SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + AMD Radeon RX 6600S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600S

10,629 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13705H paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600S is a mobile platform configuration that presents a significant imbalance between processor capability and graphics throughput. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake-H part, ranks in the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU, a Navi 23-based RDNA 2.0 chip, sits at the 49th percentile. This document analyzes the performance characteristics of this pairing strictly from benchmark data, noting that no measured frame rates exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Radeon RX 6600S, with its 49th percentile standing, is not positioned for high-refresh-rate gaming at demanding settings. Its DirectX 12 benchmark score of 56 and DirectX 11 score of 105 suggest modest frame generation capability, making high refresh rates (e.g., 144 Hz) achievable only in less demanding esports titles at lower graphical presets. The CPU is more than capable of feeding frames, evidenced by its 82nd percentile ranking, but the GPU will be the constraining factor in this scenario.

Streaming: The CPU's robust multi-threaded performance, highlighted by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998, provides ample headroom for software encoding of a stream while maintaining game performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24460 further supports this, indicating the processor can handle the simultaneous load of gaming and encoding without breaking a sweat. The GPU's performance, however, will limit the base game's graphical fidelity, potentially making the stream less sharp.

Video Editing: The combination is workable for 1080p video editing, with the CPU excelling in tasks like rendering and effects processing. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6719 and PassMark data compression score of 273720 are strong indicators of quick timeline rendering and export times. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for basic GPU-accelerated effects, but the 49th percentile score suggests it will struggle with complex, high-resolution compositions.

3D Rendering: This workload is heavily CPU-bound, and the i7-13705H delivers outstanding performance. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1612 and the high PassMark integer math score of 85927 indicate excellent processing power for ray tracing and physics calculations in 3D software. The RX 6600S is less relevant here, though its 7.168 TFLOPS FP32 performance can assist with viewport rendering, but its 49th percentile ranking means it will not accelerate final-frame rendering significantly.

Software Development: The 14-core, 20-thread configuration is ideal for compilation and running multiple containerized applications. The PassMark floating point math score of 63064 and the 82nd percentile CPU rank suggest fast code compilation, while the 20 threads allow for smooth multitasking between development environments, databases, and virtual machines. The GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant for this workload, making the pairing sufficient for a developer's workstation.

Student and Office Work: This is a scenario where the hardware is massively overqualified. Office productivity, web browsing, and document creation are single-threaded and light-threaded tasks where the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2258 excels. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU could handle these tasks, and the discrete GPU adds little value here. The 45W TDP of the CPU is a consideration for battery life, but the performance is undeniably potent for this use case.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32076, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a very strong showing, positioning it just ahead of the Intel Core i5-14450HX (32040) by 0.1% and slightly behind the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226) by -0.5%. Its nearest rivals are extremely close in performance, indicating a highly competitive segment. Specific scores include a PassMark single-thread score of 3483 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998.

The GPU presents a stark contrast. Its average benchmark score is 10629, which places it in the 49th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-pack result, nearly identical to the AMD Radeon R9 M275X (10582), which is 0.4% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti (10690), which is 0.6% faster. The PassMark G3D score of 12649 is the primary metric here, while the compute score is 4879. The combined percentile for this laptop configuration is 66, reflecting the drag exerted by the GPU's lower standing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a Raptor Lake-H architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that typically combines 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores to balance power and throughput. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, which can boost up to 5.00 GHz for demanding single-threaded tasks. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache.

The benchmark results confirm the processor's dual nature. The high boost clock is evident in the PassMark single-thread score of 3483 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2258, which are excellent for everyday application responsiveness. The multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R20 multi-core result of 6719 and the PassMark multithread score of 24460, demonstrate the raw power available when all cores are engaged. The PassMark physics score of 1854 and the find prime numbers score of 116 further illustrate its computational density. This is a top-tier mobile processor, and its 82nd percentile ranking is well-deserved.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but have modest graphics requirements. Content creators working with video editing or 3D modeling will find the processor a boon for rendering and export, though they must manage expectations for GPU-accelerated previews. Software developers compiling large codebases or running multiple virtual machines will benefit immensely from the 20 threads and high multi-core scores.

Gamers who prioritize competitive esports titles over AAA graphical showcases are a target audience. The CPU will keep frame rates high in games that are CPU-bound, and the GPU is sufficient for medium settings at 1080p. Students and small business workstations that require a snappy system for multitasking and productivity will find this more than adequate, though the discrete GPU is an unnecessary addition for their needs. The pairing is less suitable for gamers targeting high-fidelity 1440p or 4K experiences, as the GPU's 49th percentile score will be a clear bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is fundamentally unbalanced, with the CPU being the clear dominant component. The data indicates a significant disparity: the CPU sits in the 82nd percentile while the GPU is in the 49th. In CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering, code compilation, and file compression (PassMark data compression 273720), the processor will be the performance driver, and the GPU will be mostly idle.

Conversely, in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, the RX 6600S becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 56 and DirectX 11 score of 105 are low, suggesting that frame rates will be constrained by the graphics card's fill rate and pixel throughput (128.0 GPixel/s). Even with the CPU pushing frames as fast as it can, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will cap performance in modern titles. The CPU will not be a bottleneck in any graphics-intensive scenario; the GPU will always be the first to saturate.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600S is a mobile graphics processor based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The GPU has 28 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

The clock speeds are 1700 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, with a game clock of 1881 MHz. The GPU's performance, as measured by the PassMark G3D score of 12649, is modest. Its FP32 performance is 7.168 TFLOPS, which is low by contemporary standards. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant concern for modern games, as it will likely be exceeded at high resolutions or with high texture quality settings. The 49th percentile ranking, which places it alongside the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti, underscores its position as a lower-mid-range part that is now end-of-life (production status), despite supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12649 and its DirectX 12 score of 56 indicate that it is capable of playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to low settings in most AAA titles. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are less demanding, the CPU's raw speed will allow the GPU to push higher frame rates, potentially reaching high refresh rates at 1080p with competitive settings.

At 1440p, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles due to its 4 GB VRAM and limited bandwidth. The 128.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests that fill-rate-bound scenes will be problematic. Frame rates at 4K are not feasible for modern gaming. In summary, this is a 1080p gaming laptop, and even then, it is best suited for medium settings in newer games, relying on the CPU to keep the frame pacing smooth.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable mobile package. The CPU itself is not user-replaceable. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, but the specifics of the motherboard will dictate which type is used. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU, but the GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU has a TDP of 45W, and the GPU has a TDP of 80W, for a combined thermal load of 125W. The suggested PSU is not specified, but a capable power supply is required for a laptop of this class. The GPU is marked as "IGP" slot width, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be replacing the entire laptop, as the BGA socket and soldered GPU preclude component-level upgrades. The only potential upgrade is increasing system memory to DDR5 if the board supports it, but the GPU's limitations would remain the primary bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13705H compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14450HX?

A: The i7-13705H has an average benchmark score of 32076, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14450HX's score of 32040. The performance difference is negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile, and how does it rank against the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600S is in the 49th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score is 10629, which is 0.6% slower than the GTX 560 Ti's average score of 10690.

Q: Is this laptop suitable for 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, for CPU-based rendering. The i7-13705H's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 and PassMark multithread score of 24460 indicate exceptional processing power for rendering tasks.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 6600S?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, achieved with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13705H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types, according to the memory support specification.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop configuration?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 66, indicating that the overall system performance is above average, but heavily weighted by the strong CPU.

Q: Are the gaming frame rates for this laptop measured or estimated?

A: They are estimated. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so frame rates are inferred from the GPU's benchmark scores, such as its PassMark G3D score of 12649.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: laptop) that pairs a high-end mobile processor with a mid-range mobile graphics card. The Intel Core i7-13705H is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H processor that ranks in the 82nd percentile, making it one of the stronger mobile CPUs available. The AMD Radeon RX 6600S is a RDNA 2.0 GPU with 4 GB of VRAM that ranks in the 49th percentile, placing it firmly in the middle of the performance pack. The overall system, with a combined percentile of 66, is a workstation-leaning laptop that excels at processor-intensive tasks like development, rendering, and video editing, while offering only modest gaming capability at 1080p. It is a system defined by its CPU prowess and constrained by its GPU.