SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is an unusual desktop combination: a 35 W TDP efficiency-focused Raptor Lake processor matched with a flagship-tier Blackwell 2.0 graphics card. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU reaches the 87th percentile, and the pairing as a whole lands at a combined percentile of 86. The data shows a build that is strongly GPU-dominant in graphics workloads and comfortably capable in multi-threaded CPU tasks, though the low base clock of the processor makes the CPU the limiting factor in frame-rate-sensitive scenarios. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database; all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². Its base clock of 1400 MHz is low by desktop standards, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, giving the chip genuine flexibility for users willing to work within its 35 W TDP envelope. The hybrid core layout of 13th Generation Raptor Lake pairs performance cores with efficiency cores, and the cache structure — 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus 30 MB of shared L3 — reflects that design.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that holds its own well beyond what its TDP would suggest. In Cinebench R23 the chip scores 23248 in multi-core and 3282 in single-core; the R20 results follow the same pattern at 9764 and 1378, and R15 at 2343 and 330. The Geekbench results — 11573 multi-core and 2490 single-core — place the chip firmly in high-mainstream territory. PassMark tells a similar story: a multithread score of 28211, a single-thread result of 3821, and an integer math score of 105397 alongside 73928 in floating point math.

What do these numbers mean for real workloads? The multi-core results are strong enough for sustained content creation — video encoding, 3D rendering, code compilation — while the single-core figures of 3282 (R23) and 2490 (Geekbench) indicate snappy responsiveness in applications that lean on one fast thread. The PassMark subscores add texture: 327700 in data compression and 19230 in encryption show capable throughput for file archiving and storage tasks, and 34939 in string sorting points to solid performance in data-processing workloads. The find-prime-numbers result of 127 and physics score of 1769 sit at the lower end of the scale, which is expected for a TDP-constrained part in sustained heavy compute.

Against its nearest rivals, the picture is remarkably tight. The i7-13700T's average benchmark score of 35403 is statistically tied with the Intel Core 5 213PE (35428, a delta of just 0.1 percent), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, 0.1 percent), and the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, 0.3 percent). The Intel Core i7-12700K is also within 0.3 percent at 35287. In other words, the data shows this efficiency chip delivering aggregate performance effectively indistinguishable from full-desktop counterparts of the previous generation — the 85th-percentile position is earned, not gifted.

Benchmark Performance

Walking through the CPU scores step by step: Cinebench R15 gives 2343 multi-core and 330 single-core; R20 gives 9764 and 1378; R23 gives 23248 and 3282. Geekbench returns 11573 multi-core and 2490 single-core. PassMark's suite covers the full spread of compute — 105397 integer, 73928 floating point, 327700 compression, 19230 encryption, 19306 extended instructions, 34939 string sorting, 28211 multithread, 3821 single thread, 1769 physics, and 127 in prime finding. The average benchmark score across these tests is 35403, good for the 85th percentile versus all CPUs.

On the graphics side, the RTX 5080 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637, a Geekbench OpenCL result of 235901, and a Geekbench Vulkan result of 255450. PassMark graphics tests add 36565 in G3D, 21789 in GPU compute, 1415 in 2D graphics, and DirectX-specific results of 389 (DX9), 324 (DX11), 208 (DX10), and 151 (DX12). The average GPU benchmark score is 56083, placing the card in the 87th percentile of all GPUs.

The nearest GPU rivals frame that position precisely. The AMD Radeon 8060S averages 55757 — 0.6 percent behind the RTX 5080 — and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB sits 0.7 percent back at 55698. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 2.3 percent at 54828, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the one rival ahead, at 57367, a 2.2 percent advantage. These are narrow margins; the RTX 5080 is in a tightly contested performance band near the top of the distribution.

The combined picture is coherent: a combined percentile of 86 with the CPU at 85 and the GPU at 87 means both components are pulling the same direction. Neither is a dramatic outlier, but the GPU holds the slight edge in relative standing, and the gap between a 35 W processor and a 360 W graphics card tells the deeper story about where the performance ceiling sits in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-13700T compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 35403 is within 0.3 percent of the Intel Core 5 213PE, Intel Core i7-12700KF, Intel Core i5-13600T, and Intel Core i7-12700K — effectively a four-way statistical tie.

Q: Is the RTX 5080 faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE in the benchmark database?

A: No. The RX 9070 GRE averages 57367 versus the RTX 5080's 56083, a 2.2 percent edge for the AMD card. The RTX 5080 does lead the Radeon 8060S, RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and Radeon Pro W5700X.

Q: Are there measured frame rates for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: Can the i7-13700T be overclocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, though its 35 W TDP constrains sustained headroom.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: DDR4 or DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, on Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What power supply does the RTX 5080 call for?

A: A 750 W unit is the suggested PSU, with the card drawing a 360 W TDP through a single 16-pin connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics as a fallback?

A: Yes, Intel UHD Graphics 770 is integrated, though the build's discrete RTX 5080 supersedes it entirely.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700 with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, which gives builders flexibility in memory choice. The CPU provides 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 direct from the processor — enough to run the RTX 5080's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface at full width and still leave lanes for fast storage. ECC memory is not supported, which positions this as a workstation-class-adjacent rather than mission-critical platform.

Power is the key planning item. The CPU's 35 W TDP is tiny; the GPU's 360 W TDP is not. NVIDIA suggests a 750 W power supply, and that figure already accounts for the graphics card's demands through its single 16-pin connector. With the processor contributing so little to the power budget, the suggested PSU provides comfortable headroom for the rest of the system. The card is dual-slot, which is compact for its class.

A sensible next upgrade focuses on the CPU. Given that the i7-13700T performs within 0.3 percent of the i7-12700K and i7-12700KF on average, and given that the GPU sits at the 87th percentile while the CPU sits at 85, the processor is the component most worth strengthening for high-refresh gaming — a higher-TDP Socket 1700 part would lift the single-thread and physics results that currently sit at 3821 and 1769 respectively. On the graphics side, the RTX 5080 is already the stronger half of the pairing; its successor is listed as the GeForce 60 series, making that the natural generational path.

Who Should Build It

This combination suits a specific kind of builder: someone who wants near-flagship graphics performance with a cool, quiet, low-draw processor. Content creators are the clearest fit — the CPU's 23248 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 28211 in PassMark multithread handle video editing and rendering workloads, while the GPU's 235901 OpenCL and 21789 GPU compute scores accelerate effects, encode pipelines, and GPU rendering. 3D artists benefit similarly: the GPU's compute throughput plus the CPU's 16-core throughput make a credible workstation pairing.

Developers and students are well served. The 105397 integer math and 11573 Geekbench multi-core results support fast compilation, containerized workloads, and general development; the 3282 single-core score keeps IDEs and scripts responsive. For gaming, the target is high-resolution play: the GPU's 87th-percentile standing and 16 GB of GDDR7 make 1440p and 4K the natural home, with high-refresh outcomes at 1080p limited by the CPU rather than the graphics card. Small business workstations fit too — the data compression (327700) and encryption (19230) scores indicate capable file-handling throughput, though the lack of ECC rules out error-critical deployments.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: the GPU's 8637 Steel Nomad score and 87th percentile position indicate strong frame delivery, but the CPU's 1769 physics score and 35 W power ceiling mean the processor is the limiter at very high frame rates. Expect excellent results at 1440p and 4K, with CPU-limited ceilings at 1080p esports settings.

Streaming: the pairing works well. The GPU handles game rendering while the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads — evidenced by the 28211 multithread score — absorb encoding and compositing. The 34939 string-sorting result also reflects the data-shuffling throughput stream pipelines demand.

Video editing: strongly supported. The CPU's 9764 Cinebench R20 multi-core and 23248 R23 multi-core handle timeline scrubbing and CPU encodes, while the GPU's 235901 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerates effects and GPU-accelerated export.

3D rendering: the GPU's 255450 Vulkan and 235901 OpenCL results indicate heavy compute throughput for GPU renderers, and the 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 figure underpins that capability. CPU rendering is covered by the 16-core, 24-thread layout. The combined percentile of 86 reflects a genuinely capable rendering station.

Software development: the 2490 single-core Geekbench score and 105397 integer math result support responsive editors and fast builds alike; 11573 multi-core handles parallel compilation and virtualization comfortably.

Student and office work: the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU is irrelevant here, but the 3821 single-thread PassMark score means everyday applications feel instant, and the 327700 compression score makes large project archives painless. The 35 W TDP keeps the system quiet during light work.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: the database contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination — the measured FPS table is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Every frame-rate statement below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a measured result.

From those scores, the estimate is straightforward. The RTX 5080's 36565 PassMark G3D result, its 8637 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and its 87th-percentile standing indicate graphics throughput suited to max-settings play at 1440p and 4K in modern titles. The DirectX-specific results — 389 in DX9, 324 in DX11, 208 in DX10, and 151 in DX12 — trace the card's behavior across API generations, with the DX12 result being the most relevant to current game engines.

The CPU side tempers expectations at the high end. A PassMark single-thread score of 3821 and a physics score of 1769 are solid but not extreme; at 1080p with high refresh targets, the processor's low base clock and 35 W envelope become the constraint, and frame rates will plateau below what the GPU could otherwise deliver. Estimated: excellent 4K performance, very good 1440p performance, and CPU-limited 1080p high-refresh performance. Treat all of these as score-derived estimates pending measured data.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build, per the buildClass field, pairing a 13th Generation Intel efficiency processor with a GeForce 50-series flagship-class graphics card. The CPU occupies the 85th percentile of all processors with an average benchmark score of 35403; the GPU occupies the 87th percentile with 56083; the combination sits at the 86th percentile overall.

That combined figure is the honest summary: this is a high-tier build, not an absolute-top-tier one, and its character is defined by asymmetry — a 360 W graphics card driven by a 35 W processor. The RTX 5080 brings 16 GB of GDDR7, 10752 shading units, and Blackwell 2.0 architecture; the i7-13700T brings 16 cores, 24 threads, and a 4.90 GHz boost. Together they form a graphics-first machine whose overall tier reflects a GPU slightly ahead of its CPU partner.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous. In graphics-bound workloads — high-resolution gaming, GPU rendering, compute — the RTX 5080's 87th percentile and 56083 average score dominate, and the CPU's role is simply to stay out of the way. It mostly does: a 23248 R23 multi-core score and a 28211 multithread result are ample for feeding a single flagship GPU at 4K.

In CPU-bound workloads, the imbalance reverses. The 35 W TDP caps sustained multi-core output, and the single-thread results — 3282 in R23, 2490 in Geekbench, 3821 in PassMark — while good, are what a high-refresh gamer would want to improve first. Without measured FPS data, the evidence comes from the scaling implied by the scores: as resolution rises, the GPU's load increases while the CPU's stays flat, meaning higher resolutions suit this pairing better than high-refresh low-resolution play.

The evidence points one direction: the GPU is the stronger component, and the CPU is the limiting partner in frame-rate-sensitive scenarios. A builder prioritizing 4K or heavy GPU compute has a balanced system; a builder prioriting maximum refresh rates has a CPU upgrade candidate on Socket 1700.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 is built on the GB203 chip, Blackwell 2.0 architecture, TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die — a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². Memory is 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus running at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective), delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is the headline spec: it underwrites the card's ability to feed 10752 shading units at high resolutions.

Clocks run from a 2295 MHz base to a 2617 MHz boost. The card provides 336 texture mapping units, 112 render output units, a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. Ray tracing hardware comprises 84 RT cores, and AI workloads draw on 336 tensor cores. Raw compute lands at 56.28 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

For rendering, the benchmark scores translate directly. The 235901 Geekbench OpenCL and 255450 Vulkan results show the compute throughput that GPU renderers and simulation engines exploit, and the 21789 PassMark GPU compute score reinforces the picture. The 8637 Steel Nomad DX12 result reflects modern DirectX 12 Ultimate-class rendering capability, supported by API support through DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The 84 RT cores make ray-traced rendering practical rather than theoretical, and the 336 tensor cores add AI-assisted rendering paths on top. Against its rival set, the card sits at the center of a tight cluster — 0.6 to 2.3 percent ahead of three AMD cards, 2.2 percent behind the RX 9070 GRE — which frames it as a top-band, contended performer rather than an untouchable one.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds