SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, a desktop configuration combining a 35 W energy-efficient 16-core processor with a high-bandwidth 8 GB graphics card. The combination sits at the 80th percentile overall, indicating a system that is well above average for mixed productivity and gaming workloads. The CPU’s benchmark scores place it at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s scores land at the 75th percentile among all graphics cards. The data shows a pairing where the processor has a slight statistical edge over the graphics card in relative performance, though both components are closely matched in their respective tiers. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate expectations in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. Its base clock is 1400 MHz, which boosts up to 4.90 GHz, and it has a 35 W TDP, making it a low-power part relative to its core count. The chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, though the presence of a discrete GPU makes that secondary. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports high-throughput tasks.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads while maintaining strong single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23248 multi-core and 3282 single-core; the multi-core result is nearly seven times the single-core score, indicating excellent scaling across its 16 cores. The Cinebench R20 scores are 9764 multi-core and 1378 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 2343 multi-core and 330 single-core. Geekbench results are 11573 multi-core and 2490 single-core, and PassMark’s multithread score is 28211 with a single-thread score of 3821. The PassMark integer math score of 105397 and floating-point math score of 73928 show strong arithmetic throughput, while data compression scores 327700 and encryption scores 19230, indicating capable handling of data-intensive tasks.

The CPU’s 85th percentile position puts it ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF, which has an average score of 35365 and a deltaPct of 0.1, and also ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700K with an average score of 35287 and a deltaPct of 0.3. It trails the Intel Core 5 213PE with an average score of 35428 and a deltaPct of -0.1, though the difference is negligible at less than one percent. The i7-13700T’s average benchmark score of 35403 places it in the same performance class as these rivals, meaning the 35 W TDP does not come at a significant cost in raw compute capability. For real workloads, this translates to a processor that can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, while the high single-core score of 3282 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive performance in everyday applications and lightly threaded tasks.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance is the relevant metric, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3282 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3821. These figures indicate the processor can keep up with modern game engines that rely on a few fast cores, though the exact frame rates depend on the GPU, which is analyzed separately.

For streaming, the 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 327700 and multithread score of 28211 suggest the CPU can handle the background encoding workload without choking the game’s main thread, making this a viable single-PC streaming setup.

For video editing, the multi-core scores are the primary evidence. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 and Geekbench multi-core score of 11573 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks, though the 35 W TDP suggests sustained all-core loads may be limited by power delivery, not compute capability.

For 3D rendering, the PassMark floating-point math score of 73928 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9764 show that the CPU is capable of handling ray tracing workloads in software. The 16 cores will scale well in render engines that support multi-threading, and the 30 MB L3 cache helps with scene data reuse.

For software development, the PassMark integer math score of 105397 and data encryption score of 19230 are relevant. Compilation tasks are typically integer-heavy and multi-threaded, so the CPU’s 16 cores and strong integer throughput should reduce build times for large codebases.

For student and office work, the CPU is more than sufficient. The single-core scores are high enough for spreadsheet, browser, and document tasks, and the 35 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial for a shared or small workspace. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed for display output.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700T compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K in multi-threaded performance?

A: The i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35403, which is 0.3% higher than the i7-12700K’s average score of 35287, indicating essentially identical multi-threaded performance despite the T-series lower power rating.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has a 256-bit memory bus with GDDR6X memory running at 19 Gbps effective, yielding a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. This high bandwidth supports texture streaming and high-resolution rendering without bottlenecking the GPU’s compute units.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier unlocked field is true, meaning the CPU can be overclocked, though the base clock of 1400 MHz and boost of 4.90 GHz suggest there is some headroom beyond factory settings.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 80, meaning it performs better than 80% of all tested configurations in the database, based on the individual CPU and GPU scores.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29945, which is 0.5% lower than the RX 6800’s average score of 30095, indicating that the two cards are nearly equivalent in raw performance, within the margin of error.

Q: What is the CPU’s power consumption and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is low for a 16-core part. This means a capable air cooler is sufficient, and the system will not generate excessive heat, making it suitable for compact desktop builds.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate expectations in this analysis are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This build is well-suited for gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolution, where the GPU becomes the primary performance driver. The RTX 3070 Ti’s 75th percentile score means it can handle demanding titles at high settings, and the CPU’s 85th percentile single-thread performance ensures the processor does not become a limiting factor in frame pacing. For content creators, the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248, make this a solid choice for video editing and 3D rendering workstations. The 35 W TDP also makes it attractive for small form factor builds where thermal management is a priority.

