SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

46,702 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13705H paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6550M represents a mobile configuration aimed at balancing high-performance processing with dedicated graphics in a laptop form factor. This analysis draws exclusively from benchmark data, which shows a system that sits in the 84th percentile overall, indicating a capable machine for demanding tasks. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H part, while the GPU is an entry-level RDNA 2.0 discrete solution. It is important to note upfront that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the raw benchmark scores of the individual components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H mobile variant, and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². This processor features a hybrid configuration of 14 cores and 20 threads, a combination designed to handle both high-intensity single-threaded tasks and heavily parallelized workloads. With a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, the chip can dynamically scale its frequency to meet demand, providing substantial headroom for bursty tasks like application launches or compiling single-threaded code.

The cache hierarchy is robust, featuring 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This large pool of fast memory is critical for keeping the 20 threads fed with data, reducing latency, and improving overall throughput in complex simulations and datasets. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving system integrators flexibility in balancing cost and bandwidth, though the exact bandwidth figures are not specified in the data.

Benchmark results indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15998 points places the chip in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, showing it is a formidable mobile processor. The single-core score of 2258 in the same test is equally telling, as it demonstrates the high boost clock's effectiveness in lightly-threaded scenarios. The Passmark multithread score of 24460 and integer math score of 85927 corroborate the Cinebench results, suggesting that the CPU excels in productivity and computation-heavy applications. The floating-point math score of 63064 further confirms its capability in scientific and engineering simulations.

The nearest rival data shows this chip is positioned in a tight cluster. The Intel Core i5-14450HX scores an average of 32040, which is only 0.1% lower than the i7-13705H's average benchmark score of 32076. Conversely, the Intel Core i5-14400 and Intel Core i7-12800H are 0.1% higher, and the Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.5% higher. This places the i7-13705H in a competitive bracket where performance differences are negligible in real-world terms. The data suggests that while this is not a flagship chip, it delivers performance that rivals previous-generation high-end desktop parts and current mid-range mobile offerings. For real workloads, users can expect snappy responsiveness, rapid code compilation, and efficient handling of multi-threaded rendering tasks, though it will not lead the charts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-13705H and the AMD Radeon RX 6550M is a study in asymmetry. The CPU, with a percentile rank of 82, is a significantly stronger component than the GPU, which holds the 85th percentile rank. However, the nature of their workloads means that the GPU will often be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios. The CPU's high multi-threaded throughput, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15998, is far ahead of what the GPU can consistently feed in gaming contexts, meaning that at lower resolutions, the GPU will likely become saturated first.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark score of 273720) or encryption (16324), the GPU plays no role, and the processor dictates performance. The system is not inherently unbalanced; it is a question of workload. For gaming, the RX 6550M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain performance, making the GPU the primary bottleneck in modern titles. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and high boost clock will ensure that it is never the cause of stutter, but the GPU will cap maximum frame rates. The data does not include FPS scaling figures, so the exact extent of the bottleneck cannot be quantified. Still, the vast difference in compute resources—the GPU's 5.816 TFLOPS FP32 versus the CPU's ability to sustain high integer and floating-point throughput—suggests that the pairing is optimized for general productivity first and gaming second.

Gaming Performance

Data availability note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are qualitative estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's benchmarks, the Radeon RX 6550M achieves a Geekbench Vulkan score of 50867, which is a strong result for its class. This score, combined with the CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2258), suggests that the system can handle esports titles and older games at high frame rates. For modern AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM capacity will be a limiting factor at higher resolutions and texture settings. The GPU's pixel rate of 90.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 181.8 GTexel/s indicate it can fill frames quickly, but the narrow 64-bit memory bus and 144.0 GB/s bandwidth will throttle performance in memory-heavy scenes.

At 1080p resolution, the system should deliver playable frame rates in most titles with medium to high settings, though users may need to lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay in the latest releases. The CPU's performance ensures that frame pacing will be stable, with no processor-induced bottlenecks. At 1440p and above, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates due to VRAM and bandwidth constraints, making 1080p the optimal resolution for this configuration. The absence of measured FPS data means these are educated guesses based on the compute scores, but the hardware characteristics support this assessment.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is aimed at users who need a portable workstation with strong multi-threaded CPU performance and moderate discrete graphics capability. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, as the 20 threads and high cache capacity significantly reduce build times. Data analysts and engineers working with large datasets will benefit from the Passmark data compression score of 273720, which indicates rapid data processing. The presence of Iris Xe Graphics 96EU as an integrated GPU also provides a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, saving power.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15998 to be a solid foundation for rendering tasks. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit the complexity of GPU-accelerated effects. Students in STEM fields will appreciate the processing power for simulations and virtual machines, while small business workstations can leverage the CPU's encryption score of 16324 for secure communications. This is not a system for hardcore gamers seeking maximum FPS, but rather for users who need a responsive, powerful CPU for work and a capable GPU for occasional gaming or light creative tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this system is strong. The CPU holds an 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32076. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14450HX, scores 32040, a delta of 0.1%, placing them in a statistical tie. The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6550M, holds an 85th percentile rank among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46702. The closest rival, the Intel Arc A530M, scores 46614, a 0.2% delta. This puts the GPU in a slightly higher percentile position than the CPU, suggesting that the graphics card is actually a relative strength in this pairing compared to the processor.

The combined percentile for the entire system is 84th, which is a healthy position for a laptop configuration. This indicates that the system is in the top 16% of all tested configurations, making it a high-performing machine. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3483 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 42536 paint a picture of a system that is exceptionally well-rounded. It does not have a single standout component that dominates its class, but rather a combination of two above-average parts that work well together. The data shows no weakness in the compute chain, though the GPU's memory subsystem is a potential concern for future-proofing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system can push high frame rates in competitive titles like esports shooters, given the CPU's strong single-core performance and the GPU's Vulkan score of 50867. However, the 4 GB VRAM will cap performance in more demanding games, making 1080p with medium settings the practical limit for high-refresh play.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15998 ensures that the processor can handle the game logic and the encoding workload simultaneously. The GPU's lack of dedicated encoding hardware is not a factor, as the CPU can handle the task efficiently.

Video Editing: Timeline scrubbing and effect rendering will be responsive due to the CPU's high multithread score. The GPU's 144.0 GB/s bandwidth will aid in real-time previews of 1080p footage, but 4K editing with heavy effects may strain the 4 GB VRAM.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the 15998 Cinebench R23 score is a strong asset, delivering quick render times for scenes. GPU-accelerated renderers will see moderate performance, with the 5.816 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate providing a decent boost over integrated graphics.

Software Development: Compilation times will be short, thanks to the 20 threads and high L3 cache. The Passmark integer math score of 85927 is particularly relevant for code execution, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory stalls in large projects.

Student and Office Work: The system is overqualified for standard productivity, with the CPU's single-thread score ensuring snappy app launches. The Iris Xe integrated graphics provide a low-power option for simple tasks, extending battery life.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 32076, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14450HX and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i5-14400.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6550M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 144.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the system support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU holds an 85th percentile rank among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46702.

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics usable?

A: Yes, the CPU integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, which can be used for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Q: What is the system's overall performance percentile?

A: The combined system holds an 84th percentile rank, indicating it performs better than 84% of tested configurations.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13705H with the AMD Radeon RX 6550M in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H mobile processor, while the GPU is a Radeon RX 6000 series part based on the Navi 24 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture. The system's combined percentile of 84 places it in the upper echelon of laptop configurations, indicating a high-performance tier. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 85th percentile show that both components are well above average, though neither is a top-tier flagship. This is a balanced machine that prioritizes multi-threaded CPU performance and offers a solid, if not spectacular, discrete GPU for graphics tasks. It is a mid-to-high-end laptop configuration suitable for professionals and power users.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses an Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded without replacing the motherboard or entire laptop. The system supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, offering a future upgrade path for increasing RAM capacity, though the maximum capacity is not specified. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for connecting an external GPU or fast NVMe storage, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface. The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and does not require a suggested PSU, as it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor, meaning it draws power from the laptop's main power delivery system. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the combined thermal load is manageable for a laptop chassis. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase memory capacity and speed, as the CPU's dual-channel memory controller can benefit from faster DDR5 modules. Storage upgrades are also viable, leveraging the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for ultra-fast NVMe SSDs, though the exact number of M.2 slots is not specified.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Navi 24 chip, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, with a transistor density of 50.5M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz, a game clock of 2560 MHz, and a boost clock of 2840 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 144.0 GB/s. This narrow memory bus is the primary architectural limitation, as it restricts the amount of data that can be transferred between the GPU and VRAM, which is critical for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The compute unit configuration includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. It also features 16 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games, though the overall RT performance is limited by the low core count and memory bandwidth. The GPU's raw compute performance is rated at 5.816 TFLOPS for FP32 and 11.63 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 90.88 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 181.8 GTexel/s. In Geekbench benchmarks, the GPU scores 42536 in OpenCL and 50867 in Vulkan, placing it in the 85th percentile. The nearest rival, the Intel Arc A530M, scores 46614, a 0.2% delta, while the NVIDIA RTX A2000 is 1.4% higher. These scores indicate that the GPU performs well for its class, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are significant constraints for modern gaming. In rendering workloads, the GPU can handle tasks like photo editing and video transcoding efficiently, but it will struggle with large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures that exceed its VRAM capacity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13705H

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds