SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700TE

31,028 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Platform Analysis: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

This pairing combines a 35-watt, 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA’s top-tier workstation GPU, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU, part of Intel’s 13th Gen Core series, is a power-sipping part with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 5 nm Ada Lovelace monster with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory and 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The combined percentile ranking sits at 90, meaning this system outperforms 90% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database. Benchmark data shows a CPU average score of 31,028 and a GPU average score of 184,664, placing both components in the upper echelons of their respective categories. Notably, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 76,300 million transistors packed into a 609 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective 18 Gbps memory clock. This capacity and bandwidth are critical for large dataset workloads, deep learning model training, and high-resolution texture-heavy rendering tasks, where the 32 GB frame buffer prevents out-of-memory errors that would cripple smaller GPUs. The GPU’s 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation processors give it a raw pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s, numbers that indicate exceptional fill-rate capability for high-resolution output. In FP32 compute, the card achieves 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), making it equally adept at single-precision and half-precision workloads—a feature that benefits scientific simulation and AI inference. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and deep learning acceleration, respectively; these are not just marketing features but functional units that significantly accelerate path tracing in renderers and tensor-core-optimized AI frameworks. The GPU’s boost clock of 2550 MHz, up from a 1155 MHz base, indicates substantial thermal and power headroom for sustained compute loads, though the 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU requirement mean system builders must plan for adequate power delivery. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Vulkan score of 194,041, with the GPU ranking in the 98th percentile against all GPUs in the database—a statistic that places it among the elite. Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5000 Ada trails the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3% but leads the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 0.5%, edges the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 1.4%, and beats the GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7% in average benchmark score. For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM combined with 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture throughput ensures that high-polygon scenes and 4K/8K textures load without swapping, while the RT cores accelerate optical effects like reflections and global illumination to near-interactive rates.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,698 and single-core score of 2,639 paint a picture of a processor that trades raw multi-threaded supremacy for efficiency, yet still delivers strong results. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 22,754 and single-thread score of 3,422 further confirm this profile, with the CPU achieving an 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The average CPU benchmark score of 31,028 places it in a tight cluster with rivals: it is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (31,074), 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-12700F (31,081), 0.4% behind the Intel Core 9 273PTE (31,143), and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30,879). These delta percentages are minuscule, meaning the i7-13700TE is functionally competitive with those parts despite its much lower 35 W TDP—a signal of Raptor Lake’s efficiency. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 184,664 is dramatically higher in absolute terms, and its 98th percentile ranking signifies near-top-tier graphics performance. The combined system percentile of 90 reflects that while the CPU is strong (82nd percentile), the GPU is exceptional (98th percentile), and together they create a configuration that excels at GPU-bound tasks. In integer math, the CPU scores 97,911 on Passmark, while floating-point math scores 66,421, indicating balanced arithmetic capability. Data compression scores 243,565, and encryption scores 15,006, the latter being modest due to the lack of dedicated AES hardware acceleration visible in the data. The Passmark extended instructions score of 13,750 shows robust SIMD performance, useful for media encoding and scientific code. The CPU’s physics score of 1,368 is relatively low, which may indicate that the 35 W power envelope constrains sustained all-core loads, but the multi-thread Cinebench R23 score of 18,698 suggests that short-duration bursts are handled well. For the combined picture, this system is designed for tasks where GPU compute dominates, such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and AI inference, while the CPU handles orchestration and data preparation without becoming a severe bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and 194,041 Vulkan score suggest it can drive high refresh rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles, but the CPU’s 82nd percentile and single-thread score of 3,422 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios like esports at lower resolutions; expect the GPU to be the star in GPU-heavy AAA games, while the CPU could cap performance in lightweight titles at 1080p. With 32 GB VRAM, texture-heavy mods and ultra-quality presets are unlikely to exceed memory capacity, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates.

Streaming: The NVENC encoder on the RTX 5000 Ada (implied by its Ada Lovelace architecture) offloads video encoding from the CPU, and the GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute leaves ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding; the CPU’s 24 threads handle streaming software, chat bots, and background tasks without significant contention, though the 35 W TDP may cause thermal throttling under combined gaming plus streaming loads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 22,754 indicates sufficient parallel throughput for OBS and companion apps.

Video Editing: In applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM accelerates timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and color grading, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,698 ensures smooth export encoding; the FP16 1:1 ratio means half-precision effects run at full speed, beneficial for modern editors that leverage mixed precision. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with 4K multi-stream playback.

3D Rendering: This is the system’s sweet spot. The GPU’s 100 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders in Blender, Maya, and V-Ray, and the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute provides brute-force rasterization speed; the 32 GB frame buffer allows rendering of scenes with complex geometry and 8K textures that would fail on lesser cards. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads contribute to CPU-based rendering tasks, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,853, though GPU rendering will dominate.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads, with a Passmark integer math score of 97,911 indicating strong arithmetic throughput for code building; the 30 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code segments. The GPU’s tensor cores accelerate machine learning model training and inference, making this a viable workstation for AI developers, though the 35 W CPU TDP may slow long compile jobs.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,422 ensures responsive application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the GPU’s massive compute is overkill for typical office suites; the 35 W TDP means low power draw during light loads, and the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is idle or disabled. This system is far more capable than needed for word processing, but its efficiency makes it a quiet, cool-running workstation for academic research involving data analysis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a GPU-dominant system where the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the clear performance leader. The GPU’s 98th percentile versus the CPU’s 82nd percentile creates a 16-point gap, suggesting that in many workloads, the GPU will be waiting on the CPU to feed it data. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,422 may become the limiting factor, capping FPS below what the GPU could otherwise deliver; at 4K, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, where its 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate handles resolution scaling effectively. For compute tasks, the balance depends on the workload: in GPU-accelerated rendering, the CPU’s role is to prepare data and manage scene graphs, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,698 is sufficient to avoid stalling the GPU pipeline. However, in CPU-bound physics simulations, the Passmark physics score of 1,368 is low, indicating that the 35 W power limit restricts sustained integer and physics throughput, potentially bottlenecking simulation-heavy applications. The FPS scaling, though unmeasured, can be inferred: in GPU-limited scenarios, the RTX 5000 Ada’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute ensures high frame rates, but in CPU-limited scenarios, the i7-13700TE’s modest power envelope may cause frame rate drops. The memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s on the GPU versus the CPU’s dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support (no bandwidth figure given) means that data transfers from system memory to VRAM could be a bottleneck in mixed workloads, but the lack of a memory bandwidth spec for the CPU prevents quantitative analysis. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU provide high bandwidth for the GPU (though the GPU is PCIe 4.0 x16), ensuring that the interface is not a limitation. Overall, this system is best balanced for GPU-intensive tasks, with the CPU adequate but not exceptional for multi-threaded loads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Its base clock of 1100 MHz is extraordinarily low, but the boost clock of 4.80 GHz provides substantial single-thread performance when needed; this wide clock range is characteristic of a low-power part designed to scale up for short bursts. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is ample for a 16-core design and helps mitigate memory latency. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform cost, though ECC memory is not supported. It features UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, which is useful for troubleshooting or light display output without the discrete GPU. The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic: it allows for passive cooling in compact chassis and low power bills, but it also means that sustained all-core workloads may cause the CPU to drop below its boost clock to stay within thermal limits. Benchmark scores reflect this: Cinebench R15 multi-core of 1,884 and single-core of 265, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 7,853 and single-core of 1,108, and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 18,698 and single-core of 2,639. These scores indicate that the CPU can briefly hit high performance, but long renders or compiles may see reduced clocks. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 22,754, single-thread of 3,422, and a data encryption score of 15,006, which is moderate and suggests no dedicated AES-NI acceleration highlight. The find prime numbers score of 101 is low, reflecting the power constraints. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking means it outperforms 82% of all CPUs, which is respectable for a 35 W part, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% in average score, indicating that performance is tightly clustered with higher-power mobile and desktop chips. The architecture is not unlocked (multiplier locked), so overclocking is not an option, but the boost behavior is automatic. For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for tasks that are bursty—web browsing, office applications, light coding—where it can boost to 4.80 GHz, rather than sustained heavy loads where the 35 W envelope caps throughput.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize GPU compute and need a power-efficient CPU that keeps the overall build compact and cool. 3D artists and animators will benefit from the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 100 RT cores for rendering complex scenes. Video editors working with 4K or 8K footage can leverage the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth for real-time previews and the CPU’s 24 threads for export tasks. AI researchers and data scientists can use the 400 tensor cores for model training, while the 76,300 million transistors on the GPU provide massive parallel throughput. Software developers who compile code frequently will find the CPU’s multi-thread score of 22,754 adequate, though not class-leading; the 30 MB L3 cache helps with larger codebases. Students in engineering or computer science can run simulation software and machine learning frameworks without a large power footprint, thanks to the 35 W CPU TDP. Small business workstations that run financial modeling, database queries, or CAD software will see strong performance; the GPU’s 98th percentile ranking ensures that any GPU-accelerated application runs at near-maximum speed. Gamers at 4K resolution will find the GPU’s pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s sufficient for ultra settings, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,422 handles game logic without issue, though at 1080p, the CPU may become a limiting factor. Professionals requiring silent operation will appreciate the 35 W CPU that can be passively cooled, combined with the GPU’s dual-slot design and 250 W TDP, which is manageable with a quality air cooler. This is not a system for budget-conscious builders, but for those who need workstation-class graphics in a desktop form factor without excessive power consumption.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1700, which supports 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors (though the FACT PACK only specifies 13th Gen compatibility for this CPU). Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5; the lack of a memory bandwidth figure for the CPU prevents a quantitative comparison, but the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s is the system’s primary bandwidth resource. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU ensures that the GPU, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16, has more than enough bandwidth, and future upgrades to PCIe 5.0 GPUs would be supported at full speed. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 600 W, and its TDP is 250 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 35 W; this means a 600 W power supply provides ample headroom for the combined 285 W of component power, leaving room for drives, fans, and minor overclocking—though the CPU is multiplier-locked. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-TDP 13th Gen Core i7 or i9 processor (e.g., a K-series part) to improve multi-threaded performance, since the socket and chipset support it; however, this would require a better cooler and possibly a larger PSU, as the current 35 W CPU is designed for low power. Alternatively, adding more system RAM (beyond the unspecified amount) would benefit memory-hungry applications, given the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM is fixed. The GPU’s 1x 16-pin power connector is standard for modern high-end cards, and its 267 mm length (10.5 inches) fits most mid-tower cases. The display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multi-monitor setups up to 8K. The platform’s production status is Active for both CPU and GPU, meaning availability is current, and the GPU’s predecessor is Workstation Ampere, with a successor in Blackwell PRO W, suggesting a future upgrade path to newer NVIDIA workstation cards. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes enable ultra-fast NVMe SSDs, though no specific storage benchmarks are provided. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, making troubleshooting easier.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined system percentile is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE has an average benchmark score of 31,028, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS’s score of 31,074, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth at an effective 18 Gbps clock speed.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the Intel Core i7-13700TE cannot be overclocked; its boost clock of 4.80 GHz is the maximum achievable.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 600 W, which, combined with the CPU’s 35 W TDP and the GPU’s 250 W TDP, provides sufficient headroom for the components and typical peripherals.

Q: Does the GPU support the latest DirectX and Vulkan APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures discussed are estimates based on benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation combination, so all frame rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041 and OpenCL score of 175,286, combined with its 98th percentile ranking, suggest that in GPU-bound games at 4K resolution, the system will deliver very high frame rates—likely exceeding 60 FPS in most AAA titles with ultra settings, given the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate. At 1440p, the GPU’s 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate ensures that texture-heavy scenes render smoothly, and the 32 GB VRAM eliminates any concerns about texture memory caps. However, at 1080p with lower graphical demands, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,422 (82nd percentile) may become the limiting factor, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU can achieve; in esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz helps, but the 35 W TDP may cause clock reductions during sustained gameplay, leading to frame time inconsistencies. For ray-traced games, the 100 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports the additional memory traffic required for RT effects; expect playable frame rates at 1440p with DLSS enabled (though DLSS is not explicitly listed in the FACT PACK, the tensor cores support it). The GPU’s 176 ROPs ensure efficient pixel throughput, and the 256-bit bus width balances bandwidth for high-resolution rendering. The estimated FPS ranges, without measured data, are as follows: at 4K ultra, AAA titles would likely run between 60-100 FPS depending on optimization; at 1440p ultra, 100-144 FPS is plausible; at 1080p ultra, the CPU may limit performance to 120-160 FPS in CPU-bound games, while GPU-bound titles could exceed 200 FPS. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary based on specific game engines, driver optimizations, and system memory configuration. The absence of measured FPS data means that this system should be evaluated primarily on its compute benchmark scores, which indicate exceptional GPU capability for both gaming and professional workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700TE

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds