SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700TE

31,028 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

49,957 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This desktop build combines Intel’s 13th-generation Core i7-13700TE processor with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 5070 Ti graphics card, representing a pairing that lands at the 84th percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database. The CPU holds the 82nd percentile among all processors tested, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system where both major components sit in similar upper-tier performance brackets. The combination targets users who need strong multi-threaded compute from a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S chip alongside the Blackwell 2.0 architecture’s ray tracing and tensor capabilities, though the data shows some interesting asymmetries between the two components’ relative standings.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti brings 16 GB of GDDR7 memory across a 256-bit bus, yielding 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This memory configuration places the card in a position where large texture sets and high-resolution rendering workloads have ample headroom, as the bandwidth figure supports data movement for 4K-class rendering tasks without obvious starvation. The base clock runs at 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2452 MHz, while memory operates at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), giving the card a solid foundation for sustained compute workloads.

The Blackwell 2.0 architecture implements 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, with 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for pixel-dense scenes. Floating-point performance reaches 43.94 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), meaning the card does not sacrifice half-precision throughput, which matters for machine learning inference and certain rendering pipelines that leverage mixed-precision computation.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 6604, which serves as a modern DirectX 12 rasterization benchmark. This score, combined with the 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs, suggests the card handles contemporary game engines with ease. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 212363 and Vulkan score of 225122 further corroborate strong compute and graphics API performance, with Vulkan slightly ahead of OpenCL in this configuration. Passmark G3D score of 32974 reinforces the card’s position in the upper tier of graphics hardware, while the Passmark GPU compute score of 20203 indicates solid non-graphics compute throughput.

For rendering workloads specifically, the 70 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, and the 280 tensor cores accelerate DLSS-style upscaling and denoising operations. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is particularly relevant for 3D rendering applications where scene complexity can exceed 8 GB or 12 GB allocations. The 896.0 GB/s bandwidth supports rapid texture streaming and geometry uploads, reducing potential bottlenecks in viewport navigation and final-frame rendering. The card’s dual-slot form factor and 1x 16-pin power connector, with a suggested 700 W power supply, indicate a power-hungry component that requires adequate PSU headroom.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i7-13700TE achieves an average benchmark score of 31028, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, scores 31074, representing a mere 0.1% difference — essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i7-12700F scores 31081 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 31143 (0.4% ahead). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS trails slightly at 30879, meaning the i7-13700TE is 0.5% ahead of that part. These tight margins show the i7-13700TE sits in a competitive cluster where single-digit percentage differences separate several processors.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 18698 in multi-core and 2639 in single-core tests. The multi-core figure indicates strong parallel throughput, while the single-core score reflects capable per-thread performance. Cinebench R20 shows 7853 multi-core and 1108 single-core, and R15 shows 1884 multi-core and 265 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 22754, single-thread score of 3422, integer math at 97911, floating-point math at 66421, and data compression at 243565. The data encryption score of 15006 and extended instructions score of 13750 round out the compute picture.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 49957, placing at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, scores 50001 (0.1% ahead), while the Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 (0.4% behind). The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951 (2% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477 (3.1% behind). These deltas show the RTX 5070 Ti competes with previous-generation high-end cards, sitting slightly behind the RX 6900 XT but ahead of the RX 6800 XT in aggregate scoring.

The combined percentile of 84 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates that, as a system, it outperforms 84% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database. The data shows the GPU holds a slightly higher percentile (86) than the CPU (82), suggesting the graphics card is marginally the stronger component relative to its peers. However, the gap is small enough that neither component dramatically outclasses the other — this is a balanced pairing where both parts contribute meaningfully to overall system performance.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5070 Ti’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6604 and 86th GPU percentile indicate strong rasterization performance capable of driving high-refresh displays. The 16 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for texture-heavy titles at high resolutions, though the CPU’s single-core score of 2639 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The 84th combined percentile suggests this system can handle competitive titles at high refresh rates, particularly at 1440p where GPU load dominates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by the 18698 multi-core Cinebench R23 score, provide substantial headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 22754 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game rendering, stream encoding, and background tasks without significant contention. The GPU’s 280 tensor cores also support hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based stream enhancement features, making this a capable streaming workstation.

Video editing: The 243565 Passmark data compression score suggests strong performance in codec-heavy workloads, while the 66421 floating-point math score supports color grading and effect processing. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU allows for large timeline previews and GPU-accelerated effects. The CPU’s balanced single-thread (3422 Passmark single-thread) and multi-thread (22754 Passmark multithread) scores indicate responsiveness in scrubbing and timeline operations alongside efficient export rendering.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 70 RT cores provide substantial raw rendering power, as reflected in the 20203 Passmark GPU compute score. The CPU’s 18698 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles geometry processing and physics simulation tasks. The 16 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes, and the 896.0 GB/s bandwidth supports texture-heavy renders. This pairing sits at the 84th combined percentile, placing it in the upper tier for render workstations.

Software development: The CPU’s 97911 Passmark integer math score and 15006 data encryption score indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and cryptographic operations. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 24 threads allow efficient parallel builds. The GPU’s compute capabilities, shown by the 212363 Geekbench OpenCL score, can accelerate certain development tasks like test automation and simulation. The 82nd CPU percentile places this processor well above average for developer workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 3422 Passmark single-thread score ensures responsive application launches and document processing, while the 22754 multithread score handles multitasking scenarios like spreadsheets, presentations, and web browsing with many tabs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the dedicated RTX 5070 Ti handles any graphics-accelerated tasks. The 35W CPU TDP contributes to an efficient desktop system suitable for long study sessions, though the GPU’s 300W TDP means the full system draws significantly more power under load.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 84, meaning this desktop pairing outperforms 84% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, which is 2% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti’s average score of 49957. The RTX 5070 Ti is 3.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, which scores 48477.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the RTX 5070 Ti provide?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Memory operates at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700TE compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS in CPU benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 31074, which is 0.1% higher than the Core i7-13700TE’s average score of 31028. This places the two processors within a statistical tie.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the CPU?

A: The Core i7-13700TE scores 18698 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2639 in single-core tests, reflecting strong parallel and per-thread performance.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is 749 USD, listed once here as reference.

Q: Does this build use measured FPS data for gaming performance?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data reveals a nuanced bottleneck profile for this pairing. The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 82nd percentile indicates the processor is slightly weaker relative to its peers than the graphics card. This suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios — typically high-resolution gaming with heavy graphics settings — the RTX 5070 Ti will be the limiting factor, but in CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation or strategy game AI, the i7-13700TE may constrain performance.

The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2639 places the CPU in a competitive but not elite tier for per-thread performance. Games that rely heavily on single-threaded game logic may see frame rates limited by the CPU, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity. The multi-core score of 18698 suggests the CPU handles threaded workloads well, so multi-player game servers or games with heavy background simulation may not bottleneck as severely.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 20203 Passmark GPU compute score indicate the graphics card handles most render calculations, while the CPU’s 16 cores manage scene setup, physics, and file I/O. The Passmark data compression score of 243565 shows strong storage-related throughput, reducing I/O bottlenecks. The 24 threads handle concurrent asset loading and processing, though the 35W TDP of the CPU may limit sustained all-core boost clocks during extended renders, potentially creating a CPU bottleneck in CPU-heavy render passes.

The FPS scaling picture, while lacking measured data, can be estimated from benchmark scores. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (2639 Cinebench R23) likely becomes the limiting factor in many titles, as the GPU has abundant headroom. At 4K, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth become the primary constraints, with the CPU having enough headroom to keep up. At 1440p, the system likely achieves the best balance, with neither component dramatically limiting the other. The 84th combined percentile reinforces that this is a well-matched pairing for most workloads, with the CPU being the more likely bottleneck in latency-sensitive tasks and the GPU limiting in throughput-heavy graphics work.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh displays represent a primary audience for this build. The GPU’s 86th percentile and 6604 Steel Nomad score suggest strong 1440p performance, while the CPU’s 82nd percentile provides enough single-thread speed (2639 Cinebench R23) for competitive titles. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-quality textures, though the CPU may not be the limiting factor at this resolution. 1080p gamers will find the CPU more frequently limiting, but the system still delivers high frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or graphic design will benefit from the 16-core CPU and 16 GB GPU VRAM. The 18698 multi-core Cinebench R23 score accelerates export times, while the GPU’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles effects and rendering. The 243565 data compression score supports efficient codec workflows, and the 212363 Geekbench OpenCL score indicates strong GPU compute for accelerated effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 97911 integer math score and 24 threads. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data, and the 15006 encryption score handles secure communications. The 82nd CPU percentile places this processor well above average for build servers or developer workstations.

Students and office workers will find the system overqualified for basic tasks, but the 3422 Passmark single-thread score ensures snappy application performance. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display option. The 35W CPU TDP contributes to lower idle power draw, though the 300W GPU TDP means gaming or GPU compute sessions consume significant power.

Small business workstations handling financial modeling, data analysis, or CAD software will benefit from the CPU’s 66421 floating-point math score and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The 84th combined percentile places this system in the upper tier for workstation tasks, though the 700W suggested PSU requirement means system integrators must account for adequate power delivery.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The chip features a base clock of 1100.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 35W TDP that emphasizes efficiency over raw sustained performance. The die size measures 257 mm², and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-S, represents Intel’s 13th generation Core i7 line, released on January 3, 2023, and remains in active production.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial L3 cache supports the 24 threads by reducing main memory access frequency, which is particularly beneficial for workloads with moderate data reuse patterns. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe implementation provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connections to the GPU and NVMe storage.

Benchmark scores reveal the CPU’s character: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18698 demonstrates strong parallel throughput, while the single-core score of 2639 shows capable per-thread performance. The Passmark multithread score of 22754 and single-thread score of 3422 corroborate these findings. The data compression score of 243565 indicates efficient handling of compressed data streams, while the floating-point math score of 66421 supports scientific and financial computations. The integer math score of 97911 shows strong general-purpose arithmetic capability.

The 35W TDP is notably low for a 16-core processor, suggesting the chip relies on aggressive power management to maintain boost clocks within thermal constraints. The 4.80 GHz boost clock indicates the chip can reach high frequencies for short bursts, but sustained all-core workloads may cause clocks to drop as power limits are enforced. This makes the CPU well-suited for workloads with variable intensity rather than continuous full-load operations. The 82nd percentile ranking places it in the upper tier of all CPUs, but its nearest rivals include mobile processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, suggesting the i7-13700TE competes with efficient high-core-count parts rather than desktop flagship CPUs.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing brings together the Intel Core i7-13700TE, a 16-core Raptor Lake-S processor, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The system sits at the 84th combined percentile among all recorded CPU+GPU combinations, placing it in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile both fall within a similar performance band, indicating this is a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other.

The GPU’s launch MSRP of 749 USD positions it as a high-end graphics card, while the CPU’s 35W TDP suggests a focus on efficiency despite its 16-core configuration. The desktop class means users have access to full-size expansion slots, multiple display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b), and standard power supply connections (1x 16-pin). The 304 mm GPU length requires a case with adequate clearance, and the 700W suggested PSU provides headroom for the 300W GPU TDP alongside the CPU and other components.

The overall tier, derived from the percentiles, places this system firmly in the upper-middle to high-end desktop category. The 84th combined percentile means it outperforms most recorded configurations, though it does not reach the very top tier occupied by flagship CPUs paired with flagship GPUs. The system is well-suited for users who want strong performance across gaming, content creation, and productivity without the extreme costs or power requirements of the absolute highest-end components.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-13700TE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connections to the GPU and storage devices. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully supported by the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 capability. The memory bus width is dual-channel, meaning users can populate two or four DIMM slots to take advantage of the memory controller’s bandwidth.

The suggested power supply for this build is 700W, based on the GPU’s 300W TDP and the CPU’s 35W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for other components like storage drives, cooling systems, and peripherals. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, which modern power supplies include or can adapt to. The dual-slot GPU form factor fits in most mid-tower and full-tower cases, though the 304 mm length requires case compatibility verification.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the CPU platform, as the Socket 1700 supports 13th-generation and 14th-generation Intel processors. Upgrading to a higher-core-count or higher-clock 13th or 14th generation Core i7 or Core i9 processor would provide a performance boost, particularly for multi-threaded workloads where the 35W TDP of the i7-13700TE may limit sustained performance. The DDR4/DDR5 support means users can choose memory technology based on their existing hardware, with DDR5 offering higher bandwidth for memory-sensitive workloads.

The GPU upgrade path is less constrained, as the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface supports current and near-future graphics cards. The 700W PSU provides enough headroom for GPUs with similar or slightly higher power requirements, though upgrading to a significantly more power-hungry card would necessitate a PSU upgrade. The 16 GB VRAM of the RTX 5070 Ti is already substantial, so GPU upgrades would target higher performance tiers rather than addressing memory capacity limitations.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for any game or resolution, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. Users should treat these expectations as approximations based on the component performance characteristics.

At 1080p resolution, the system likely delivers very high frame rates in most titles. The CPU’s 2639 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 3422 Passmark single-thread score suggest sufficient per-thread performance to drive high frame rates, though the 35W TDP may cause clock reductions during sustained gaming sessions. The GPU’s 6604 Steel Nomad score indicates the graphics card has ample headroom at 1080p, meaning the CPU may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound games or at very high frame rates.

At 1440p, the system likely achieves a strong balance between CPU and GPU load. The GPU’s 86th percentile and 16 GB VRAM support high-quality textures and effects, while the CPU’s 16 cores handle game logic and simulation. This resolution likely represents the sweet spot for this pairing, where neither component consistently bottlenecks the other. The 84th combined percentile suggests the system performs in the upper tier of gaming desktops at this resolution.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary performance determinant. The 16 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth support 4K textures, while the 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles the increased pixel workload. The 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate indicates strong fill-rate capabilities for 4K rendering. Frame rates at 4K will likely be lower than at 1440p but should remain playable in most titles, particularly with DLSS or similar upscaling technologies enabled. The CPU’s role diminishes at this resolution, as the GPU load dominates frame time.

For competitive titles like esports games, the CPU’s single-thread performance and the GPU’s high rasterization throughput should deliver very high frame rates at 1080p or 1440p. For AAA single-player titles with heavy graphics requirements, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and ray tracing capabilities (70 RT cores) provide a strong foundation, though ray-traced workloads may reduce frame rates significantly. The absence of measured FPS data means these expectations carry uncertainty, but the benchmark scores consistently indicate a capable gaming system across resolutions.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds