SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

43,667 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process node. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series and carries a 45 W TDP, positioning it as a high-performance part for laptops rather than desktops. The chip's base clock sits at 2.40 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.00 GHz, enabling substantial single-thread bursts when workloads demand it. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 pool — a configuration that supports both latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks and heavily parallel multi-threaded workloads.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15998 points in multi-core and 2258 in single-core. These figures indicate strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a mobile part, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs tracked. The multi-core score is particularly telling for rendering and compilation tasks, where all 14 cores can be engaged simultaneously. The single-core score of 2258, while lower in absolute terms, still represents a capable baseline for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The R20 results — 6719 multi-core and 948 single-core — follow the same pattern, reinforcing the chip's balanced profile. In R15, the multi-core score of 1612 and single-core score of 227 further corroborate this, though the older benchmark shows relatively modest scaling compared to newer tests.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The multi-thread score of 24460 and single-thread score of 3483 align with the Cinebench data, suggesting consistent performance across different benchmark methodologies. Integer math scores 85927, while floating-point math reaches 63064, indicating strong computational throughput for both integer-heavy logic and scientific or financial calculations. Data compression hits 273720, a high figure that benefits from the large L3 cache and multiple cores working in tandem. Data encryption scores 16324, which is respectable for a mobile CPU and suggests adequate hardware support for security-related workloads. Extended instructions score 15810, hinting at solid SIMD performance, though the find prime numbers score of 116 is lower in absolute terms — a reflection of the workload's sensitivity to clock speed and cache latency rather than core count.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i7-13705H sits within 0.5% of several desktop and mobile parts. It trails the Intel Core i5-14450HX by just 0.1% in average benchmark score, and it leads the Intel Core i5-14400 by 0.1%. The Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.1% behind, while the Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.5% ahead. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the i7-13705H delivers performance on par with a previous-generation desktop i9 and a current mid-range desktop i5, despite being a mobile chip. This tight clustering suggests that the 13th-gen mobile architecture has matured to the point where generation-over-generation gains are marginal at this tier.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with PCIe Gen 5 available on 8 CPU lanes. Integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units provides a fallback display output, though in a laptop with a discrete GPU, this is rarely the primary rendering path. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking headroom is limited by design, but boost behavior is already aggressive at 5.00 GHz.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 83, indicating that the system outperforms 83% of all tracked configurations. The CPU alone holds the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 84th percentile among all GPUs. These positions are nearly aligned, suggesting a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in overall capability.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32076, with nearest rivals clustering within a 0.5% band. The Intel Core i5-14450HX scores 32040, the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115, the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, and the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226. The i7-13705H's position in this group means that for multi-threaded productivity tasks, users would be hard-pressed to notice a difference between these processors without running synthetic benchmarks side by side.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile achieves an average benchmark score of 43667, placing it in the 84th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 43301 (0.8% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43268 (0.9% ahead), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 (0.9% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A6000 at 44075 (0.9% behind). This places the RTX 4090 Mobile in rarefied company — it trades blows with professional workstation cards that carry far higher price tags and power envelopes. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 180831 and Vulkan score of 170774 are both strong, indicating robust compute and graphics API performance. PassMark G3D scores 27212, while GPU compute hits 12347, reinforcing the GPU's capability in both rasterization and general-purpose compute tasks.

The combined picture is one of a high-end laptop platform that can handle demanding workloads without a clear bottleneck at the component level. The CPU and GPU percentiles being within two points of each other suggests that for mixed workloads — such as gaming while streaming or rendering while compiling — neither component will consistently hold the other back. The data shows a balanced system that ranks in the top sixth of all configurations tracked, which is a strong position for a mobile platform.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 84th percentile ranking and its proximity to workstation cards like the RTX A6000 suggest that at 1080p and 1440p resolutions with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 2258 in Cinebench R23 and 3483 in PassMark single-thread indicate it can feed the GPU adequately in CPU-bound scenarios, though the mobile form factor imposes thermal constraints that could affect sustained performance.

For esports titles and lighter competitive games, the combination of a 5.00 GHz boost clock and a GPU in the 84th percentile should provide frame rates well above 144 Hz at 1080p, assuming the laptop's cooling solution can maintain boost clocks. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, but its 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are sufficient for high-refresh gaming at this resolution in most titles. At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus provide enough capacity and bandwidth for ultra textures, but frame rates will depend heavily on the specific game's optimization and the laptop's power delivery.

The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 16324 and extended instructions score of 15810 are less relevant to gaming than the integer math score of 85927, which influences physics calculations and game logic. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with game asset streaming and reduces memory latency, which is beneficial for open-world titles that load large environments dynamically. However, without measured FPS data, these are estimates based on synthetic benchmarks; real-world gaming performance could vary by 10-15% depending on the laptop's thermal design and power limits.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need a single laptop to serve both demanding compute tasks and high-end gaming. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where multi-threaded performance directly translates to faster project turnaround. The GPU's 84th percentile and 16 GB of VRAM support large texture sets and complex scenes, making it appropriate for 3D artists and CAD professionals who work with detailed models. Game developers can benefit from the combination of CPU multi-threading for build pipelines and GPU compute for shader compilation and lighting simulation.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions are the primary gaming audience, as the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute throughput align with high-resolution rendering. Students in engineering or computer science programs would find the CPU's multi-threaded performance useful for simulations and parallel programming assignments, while the GPU accelerates machine learning coursework through its tensor cores. Small business workstations that handle video conferencing, document processing, and occasional rendering tasks would be well-served, though the CPU's performance is overkill for basic office workloads — the integrated Iris Xe Graphics alone could handle those tasks, making the discrete GPU a luxury rather than a necessity for such environments.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data suggests a well-balanced system, but workload-specific bottlenecks emerge when examining the scores closely. For CPU-bound tasks like code compilation or data compression, the i7-13705H's 273720 PassMark data compression score and 15998 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicate that the CPU can sustain heavy parallel workloads. In these scenarios, the GPU remains largely idle, and system performance is limited by CPU clock speeds and memory bandwidth. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support is adequate, but it is not a bottleneck given the CPU's cache design.