Developers will benefit from the CPU’s integer throughput, as shown by the PassMark integer math score of 105397, which accelerates compilation and testing loops. The 30 MB L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory (alongside DDR4) provide flexibility for memory-intensive workloads. Students and small business users will find this build more than adequate for office productivity, with the CPU’s single-core scores handling document and spreadsheet tasks effortlessly. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most professional 2D and light 3D applications, and the system’s overall 80th percentile ranking indicates it is a high-tier machine that will remain relevant for several years. The end-of-life status of the GPU means buyers should consider availability, but the performance data shows it remains competitive.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures in this section are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The RTX 3070 Ti’s PassMark G3D score of 23356 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 indicate strong rasterization performance, while the CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3282 ensures that most games will not be CPU-bound at typical settings.

For esports titles at 1080p, the high single-thread performance of the CPU, combined with the GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute, suggests frame rates well above 144 Hz in games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, though these are estimates. For AAA games at 1440p, the GPU’s 608.3 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6X memory should deliver high settings with smooth frame pacing, but the exact numbers depend on the title. At 4K, the GPU’s 75th percentile score suggests it will handle medium to high settings, with the 8 GB VRAM potentially being a limiting factor for ultra textures in the most demanding titles. The CPU’s 16 cores provide headroom for background tasks, but the gaming performance is largely dictated by the GPU, which is the lower-scoring component in this pair.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is an Ampere architecture GPU built on Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The base clock is 1575 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, and the memory runs at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6X memory sits on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The card has a TDP of 290 W and requires a 600 W suggested power supply, with a dual-slot cooler and a single 12-pin power connector.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is strong in direct compute tasks. The PassMark G3D score of 23356 places it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29945. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 and Vulkan score of 139541 indicate solid cross-API performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 reflects modern DirectX 12 workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11601 shows the card’s compute capability, which is relevant for rendering and physics simulations. The pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering, while the FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 21.75 TFLOPS 1:1) provides computational horsepower for shader-heavy effects.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3070 Ti is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (average score 29928), 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (average score 30095), 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (average score 29783), and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (average score 30433). These deltaPct values show that the GPU is squarely in the performance tier of previous-generation high-end cards. The RT and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint in future titles that require more memory for ray-traced scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are led by the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 23248, which places it firmly in the high-performance desktop category. The single-core score of 3282 in the same test is equally important for responsiveness. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11573 and single-core score of 2490 corroborate these findings. PassMark results are comprehensive: multithread 28211, single-thread 3821, integer math 105397, floating-point math 73928, data compression 327700, and data encryption 19230. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35403, and its percentile rank is 85, meaning it outperforms 85% of all CPUs in the database.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are anchored by the PassMark G3D score of 23356 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 and Vulkan score of 139541 show strong cross-platform compute. The DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores from PassMark are 192 and 91, respectively, which are lower than the G3D score but reflect specific API tests. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29945, and its percentile rank is 75. The combined percentile for the system is 80, indicating that the CPU and GPU together form a configuration that is better than four out of five builds in the database.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a 13th-generation Intel Core i7 processor with a GeForce 30-series NVIDIA GPU. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, provide high multi-threaded throughput, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth provide strong graphics performance, with a PassMark G3D score of 23356. The system’s overall tier is high, with a combined percentile of 80 and individual CPU and GPU percentiles of 85 and 75, respectively. This is a balanced desktop pairing where the CPU slightly outpaces the GPU in relative benchmark standing, but both are in the upper quartile of their categories.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows that the CPU has a higher percentile rank (85) than the GPU (75), indicating that the processor is statistically stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its peers. This suggests that in gaming workloads, the GPU is the more likely bottleneck, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are stressed. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3282, should be sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rates.

In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 23248, PassMark multithread 28211) are strong, but the GPU’s compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute 11601, FP32 21.75 TFLOPS) can also be leveraged for GPU-accelerated rendering. In such scenarios, the workload determines which component is the bottleneck: CPU-only rendering will be limited by the processor, while GPU-accelerated rendering will use the graphics card’s compute throughput. The 35 W TDP of the CPU is a potential constraint for sustained all-core loads, as it may throttle under heavy multi-threaded tasks, but the benchmark scores suggest that the processor still delivers competitive performance within that power envelope. Overall, this is a well-balanced system where neither component is egregiously mismatched, but users prioritizing high frame rates at 1440p or 4K should be aware that the GPU is the performance ceiling.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds