SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700T and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing represents a desktop configuration that balances a high-core-count, low-power CPU with a capable mid-range GPU. The core data shows a processor that ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs and a graphics card that sits in the 71st percentile among all GPUs, placing the overall combination in the 78th percentile of all builds. It is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all discussions of frame rates below are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not from direct game testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The GPU die contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² footprint. It operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The memory subsystem is substantial for its class: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at an effective 18 Gbps. This capacity and throughput are well-suited for modern texture-heavy workloads at 1440p, where 12 GB is often the threshold for high-detail assets without stuttering.

The compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The card also features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, which places it in a specific position: it can handle ray-traced effects, but the RT performance is not the primary strength of the RDNA 2 architecture. Notably, the FACT PACK does not list tensor cores for this GPU, meaning there is no dedicated hardware for AI-accelerated features like DLSS; instead, any upscaling would rely on driver-level or OpenCL-based methods. The raw throughput numbers are telling: the card achieves 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), with a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results reinforce this profile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the RX 6750 XT scores 2548 points. In Geekbench, it scores 137249 in Metal, 16360 in OpenCL, and 98089 in Vulkan. The Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 20700 and a GPU compute score of 9550. The GPU sits in the 71st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011. Its nearest rivals in the data include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (average score 25891, delta 0.5%), the AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, delta 0.6%), the AMD FirePro D700 (25842, delta 0.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25740, delta 1.1%). The deltas are all within 1.1%, meaning the RX 6750 XT is effectively in a tight cluster with these cards, though the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is a laptop part, so the comparison is more about raw score parity than direct desktop competition.

For rendering workloads, the data indicates a strong rasterization performer. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that large vertex buffers and high-resolution textures are fed efficiently, while the 64 ROPs handle fill-rate-bound scenes adequately. The FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS is respectable for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that use OpenCL or Vulkan, as evidenced by the Geekbench scores. However, for ray-traced rendering in DXR titles, the 40 RT cores will lag behind newer architectures; benchmark results suggest users should expect playable but not exceptional ray-traced performance. The Passmark DirectX scores are mixed—DirectX 11 scores 180, DirectX 12 scores 80, DirectX 10 scores 125, and DirectX 9 scores 263—indicating that the card is optimized for modern APIs, with DX12 being the weakest relative score, which is unusual and may reflect driver or benchmark specifics rather than real-world capability.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R15, the i7-13700T scores 2343 in multicore and 330 in singlecore. Moving to Cinebench R20, the scores are 9764 multicore and 1378 singlecore. The Cinebench R23 results are 23248 multicore and 3282 singlecore. Geekbench reports 11573 multicore and 2490 singlecore. Passmark results are extensive: multithread score of 28211, single-thread score of 3821, integer math at 105397, floating point math at 73928, extended instructions at 19306, data compression at 327700, data encryption at 19230, find prime numbers at 127, random string sorting at 34939, and physics at 1769.

The CPU has an average benchmark score of 35403 and ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core 5 213PE (average score 35428, delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, delta 0.3%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, delta 0.3%). These deltas are all within 0.3%, meaning the i7-13700T performs statistically identically to the i7-12700K and i7-12700KF, despite being a lower-TDP model. The 0.1% delta against the i7-12700KF means the 13700T is effectively tied with a previous-generation unlocked K-series chip, which reflects the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture.

The GPU, as detailed, has an average score of 26011 and a 71st percentile rank. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, which places it in the upper quartile of all desktop builds. The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is solid but not class-leading. In practical terms, this means the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios; the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and graphical settings. For productivity, the CPU's multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 23248) are excellent and will drive rendering and compilation tasks effectively, while the GPU's compute scores (Passmark 9550) are adequate for GPU-accelerated workflows but not top-tier.

Since no measured FPS data exists, we estimate that in CPU-bound games at 1080p with lower settings, the system could push very high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles, given the single-thread Passmark score of 3821. At 1440p with high settings, the GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS and 12 GB VRAM would target 60-100 FPS in most AAA titles, with the GPU being the primary limiter. At 4K, the RX 6750 XT would struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding games, and the CPU's headroom would be largely unused.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 1400.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The T-series designation is notable: this is a low-power part with a TDP of just 35 W, which is significantly lower than standard desktop parts. Despite this, the boost clock is high, indicating that the chip can maintain high frequency in short bursts. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

The architecture is a hybrid design, combining performance cores and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The single-core performance is strong, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3282 and the Passmark single-thread score of 3821. The multi-core performance is where this chip shines: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248 puts it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs, and the Passmark multithread score of 28211 confirms this. The data also shows strong integer and floating-point performance: Passmark integer math at 105397 and floating point math at 73928. Extended instructions score 19306, which is relevant for AVX-512-like workloads, though the specific instruction set is not detailed. Data compression at 327700 and encryption at 19230 suggest strong performance in archival and security tasks.

For real workloads, these numbers translate to excellent performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 score of 23248 indicates that the CPU can handle multi-threaded rendering tasks that would take minutes on lower-tier chips. The low TDP of 35 W is critical: this is a chip that can deliver near-desktop performance in a system with a modest cooler and power delivery, making it ideal for compact builds or workstation environments where thermal and power budgets are tight. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel bus, means flexibility in platform choice. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for troubleshooting or basic display output, though it is not intended for gaming.

The nearest rival comparison shows the 13700T is within 0.3% of the i7-12700K in average score, which is remarkable given the 12700K has a much higher TDP. This means the 13700T offers similar multi-threaded performance to a previous flagship desktop chip while consuming a fraction of the power. The 0.1% delta against the i7-12700KF (the 12700K without integrated graphics) further underscores this efficiency. The chip's 85th percentile rank among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors ever benchmarked, placing it in the top 15% globally.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without the thermal and power overhead of a high-TDP processor, paired with a GPU that handles 1440p gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks competently. Gamers at 1440p will find the RX 6750 XT adequate for high-refresh-rate play in esports titles and high-settings play in AAA games, with the CPU ensuring no frame drops in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark 3821) will push very high frame rates, making this a viable esports machine.

Content creators, particularly those who edit video or render 3D scenes, will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248, which will accelerate export times and preview renders. The GPU's OpenCL score of 16360 in Geekbench means it can assist in GPU-accelerated effects in video editors, though it is not a top-tier compute card. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the 24 threads and high multi-thread scores (Passmark multithread 28211). Students and professionals in engineering or data science can leverage the CPU's integer math and floating-point performance for simulations and data processing.

Small business workstations that run virtualization, database management, or complex spreadsheets will find the CPU's data compression score of 327700 and encryption score of 19230 beneficial for file transfers and security tasks. The low TDP of 35 W makes this an excellent choice for office environments where noise and heat are concerns, as a capable air cooler will suffice. However, users who require ray-traced rendering or AI training workloads should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 40 RT cores and lack of tensor cores limit those specific tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i7-13700T and the RX 6750 XT is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 85th percentile rank is significantly higher than the GPU's 71st percentile, indicating that the CPU is the more powerful component relative to its peers. In gaming at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, as the CPU can handle frame generation at high rates. At 1440p with high settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor in most titles, with the CPU having headroom to spare. At 4K, the GPU is decisively the bottleneck, and the CPU's extra performance is largely unused.

In productivity workloads, the balance depends on the task. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering (using CPU-based renderers), and software compilation, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU is secondary. For GPU-accelerated tasks like OpenCL-based rendering or physics simulation, the GPU's compute score of 9550 in Passmark will be the limiter. The CPU's passmark physics score of 1769 is moderate, suggesting that in games with heavy physics simulation, the CPU might be a bottleneck, but this is less common than GPU-bound scenarios.

The estimated FPS scaling supports this: at 1080p, the CPU can output very high frame rates, but the GPU will cap them at its rasterization limits. At 1440p, the GPU's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.31 TFLOPS are sufficient for 60 FPS in most games, but not for sustained high-refresh (144Hz) in demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 3282 in Cinebench R23 means it will not be a bottleneck in most games, even at low resolutions. Overall, this is a balanced build in the sense that the CPU has headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the current GPU is the limiting factor in gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for future high-speed storage and GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds. The system's TDP is 35 W for the CPU and 250 W for the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. This leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future, as a 600 W PSU can typically handle higher-end cards, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact headroom beyond the numbers.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the component to replace first. The CPU's 85th percentile rank and its proximity to the i7-12700K (within 0.3%) mean it will remain relevant for years. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the CPU's headroom, especially at 1440p and 4K where the current GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU supports DDR5 memory, so if the build currently uses DDR4, upgrading to DDR5 would provide a modest performance boost, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact memory bandwidth gain. The Socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer Intel sockets, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard. However, the current CPU's performance is strong enough that such an upgrade is not necessary in the near term.

The GPU is end-of-life and has a successor (Navi III), so a future upgrade to a newer Radeon card would be logical, provided the 600 W PSU can handle it. The GPU's dual-slot design and 267 mm length (10.5 inches) mean case compatibility is generally good, but users should check clearance. The power connectors are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin, which is standard. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting high refresh rates on multiple monitors.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700T has a TDP of 35 W, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 600 W.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, indicating it supports overclocking. However, it is a T-series low-power part, and the base clock is 1400.00 MHz with a boost of 4.90 GHz.

Q: What type of memory does this CPU support?

A: The i7-13700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35403, which is 0.3% higher than the i7-12700K's score of 35287. They are statistically identical in performance.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6750 XT has 40 dedicated ray tracing cores. The DirectX 12 Ultimate API is supported, indicating hardware-level RT support.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all builds in the database.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system. The pairing consists of the Intel Core i7-13700T, a 16-core/24-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, an RDNA 2 GPU with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU ranks in the 71st percentile of all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 78. The CPU's average benchmark score is 35403, and the GPU's is 26011.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end. The CPU's performance is exceptional for its power envelope, matching a previous flagship i7-12700K within 0.3%. The GPU is a solid 1440p performer, holding its own against a cluster of rivals within 1.1% of its score. This is a build that prioritizes CPU compute power for productivity while maintaining a capable GPU for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. It is not a top-tier gaming rig for 4K or extreme ray tracing, but it is a versatile machine for a wide range of workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 3821 in Passmark is sufficient to drive frame rates above 144 FPS in esports titles, though the GPU's rasterization limits will cap performance. At 1440p, the GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support high refresh rates in less demanding games, but AAA titles will hover around 60-100 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248 provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay, ensuring smooth streaming without significant frame drops. The GPU's OpenCL score of 16360 can assist with encoder offloading, though the lack of tensor cores means no AI-based upscaling.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance accelerates timeline rendering and export, with Cinebench R23 23248 indicating fast processing of 4K footage. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle effects and color grading, though GPU compute at Passmark 9550 is not top-tier for heavy motion graphics.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will benefit greatly from the 16 cores, with the Passmark multithread score of 28211 ensuring quick iteration. GPU-based renderers using OpenCL or Vulkan will see moderate performance from the 13.31 TFLOPS, but the 40 RT cores are limited for ray-traced rendering.

Software development: Compilation times are drastically reduced by the CPU's high integer math score of 105397 and multithread score of 28211. Virtualization and container workloads also benefit from the 24 threads, while the 35 W TDP keeps power consumption low in always-on development servers.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark 3821) ensures snappy response in office applications, while the low 35 W TDP means quiet operation. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the 12 GB GPU VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the system is more than capable.