For GPU-bound tasks like 4K gaming or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the RTX 4090 Mobile's 32.98 TFLOPS and 76 RT cores become the limiting factor. The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to keep up with frame generation in most titles, but at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU may become the bottleneck in games that rely heavily on physics or AI. The PassMark physics score of 1854 is modest, suggesting that CPU-bound game logic could limit frame rates in simulation-heavy titles at high refresh rates.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K would show diminishing returns as the GPU becomes increasingly saturated. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is a potential constraint at 4K with ultra textures, but the 16 GB VRAM capacity mitigates this by allowing larger texture caches in memory. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 84th percentile are close enough that neither component consistently dominates, making the system's balance its strength.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — there is no user upgrade path for the processor itself. The laptop form factor, indicated by the buildClass of "laptop," means that component upgrades are limited to memory and storage, assuming the laptop's design allows access. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, so a user could potentially upgrade from DDR4 to DDR5 only if the motherboard supports both, which is unlikely — the memory type is typically fixed at the factory. The PCIe Gen 5 support on 8 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage devices, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is not a bottleneck given the current GPU's performance.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, for a combined 165 W of component power draw. The suggested PSU is listed as null, meaning no specific power supply recommendation is provided, but the laptop's power adapter must supply at least this amount plus overhead for the rest of the system. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity and adding a high-speed NVMe SSD that leverages the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU's successor, the GeForce 50 Mobile, exists, but upgrading to it would require a new laptop given the soldered nature of mobile GPUs.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU's 84th percentile ranking and 32.98 TFLOPS should deliver frame rates that exceed typical 144 Hz displays in most titles, though CPU-bound scenarios may cap performance due to the modest physics score of 1854.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads handle encoding workloads alongside gaming, with the multi-thread score of 24460 in PassMark indicating sufficient headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding, though the GPU's tensor cores could offload encoding via NVENC.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K preview playback and effects processing without stuttering.

3D rendering: The GPU's 76 RT cores and 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 compute excel at ray-traced renders, with the CPU's multi-threaded performance feeding geometry and scene data efficiently, resulting in render times competitive with desktop workstation GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache speed up compilation of large codebases, with the PassMark integer math score of 85927 indicating strong performance for build servers and continuous integration tasks.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for document processing and web browsing, but it future-proofs a laptop for machine learning assignments that leverage the GPU's 304 tensor cores, making it suitable for advanced coursework.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13705H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. The combined percentile of 83 places it in the top 17% of all tracked systems, with the CPU and GPU both ranking in the low-to-mid 80s percentiles. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32076 and GPU's average score of 43667 indicate a high-end mobile platform that competes with desktop systems from a few generations ago. The pairing is notable for its balance — neither component dramatically exceeds the other in percentile ranking, which is uncommon in laptop builds where manufacturers often pair a high-end GPU with a weaker CPU to cut costs. Here, the i7-13705H provides enough multi-threaded and single-threaded performance to complement the RTX 4090 Mobile's compute capabilities, resulting in a system that handles both gaming and productivity workloads without a clear weak link.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13705H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13705H scores 32076 on average, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-14450HX, 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14400, 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800H, and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-11900. These differences are within 0.5% of each other, making them effectively equivalent in real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile holds the 84th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 84% of tracked graphics cards. Its average benchmark score of 43667 places it within 0.9% of workstation cards like the NVIDIA RTX A6000, which scores 44075.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact pairing, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct gaming measurements.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13705H supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. However, the actual memory type installed is determined by the laptop's motherboard, and upgrading from one type to the other is not possible after purchase.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The CPU's boost clock of 5.00 GHz is the maximum achievable under load, and the laptop's cooling solution determines how long this can be sustained.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for high-resolution textures and large compute workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and die size?

A: The i7-13705H is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The GPU, in contrast, uses TSMC's 5 nm process with a 379 mm² die and 45,900 million transistors.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a high-end laptop GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD103 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It packs 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The GPU features 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 515.3 GTexel/s. The 76 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads, while 304 tensor cores accelerate AI-based tasks such as DLSS and machine learning inference. The FP32 compute throughput is 32.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.98 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, indicating that the GPU does not sacrifice half-precision performance for full-precision.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth are well-suited for 4K gaming with high-resolution textures and for professional workloads like video editing and 3D rendering that require large frame buffers. The GPU's base clock is 1335 MHz, with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, and its TDP is rated at 120 W — a substantial power draw for a mobile component, but justified by the performance on offer. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a mature standard and does not bottleneck the GPU's data transfer needs.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 180831 in Geekbench OpenCL and 170774 in Geekbench Vulkan, demonstrating strong compute performance across different API environments. PassMark G3D scores 27212, while PassMark GPU compute reaches 12347. The DirectX 12 score of 107 is relatively low in isolation, but this benchmark measures specific rasterization features and should be interpreted in the context of the higher-level G3D score. The GPU's 84th percentile ranking and its proximity to the NVIDIA RTX A6000 — a professional workstation card — indicate that this mobile GPU delivers desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor. For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB VRAM, 76 RT cores, and 32.98 TFLOPS FP32 compute means it can handle complex scenes with ray tracing and high polygon counts without running out of memory or compute headroom.