rendering. This configuration prioritizes CPU-bound productivity and high-refresh 1080p gaming over high-resolution visual fidelity. The data indicates a clear hierarchy where the processor is the dominant component, with the graphics card serving as the primary constraint in graphically intensive workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-13790F delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, scoring 35,404 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a figure that places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This score is statistically indistinguishable from its nearest rivals, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX just 0.1% behind at 63,173 average, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G merely 0.4% ahead. The single-core performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 4,998 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,212, confirming excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 63,080 is within a tight 0.5% band of its four closest competitors, demonstrating that this chip sits at the very top of its performance class.

In contrast, the Radeon RX 6600 produces a Passmark G3D score of 15,096, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 19,036 is virtually tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0% delta) and the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (0.1% ahead). The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,492 indicates solid DirectX 12 rasterization capability, while its Geekbench OpenCL score of 28,850 reveals modest compute throughput compared to the CPU’s capabilities. The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU operates at a near-flagship level, while the GPU functions as a competent 1080p-class part, leaving significant performance on the table in GPU-bound scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700 with the Raptor Lake-S architecture, offering dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 modules. This flexibility is a key advantage, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 without changing the motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, ensuring ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The Radeon RX 6600, however, utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs but does not exploit the platform’s newest connectivity.

Power delivery is not a concern for this configuration. The CPU has a 65W TDP, while the GPU has a 132W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 300W. This creates substantial headroom, meaning a quality 500W or 550W power supply would comfortably handle the entire system with room for overclocking or additional drives. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to drive higher-tier graphics cards without creating a new bottleneck. The 16 cores and 24 threads of the i7-13790F will remain relevant for years, making the graphics card the clear component to prioritize in any future upgrade cycle.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 6600 is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), with the GPU core boosting to 2491 MHz. The card features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, yielding a pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute throughput is rated at 8.928 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 17.86 TFLOPS through a 2:1 ratio. The chip, built on TSMC’s 7nm process, contains 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die.

The benchmark scores for rendering are mixed. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 152 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 51, suggesting that the card performs better in legacy APIs than in modern, feature-heavy workloads. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,492 indicates adequate performance for contemporary DirectX 12 titles. The GPU’s 28 ray accelerators provide some ray tracing capability, but the modest compute throughput means ray-traced effects will be limited to lighter implementations. For pure rasterization at 1080p, the card is competent, but its 63rd-percentile standing places it below many of its peers in the current market.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i7-13790F sits in the 93rd percentile for processors, while the RX 6600 rests in the 63rd percentile for GPUs, a 30-point gap that clearly identifies the graphics card as the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. In CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D rendering, the processor will operate near its full potential, with the GPU playing a minor role. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks such as high-resolution gaming or complex shader effects, the RX 6600 will be saturated, and the CPU will be underutilized.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely be the primary constraint in most titles, as its 8GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards. At 1440p, the bottleneck shifts even more decisively to the GPU. The only scenarios where the CPU becomes the limiting factor are those involving very high frame rates at low resolutions or in CPU-heavy simulations and physics calculations. The Passmark physics score of 3,017 and the data compression score of 567,473 demonstrate that the CPU has significant headroom in these areas, making it unlikely to bottleneck in any realistic gaming workload.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the two components. The Radeon RX 6600’s 63rd-percentile standing and its DirectX 11 performance (Passmark score of 152) suggest it is well-suited for 1080p gaming. At 1080p with ultra settings, most esports titles and older AAA games should achieve frame rates well above 60 FPS, given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance of 4,212 in Passmark. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 8.928 TFLOPS is adequate for 1080p rasterization, but the 8GB VRAM may become a limitation in the latest titles with high-resolution textures.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, as its 224 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit bus are narrow for that resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,492 suggests moderate performance in DX12 titles, but the card’s lower DirectX 12 score (51 in Passmark) compared to DirectX 11 (152) implies that older games may run better than newer ones. For the best experience, users should target 1080p, where the CPU’s substantial single-core performance will help drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU handles the rendering load without becoming a severe bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Core i7-13790F’s single-core score of 4,998 in Cinebench R23 provides the headroom needed to drive high frame rates in competitive titles. The RX 6600, with its 63rd-percentile standing, is capable of supporting 144Hz displays at 1080p in less demanding games, though it may not sustain those rates in graphically intense AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,404, are more than sufficient for software encoding while gaming simultaneously. The Passmark data encryption score of 31,703 indicates that the processor can handle the encoding workload without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The high multi-threaded performance makes this system excellent for rendering timelines and exporting video. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 151,416 and floating-point math score of 110,512 point to strong performance in encoding and effect processing, though the GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL score of 28,850) will be a secondary factor in GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the i7-13790F is exceptional, with its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,568 and R20 score of 14,869 showing clear strength. For GPU-based renderers, the RX 6600’s 8.928 TFLOPS is workable but not fast, making the CPU the primary workhorse in most rendering scenarios.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, along with a Passmark multithread score of 44,737, allow for fast compilation times and smooth multitasking. The 33MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the platform’s DDR5 support enables high memory bandwidth for development tools.

Student and office work: This is far more performance than needed for typical productivity tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures snappy application load times, while the GPU is more than adequate for spreadsheet work, web browsing, and light photo editing, all while consuming modest power with the CPU’s 65W TDP.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance and plan to game at 1080p. Gamers at that resolution will benefit from the i7-13790F’s high single-core scores (4,998 in Cinebench R23) to maximize frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the RX 6600 provides acceptable graphics performance for the resolution. Content creators, specifically video editors and 3D artists who work with CPU-based renderers, will find the 16-core processor exceptionally capable, with the GPU serving as a secondary accelerator.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compile times enabled by the 24 threads and high cache capacity, making this a productive workstation for coding. Students and small business users looking for a responsive, reliable desktop for office work will find this configuration overqualified but smooth, with the benefit of a long upgrade path. The primary caveat is that users seeking high-resolution (1440p or 4K) gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering should consider a more powerful graphics card, as the RX 6600 will be the limiting factor in those workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 78, indicating that it outperforms 78% of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Core i7-13790F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The Core i7-13790F scores an average of 63,080, which is 0.1% lower than the Core Ultra 7 265HX’s average score of 63,173, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 6600?

A: The Radeon RX 6600 has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, provided by 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU’s multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked (false), meaning the Intel Core i7-13790F cannot be overclocked via the multiplier, though it has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the Radeon RX 6600?

A: The suggested PSU for the Radeon RX 6600 is 300W, and the GPU itself has a TDP of 132W, requiring a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the system support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13790F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in memory choice.

Q: What are the estimated FPS figures for this build in gaming?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination. Based on the GPU’s 63rd-percentile benchmark score and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, estimates suggest smooth 1080p gaming at 60+ FPS in most titles, with 1440p being more demanding for the RX 6600.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13790F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel’s 10nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for gaming and productivity workloads that benefit from large data sets. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though it does not support ECC memory, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,404 is exceptional, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The single-core score of 4,998 is equally impressive, ensuring fast response in everyday tasks and games. Passmark results show strong performance in data compression (567,473), integer math (151,416), and floating-point math (110,512), indicating versatility across different compute types. The extended instructions score of 34,828 suggests good support for modern SIMD workloads, while the find prime numbers score of 207 is a lower result, reflecting that the processor prioritizes throughput over raw integer per-core speed.

For real workloads, this means the i7-13790F is a highly capable processor for tasks ranging from heavy multi-threaded renders to fast single-threaded application launches. Its 33MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in gaming, and the 24 threads allow for efficient multitasking. The processor’s 93rd-percentile standing, with an average benchmark score of 63,080, places it alongside much newer and power-hungry alternatives, making it a strong choice for any CPU-bound workload. The 65W TDP is remarkably low for this level of performance, making it an efficient option for high-performance desktops where power consumption is a consideration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13790F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13790F

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds