SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Consequently, all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

Benchmark results suggest this pairing is viable for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with the GPU being the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The Quadro RTX 4000 posts a Passmark G3D score of 15,117, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU's single-thread performance — a Passmark single-thread score of 3,821 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,282 — indicates strong per-core capability. For esports titles and older games, the estimated FPS at 1080p ultra could comfortably exceed 100 FPS, given the CPU's high single-core throughput and the GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 compute. However, for modern AAA titles at 1440p or 4K ultra, the estimated FPS would likely drop below 60 in demanding scenes, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and mid-tier rasterization performance (evidenced by its 61st percentile ranking) become limiting factors.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 on Passmark is notably low, which suggests that the most modern API-heavy titles may underperform relative to what the raw compute numbers imply. At 1080p, the CPU's 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs ensures it will rarely bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but at lower resolutions where CPU overhead dominates, the i7-13700T's 35W TDP and reduced boost behavior may cause frame pacing inconsistencies. The estimated FPS figures should be treated as rough ranges: 1080p ultra likely delivers 60–120 FPS depending on title optimization, 1440p ultra likely delivers 40–70 FPS, and 4K ultra likely delivers 25–45 FPS. These estimates align with the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15,117, which sits just 0.9% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060's average score of 17,639.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35,403, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 213PE (average score 35,428, delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (average score 35,365, delta +0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13600T (average score 35,305, delta +0.3%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (average score 35,287, delta +0.3%). The sub-1% deltas across all four rivals indicate that the i7-13700T is statistically indistinguishable from these peers in aggregate performance, which is remarkable given its 35W TDP compared to the 125W+ TDPs typical of the K-series parts.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23,248 multi-core and 3,282 single-core. The multi-core score represents strong sustained throughput for a low-power chip, though it trails the higher-TDP i7-12700K by only 0.3% in average score — evidence of the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture at reduced power limits. The Geekbench results of 11,573 multi-core and 2,490 single-core corroborate the Cinebench findings, showing balanced performance across synthetic workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,789, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (average score 17,666, delta +0.7%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (average score 17,639, delta +0.9%), the AMD Radeon 780M (average score 17,588, delta +1.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (average score 17,551, delta +1.4%). The Quadro RTX 4000 leads all four rivals by narrow margins, but the tight clustering — all within 1.4% — means the GPU sits in a competitive mid-range tier where architectural differences matter more than raw score gaps.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, reflecting a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop configurations. The CPU's 85th percentile is substantially higher than the GPU's 61st percentile, indicating a CPU-heavy balance where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can fully utilize.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz with 13 Gbps effective speed. This bandwidth figure is adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering but may become a constraint at 4K or when working with large textures in professional applications. The GPU's base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, which are modest clocks for a 160W TDP card, reflecting its workstation-oriented design priorities.

The GPU contains 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, making it one of the earlier professional cards to feature dedicated ray tracing and AI acceleration hardware. The FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), indicating that the tensor cores can accelerate mixed-precision workloads. The pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s, both of which support the notion of a capable mid-range rendering card.

The Passmark G3D score of 15,117 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540 suggest that the GPU handles compute workloads competently but not exceptionally. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,873 is notably low, indicating that the card struggles with the most demanding modern DirectX 12 path — a significant consideration for gaming, as this API is now standard in AAA titles. The GPU's Vulkan score of 78,844 on Geekbench is stronger, suggesting better optimization in Vulkan-based titles. For rendering workloads in Blender or similar applications, the 36 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the modest 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means that final-frame rendering will be slower than contemporary mid-range gaming GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly shows a CPU-favored balance. With the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score 3,821) ensures that frame generation is not CPU-bound in most titles, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking means it will cap FPS in demanding scenes. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's relative weakness becomes more pronounced, with the 8 GB VRAM and lower compute throughput acting as the primary bottlenecks.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-threaded performance — Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,248 and Passmark multi-thread score of 28,211 — indicates that CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and data compression (Passmark data compression score of 327,700) will be well-served. The GPU's compute scores (Passmark GPU compute score of 6,176, Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540) suggest it can accelerate some workloads, but the CPU will likely dominate in mixed-use scenarios. The combined percentile of 73 indicates that while neither component is top-tier, the pairing avoids severe imbalances that would waste performance in either direction.

Evidence for the bottleneck dynamic comes from the FPS scaling pattern: the CPU's 0.1% delta against the i7-12700KF in average score means that swapping in a higher-TDP CPU would yield negligible gaming gains because the GPU is already the limiting factor. Conversely, upgrading the GPU would produce immediate FPS improvements across all resolutions, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed a faster graphics card.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the estimated FPS in less demanding titles can exceed 144 FPS, given the CPU's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 3,282) and the GPU's moderate raster performance. However, the low DirectX 12 score of 52 on Passmark suggests that modern AAA titles will struggle to maintain high frame rates, making this a better fit for 60–100 Hz monitors rather than 144 Hz+ displays.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,248 indicating strong parallel performance. The GPU's 288 tensor cores can also accelerate NVENC-like workloads, though the card's age (2018 release) means it lacks the most recent encoder improvements.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 105,397 and floating-point math score of 73,928 indicate strong computational throughput for timeline operations and effect processing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, and the 416 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth scrubbing with moderate color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU's 36 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, and the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles viewport rendering. However, the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 suggests that the most modern render engines may not fully exploit the hardware, and the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, with Passmark multi-thread score of 28,211 indicating solid parallel build performance. The 30 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides flexibility.

Student and office work: The 35W TDP makes this an efficient choice for sustained office workloads, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3,821 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is idle, though the Quadro RTX 4000 will handle any graphics tasks with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-13700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16. This means the GPU is running on an older bus standard, though the bandwidth difference is unlikely to be a bottleneck for the Quadro RTX 4000's performance level.

The CPU's TDP is 35W, and the GPU's TDP is 160W, with a suggested PSU of 450W. This leaves substantial headroom for upgrades. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU — the data shows that the CPU could feed a significantly faster card without becoming a bottleneck, given its 85th percentile ranking. For instance, a GPU with a Passmark G3D score above 20,000 would likely pair well with this CPU, as the combined percentile would rise accordingly.

The motherboard socket supports future 13th-generation and potentially 14th-generation Intel CPUs, though the 35W TDP of the current chip means that higher-TDP replacements (e.g., the i7-12700K at 125W+) would require a more robust cooling solution. Memory upgrades are also viable: the platform's DDR5 support allows for higher bandwidth configurations, though the current dual-channel setup is adequate for the GPU's 416 GB/s memory bandwidth demands.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700T features 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 1400 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The architecture is Raptor Lake, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and has integrated UHD Graphics 770.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that punches above its 35W TDP. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,248 is competitive with higher-TDP desktop chips, as evidenced by the 0.3% delta against the i7-12700K. The single-core score of 3,282 in Cinebench R23 is strong, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3,821 confirms excellent per-core performance for legacy and lightly-threaded workloads.

The Passmark suite provides granular insights: integer math at 105,397 and floating-point math at 73,928 show balanced ALU and FPU performance, while extended instructions (19,306) and data encryption (19,230) indicate capable cryptographic and SIMD throughput. The data compression score of 327,700 is exceptionally high, suggesting that the CPU excels at archive operations and data-heavy workloads. The find prime numbers score of 127 is lower, reflecting the CPU's design priorities toward real-world integer operations rather than pure mathematical benchmarks.

The 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this chip in the upper tier of desktop processors, and the near-zero deltas against the i7-12700K and i7-12700KF (both within 0.3%) demonstrate that the T-series low-power variant delivers essentially the same performance as its higher-TDP counterparts in aggregate benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700T compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35,403, which is 0.3% higher than the i7-12700K's score of 35,287. Both CPUs are statistically equivalent in aggregate performance, despite the 13700T's much lower 35W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17,789, which is 0.9% higher than the RTX 4060's score of 17,639. The two cards are nearly identical in aggregate performance, though the RTX 4060 is a gaming-focused part while the Quadro is workstation-oriented.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's 61st percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM, 4K gaming is possible in undemanding titles, but estimated FPS at 4K ultra would likely fall in the 25–45 FPS range for modern AAA games, which falls short of smooth gameplay standards.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, indicating overclocking support. However, the 35W TDP suggests limited thermal headroom for significant frequency increases, so practical overclocking gains would likely be modest.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has a memory bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s, delivered via 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a 1625 MHz memory clock (13 Gbps effective).

Q: Is the CPU good for software development?

A: Yes. The 16 cores and 24 threads deliver a Passmark multi-thread score of 28,211, which indicates strong compilation performance. The 30 MB shared L3 cache also helps with frequently accessed code.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 73, meaning this desktop configuration outperforms approximately 73% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads while still needing competent graphics performance. Gamers at 1080p who play less demanding titles will find the system capable, though those seeking 1440p or 4K high-refresh experiences should look elsewhere — the GPU's 61st percentile and low DirectX 12 score of 52 cap performance in modern AAA games. Content creators working in video editing will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded throughput (Cinebench R23 multi-core 23,248, Passmark multi-thread 28,211), and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines. 3D artists using Vulkan-based renderers will find the GPU's Vulkan score of 78,844 encouraging, though ray-traced workloads will be slow due to the modest 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads, as well as the data compression score of 327,700 that speeds up build artifacts and package management. Students and office workers running productivity suites will find the system more than adequate — the CPU's 85th percentile ensures smooth multitasking, and the 35W TDP keeps power consumption low for extended use. Small business workstations that require occasional rendering or video processing will benefit from the Quadro's workstation drivers and the CPU's balanced performance, though the end-of-life production status of the GPU means replacements may be needed sooner than with newer parts.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a desktop-class pairing that combines a low-power, high-core-count CPU with a mid-range workstation GPU. The CPU, part of the Core 13th Gen series on the Raptor Lake architecture, delivers 16 cores and 24 threads with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is based on the Turing architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 160W TDP. The combined percentile of 73 places this build in the upper-mid tier of desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 85th percentile significantly outperforming the GPU's 61st percentile in relative terms. This is a system built for CPU-centric productivity workloads that also handles moderate gaming and rendering tasks, rather than a high-end gaming rig or a top-tier workstation.