SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

71,768 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates at a 2.40 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.00 GHz, within a 45 W TDP envelope. The core configuration is split between performance and efficiency cores, which is characteristic of Raptor Lake-H, and the chip includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 80 KB of L1 per core. This cache hierarchy and core count make it a strong candidate for heavily threaded workloads, but the single-core performance is where the boost clock plays a critical role.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32076. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 15998, while the single-core score is 2258. The R20 multicore score is 6719, and the single-core score is 948. These numbers indicate a processor that is roughly balanced for both productivity and lightly threaded tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 24460, combined with an integer math score of 85927 and a floating point math score of 63064, suggests strong computational throughput for scientific and financial workloads. The data compression score of 273720 is particularly high, indicating excellent performance in archiving and file compression tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, this chip is essentially in a dead heat. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has an average score of 32040, just 0.1% lower, while the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115, 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i7-12800H matches at 32121, also 0.1% higher, and the Intel Core i9-11900 leads the pack at 32226, 0.5% higher. These deltas are within noise margins, meaning the i7-13705H does not have a meaningful advantage or disadvantage over these specific alternatives in average benchmark terms. Real-world differences will come from power delivery, cooling, and platform features rather than raw compute differences.

The single-thread Passmark score of 3483, alongside the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 227, shows that the 5.00 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software. The R15 multicore score of 1612 further confirms that this is a high-performance mobile part, not a low-power ultrabook chip. For developers, the Passmark extended instructions score of 15810 and encryption score of 16324 indicate solid AVX-512 and AES-NI performance, which accelerates cryptographic operations and SIMD-heavy code compilation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Intel Core i7-13705H with the AMD Radeon RX 6650M creates a system where the CPU is not the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 91st percentile, meaning the GPU is statistically the stronger component relative to its peer group. This imbalance suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the GPU will be waiting on the processor, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU has headroom to spare.

The combined percentile for this pair is 87, which indicates a well-matched system overall, but the delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles is telling. The GPU's average benchmark score is 71768, while the CPU's average score is 32076, and the GPU's percentile advantage of 9 points suggests that at high resolutions and ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. Conversely, at lower resolutions or in CPU-intensive tasks like physics simulation, the CPU's 45 W TDP and 14-core design will handle the load without becoming a constraint.

The Passmark physics score of 1854 and the data encryption score of 16324 reinforce that the CPU is capable of handling real-time physics and secure data processing without stuttering. The GPU's pixel rate of 154.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 270.6 GTexel/s are strong for a mobile part, but the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth over a 128-bit bus is a potential limiting factor in high-resolution texture streaming. The CPU's dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 helps feed the GPU, but the 8 GB VRAM on the GPU could become a constraint in future titles that exceed that capacity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15998 places it firmly in the upper mid-range for mobile processors, while the single-core score of 2258 is competitive with desktop parts from a few generations ago. The Passmark multithread score of 24460 and single-thread score of 3483 provide a balanced picture: this is a chip that can handle both heavy multi-threaded renders and snappy single-threaded responsiveness. The average benchmark score of 32076 at the 82nd percentile means it outperforms roughly 82% of all CPUs in the database.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 65800, and the Vulkan score is 77735, with an average benchmark score of 71768 at the 91st percentile. This places the RX 6650M ahead of the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal, which scores 72098, by 0.5%, and ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64, which scores 72379, by 0.8%. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE by 1.3%, which scores 70829, and leads the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition by 2.2%, which scores 73370. These deltas indicate that the RX 6650M is a high-end mobile GPU that can compete with older desktop flagship cards in compute workloads.

The combined picture is a laptop that excels in both CPU and GPU compute tasks. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 91st percentile, combined with an overall system percentile of 87, suggest that this is a high-performance machine for content creation, gaming, and development. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores, but the underlying compute power is clearly present.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh displays will find this combination suitable, as the GPU's 91st percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-core performance support high frame rates in esports and AAA titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games at these resolutions with high settings, but users planning to play at 4K should expect to lower settings or accept lower frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15998 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65800, which accelerate rendering and export tasks. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle timeline scrubbing and effect stacking, while the GPU's 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 performance handles GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The data compression score of 273720 also makes this a strong choice for archivists and backup workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multithreaded performance, with the Passmark integer math score of 85927 indicating rapid build times. The encryption score of 16324 is relevant for security-focused development, and the extended instructions score of 15810 supports SIMD-heavy applications like game engines and scientific computing. The 24 MB L3 cache also reduces cache misses in large codebases.

Students and small business workstations that run office suites, web development tools, and virtual machines will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3483 sufficient for responsive multitasking. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but the system's overall performance headroom ensures longevity. The 45 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP are reasonable for a laptop chassis, making this a viable option for mobile professionals.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13705H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not user-upgradeable. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus provides some flexibility in configuring the system, but the BGA socket means the processor is fixed at purchase time. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 lanes for the CPU allows for fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 120 W TDP suggest that a system with this pairing requires adequate cooling and a power supply that can handle the combined load. The GPU has no power connectors, indicating it draws power from the motherboard, and the suggested PSU is not specified in the data, so users should rely on the OEM's power delivery design. The GPU is end-of-life, so the upgrade path for graphics is not through this specific model, but the PCIe interface allows for future external GPU enclosures if the laptop supports them.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported by the dual-channel controller, as the CPU's performance is not memory-bandwidth-limited in most benchmarks. The storage subsystem can be upgraded to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives to take advantage of the CPU's 8 Gen 5 lanes, though the practical benefit over Gen 4 drives is minimal for most workloads. The GPU is soldered or integrated into the motherboard, so the only meaningful upgrade is the entire laptop.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is well-supported by the RX 6650M's 91st percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-core performance. The GPU's Vulkan score of 77735 indicates robust DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, which are standard in modern game engines. Frame rates will be high, but exact numbers are estimates due to the lack of measured FPS data.

Streaming gameplay while gaming is feasible because the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads can handle encoding workloads alongside game logic. The Passmark multithread score of 24460 and the hardware encoder on the GPU (not specified in the data, but implied by the architecture) would offload encoding from the CPU, though the lack of specific encoder data means this is an inference from the GPU's compute capabilities.

Video editing in software like Adobe Premiere Pro will leverage the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15998 for export rendering, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 65800 accelerates effects and transitions. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines with moderate effects, but longer timelines with heavy color grading may push beyond this capacity.

3D rendering in Blender or similar applications will rely heavily on the GPU's 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the CPU's multithreaded score. The GPU's 28 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, and the 1792 shading units handle rasterization. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache helps with scene graph traversal.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high integer math score of 85927 and extended instructions score of 15810, which accelerate compilation and code analysis. The 20 threads allow parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 3483 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The encryption score of 16324 supports secure shell sessions and VPNs without performance degradation.

Student and office work is more than adequately served by this hardware. The single-thread performance handles spreadsheet recalculation and document rendering, while the multithreaded score ensures smooth multitasking with many browser tabs and applications open. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides a fallback for display output, though the discrete GPU handles any 3D tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 91st percentile and the CPU's 82nd percentile suggest that this system is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with ultra settings. The GPU's pixel rate of 154.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 270.6 GTexel/s are strong indicators of rasterization performance.

At 1080p ultra, the CPU's single-core score of 3483 ensures that frame pacing is not CPU-limited in most titles, while the GPU's 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 performance can push high frame rates in esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs. The 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the 128-bit bus may become a bottleneck in games that aggressively stream high-resolution assets.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU's 91st percentile ranking means it should deliver playable frame rates in most AAA games, though the 8 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in or reduced settings in VRAM-heavy titles. The CPU's 14 cores handle background tasks like Discord and streaming without impacting gaming performance. The Vulkan score of 77735 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based titles, which are becoming more common.

At 4K, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM are clear limitations, and users should expect to lower settings to high or medium to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU will not be a bottleneck at this resolution, as the GPU will be fully saturated. The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations, not precise figures.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i7-13705H's architecture and process node?

A: It is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-H, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 6650M compare to the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal in compute benchmarks?

A: The RX 6650M has an average benchmark score of 71768, which is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal's score of 72098.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 15998, with a single-core score of 2258.

Q: Does the RX 6650M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 28 RT cores, and its architecture is RDNA 2.0, which supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and bus width?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning it is not unlocked for overclocking.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650M is based on the Navi 23 chip, built on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The architecture is RDNA 2.0, which includes 28 RT cores and 1792 shading units, alongside 112 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2068 MHz and boosts to 2416 MHz, with a game clock of 2222 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective, across an 8 GB GDDR6 interface with a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute performance is substantial: FP32 throughput is 8.659 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 17.32 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 154.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 270.6 GTexel/s. These figures place the GPU at the 91st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 71768. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65800 and Vulkan score of 77735 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The GPU is end-of-life, released in January 2022, and has no successor listed in the data.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RX 6650M slightly trails the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal by 0.5% and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 by 0.8%, but it leads the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE by 1.3% and the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition by 2.2%. These deltas are small, but they show that this mobile GPU is competitive with older desktop flagship cards. For rendering workloads, the 28 RT cores accelerate ray tracing in supported engines, while the 1792 shading units handle traditional rasterization. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large scenes or high-resolution textures, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most current games and moderate content creation. The GPU's 120 W TDP is reasonable for a mobile part, and the lack of power connectors means it draws power from the motherboard, simplifying laptop design.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13705H

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds