SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

8,746 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13705H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is a laptop-class combination that skews heavily toward CPU compute rather than graphics throughput. The processor sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 44th percentile, and the combined build sits at the 63rd percentile. This is a configuration where the processor is the dominant component, and the graphics card will be the limiting factor in most visually intensive tasks. Benchmark results indicate a strong 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H CPU with a 5.0 GHz boost, paired with a 4 GB Ampere GPU that is close to end-of-life, and the data shows that the system is best suited for productivity and moderate gaming rather than high-end graphics work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a Raptor Lake-H mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 14 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 2.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU is rated at a TDP of 45 W, which is typical for a high-performance mobile part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and the memory bus is dual-channel, though the exact memory bandwidth is not listed. It also includes an Iris Xe Graphics 96EU integrated GPU, which provides a fallback for basic display output.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15998 in multi-core and 2258 in single-core. The R20 multi-core score is 6719, and the R15 multi-core is 1612. These numbers place the i7-13705H in the same performance tier as several desktop and mobile rivals: the Intel Core i5-14450HX (average score 32040, delta +0.1%), the i5-14400 (32115, delta -0.1%), the i7-12800H (32121, delta -0.1%), and the i9-11900 (32226, delta -0.5%). The average benchmark score for the CPU is 32076, which is essentially identical to those rivals. This indicates that the i7-13705H delivers performance on par with a mid-range desktop i5 from the 14th generation, or a previous-generation i9-11900, despite being a mobile part.

The Passmark suite shows strong compute numbers: data compression scores 273720, data encryption 16324, extended instructions 15810, floating point math 63064, integer math 85927, multithread 24460, physics 1854, random string sorting 29285, and single-thread 3483. The multithread score of 24460 is notably high for a laptop CPU, indicating that heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing will run well. The single-thread score of 3483 is also competitive, which matters for everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option. It is a mobile part with a BGA 1744 socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. Its market segment is mobile, and it was released in January 2023. The launch MSRP is $502, but no pricing analysis is included here.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile. The combined percentile is 63. This imbalance is clear: the CPU is far more capable than the GPU. In gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, the GPU will almost always be the bottleneck. The CPU can push high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will limit the rendering resolution and detail settings. In productivity tasks that rely on the CPU—such as compiling code, running simulations, or video encoding—the CPU will handle the load, but the GPU's role is minimal.

Benchmark scores reinforce this. The CPU's multi-threaded performance is near the top of its class, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 8746, which is only at the 44th percentile. The nearest rival GPUs are the GeForce GTX 460 v2 (average 8743, delta 0%), the Quadro P2200 (8686, delta +0.7%), the Radeon R9 M265X (8851, delta -1.2%), and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 (8863, delta -1.3%). These are all older or lower-tier cards, meaning the RTX 3050 A mobile is not a high-end part. Its performance is roughly on par with a GTX 460 v2 from over a decade ago, though the architecture is more modern.

In real-world terms, if the user is running a CPU-intensive task like 4K video export, the CPU will be the star, but if they try to play a modern game at 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The data shows that the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 192 GB/s bandwidth are modest, and its 1792 shading units and 56 tensor cores are far fewer than a high-end Ampere card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single 2258, multi 15998) can feed a high-refresh monitor, but the GPU's low percentile (44th) and modest VRAM will cap frame rates. Expect 1080p or lower settings to be playable, but not high-refresh at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's multithreaded performance (PassMark multithread 24460) can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, but the GPU's limited memory and compute power (PassMark GPU compute 4419) may restrict the stream quality and game settings. The lack of measured FPS data makes exact guidance uncertain.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core scores (R23 multi 15998) will accelerate export and rendering, while the GPU can assist in effects and previews, but its 4 GB VRAM may be insufficient for large 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU is well suited for CPU-based renderers, but the GPU's low compute score (PassMark GPU compute 4419) means GPU rendering will be slow. The CPU will carry the workload.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread and multi-thread scores are strong, so compilation, test suites, and virtual machines will run well. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but the integrated Iris Xe can handle display output.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score (PassMark single-thread 3483) ensures snappy responsiveness, and the GPU is more than enough for basic graphics and video. This is a capable workstation for everyday tasks, though the GPU is not needed for such work.

Who Should Build It

This combination is best for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU power. That includes developers who compile code, engineers running simulations, video editors working with CPU-based codecs, and anyone who needs a fast laptop CPU for productivity. The GPU is sufficient for light gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not intended for high-end gaming or rendering. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking means it outperforms most processors on the market, while the 44th percentile GPU is below average. This is a machine for CPU-bound workloads, not graphics-bound ones.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $502, but the GPU has no listed MSRP. The system is mobile, so upgradeability is limited, but the CPU is already high-end.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is soldered (BGA 1744) and the GPU is part of the laptop, so neither component is user-upgradeable. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the memory is also likely soldered or limited to SODIMM slots. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The power supply is not specified, and the CPU TDP is 45 W, with the GPU TDP also 45 W, suggesting a total load of about 90 W for the CPU and GPU together, but the exact PSU headroom is not given. The GPU has no power connectors, being an IGP (integrated GPU) in a mobile design, so the laptop motherboard handles power.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to add more memory (if possible) or to use an external GPU (eGPU) via the PCIe lanes, but that would require a compatible enclosure and is not a direct part of this build. For the CPU, the next step would be a higher-tier Raptor Lake-H or a newer generation, but that is not possible without a new motherboard. The platform is a dead end for CPU upgrades, but the existing CPU is already strong.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all FPS discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's percentile is 44th, and its average benchmark score is 8746. In PassMark DirectX tests, it scores 152 in DirectX 9, 94 in DirectX 11, 61 in DirectX 10, and 55 in DirectX 12. These scores are low, suggesting that the GPU will struggle with modern titles at high settings. The GPU also has 4 GB VRAM, which is low for 1440p or 4K textures. The CPU, however, is capable of feeding the GPU in most scenarios.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU can handle high refresh rates, but the GPU will limit frame rates. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Fortnite, the GPU might manage medium settings at 60 FPS, but for AAA games, low settings or lower resolutions would be necessary. At 1440p, the GPU would be the bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread score of 3483 suggests it can handle game logic and physics well, but the GPU will not keep up. The lack of measured FPS means we cannot give exact numbers, but the percentile ranking and the GPU's compute scores indicate that this is not a gaming system for high settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU has an average benchmark score of 32076, which places it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival CPU is the Intel Core i5-14450HX with an average score of 32040 (delta +0.1%), the i5-14400 (32115, delta -0.1%), the i7-12800H (32121, delta -0.1%), and the i9-11900 (32226, delta -0.5%). This shows the i7-13705H is statistically tied with these parts, all within 0.5% of each other.

The GPU has an average benchmark score of 8746, placing it at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the GTX 460 v2 (8743, delta 0%), the Quadro P2200 (8686, delta +0.7%), the Radeon R9 M265X (8851, delta -1.2%), and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 (8863, delta -1.3%). The GPU is also close to these parts, but all are low-end or older.

The combined percentile is 63, which is between the CPU and GPU percentiles. This means that the system is above average overall, but the CPU is the main driver of that score.

FAQ

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, so the CPU cannot be overclocked.

Q: What memory types does the i7-13705H support?

A: It supports DDR4 and DDR5, in dual-channel mode.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to a desktop i5-14400?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 32076, while the i5-14400 scores 32115, a delta of -0.1%, meaning they are essentially identical.

Q: Is the GPU capable of ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 14 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, so it can run ray-traced effects, but its low performance will make ray tracing impractical in modern games.

Q: What is the TDP of the GPU?

A: The GPU TDP is 45 W, matching the CPU's TDP.

Q: Does the system have a discrete power connector for the GPU?

A: No, the GPU has no power connectors; it is an IGP design, so power is provided by the motherboard.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 63rd.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is a 30-series Ampere GPU built on Samsung's 8nm process. The chip is the GA106, with a die size of 276 mm² and 12,000 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1065 MHz, boost clock is 1343 MHz, and the memory clock is 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The shading units number 1792, with 56 TMUs and 32 ROPs. There are 14 RT cores and 56 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and AI workloads. The pixel rate is 42.98 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 75.21 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.813 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 4.813 TFLOPS (1:1).

The GPU's benchmark scores are modest. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 52998. PassMark DirectX 9 scores 152, DirectX 10 scores 61, DirectX 11 scores 94, and DirectX 12 scores 55. The PassMark G2D score is 526, and G3D is 11664. The GPU compute score is 4419. The average benchmark score is 8746, placing it at the 44th percentile. The nearest rivals are the GTX 460 v2, Quadro P2200, Radeon R9 M265X, and Radeon Pro WX 5100, all with similar scores.

The GPU's memory capacity of 4 GB is a limitation for modern games, and the 192 GB/s bandwidth is low by today's standards. The RT cores and tensor cores are present, but the overall compute power is low. The GPU is end-of-life and is marked as production status "End-of-life" and was released in December 2023. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are portable-device dependent, meaning the laptop's ports are determined by the manufacturer. The GPU's TDP is 45 W, and it has no power connectors. This is a low-power, low-performance GPU that is suitable for basic graphics, light gaming, and some compute, but it is not a high-end part. The CPU is the dominant component in this build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13705H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds