SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700TE

31,028 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700TE paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a study in contrasts. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP and a modest 1.10 GHz base clock, while the GPU is a 5 nm AD102 monster with 24 GB of GDDR6X and a 1.01 TB/s memory bus. This combination produces a machine that is wildly unbalanced on paper, yet capable of extraordinary throughput in specific scenarios where the GPU can stretch its legs and the CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz can keep up. The data indicates that this is not a conventional gaming rig, but rather a specialized tool for creators and developers who prioritize parallel compute and rendering over raw frame pacing. Benchmark results show the CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU commands the 88th percentile, placing the overall build at the 85th combined percentile. The following analysis breaks down what these numbers mean for real workloads, where the bottlenecks will appear, and who should actually consider building this system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is a Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. Its architecture uses a hybrid design, although the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. What is clear is the power envelope: the 35 W TDP is extremely low for a desktop part, and the base clock of 1.10 GHz reflects that constraint. However, the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, which allows the chip to surge when needed. The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 pool. This configuration favors bursty workloads that can leverage the high boost frequency.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the chip posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18698 and a single-core score of 2639. The multi-core result is competitive with mainstream desktop chips, but the single-core score is lower than what a higher-power 13th-gen part would achieve, indicating that the 35 W TDP limits sustained all-core performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 22754 and integer math score of 97911 reinforce this picture: the CPU is a strong multi-threaded performer for its power class, but it is not a top-tier desktop part.

The nearest rival data shows the i7-13700TE is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (deltaPct -0.1), the Intel Core i7-12700F (deltaPct -0.2), and the Intel Core 9 273PTE (deltaPct -0.4). It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS. These are all mobile or lower-power desktop parts, which confirms that the 13700TE is positioned as an efficiency-focused processor rather than a raw performance leader. For real workloads, this means the CPU will handle compilation, script execution, and light multi-threaded rendering without complaint, but it will not keep pace with unlocked or higher-TDP desktop chips in sustained all-core loads. The Passmark data encryption score of 15006 and data compression score of 243565 are strong, suggesting the chip is well-suited for archival and security tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 609 mm² and a transistor count of 76,300 million. The GPU has 16384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. It includes 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores, making it a powerhouse for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The memory subsystem is equally impressive: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2235 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and the memory runs at 21 Gbps effective.

The FP32 compute throughput is 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). This raw compute power translates into a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 255416 and Vulkan score of 271631 indicate strong cross-API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 38194 is exceptionally high, placing the GPU at the 88th percentile overall. The GPU compute score of 26613 further validates its compute capabilities.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4090 are not other gaming GPUs, but professional workstation parts: the Intel Arc Pro A60 (deltaPct 0), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (deltaPct 0.3), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (deltaPct -2.5), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (deltaPct 2.9). This is a critical insight: the 4090’s average benchmark score is in the same range as these pro cards, meaning the data reflects compute and rendering performance rather than gaming rasterization alone. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores are the key differentiators for modern workloads. For rendering, the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that large textures and scenes load quickly, while the 24 GB VRAM capacity prevents out-of-memory errors in complex 3D scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is defined by the CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile, with an overall build percentile of 85. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31028, while the GPU’s average is 60347. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18698 is a strong result for a 35 W part, but it is the GPU that dominates the system’s overall capability.

In single-threaded tasks, the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3422 is moderate, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 38194 is near the top of the database. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 9223 is a direct measure of DX12 gaming performance, and it is excellent. However, the CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1368 is low, which will limit frame rates in physics-heavy games.

The data shows a clear imbalance: the GPU can deliver frame rates that the CPU cannot consistently feed. For example, the CPU’s Passmark find prime numbers score of 101 suggests weak integer-heavy single-thread performance, which is a common bottleneck in game logic. The combined percentile of 85 indicates that the system is faster than 85% of all tracked builds, but the gap between CPU and GPU performance means the system will feel CPU-limited in many real-world scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This build is not for the mainstream gamer; it is for users who need GPU compute above all else. The target audience includes 3D renderers who use GPU-accelerated engines like Blender Cycles or Octane, where the 4090’s 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 128 RT cores will crush rendering tasks. The 24 GB VRAM is sufficient for large scenes and high-resolution textures, making it a viable workstation replacement for small studios.

Content creators working with 8K video will benefit from the 4090’s tensor cores for AI-based upscaling and denoising, while the CPU’s 24 threads handle encoding pipelines. The 13700TE’s low 35 W TDP means the system can be built in a compact chassis with a modest cooler, freeing up space for the triple-slot 4090. Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threaded Passmark score of 22754, but they must accept that the 1.10 GHz base clock slows down incremental builds.

Students and small business workstations are a secondary market, provided the workload is GPU-centric. For example, machine learning researchers can leverage the 512 tensor cores for model training, while the CPU handles data loading. The key limitation is that the CPU is not a high-frequency part, so any task that relies on single-thread speed will underperform relative to a desktop i7-12700F, which is only 0.2% faster overall but has a much higher base clock.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the GPU is the star, and the CPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3422 is about one-third of the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 38194, but the real issue is the base clock. At 1.10 GHz, the CPU will struggle to issue draw calls fast enough to keep the 4090 busy in games. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz helps, but it is not sustainable across all cores.

In multi-threaded CPU workloads, the 13700TE holds its own, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18698. However, in gaming, the CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1368 and find prime numbers score of 101 indicate weak performance in tasks that require rapid, single-threaded calculations. The FPS scaling will be inconsistent: at 1080p, the CPU will bottleneck the GPU, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor because the resolution increases the GPU workload.

The data suggests that the system is balanced only when the workload is GPU-compute-bound, such as rendering or AI inference. In these cases, the CPU’s 16 cores can feed the GPU enough data to keep it busy. For gaming, the balance is poor, and the system will underperform a cheaper CPU like the i7-12700F in frame pacing, despite the 4090’s raw power.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU supports dual-channel memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. This gives the system ample headroom for the GPU, but the CPU’s low TDP means a modest cooler is sufficient.

The upgrade path is limited because Socket 1700 is a dead end with no new CPU generations. The sensible next upgrade would be to replace the motherboard and CPU with a newer platform, but the 4090 is already end-of-life (production status: End-of-life), so the GPU is not a future-proof part either. The 850 W PSU is sufficient for the current build, but a future GPU with a higher TDP would require a PSU upgrade. The system supports up to 20 PCIe lanes on the CPU, so there is room for a second GPU or high-speed NVMe drives, but the low CPU TDP may limit overall system power delivery.

Memory support is broad, with DDR4 and DDR5 options, but the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacity or speed. The 24 GB VRAM on the GPU is generous, but the CPU’s lack of ECC memory support (eccMemory: false) is a consideration for workstation use. The 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU requires an adapter or a native 12VHPWR cable, which should be factored into the PSU selection.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 4090 can push high FPS, but the CPU’s low base clock and weak single-thread scores (Passmark single-thread 3422) will cap frame rates in CPU-heavy titles. Expect inconsistent FPS at 1080p and 1440p, with better scaling at 4K where the GPU is the bottleneck.
Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores can handle NVENC encoding, offloading work from the CPU. The 13700TE’s 24 threads can manage stream overlays and chat, but the low base clock may cause hiccups if the CPU is also running the game.
Video editing: The 4090 accelerates effects and rendering in Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve, while the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 243565 helps with codec-heavy workflows. The 24 GB VRAM is ideal for 8K timelines.
3D rendering: This is the sweet spot. The 4090’s 128 RT cores and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 will render scenes faster than most professional GPUs, and the CPU’s 18698 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is sufficient for scene preparation.
Software development: The CPU’s 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache help with parallel builds, but the 1.10 GHz base clock slows down single-threaded compilation steps. The GPU is irrelevant for most coding tasks.
Student and office work: Overkill. The 4090’s 450 W TDP and triple-slot size are unnecessary for document editing, but the system will excel at any GPU-accelerated academic work like simulation or data visualization.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700TE a good match for the RTX 4090?

A: No, the data shows a significant imbalance. The CPU is at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 88th, and the CPU’s low base clock of 1.10 GHz will bottleneck the GPU in gaming and other latency-sensitive tasks.

Q: What is the CPU’s best benchmark result?

A: The CPU’s strongest result is the Passmark data compression score of 243565, followed by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18698. These indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for its 35 W TDP.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The RTX 4090’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 9223 is excellent, and at 4K the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, which is preferable. However, the CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1368 may cause stutters in physics-heavy scenes.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 4K textures and large 3D scenes, and it is the primary reason this build is viable for professional rendering.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 850 W, based on the GPU’s 450 W TDP and the CPU’s 35 W TDP. This provides enough headroom for the system, but a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for future upgrades.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). The CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz is the maximum achievable without external clock generators.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The RTX 4090 is marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series. Its launch MSRP was 1,599 USD, but the FACT PACK does not indicate current pricing.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4090’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 9223 and Passmark G3D score of 38194 indicate it can handle any game at maximum settings. However, the CPU’s performance will dictate the final FPS.

At 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor. The Passmark single-thread score of 3422 is low, and the base clock of 1.10 GHz will cause the GPU to idle between frames. Expect high average FPS but inconsistent 1% lows. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more relevant, and the system should deliver a smoother experience. At 4K, the GPU’s 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 24 GB VRAM will be fully utilized, and the CPU bottleneck is minimized. In GPU-bound titles, the 4090 can achieve 144+ FPS at 4K in most games, but CPU-intensive simulations will see lower numbers. The estimated figures are based on the benchmark scores, but actual performance will vary by game engine and driver optimization.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds