SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13705H + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13705H

32,076 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i7-13705H with the AMD Radeon 740M creates a distinct performance profile for a laptop, where a high-tier 14-core CPU is matched with a modest integrated GPU. The data indicates a system that excels in processor-intensive tasks while remaining firmly entry-level for graphics, a combination that defines its primary use cases and limitations. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores and architectural data to interpret what this pairing means for potential workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU components, with the processor being the clear dominant force. The Intel Core i7-13705H sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. In stark contrast, the AMD Radeon 740M sits at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, placing it squarely in the mid-range for graphics hardware. This gap suggests that in any workload that engages both components, the GPU will consistently be the limiting factor.

The bottleneck becomes apparent when considering the nature of the tasks. For gaming, the GPU's average benchmark score of 12870 will determine frame rates, and the CPU's raw power, while substantial, will be underutilized in most titles. The Radeon 740M’s performance is closely matched by rivals like the AMD FirePro W5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590, with deltaPct values of 0.2 and 0.3 respectively, indicating it performs within a few percentage points of these older discrete cards. This means the system will be limited to lower resolutions and graphical settings to achieve playable frame rates, regardless of the CPU's capability.

However, for workloads that are purely CPU-bound, the bottleneck reverses. The i7-13705H's multi-threaded score of 15998 in Cinebench R23 places it in a class far above its GPU counterpart. In tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the GPU plays a minimal role, and the processor can operate at its full potential. The data shows that the CPU is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i5-14450HX and 0.1% slower than the Intel Core i5-14400 in average benchmark scores, confirming its position among high-performing desktop and mobile chips. This creates a system where the user must be acutely aware of the workload: the CPU will never be the reason a task is slow, but the GPU will frequently be the cause of performance limitations in graphics-intensive applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores paint a picture of a powerful mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multi-core score of 15998 and a single-core score of 2258. The multi-core result is particularly strong, indicating excellent performance for heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 24460 further reinforces this, while the single-thread score of 3483 shows strong per-core performance for everyday tasks. The processor's average benchmark score of 32076 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14400 with an average score of 32115 (0.1% faster) and the Intel Core i7-12800H with 32121 (0.1% faster), showing it is competitive with a range of high-end desktop and mobile parts.

The GPU, on the other hand, delivers modest results. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 10172, and its Vulkan score is 15568, with an average benchmark score of 12870. This places it at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, a far less impressive position than the CPU. Its nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5100 with an average score of 12847 (0.2% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 with 12928 (0.4% faster), which contextualizes its performance as being similar to a mid-range discrete GPU from several generations ago. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, reflecting the strong CPU dragging the overall score upward despite the GPU's mediocrity. The data suggests a system that is a workstation-class processor paired with an entry-level graphics solution, a combination that will excel in productivity but struggle in gaming.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13705H compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14400?

A: The benchmark data shows they are nearly identical in performance. The i7-13705H has an average benchmark score of 32076, which is 0.1% lower than the i5-14400's score of 32115. This indicates they are effectively peers in overall processing capability.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon 740M sits at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 12870 is within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 580, suggesting it performs at a level similar to those older discrete cards.

Q: Does this system have enough processing power for demanding productivity tasks?

A: Yes, the CPU data strongly supports this. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 and a PassMark multithread score of 24460 indicate the processor is highly capable for demanding workloads like video editing and 3D rendering, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Will this laptop be able to play modern games at high settings?

A: No, the data does not support that expectation. The Radeon 740M's average benchmark score of 12870 places it in the mid-range, and its performance is comparable to older GPUs like the GTX 590. This indicates that high-ultra settings at high resolutions will likely be beyond its capability, with playable frame rates expected only at lower settings and resolutions.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this system?

A: The i7-13705H supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The GPU's memory is "System Shared," meaning its memory size, type, and bus width are all dependent on the system's main RAM, and its bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent."

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile-specific platform. The CPU provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, indicating support for a fast connection to discrete components like an NVMe SSD.

Q: Is the CPU's clock speed high?

A: The processor has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This 2.6 GHz difference between base and boost indicates a significant dynamic range, allowing for high single-thread performance when needed.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is best suited for users whose primary workload is processor-intensive and who require graphics for basic display output rather than gaming or high-end creative work. The 82nd percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for professionals in software development, data analysis, and financial modeling, where the multi-core scores of 15998 in Cinebench R23 and 24460 in PassMark multithread would significantly accelerate compilation times, complex calculations, and virtual machine management. Students in STEM fields or small business owners running office applications will find the single-thread score of 3483 ensures a highly responsive system for everyday tasks.

The system is not designed for gamers targeting high-refresh-rate or high-resolution experiences, as the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking and performance comparable to the GTX 590 will limit it to esports titles at 1080p with lower settings. For content creators, the CPU can handle 3D rendering and video encoding, but the GPU will not accelerate these tasks in a meaningful way, making it a poor choice for those who rely on GPU-accelerated effects. The system is a compelling option for users who need a powerful, mobile CPU for heavy computational work and only require an integrated GPU for productivity, media playback, and light photo editing. The 68th combined percentile reflects a system that is far more capable as a computation engine than as a gaming or graphics workstation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-H architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a hybrid design typical of 13th Gen parts, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, allowing it to scale performance dynamically. The CPU has a substantial cache hierarchy with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for feeding the 14 cores with data. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for direct connections to high-speed components.

Benchmark results demonstrate its strong multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998 and the PassMark multithread score of 24460 are indicative of a processor that can handle demanding parallel workloads with ease. The PassMark data compression score of 273720 and integer math score of 85927 suggest the CPU is highly efficient at tasks like file compression and complex calculations. The single-thread performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 score of 2258 and PassMark single-thread score of 3483, ensures that less parallelized tasks like web browsing and office applications remain snappy. The average benchmark score of 32076 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14450HX, being just 0.1% slower. This data shows a processor that is a top-tier mobile part, rivaling many desktop CPUs in performance, and is a clear powerhouse for any CPU-bound workload.

Gaming Performance

This FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the AMD Radeon 740M and should be treated as approximations of expected performance, not exact measurements.

The gaming performance of this system will be dictated entirely by the AMD Radeon 740M, which has an average benchmark score of 12870 and sits at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. This score, which places it in the same performance class as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590, suggests that the GPU is only suitable for light gaming. In modern AAA titles, the expectation is that the system will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at 1080p with high or ultra settings. The GPU’s low pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s indicate a limited ability to fill pixels and apply textures, which will become a bottleneck in graphically demanding scenes.

For esports and competitive titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the data suggests the system could potentially achieve 60 FPS or more at 1080p with medium or low settings, as these games are less demanding on the GPU and more reliant on CPU performance, which is a strength here. However, for any game with modern graphics requirements, the system will likely need to be run at 720p with the lowest settings to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU’s high performance will not be a limiting factor in gaming, but it also cannot compensate for the GPU’s lack of raw power. Users should set their expectations for a casual gaming experience, not a high-performance one.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable. The Radeon 740M's benchmark scores, comparable to the GTX 590, lack the power to drive high frame rates in modern titles, even at lower resolutions. The CPU would be more than capable, but the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for software encoding, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15998. A streamer could use x264 encoding on the CPU without a major performance hit. However, the GPU will struggle to render games at high quality while streaming, so the overall experience would be limited to less demanding titles.

Video Editing: The i7-13705H's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a PassMark multithread score of 24460, will handle timeline editing and rendering for 1080p and some 4K projects effectively. The GPU will not accelerate effects or exports, so render times will be longer than a system with a powerful discrete GPU.

3D Rendering: This is a strong suit for the CPU. The 14 cores and 20 threads will render 3D scenes efficiently, with scores like 6719 in Cinebench R20 multi-core indicating a high level of performance. The GPU is a non-factor in this workload, so the CPU will be the primary driver, making this system a viable option for CPU-based rendering.

Software Development: The CPU's high single-thread score of 3483 and multi-core score of 24460 make it excellent for code compilation, running virtual machines, and managing containers. The fast 5.00 GHz boost clock will also make the system feel highly responsive for coding, debugging, and running local development servers.

Student and Office Work: This is an ideal scenario. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures smooth operation for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet management. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking means the system will remain responsive even with many applications open, and the integrated GPU is more than sufficient for display and video playback.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing an Intel Core i7-13705H processor with an AMD Radeon 740M integrated graphics processor. The CPU is a high-end mobile part from Intel's 13th Gen Raptor Lake family, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads, with a 45 W TDP. The GPU is AMD's entry-level integrated solution, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Phoenix2 chip. The pairing is unusual in that it combines a top-tier CPU with a low-tier GPU, creating a system that is heavily skewed towards processor performance.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 68, which is a reflection of the high-performing CPU being dragged down by the mid-range GPU. The system's overall tier is thus defined by its computational power rather than its graphics ability. It is a system for users who need a powerful mobile workstation for CPU-intensive tasks like programming, data processing, and 3D modeling, and who do not prioritize gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The data clearly shows this is a CPU-centric build, where the processor is the star and the GPU is a functional but unspectacular companion.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13705H is mounted on the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable mobile platform. This means the CPU cannot be swapped out for a newer or more powerful model. The system's upgrade path is therefore limited to components that are not soldered to the motherboard. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so users can potentially upgrade the amount of system RAM, which would also benefit the GPU since it uses "System Shared" memory whose bandwidth is "System Dependent."

The CPU provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are typically used for a high-speed NVMe SSD. Upgrading to a Gen 5 SSD could improve loading times and data transfer rates. The GPU's TDP is 45 W, and since it is an IGP, there is no separate power connector, and the suggested PSU is null. This indicates the system's power delivery is designed for the CPU and other motherboard components, and a future upgrade to a discrete GPU is not possible due to the laptop's form factor. The most sensible upgrades for this platform are increasing RAM capacity and storage speed, as the core processing components are fixed.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 raster operation units, along with 4 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. Its memory is "System Shared," meaning it uses the laptop's main system RAM, with its bandwidth being "System Dependent" on the memory configuration. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

In terms of performance, the Radeon 740M delivers an average benchmark score of 12870, placing it at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 show its compute capabilities. The GPU's performance is closely matched with the AMD FirePro W5100 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590, with deltaPct values of 0.2 and 0.3, respectively. Its theoretical pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. With an FP32 performance of 2.867 TFLOPS, it offers a baseline level of compute power. For rendering, the data suggests this GPU is suitable for 2D tasks and light 3D workloads. The presence of 4 RT cores indicates hardware support for ray tracing, but the low overall performance level means any ray tracing effects will have a significant impact on frame rates, likely making them impractical in modern games.