SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a balanced desktop pairing built around a 35W power-efficient 16-core processor and a mainstream 8GB graphics card. The combination targets 1080p gaming and mixed productivity workloads where the CPU’s multi-threaded strength can handle background tasks while the GPU delivers smooth frame rates at high settings. The data shows a system that prioritizes versatility and efficiency over raw high-end performance, sitting at the 72nd combined percentile among all desktop configurations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The AMD Radeon RX 9060’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 and PassMark G3D score of 17631 place it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates in most titles, though the 8GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will limit performance in the most demanding modern games at maximum settings. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3282 ensures it will not bottleneck frame generation in CPU-light scenarios.

Streaming: With 24 threads from the Core i7-13700T’s 16 cores, the CPU has ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast software. The PassMark multithread score of 28211 places this processor at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets while maintaining playable frame rates. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware-accelerated encoding will rely on the CPU or standard GPU encoders, but the CPU’s multi-threaded muscle covers this workload well.

Video editing: The combination of a strong multi-core CPU and a GPU with 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute provides a solid foundation for timeline editing, effects, and rendering in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9764 and Geekbench multicore score of 11573 indicate responsive scrubbing and export times, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 88183 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects. The 8GB VRAM may restrict very large projects or heavy color grading with multiple 4K layers.

3D rendering: The CPU is the workhorse here, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248 that places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and 0.3% of the Core i7-12700K. This translates to competitive CPU-based rendering performance for Blender or V-Ray workloads. The GPU’s PassMark GPU Compute score of 9919 supports GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 8GB VRAM will be the limiting factor for scenes that exceed that capacity, making this a capable entry-level rendering workstation rather than a professional-grade one.

Software development: Compilation, testing, and running multiple virtual machines or containers benefit directly from the CPU’s 24 threads and PassMark integer math score of 105397. The data compression score of 327700 and random string sorting score of 34939 indicate strong performance in build tools that compress artifacts or sort large datasets. The 35W TDP means sustained multi-core loads run cool and quiet, which is ideal for long compile sessions in an office environment.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but the efficiency is the selling point. The 35W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide a fallback for office tasks when the discrete GPU is unnecessary, and the CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3821 ensures snappy response in spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing workloads. The 16 cores handle multitasking with dozens of browser tabs and background applications without breaking a sweat.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are consistent across multiple suites, showing a well-rounded processor. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 23248, with a single-core result of 3282 that gives a ratio of roughly 7:1 multicore-to-single-core, typical for a hybrid architecture with 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. Geekbench reports 11573 multi-core and 2490 single-core, while PassMark multithread reaches 28211 and single-thread 3821. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35403 places it at the 85th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core 5 213PE (0.1% lower), Core i7-12700KF (0.1% higher), and Core i5-13600T (0.3% higher). This means the 13700T is statistically tied with these chips in overall CPU performance despite its drastically lower power envelope.

The GPU benchmarks tell a different story. 3DMark Steel Nomad scores 3322, PassMark G3D scores 17631, and Geekbench OpenCL reaches 88183. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 16014 places it at the 59th percentile, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at just 0.7% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 at 1% lower. This puts the RX 9060 in the same performance class as the RTX 3060 Ti, a well-known 1080p gaming card, but with newer architecture features. The combined percentile of 72 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects a system where the CPU significantly outclasses the GPU in relative performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 17631 and its proximity to the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% higher score) suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, this system should deliver playable frame rates in most games released before 2025, typically in the 60-100 FPS range depending on the title. At 1440p, expect frame rates to drop by 25-35% as the 288 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. At 4K, the 8GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will cause significant performance degradation in texture-heavy scenes.

The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3282 ensures that CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters at lower settings will not be limited by the processor, allowing the GPU to reach its maximum output. However, the GPU’s 59th percentile ranking means it is not a high-end part, and frame rates at 1440p ultra will likely fall below 60 FPS in demanding titles. For esports titles like CS2, Valorant, or Rocket League, the system should easily push beyond 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s adequate rasterization power.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The processor sits at the 85th percentile while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile, a 26-point gap that indicates the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35403 versus the GPU’s 16014 further confirms this. In gaming, this means frame rates will be dictated by the GPU’s rasterization capabilities, with the CPU rarely limiting performance except in extremely CPU-bound titles at low resolutions.

In productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. For CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation, the CPU’s 24 threads will be fully utilized, and the system performs near the level of a Core i7-12700K (0.3% difference). For GPU-accelerated tasks like ray tracing or machine learning inference, the GPU’s 28 RT cores and 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute are the limiting factor, and the CPU will wait on the GPU. The 35W TDP of the CPU also means it will not thermally throttle under sustained load, ensuring consistent performance, while the GPU’s 132W TDP is modest for a discrete card.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip on a 4nm TSMC process, with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. It features 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 28 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. The base clock is 1700 MHz, game clock is 2400 MHz, and boost clock reaches 2990 MHz, which is a high boost relative to the base, indicating good thermal headroom. Memory is 8GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288 GB/s bandwidth — this is the most significant weakness, as modern games at high settings can exceed 8GB VRAM usage at 1440p and above.

The pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s are respectable for the class, and the FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS matches the FP16 rate at a 1:1 ratio, which simplifies compute workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 and PassMark G3D score of 17631 indicate that this GPU delivers performance comparable to the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% lower) and RX 7700 (1% higher). The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 is notably low, suggesting that the GPU’s DX12 driver optimization may be suboptimal, while the DirectX 11 score of 182 is more competitive. The GPU has no tensor cores, meaning AI-accelerated features like DLSS-style upscaling are not available, and any AI workloads must run on the 21.43 TFLOPS of standard shader compute.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for a PC builder who wants a strong multi-core CPU for productivity and a competent 1080p gaming GPU, without the power draw or cost of high-end components. The 35W TDP CPU makes this an excellent choice for a compact or quiet build where thermal management is a priority, such as a small form factor workstation or a home office PC that doubles as a gaming rig. Content creators working with 1080p or light 4K video editing will benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads and the GPU’s OpenCL performance for effects rendering.

Gamers targeting 1080p with high settings will find this pairing adequate, with frame rates similar to an RTX 3060 Ti system (0.7% performance delta). Students and office workers who need a responsive system for multitasking and occasional gaming will appreciate the efficiency and lack of noise. However, this is not the right choice for 1440p ultra gaming or professional 3D rendering with large scenes, as the 8GB VRAM and 59th percentile GPU ranking will cause frustration. Developers who compile large codebases and run virtual machines will find the CPU’s multithreaded performance excellent, but should ensure their workloads do not require GPU compute beyond 8GB VRAM.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-S architecture, built on Intel’s 10nm process with a 257 mm² die size. The base clock is a low 1400 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz, which is a massive range that highlights the efficiency-focused design. The 35W TDP is the defining characteristic: this chip delivers near-desktop-class performance at a fraction of the power draw of standard desktop CPUs. Cache configuration includes 80KB L1 per core, 2MB L2 per core, and 30MB shared L3, which is generous for a 16-core design.

Benchmark results confirm that the low TDP does not cripple performance. Cinebench R23 multicore of 23248 and single-core of 3282 show that this chip is within 0.3% of the Core i7-12700K (which has a much higher power limit), and the PassMark multithread score of 28211 places it at the 85th percentile. The Geekbench multicore score of 11573 and single-core of 2490 are competitive with the Core i5-13600T (0.3% higher average score). The PassMark extended instructions score of 19306 and floating point math score of 73928 indicate strong AVX-512 and FPU performance, which benefits scientific computing and encryption tasks. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though ECC is not supported. It includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output without the discrete GPU.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13700T compare to the Core i7-12700K in CPU performance?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the 13700T scores 35403, which is 0.1% higher than the 12700K’s 35365. This means the 35W TDP chip matches the higher-power part in overall CPU workloads.

Q: Is the RX 9060 better than the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The average GPU benchmark scores are very close: the RX 9060 scores 16014, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129. This puts the RX 9060 at 0.7% lower performance, meaning they are effectively tied in overall GPU benchmarks.

Q: What resolution is this system best for gaming at?

A: Based on the GPU’s 59th percentile ranking and 8GB VRAM, 1080p is the sweet spot for high settings. At 1440p, expect lower frame rates and potential VRAM limitations in demanding titles.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core i7-13700T does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the specifications. It supports standard DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W, and the GPU has a TDP of 132W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300W, which is modest for a discrete graphics card.

Q: Does the GPU have tensor cores for AI workloads?

A: No, the RX 9060 does not list tensor cores. It relies on its 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 compute for any AI or ML tasks, which is less efficient than dedicated tensor hardware.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 30MB of shared L3 cache, along with 2MB L2 per core and 80KB L1 per core, which provides a total of 16MB L2 across all cores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, though the GPU is a PCIe 5.0 x16 card (the RX 9060 uses this interface). The motherboard selection will determine whether you use DDR4 or DDR5, and since the CPU supports both, you can choose based on budget and availability. The CPU’s 35W TDP means most LGA1700 motherboards will handle it easily, including budget B760 boards, leaving room for a future CPU upgrade within the same socket generation.

The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 300W PSU, which is very accommodating for most power supplies. The 132W GPU TDP is low enough that it will run in most cases without airflow concerns. The upgrade path is clear: the CPU has headroom to pair with a much stronger GPU, as the 85th percentile CPU will not bottleneck a higher-end graphics card in most gaming scenarios. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor for gaming, and upgrading to a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM would be the first sensible step. Conversely, if you need more CPU throughput, the socket 1700 platform supports higher-TDP 13th-gen parts, but the 13700T’s performance within 0.3% of the 12700K suggests you would need a significant jump to see real gains. For most users, the practical upgrade path is to keep the CPU and replace the GPU with a card that has more than 8GB VRAM and higher compute throughput, while ensuring the PSU has enough headroom beyond the 300W suggested rating.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700T

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds