SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700TE

31,028 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

31,087 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700TE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER form a desktop pairing that targets a high-performance niche, but the data reveals a distinct asymmetry. The CPU lands in the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 76th percentile among all GPUs, with a combined percentile of 79. This is a system built around a powerful graphics card, supported by a capable, power-efficient processor. The following analysis is based strictly on the benchmark data provided.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which dictates the upgrade path. The Core i7-13700TE is a Raptor Lake-S architecture chip, and its platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more prevalent DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, though the platform itself does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, which is forward-looking for high-bandwidth storage devices like NVMe SSDs, while the GPU utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The most significant constraint for a sensible upgrade path is the power delivery. The CPU has a remarkably low TDP of 35 W, which means it will not stress even modest motherboard VRM designs. However, the GPU is a different story entirely. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 600 W. This means any upgrade to the CPU would be relatively easy, as the platform's power draw is dominated by the graphics card. A user could move to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake chip without needing to change the power supply, as long as the 600 W unit provides adequate headroom for the entire system.

The upgrade path for the GPU is less flexible. With a 285 W TDP, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER already demands a substantial PSU. Upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would likely require a new power supply, as the 600 W suggestion leaves little room for a more demanding card. The platform itself, however, is not the bottleneck; the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is standard and will not limit current or near-future graphics cards. A sensible next upgrade would be to maximize the CPU within the 35 W TDP envelope, which is a rare opportunity for low-power builds, or to focus on adding fast DDR5 memory to improve system responsiveness.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the centerpiece of this build, and its specifications are substantial. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 379 mm² containing 45,900 million transistors. The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This is a high-capacity, high-bandwidth configuration that is well-suited for modern game textures and creative workloads. The GPU clocks are set at a base of 2340 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz or 21 Gbps effective.

For rendering and compute, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is equipped with 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The dedicated ray tracing hardware includes 66 RT cores, and the AI acceleration is handled by 264 tensor cores. The raw compute throughput is listed as 44.10 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1). This level of compute power is reflected in the benchmark scores. The GPU achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 199267. The Passmark G3D score of 31811 places it in the 76th percentile, which is a solid performance tier, though the nearest rivals are older professional cards like the NVIDIA TITAN RTX, which has an average score of 31676 and a delta of -1.9%.

The GPU's direct relevance to rendering is clear. The high FP32 and FP16 throughput, combined with the dedicated RT and tensor cores, makes it a capable tool for real-time rendering in game engines and for accelerating 3D workloads. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset, allowing for large scenes and high-resolution textures without running out of memory. The texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities, which supports high-detail rendering at demanding resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data shows a clear split between the CPU and GPU, with the CPU performing slightly better relative to its peers. The Intel Core i7-13700TE has an average benchmark score of 31028, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, which scores 31074, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Intel chip is essentially tied with that mobile processor. It also sits close to the Intel Core i7-12700F, which scores 31081, a delta of -0.2%. This indicates that the 13700TE's performance is comparable to a previous-generation desktop i7.

In specific CPU tests, the 13700TE shows strength in multi-threaded workloads. It scores 18698 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a strong result for a 35 W part. The single-core score of 2639 in the same test is also competitive. The Passmark scores further illustrate its capabilities: a multi-thread score of 22754 and a single-thread score of 3422. The data compression score of 243565 and integer math score of 97911 suggest strong performance in productivity tasks.

The GPU, meanwhile, sits in the 76th percentile for all GPUs with an average score of 31087. This is surprisingly close to the CPU's average score, but the comparison pool is different. The GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, which scores 31206, a delta of -0.4%, indicating the 4070 Ti SUPER is slightly behind that professional card in the aggregate. The combined picture is one of a balanced system, but the GPU is the weaker link in terms of percentile ranking. The CPU is performing above its class, while the GPU is performing slightly below its expected percentile given its specifications. This suggests the GPU might be the limiting factor in some high-end scenarios, but the overall system is well above average.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong GPU performance without compromising on CPU power efficiency. The target audience includes gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolutions, where the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates. The 16 GB VRAM and high compute throughput make this a viable option for high-detail gaming. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, while having a low base clock, can handle modern game logic and background tasks without issue.

Content creators are another primary audience. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and motion graphics. The CPU's multi-threaded scores, such as 18698 in Cinebench R23, indicate it can handle video encoding and complex compositing. The Passmark floating point math score of 66421 further supports its capability in scientific and mathematical workloads.

Developers and students in computer science or data science fields would benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threading and the GPU's compute capabilities for machine learning inference and prototyping. The low CPU TDP of 35 W makes this an efficient system for running long compile or simulation tasks. Small business workstations that run CAD software or heavy spreadsheet analysis would also find this pairing capable, as the CPU's integer math score of 97911 suggests strong performance in logic-heavy applications. The system is not ideal for those who prioritize absolute CPU performance, but it is excellent for those who need a balanced, powerful desktop.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is a curious chip: it is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, produced on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The most striking feature is its power profile. With a TDP of only 35 W, it is designed for efficiency, but it still offers a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is high for such a low-power part. The base clock is just 1100.00 MHz, which is low, but the boost clock is where the performance lives. This is a design that emphasizes short bursts of high performance rather than sustained all-core loads.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps with gaming and productivity by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for flexibility, but the low TDP might limit the ability to overclock memory aggressively. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a basic iGPU that can handle display output and light tasks, but it is not intended for gaming.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a strong performer despite its efficiency focus. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18698 is impressive for a 35 W part, and the single-core score of 2639 is competitive with many desktop parts. The Passmark single-thread score of 3422 confirms its strong per-core performance. The data encryption score of 15006 and extended instructions score of 13750 show it handles encryption and modern instruction sets well. The physics score of 1368 in Passmark is a bit lower, suggesting that while it is fast, it may not be the absolute best for physics simulations. Overall, the 13700TE offers a unique combination of high boost clocks and low sustained power draw, making it a compelling choice for compact or power-conscious builds.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's performance is the primary driver for gaming, and its 76th percentile ranking suggests it will handle most games well. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is the modern standard for PC games.

At 1440p resolution, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is estimated to provide high frame rates in most titles. The combination of 16 GB VRAM and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth should avoid texture streaming issues and maintain smooth performance in detailed scenes. The CPU's single-core score of 2639 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most games, though some CPU-intensive titles might show a slight limitation due to the low base clock.

At 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck. The 44.10 TFLOPS of compute performance is high, but 4K requires significant pixel pushing. The pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s is adequate, but users may need to adjust settings from "Ultra" to "High" in the most demanding titles to maintain 60 FPS. The GPU's ray tracing performance, supported by 66 RT cores, is estimated to be good, but enabling ray tracing at 4K will likely require DLSS or other upscaling technologies to achieve high frame rates. Overall, the gaming experience is expected to be strong, with the system capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance with some settings adjustments.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core i7-13700TE?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER have?

A: The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP, and what PSU is suggested for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 285 W, leading to a suggested PSU of 600 W for the system.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core i7-13700TE does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, despite a low base clock of 1100.00 MHz.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE has an average score of 31028, which is a -0.1% delta from the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS's score of 31074, meaning they are essentially tied.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-13700TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The CPU is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake chip designed for efficiency, while the GPU is a high-end Ada Lovelace card. The combined percentile for this pairing is 79, which places it in the upper tier of systems. The CPU's 82nd percentile is slightly higher than the GPU's 76th percentile, indicating that the CPU is a relatively stronger component in this pairing.

The system is defined by its power characteristics. The CPU's 35 W TDP is remarkably low, making it an excellent choice for small form factor or energy-efficient builds. In contrast, the GPU's 285 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU mean the system still requires a substantial power supply. This is a pairing that offers high performance with a focus on CPU efficiency, making it suitable for users who want a quiet, cool-running processor without sacrificing graphics power. The GPU is now marked as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, but its 16 GB of VRAM and 76th percentile ranking keep it relevant for current workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed depending on the workload. In gaming, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, while powerful, sits in the 76th percentile, whereas the CPU's 82nd percentile and strong single-core performance suggest it can keep up with the GPU's demands. The estimated FPS scaling would show that at lower resolutions, the CPU might become a slight bottleneck in CPU-intensive games, but at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU will be the primary constraint.

In compute and productivity tasks, the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck. The 13700TE's multi-threaded scores are good, but its low TDP limits sustained all-core performance. Tasks like video rendering that use both CPU and GPU will be balanced, but pure CPU workloads like data compression, which scores 243565 in Passmark, will rely heavily on the CPU. The GPU's compute score of 18372 in Passmark shows it is also capable of compute tasks, but the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide a strong foundation.

The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU being the limiting factor for high-end gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, while the CPU could be the limiting factor for sustained multi-threaded CPU workloads. The percentile difference of 6 points (82 vs 76) is not huge, so the system is reasonably balanced. However, the data suggests that if a user were to upgrade one component, upgrading the GPU would yield the most benefit for gaming and GPU compute tasks, while upgrading the CPU would be more beneficial for CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or complex physics simulations.