SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700TE

31,028 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700TE and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing that presents a striking contrast in performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 55th percentile among all graphics cards, creating an imbalance where the processor significantly outpaces the graphics hardware in relative standing. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark scores, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, making all gaming performance estimates derived from those scores.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i7-13700TE with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. All frame rate expectations are therefore estimates drawn from the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,698 and single-core score of 2,639 indicate strong processing headroom, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 29,009 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 define the graphics ceiling. The GPU’s 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus with 800.0 GB/s bandwidth suggests it can handle high-resolution textures without capacity constraints, but the 55th percentile ranking implies it is not an elite-tier card.

At 1080p resolution, the combination of the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s raw compute should produce high frame rates in most titles, though the GPU’s moderate percentile ranking means it will likely be the limiting factor even at this resolution. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3,422 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,639 indicate it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 459.6 GPixel/s pixel rate set the practical upper bound. Expect the GPU to be the primary bottleneck at 1080p, with the CPU rarely constraining performance.

At 1440p, the GPU’s workload increases, and the RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant. The estimated frame rates would likely drop modestly from 1080p, but the large memory pool should prevent texture-related stutters. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample margin, so the gaming experience at this resolution would still be GPU-bound. The GPU’s 84 RT cores suggest ray tracing is supported, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 and DirectX 11 score of 340 are low in absolute terms, indicating that API-specific optimizations may vary.

At 4K, the GPU’s 55th percentile ranking becomes more consequential. The estimated frame rates would likely fall below the 1440p figures, and the GPU’s 300 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU indicate it draws significant power but does not guarantee 4K ultra-class performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,623 places it in the mid-range of modern GPUs, so 4K gaming would require settings adjustments for demanding titles. The CPU’s performance at 4K becomes even less relevant, as the GPU will be the clear constraint. Overall, the data suggests this pairing is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being possible but not ideal.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,639 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,422 indicate strong per-core performance that can drive high frame rates in esports and competitive titles. The GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 459.6 GPixel/s pixel rate provide sufficient throughput for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh monitors, though the 55th percentile ranking suggests the GPU will limit maximum frame rates in heavier titles. The combination should handle 144Hz class monitors at 1080p in most games, with 1440p requiring some settings compromises.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, which provide dedicated processing headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 22,754 and data compression score of 243,565 indicate strong parallel throughput, allowing simultaneous game and encode tasks. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means no specialized AI upscaling hardware, but the 5nm process and 57,700 million transistors suggest efficient compute for streaming tasks. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is remarkably low for its core count, leaving thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing leverages the CPU’s multicore performance, with Cinebench R23 multicore scoring 18,698 and Passmark integer math scoring 97,911. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for large video buffers, while its 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and transitions. The combined picture shows a system that can handle 4K video timelines, though the GPU’s 55th percentile ranking means render times will not match top-tier cards. The CPU’s 30 MB shared L3 cache further supports large working sets.

3D rendering relies heavily on the CPU’s 16 cores, evidenced by Cinebench R20 multicore scoring 7,853 and R15 multicore scoring 1,884. The GPU’s 5,376 shading units and 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 compute provide acceleration for GPU-based renderers, while the 84 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing. The Passmark GPU compute score of 16,828 indicates moderate compute throughput, so CPU-based rendering will likely outperform GPU-based workflows in this pairing. The 257 mm² CPU die size and 529 mm² GPU die size reflect substantial silicon resources for rendering tasks.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high single-thread performance, with Cinebench R15 single-core scoring 265 and Passmark single-thread scoring 3,422, enabling fast compilation of single-file changes. The 24 threads accelerate parallel builds, with Passmark multithread scoring 22,754, and the data encryption score of 15,006 supports secure coding workflows. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM allows large virtual machines or GPU-accelerated development environments, though its 55th percentile rank means it is not the primary asset here.

Student and office work is well served by this hardware, though it is oversized for basic tasks. The CPU’s 35 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide an energy-efficient baseline for document processing and web browsing, while the GPU’s 1,232 Passmark G2D score handles 2D acceleration. The 82nd CPU percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, and the 30 MB L3 cache speeds up repetitive workflows. The low CPU power draw makes this a practical if overpowered choice for academic environments.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-13700TE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connections for modern storage and expansion cards. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, though the interface runs at the older standard. The platform supports a wide range of 13th Gen Core processors, so a CPU upgrade within the same socket is a viable path.

The power delivery system must accommodate the CPU’s 35 W TDP and the GPU’s 300 W TDP, with the suggested PSU rated at 700 W. This leaves headroom for the rest of the system, including drives, fans, and peripherals. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking indicates it has substantial headroom before becoming a bottleneck. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means future graphics upgrades will require new hardware, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot ensures compatibility with current and upcoming cards.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited, but the 4.80 GHz boost clock already provides strong single-thread performance. The platform’s DDR4 and DDR5 support means memory upgrades can be tailored to budget and performance needs, with the dual-channel bus providing balanced bandwidth. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support next-generation NVMe drives, making storage upgrades a straightforward path. The 700 W PSU provides sufficient headroom for a more powerful GPU, as long as it does not exceed the 300 W power draw of the current card by a significant margin.

The memory bus width of 320 bits on the GPU and the CPU’s dual-channel memory controller suggest that memory bandwidth is not a primary constraint. A future CPU upgrade within Socket 1700, such as a higher-core-count 13th Gen part, would leverage the existing motherboard and memory. The GPU’s successor, Navi IV, is noted in the FACT PACK, indicating an upgrade path for graphics as well. The 276 mm GPU length and dual-slot width should fit in most mid-tower cases, leaving physical space for upgrades.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU’s 82nd percentile versus the GPU’s 55th percentile creates a clear performance imbalance, with the GPU being the limiting component in most workloads. In gaming, the GPU’s lower relative standing means it will cap frame rates, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s strong single-thread scores, such as the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,639, suggest it can keep up with the GPU’s demands at 1080p, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,623 sets the ceiling. The estimated FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K would show diminishing returns as the GPU becomes increasingly saturated.

In compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads dominate, with the Passmark multithread score of 22,754 far exceeding the GPU’s Passmark compute score of 16,828. The CPU is the primary driver here, and the GPU’s 55th percentile ranking means it contributes less to render times. The CPU’s 35 W TDP versus the GPU’s 300 W TDP highlights the efficiency disparity, with the CPU providing more relative performance per watt. The bottleneck shifts from the GPU in gaming to the CPU in multi-threaded productivity.

The GPU’s 84 RT cores and 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute are substantial, but the 55th percentile ranking indicates they are not top-tier. In ray tracing workloads, the GPU would likely be the limiting factor, as the CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache and high clock speeds are less relevant. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this balance, with the CPU pulling the average up and the GPU pulling it down. The deltaPct values from nearest rivals show the CPU is within 0.5% of similar processors, while the GPU is within 1.5% of its rivals, reinforcing the GPU’s mid-range positioning.

The data suggests that for gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck, and upgrading it would yield the largest FPS gains. For productivity, the CPU is the bottleneck, and upgrading to a higher-core-count processor would improve render times. The 20 GB VRAM on the GPU is a mitigating factor, preventing memory-related bottlenecks in texture-heavy workloads. The 16-core CPU with 24 threads provides balanced performance across most applications, but the GPU’s 55th percentile limits the overall system’s capability in graphics-intensive scenarios.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 1,100 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that is notably low for its core count. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it integrates UHD Graphics 770. The 257 mm² die size and 30 MB shared L3 cache indicate a substantial silicon footprint for desktop workloads.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,698 places the CPU at the 82nd percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS at a 0.1% performance difference. The single-core score of 2,639 is strong, supporting fast response in single-threaded applications like web browsing and office software. The Passmark multithread score of 22,754 and integer math score of 97,911 indicate robust parallel processing for video encoding, compilation, and scientific computing. The data encryption score of 15,006 and extended instructions score of 13,750 show capability in security and specialized workloads.

The architecture’s hybrid design, implied by the core/thread ratio, allows efficient scaling across diverse tasks. The 80 KB L1 cache per core and 2 MB L2 cache per core provide fast access to frequently used data, while the 30 MB L3 cache handles larger working sets. The 10 nm process node and 35 W TDP suggest excellent power efficiency, making this CPU suitable for systems where thermal and energy constraints are a priority. The base clock of 1,100 MHz is low, but the 4.80 GHz boost clock delivers high single-thread performance when needed.

The benchmark scores reveal a CPU that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads, with the 82nd percentile confirming its high standing among all CPUs. The nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-12700F and Intel Core 9 273PTE, are within 0.4% performance, indicating a tight cluster at this performance level. The Passmark physics score of 1,368 and floating point math score of 66,421 further demonstrate the CPU’s capability in simulation and number-crunching tasks. The 24 threads make it well-suited for professional software that scales across cores, while the 35 W TDP allows for compact cooling solutions.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh monitors are the primary audience for this build, given the CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 55th percentile. The CPU’s single-core score of 3,422 in Passmark ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game textures. The estimated FPS at 1080p would be high, with 1440p requiring some settings adjustments due to the GPU’s mid-range ranking. Gamers at 4K would find the GPU inadequate for ultra settings, making this build less suitable for that resolution.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with Cinebench R23 multicore scoring 18,698. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM supports large video buffers and complex scenes, while its 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects. The 55th GPU percentile means render times will be moderate, but the CPU’s 82nd percentile ensures smooth timeline scrubbing and export processes. This build suits creators who prioritize CPU-bound workflows over GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software developers will find the CPU’s high single-thread performance valuable for compilation, with Passmark single-thread scoring 3,422. The 24 threads accelerate parallel builds, as shown by the multithread score of 22,754, and the 30 MB L3 cache speeds up large codebases. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM supports virtualized development environments and GPU-accelerated testing, though its 55th percentile ranking is less relevant for code writing. The low 35 W CPU TDP allows for quiet, efficient development workstations.

Students and small business users will benefit from the CPU’s energy efficiency, with its 35 W TDP reducing power costs, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 providing a fallback for basic tasks. The 82nd CPU percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, while the 16 cores handle occasional heavy workloads like data analysis. The GPU is overkill for this segment, but the 1,232 Passmark G2D score handles 2D acceleration efficiently. The 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for future upgrades, making this a future-proof investment for growing businesses.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a base clock of 1,387 MHz, a boost clock of 2,394 MHz, and a game clock of 2,025 MHz, with memory running at 2,500 MHz or 20 Gbps effective. The 5,376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs deliver 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 and 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 compute, with pixel and texture rates of 459.6 GPixel/s and 804.4 GTexel/s, respectively.

The GPU includes 84 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, but the absence of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. The 55th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range of GPUs, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon 660M at a 0.5% performance difference. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 indicates moderate DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068 shows strong Vulkan capability. The Passmark G3D score of 29,009 and GPU compute score of 16,828 provide additional performance metrics.

For rendering, the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM is a significant asset, allowing large textures, complex scenes, and high-resolution output without memory overflow. The 800.0 GB/s bandwidth supports fast data transfer between the GPU and VRAM, crucial for real-time rendering and texture streaming. The 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute power accelerates polygon processing and shader effects, while the 103.0 TFLOPS FP16 compute is useful for AI-based denoising if software supports it. The 84 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but the 55th percentile ranking suggests it will not match top-tier ray tracing performance.

The GPU’s 300 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU indicate significant power draw, and the dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin connectors requires adequate case space and power supply capacity. The 276 mm length and 110 mm height are standard for a high-end card, fitting most mid-tower cases. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, supporting modern monitors and VR headsets. The end-of-life production status means it is no longer in production, but its 20 GB VRAM ensures longevity for future games.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE ranks at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31,028.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bus width?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP, and what PSU is suggested for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 300 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a launch MSRP of 899 USD.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have, and what architecture is it based on?

A: The GPU has 84 RT cores and is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and process node?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz and is built on Intel’s 10 nm process.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i7-13700TE achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,698 and a single-core score of 2,639, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The Passmark multithread score of 22,754 and single-thread score of 3,422 confirm strong performance across both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 31,028 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, which scores 31,074 for a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i7-12700F and Intel Core 9 273PTE are also within 0.4% performance, showing a tight competitive cluster.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT scores 5,623 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 29,009 in Passmark G3D, placing it at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068 is particularly strong, while the OpenCL score of 12,756 is more moderate. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 13,745 is close to the AMD Radeon 660M’s 13,812, a 0.5% difference, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile’s 13,821, also a 0.5% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is 1.5% ahead, indicating the RX 7900 XT sits just below newer mid-range cards.

The combined picture shows a CPU at the 82nd percentile paired with a GPU at the 55th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 69. This indicates that the CPU is the stronger component, pulling the system’s overall performance upward, while the GPU represents the limiting factor. The CPU’s high scores in Cinebench and Passmark suggest it can handle demanding productivity workloads, while the GPU’s mid-range scores indicate it is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming rather than 4K ultra settings. The average benchmark scores of 31,028 for the CPU and 13,745 for the GPU highlight the disparity, with the CPU outscoring the GPU by a factor of over two in average terms.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700TE with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in a desktop configuration, as indicated by the build class. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is a 300 W RDNA 3.0 card with 20 GB VRAM. The combination targets desktop users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and moderate GPU performance for gaming, with the system’s overall tier defined by the 69th combined percentile.

The CPU’s 82nd percentile places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, capable of handling demanding multi-threaded workloads with ease. The GPU’s 55th percentile places it in the mid-range of graphics cards, suitable for mainstream gaming at 1080p and 1440p but not for enthusiast-level 4K or high-refresh 1440p ultra settings. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this balanced but CPU-leaning configuration, where the processor provides headroom for future GPU upgrades.

The desktop class means the build is not constrained by laptop thermal and power limits, allowing the CPU’s 35 W TDP and GPU’s 300 W TDP to be managed with standard cooling and a 700 W PSU. The socket 1700 platform offers upgradeability within the 13th Gen Core family, while the PCIe 4.0 x16 GPU slot supports current and next-generation graphics cards. The overall tier is mid-to-high, with strong CPU performance and adequate GPU performance, making this build a solid choice for users who prioritize productivity and are satisfied with high-quality 1080p or 1440p gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700TE + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700TE

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds