SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700T + AMD Radeon RX 7400

This pairing combines a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake desktop processor with a low-power RDNA 3 graphics card, landing at the 51st combined percentile across all desktop builds. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies only the 17th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a stark performance asymmetry that defines every workload discussion below. The data shows a system that can chew through heavily threaded productivity tasks but will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in modern titles at high settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck picture here is unambiguous: the RX 7400 is the limiting factor in virtually every GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's multi-core score of 23248 in Cinebench R23 places it among the top 15% of all processors, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11897 places it in the bottom 17% of all graphics cards. That 68-percentile gap between the two components means the CPU will spend most of its time waiting on the GPU in gaming and graphics workloads.

Benchmark results indicate the CPU has massive headroom for faster graphics hardware. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 11573 and single-core score of 2490 suggest it can feed even high-end GPUs without becoming the limiting factor in most scenarios. The GPU, conversely, would bottleneck even a modest mid-range processor. In CPU-light tasks like 1080p gaming at high settings, the RX 7400's 44 Passmark DirectX 12 score will cap frame rates well below what the i7-13700T could theoretically support.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts toward the CPU being the star. The i7-13700T's Passmark multi-thread score of 28211 and data compression score of 327700 indicate strong parallel processing capability. Memory-intensive tasks like encryption (Passmark score of 19230) and floating-point math (73928) will run efficiently, with the GPU only mattering for rendering or compute acceleration. The 8 GB VRAM on the RX 7400 is adequate for most productivity tasks, but the GPU's low compute score of 5152 in Passmark means GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow.

The 35 W TDP of the CPU paired with the 43 W TDP of the GPU creates an interesting dynamic. This is a low-power build by desktop standards, but the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads can still draw significant power under full load despite the conservative TDP rating. The GPU's 200 W suggested PSU requirement indicates the entire system can run on a modest power supply, but the performance ceiling remains firmly set by the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The i7-13700T delivers strong CPU benchmark numbers across the board. Its average benchmark score of 35403 places it essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Core 5 213PE (35428, 0.1% faster) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, 0.1% slower). The processor also edges out the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, 0.3% slower) and Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, 0.3% slower). These are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating the 13700T sits right at the top of its performance class.

In single-threaded workloads, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3282 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3821. These numbers reflect solid Raptor Lake architecture efficiency at the 4.90 GHz boost clock. The Geekbench single-core score of 2490 further confirms strong per-thread performance, which matters for legacy applications and lightly threaded games.

The GPU tells a different story. Its average benchmark score of 2467 places it just 1.1% above the AMD Radeon 8040S (2440) and 1.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433). It also beats the Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425) by 1.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2422) by 1.9%. These nearest rivals are all entry-level or integrated graphics solutions, which contextualizes the RX 7400's performance tier clearly. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 reinforces this positioning.

The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but falls short in GPU-bound ones. The 51st combined percentile reflects this mixed profile, placing the build in the middle of all desktop configurations despite having a top-tier processor. Users who prioritize CPU performance for compilation, encoding, or simulation workloads will find plenty of capability here, but gamers and GPU-accelerated creators will hit a hard wall.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the Navi 33 chip using TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. The GPU features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, with 28 ray accelerators for RT workloads. Clock speeds range from a 1452 MHz base to a 2300 MHz boost, with a 2200 MHz game clock. These specifications produce 16.49 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 257.6 GTexel/s of texture fill rate, though the 147.2 GPixel/s pixel rate is modest by modern standards.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming with reasonable texture budgets but will struggle with high-resolution textures or 1440p+ workloads. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. The 128-bit bus width limits memory bandwidth scalability, which becomes a bottleneck in bandwidth-intensive DX12 titles.

The ray tracing hardware includes 28 RT cores, but the low overall compute throughput means RT performance will be limited. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures feature compatibility, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 indicates real-world DX12 performance is weak. The Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support provide API flexibility, but again, raw hardware limits apply.

The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11897 places it in the 17th percentile, while its DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 9 score of 176 show better legacy API performance relative to its modern API scores. The G2D score of 1209 suggests acceptable 2D desktop performance. For rendering, the FP16 compute of 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) provides some acceleration for workloads that support half-precision, but the FP32 figure of 16.49 TFLOPS is the more relevant number for most 3D applications.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need serious multi-core CPU performance but have modest graphics requirements. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the i7-13700T's 16 cores and 24 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 indicating strong parallel compilation throughput. Students in computer science or engineering programs will appreciate the CPU power for simulations and data processing, though gaming performance will be limited.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity will find the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 105397 and data encryption score of 19230 more than adequate. The 8 GB GPU VRAM can drive multiple displays via the 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, though the GPU's 17th percentile ranking means it is not suited for graphics-intensive work.

Content creators working with video editing will see mixed results. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 327700 helps with video encoding tasks, but GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow given the RX 7400's low compute scores. Gamers should consider this build only for esports titles or older games at low-to-medium settings, as the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 44 indicates poor modern game performance.

The 35 W CPU TDP and 43 W GPU TDP make this an energy-efficient desktop option, which could appeal to always-on workstations or quiet office environments. The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for builders with existing RAM or those wanting newer memory technology.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7400 cannot sustain high refresh rates in modern titles. With estimated frame rates well below 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings in demanding games, this build is better suited for 60 Hz monitors and esports titles where the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3282 in Cinebench R23 can help maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound games.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads can handle x264 encoding at reasonable quality settings while gaming, provided the game itself is not too GPU-demanding. The Passmark multi-thread score of 28211 indicates enough headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding, but the GPU's weak DirectX performance will limit which games can be streamed.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will perform well, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 accelerating timeline rendering and export in software-encoded codecs. GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will lag, as the RX 7400's Passmark GPU compute score of 5152 indicates limited parallel compute for these tasks.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will benefit from the 16-core processor, but GPU rendering will be disappointing. The GPU's FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS places it far below what dedicated rendering GPUs offer, making this a poor choice for GPU-accelerated ray tracing workloads.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. Compilation, testing, and container workloads benefit from the 24 threads, and the Passmark integer math score of 105397 handles typical development workloads efficiently. The 16-core design with 30 MB of L3 cache reduces compilation times in large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU's capabilities are overkill for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, but this means the system will never feel slow in these tasks. The GPU's 1209 Passmark G2D score handles desktop compositing and 2D applications without issue, and the low power draw keeps the system quiet and cool for shared spaces.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 suggest that modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings will likely run below 30 FPS. At 1080p medium settings, frame rates might approach 40-50 FPS in less demanding titles, but the GPU's modest 8 GB VRAM and 288 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering in texture-heavy scenes.

At 1440p, the RX 7400 is not viable for modern gaming. The memory bandwidth and compute throughput are insufficient for 1440p ultra settings, and even medium settings will likely produce frame rates below 30 FPS. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 97 is relatively better, suggesting older DirectX 11 titles may run acceptably at 1080p, but DirectX 12 games will suffer.

Esports titles like CS2, Valorant, and League of Legends may run at playable frame rates given the CPU's strong single-core performance, but the GPU remains the limiting factor. The CPU's 4.90 GHz boost clock helps in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's low fill rate of 147.2 GPixel/s caps overall rendering throughput. For 1080p competitive gaming at low settings, estimated frame rates of 60-100 FPS are possible in lighter titles, but this is not a high-refresh gaming system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. The core configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 1400 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The 35 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core desktop processor, though the multiplier is unlocked for those wanting to push higher clocks at the cost of power consumption.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps with multi-threaded workloads and gaming performance. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility for builders. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or office use without the discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show the CPU performing at the top of its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 and single-core score of 3282 demonstrate strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11573 and single-core score of 2490 align with expectations for this processor tier. The Passmark results further characterize the CPU: floating-point math at 73928, integer math at 105397, extended instructions at 19306, and physics at 1769.

The 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms this processor outperforms the vast majority of installed processors. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% in average score, indicating the 13700T sits at the top of a tight performance cluster. The release date of January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $384, positions it as a mid-cycle Raptor Lake refresh that remains competitive against newer parts. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes provides modern connectivity for storage and expansion.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs a top-tier 16-core processor with an entry-level GPU, creating an unbalanced system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks while underperforming in graphics workloads. The combined 51st percentile ranking reflects this asymmetry, placing the build in the middle of all desktop configurations despite having a processor in the 85th percentile.

The Intel Core i7-13700T represents the high end of the Core 13th Gen series, with Raptor Lake architecture providing strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The AMD Radeon RX 7400, part of the Radeon RX 7000 series using RDNA 3.0 architecture, is one of the weakest discrete GPUs in the market, with its 17th percentile ranking placing it near integrated graphics solutions. The 43 W GPU TDP and 200 W suggested PSU requirement indicate a low-power graphics solution.

This is a desktop build in the truest sense, with the Intel Socket 1700 platform supporting DDR4 or DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. The system's overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU bottleneck, despite the CPU's high-end positioning. Users should consider this build for productivity-focused workloads where the GPU's limitations are less impactful, or as a foundation for a future GPU upgrade that would transform the system's gaming and rendering capabilities.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-13700T compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i7-13700T's average benchmark score of 35403 is essentially tied with the Intel Core 5 213PE (35428, 0.1% faster) and the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, 0.1% slower). It also edges out the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, 0.3% slower) and Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, 0.3% slower).

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The RX 7400 ranks in the 17th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2467. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8040S (2440, 1.1% slower), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433, 1.4% slower), and Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425, 1.8% slower), placing it at the entry-level tier.

Q: Can this system handle modern gaming at 1080p?

A: Based on the GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 and overall 17th percentile ranking, modern AAA games at 1080p ultra settings will likely run below 30 FPS. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, these are estimates. Less demanding titles or lower settings may achieve playable frame rates.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility for builders who may have existing DDR4 modules or want to invest in newer DDR5 memory technology.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23248 and Passmark multi-thread score of 28211 indicate strong parallel processing capability. The 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with 30 MB of L3 cache, make it well-suited for compilation, encoding, and simulation tasks.

Q: What is the power consumption profile of this build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP while the GPU has a 43 W TDP, with a suggested PSU rating of 200 W for the GPU. This is a low-power desktop configuration that runs cool and quiet, though the CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for higher power draw if overclocked.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and modern APIs?

A: The RX 7400 includes 28 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. However, the low overall compute performance means ray tracing will be very slow, and the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 indicates limited real-world DX12 performance.