SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13705H and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a high-tier laptop configuration, sitting at the 77th percentile overall. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a modern RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution. This combination is unusual: a strong multi-threaded processor paired with an integrated GPU that performs near entry-level discrete graphics. The data shows a system designed for productivity and light gaming rather than high-end 3D rendering, with the CPU clearly being the dominant component in terms of performance headroom.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a 14-core processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and features a total of 24 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The processor has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. It is not multiplier-unlocked and uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, indicating a mobile-focused design.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 82nd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32076. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-14450HX, which scores 32040, a delta of just 0.1% — essentially a statistical tie. The i7-13705H also trades blows with the Intel Core i5-14400 (32115, -0.1%) and the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, -0.1%). This means the i7-13705H sits at the top of a very tight cluster of high-performance mobile and desktop parts. The margin over the Intel Core i9-11900 is slightly larger at -0.5%, but still within a narrow band.

Looking at specific workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded performance, which is critical for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 2258 in the same test shows excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark integer math score of 85927 and floating-point math score of 63064 reinforce this picture of a well-rounded processor. Data compression tasks score 273720 in Passmark, while encryption scores 16324, indicating strong capability in these areas. The processor's 20 threads allow it to handle heavy parallel workloads effectively, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks, such as older games or spreadsheet calculations, run without latency issues.

The integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units is present, but for this build, the primary graphics solution is the discrete AMD Radeon 860M. The CPU itself is the performance leader, with its 82nd percentile ranking far exceeding the GPU's 72nd percentile. In terms of memory, the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides adequate bandwidth for both the CPU and the integrated GPU, though the actual system memory configuration will affect overall performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The estimated FPS figures are not measured for this exact combination, but the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2258) will not bottleneck modern game engines. However, the GPU, with a 72nd percentile ranking, is the limiting factor. At high refresh rates, expect playable framerates at 1080p with reduced settings, but not high-refresh at high detail levels.

Streaming: The 20 threads and 45 W TDP provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998) is more than sufficient for x264 encoding at medium presets. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores is not a concern here, as the CPU can handle the encoding load without impacting gaming performance too severely.

Video editing: This workload benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded muscle. The Passmark multithread score of 24460 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6719 indicate that timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will be responsive. The GPU can accelerate some effects via OpenCL (Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759), but the heavy lifting is done by the CPU.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. With a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1612 and R23 multi-core of 15998, rendering times will be competitive with desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-14400. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not suited for GPU rendering; expect CPU-only rendering to be the primary workflow.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The Passmark data encryption score of 16324 and extended instructions score of 15810 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, useful for compiling and testing. The single-thread score of 3483 ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2258) makes everyday tasks like word processing, web browsing, and spreadsheets feel instant. The integrated GPU is overkill for these tasks, and the 45 W TDP is manageable in a laptop chassis. This is a capable machine for any academic workload.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, placing it in the upper quarter of all systems. The CPU's average benchmark score is 32076, with a percentile of 82. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, with a percentile of 72. This gap of 10 percentile points indicates that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 22759, and its Vulkan score is 30043. These are respectable numbers for an integrated GPU. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which scores 26421, a delta of -0.1% — again, a statistical tie. The AMD Radeon 860M also compares closely to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331, +0.3%) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.6%). This is a significant finding: an integrated GPU performing within 0.6% of a desktop Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is remarkable for an IGP, though the latter is an older, special edition card.

The CPU's benchmarks show a clear strength in multi-threaded workloads. The Passmark multithread score of 24460 is high, and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6719 confirms this. The single-thread Passmark score of 3483 is also strong, showing no weakness in lightly-threaded tasks. The combined picture is a system with exceptional CPU performance and good, but not equally exceptional, GPU performance. The data suggests that this build is aimed at users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks such as rendering, compilation, and data processing, while still wanting the capability to play games at moderate settings.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need serious CPU horsepower without a discrete GPU. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, and software development, where multi-core performance is paramount. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 is evidence of its capability in these fields.

Developers will appreciate the 20 threads and fast single-core speed (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2258) for rapid code compilation and responsive tooling. The data encryption and extended instruction scores from Passmark (16324 and 15810, respectively) support this use case.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will find this system capable of handling everything from virtual machines to simulation software. The CPU's performance ensures no lag in demanding academic applications.

Small business workstations that run financial modeling, database management, or complex spreadsheets will benefit from the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking. The Passmark data compression score of 273720 indicates strong database and archiving performance.

For gamers, this is not a high-end gaming laptop. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking means it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the CPU is overkill for gaming alone. This build makes more sense for users who game occasionally but need a workstation-class CPU for their primary tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU's 82nd percentile versus the GPU's 72nd percentile means that in most workloads, the GPU will reach its limits before the CPU is fully utilized. For gaming, this means that FPS will be constrained by the Radeon 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance, not the CPU's processing power.

In CPU-bound tasks, the bottleneck shifts. For workloads like 3D rendering in software (CPU-based), the GPU's performance is irrelevant, and the CPU's 20 threads will be the limiting factor. The average benchmark score of 32076 for the CPU and 26401 for the GPU quantifies this imbalance: the CPU is about 21.5% more powerful on average.

For gaming, the FPS scaling will be dictated by the GPU. At lower resolutions and settings, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3483) will allow the GPU to operate near its maximum potential. At higher resolutions, the GPU will be the sole limiter. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means these are estimates, but the percentile gap provides a clear picture: the CPU is not the constraint.

The system's overall 77th percentile ranking suggests that for mixed workloads, the pairing is well-balanced enough, but for gaming, users should expect the GPU to be the limiting factor. The CPU has significant headroom, meaning that in CPU-light tasks, the system may feel underutilized. For users who prioritize gaming, this pairing will leave performance on the table; for productivity, the CPU is the star.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H scores 32076 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14450HX (32040) and 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-14400 (32115).

Q: How does the GPU compare to a dedicated entry-level graphics card?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401 on average, which is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421) and 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331).

Q: Is this system good for video editing?

A: Yes, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 and Passmark multithread score of 24460 indicate strong performance for video rendering and export tasks.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The Passmark single-thread score is 3483, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2258, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks.

Q: Can this laptop handle 3D rendering?

A: Yes, for CPU-based rendering, the 14 cores and 20 threads are highly capable. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not suited for GPU-accelerated rendering.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M uses System Shared memory, with bandwidth described as System Dependent. This means performance scales with the system's RAM speed.

Q: How does this CPU compare to a desktop Core i9?

A: The i7-13705H is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900 in average benchmark score, showing that this mobile CPU can match a previous-generation desktop flagship.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its base clock is 600 MHz, with a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). It is a 15 W part with a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The GPU's benchmark scores are strong for an integrated solution. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is particularly noteworthy, showing good graphics API efficiency. The OpenCL score of 22759 indicates solid compute performance. The GPU's percentile rank is 72, which places it above the majority of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, scores 26421, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Radeon 860M is essentially equivalent to that entry-level discrete GPU.

For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest. This GPU is not intended for heavy 3D rendering or ray-traced workloads, despite having 8 RT cores. The ray tracing performance is limited by the overall shader throughput. However, for light gaming at 1080p and general graphics acceleration, the Radeon 860M is more than adequate. The memory being System Shared means that the GPU uses the system's RAM, which can be a bottleneck in bandwidth-intensive tasks. The bus width and bandwidth are both System Dependent, so the actual performance will vary based on the laptop's memory configuration.

The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking against all GPUs is impressive for an IGP, but it is still the weaker component in this build. The 3000 MHz boost clock is high for an integrated part, helping to maximize the performance of the 512 shading units. The lack of dedicated VRAM means that texture-heavy games may suffer, but for a productivity-focused laptop, this GPU provides a capable graphics solution without the power draw of a discrete card.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core i7-13705H and AMD Radeon 860M. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H processor with a 45 W TDP, while the GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.5 part with a 15 W TDP. The overall combined percentile is 77, placing this system in the upper quartile of all builds. The CPU ranks at the 82nd percentile, and the GPU at the 72nd percentile, indicating a CPU-heavy configuration.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $502. This is the only price information available. The pairing represents a high-end mobile processor with a mid-tier integrated GPU. This is not a typical combination for gaming laptops, which usually pair a high-end CPU with a discrete GPU. Instead, this build is designed for users who need significant CPU processing power in a laptop form factor without the added cost and power of a discrete GPU.

The system's tier, based on the 77th percentile, is solidly in the performance segment. It will outperform many older desktop systems and most laptops. The CPU's close competition with the Intel Core i5-14400 and i5-14450HX shows that it can deliver desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile package. The GPU's proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 means it can handle light gaming and graphics acceleration, but it is not a gaming powerhouse.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 and its 72nd percentile ranking suggest it can handle modern games at 1080p with medium settings. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2258) ensures that frame pacing will be smooth, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the estimated FPS could be in the high range, possibly exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, given the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance. For more demanding AAA titles, expect 30-60 FPS at 1080p with low settings. The lack of dedicated VRAM and System Shared memory bandwidth will hurt performance in games with large texture packs.

The CPU's 20 threads do not directly help gaming FPS, but they ensure that background tasks, such as Discord or a web browser, do not cause stutters. At 1440p or higher resolutions, the GPU will be heavily overloaded, and FPS will drop significantly. The system is not suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming at high detail settings. Users interested in gaming should consider this a casual gaming machine, capable of running older titles and less demanding games well, but not modern AAA games at high settings. The estimates are based on the GPU's percentile ranking and its similarity to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is a known entry-level gaming solution.