SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13705H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile represent a high-end laptop pairing designed for demanding users. This analysis is based strictly on synthetic benchmark data, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are therefore estimates derived from CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU pairing, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and its 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate it is a very capable high-end mobile graphics processor. The Core i7-13705H, with an 82nd percentile ranking among CPUs, provides adequate single-thread performance that should not severely bottleneck the GPU in most gaming workloads.

For 1080p gaming, the data suggests this pairing should deliver very high frame rates in esports and moderately demanding titles. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3,483 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,258 point to strong per-core performance. The GPU’s FP32 compute of 24.72 TFLOPS and its DirectX 12 benchmark score of 96 (relative to its other API scores) suggest it can handle modern game engines well. Expect high refresh rate performance at this resolution, likely exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding titles, though the exact figures remain estimates.

At 1440p, the balance shifts more toward the GPU. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and effects. The 80 ROPs and 232 TMUs contribute to solid pixel and texture throughput. Estimated frame rates would likely remain above 100 FPS in many titles, with heavier games dropping lower. The GPU’s 81st percentile position suggests it outperforms roughly 80% of other GPUs in the database, reinforcing its high-end status.

For 4K gaming, the data indicates this laptop GPU will face challenges with the most demanding titles at maximum settings. The 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, while respectable, are lower than what desktop flagship GPUs offer. The GPU’s passmark G3D score of 24,926 is strong, but 4K rendering requires substantial raw throughput. Estimated frame rates would likely fall into the 60-90 FPS range for many games, with drops below 60 FPS possible in the heaviest scenarios. The tensor cores, 232 in total, could help via DLSS, though the FACT PACK does not specify DLSS performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-13705H demonstrates a well-rounded performance profile across numerous benchmarks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15,998 in multi-core and 2,258 in single-core. The multi-core result places it near the Intel Core i5-14450HX, which averages 32,040 in overall benchmark score versus the i7’s 32,076, a negligible 0.1% difference. This indicates the 14-core, 20-thread configuration provides competitive multi-threaded rendering performance.

The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 24,460 and integer math score of 85,927 show strong computational throughput. Its floating point math score of 63,064 further confirms its capability in scientific and engineering workloads. The data compression score of 273,720 and encryption score of 16,324 illustrate efficiency in data-intensive tasks. The CPU holds an 82nd percentile position among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 82% of processors in the database.

The RTX 4080 Mobile posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 and a Vulkan score of 145,807, indicating strong compute performance across different APIs. Its PassMark G3D score of 24,926 places it in the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The average benchmark score of 38,135 positions it close to the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, which scores 38,299, a difference of only -0.4%. More notably, it is just 0.6% behind the RTX 5080 Mobile’s average score of 38,349, suggesting the 4080 Mobile remains highly competitive even against newer hardware.

The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 82, reflecting the overall strength of the build. The CPU and GPU scores are closely matched in their respective percentile rankings, which indicates a well-balanced system. The GPU’s compute score of 11,191 in PassMark further supports its ability to handle non-graphics workloads, though it lags behind its graphics score in relative terms.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are both positioned in the low-80s percentile range, suggesting they are well matched. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 81st percentile mean neither component dramatically outclasses the other. In gaming, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3,483 PassMark single-thread score, should keep up with the GPU’s demands. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,258 reinforces this, indicating the CPU can handle the primary game thread efficiently.

For multi-threaded workloads, the CPU becomes the more active participant. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,998 and PassMark multithread score of 24,460 show it can feed the GPU with data in compute-heavy tasks. However, the GPU also has substantial compute capability, with 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance. In rendering tasks that use GPU acceleration, the GPU will take the lead. The PassMark compute score of 11,191 for the GPU is respectable but lower than its graphics score, suggesting it is optimized more for rasterization than raw compute.

Bottleneck analysis from FPS scaling is not possible due to the lack of measured FPS data. However, the benchmark scores suggest that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s performance will be the limiting factor for achieving extremely high frame rates, as its single-thread score of 3,483 is strong but not exceptional. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192-bit bus will likely become the constraint, as these figures are modest for a high-end mobile GPU. The CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency, which benefits gaming performance.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need high performance in both gaming and productivity applications. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the GPU’s strong G3D score of 24,926 and the CPU’s capable single-thread performance. The high refresh rate potential at these resolutions, based on estimated FPS, makes it suitable for competitive and immersive gaming alike. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads beneficial for multi-threaded tasks, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,998.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 85,927 and multithread score of 24,460. The extended instructions score of 15,810 suggests good support for modern instruction sets, which can accelerate specific workloads. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the combination capable for simulations, virtual machines, and development environments. Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for office productivity, data analysis, and light content creation will also benefit, though the high cost of this hardware might be a consideration for budget-constrained operations.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13705H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 82, indicating it outperforms 82% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 Mobile compare to the RTX 5080 Mobile in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38,135, which is 0.6% lower than the RTX 5080 Mobile’s score of 38,349. This is a very small difference, suggesting the 4080 Mobile remains highly competitive.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Intel Core i7-13705H?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, up from a base clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Which CPU is the closest rival to the Core i7-13705H in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX is the closest rival, with an average score of 32,040, which is just 0.1% higher than the i7-13705H’s score of 32,076.

Q: Does this build support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the RTX 4080 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the process node for the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 294 mm² and 35,800 million transistors.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with an effective speed of 18 Gbps, providing 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus for a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

The GPU features 7,424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. For ray tracing, it includes 58 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 232 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 24.72 TFLOPS, with a 1:1 ratio. The GPU consumes up to 110 W in this mobile configuration.

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 159,575 in Geekbench OpenCL and 145,807 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its PassMark G3D score of 24,926 places it in the 81st percentile. The DirectX 12 score of 96, relative to DirectX 9 at 286 and DirectX 11 at 244, suggests strong modern API performance. For rendering workloads, the high G3D score indicates excellent rasterization capability. The FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS is substantial, though the 1:1 FP16 ratio means there is no dedicated half-precision boost, which some competing architectures offer. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may be a limiting factor in high-resolution texture-heavy scenes.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the processor. It does not support ECC memory and is not multiplier-unlocked. The launch MSRP is $502.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15,998 in multi-core and 2,258 in single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 24,460 and a single-thread score of 3,483. The data compression score of 273,720 and encryption score of 16,324 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks. The floating point math score of 63,064 and integer math score of 85,927 demonstrate robust computational capability. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking matches the GPU’s 81st percentile, creating a balanced platform. For real workloads, the 14 cores and 20 threads handle multi-tasking and parallel compilation well, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded application performance.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13705H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 14-core Raptor Lake-H processor with 20 threads, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based mobile graphics solution with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, placing it in the top tier of laptop configurations in the database.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32,076, with close rivals including the Intel Core i5-14400 at 32,115 (-0.1%) and the Intel Core i7-12800H at 32,121 (-0.1%). The GPU’s average score is 38,135, with the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 at 38,299 (-0.4%) and the RTX 5080 Mobile at 38,349 (-0.6%) as nearest competitors. The similarity in these scores indicates that this build offers performance comparable to newer and more expensive options.

The build class is laptop, meaning all components are designed for mobile use. The GPU’s 110 W TDP and the CPU’s 45 W TDP together suggest a system that requires adequate cooling but is not excessively power-hungry. The overall tier, based on the 82nd combined percentile, is high-end, suitable for demanding gaming and professional workloads. This is a premium configuration that balances CPU and GPU performance effectively.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3,483 and the GPU’s G3D score of 24,926 suggest this build can drive high frame rates at 1080p. The estimated FPS should easily exceed 144 in many titles, though exact numbers are not available. The 12 GB memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support high texture quality.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,998, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding, though specific streaming features are not detailed in the data.

Video editing: The CPU’s floating point math score of 63,064 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 159,575 indicate strong performance in rendering and effects. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient for 4K video timelines, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with large file transfers.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 58 RT cores make it capable for real-time and ray-traced rendering. The CPU’s multi-core score of 15,998 in Cinebench R23 supports CPU-based rendering tasks as well.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 85,927 and multithread score of 24,460 accelerate code compilation and testing. The extended instructions score of 15,810 indicates support for modern SIMD operations, beneficial for scientific computing.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,483 ensures responsive application usage, while the 20 threads handle multitasking. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics can handle basic display tasks, and the discrete GPU provides acceleration for any graphics-intensive coursework.