SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700T

35,403 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700T and AMD Radeon RX 6600 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 74th percentile among all builds, a figure derived from the CPU’s 85th percentile and the GPU’s 63rd percentile. This gap in percentile ranking is the first indicator of the system’s balance: the processor is a high-end part, while the graphics card is a mid-range component. The data shows a clear division of labor, where the CPU has the headroom to handle the most demanding computational tasks, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive scenarios. The combined percentile of 74, which is closer to the GPU’s 63 than the CPU’s 85, suggests that the graphics card is the primary constraint for the overall system performance in typical use cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is defined by a significant disparity in compute capability between the CPU and GPU. The Intel Core i7-13700T achieves strong multi-threaded scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248, which places it above rivals like the Intel Core i7-12700K, which has an average score of 35287 and a delta of 0.3 percent. In contrast, the Radeon RX 6600’s Passmark G3D score of 15096 is more modest, landing it at the 63rd percentile. This indicates that for workloads heavily reliant on GPU parallel processing, such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the RX 6600 will be the bottleneck, capping the frame rate and limiting the system’s ability to push high pixel counts.

Evidence for this bottleneck can be inferred from the CPU’s single-thread performance, which is exceptional. A Geekbench single-core score of 2490 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3282 show that the i7-13700T can feed frames very quickly. However, the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will constrain texture loading and fill rates. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (Passmark score of 327700) or physics calculations (Passmark score of 1769), the i7-13700T will not be the limiting factor. The bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU when the workload involves pixel shading, ray tracing, or heavy texture memory usage.

The system’s FPS scaling in games will be directly tied to this dynamic. At lower resolutions, such as 1080p, the CPU has the capacity to push high frame rates, but the RX 6600’s pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s will be the ceiling. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases, and its 63rd percentile performance will be further strained, leading to a more significant performance drop. The data does not include measured FPS for this combination, so FPS expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s multi-threaded advantage, seen in its Passmark multithread score of 28211, will not translate into higher FPS if the GPU is saturated; instead, it ensures that the system remains smooth and responsive even when background tasks are running.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core i7-13700T show a processor that excels in both single and multi-threaded tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248 is a strong indicator of heavy multitasking and rendering capability, while the single-core score of 3282 supports fast, responsive application performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 11573 and single-core score of 2490 reinforce this dual strength. In Passmark tests, the CPU scores 28211 in multithread and 3821 in single-thread, with a top-tier data compression score of 327700 and floating-point math score of 73928. With an average benchmark score of 35403, the CPU is at the 85th percentile, making it significantly more powerful than its nearest rivals, which include the Intel Core 5 213PE (avg score 35428, delta -0.1 percent) and the Intel Core i7-12700KF (avg score 35365, delta 0.1 percent). This indicates that the i7-13700T is a top-tier processor for its class.

The GPU benchmarks for the AMD Radeon RX 6600 show a more moderate level of performance. Its Passmark G3D score of 15096 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 place it at the 63rd percentile. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19036, placing it in direct competition with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (avg score 19030, delta 0 percent) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (avg score 19049, delta -0.1 percent). The compute performance, as measured by Passmark GPU Compute at 6554, is adequate for general-purpose tasks but not exceptional. The combined picture is of a CPU that can handle workstation-level loads without issue, paired with a GPU that is more suited to 1080p gaming and light content creation, rather than high-end 4K rendering or professional 3D work.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 74, which reflects a system where the CPU is at the 85th percentile and the GPU is at the 63rd percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700K?

A: The i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35403, while the i7-12700K has a score of 35287, giving the i7-13700T a 0.3 percent lead.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, indicating support for overclocking, though the power limits of the 35 W TDP may constrain the headroom.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 had a launch MSRP of 329 USD.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process, while the GPU is built on TSMC’s 7 nm process.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU is listed as active in production.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700T is based on the LGA 1700 socket and uses the Raptor Lake architecture, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides a flexible upgrade path for memory, allowing users to choose between the two standards based on availability and platform support. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is a forward-looking feature for high-bandwidth storage devices and future graphics cards, although the current GPU only utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for users requiring error-correcting code for professional workloads.

The GPU’s power requirements are modest, with a TDP of 132 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W, leaving significant headroom for the CPU’s 35 W TDP. This means that a system with a high-quality 300 W power supply would be sufficient, but there is ample room to upgrade to a more powerful GPU in the future without necessarily requiring a new PSU, as long as the total system power stays within the unit’s capacity. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 6600 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 85th percentile performance is not the limiting factor. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with its high single-thread scores, will remain relevant for several years, making the GPU the primary target for a performance boost. The socket supports future Raptor Lake refresh models, but the platform is at the end of its generational life, so a new build might be necessary for a major CPU upgrade.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 1400 MHz and a boost clock of 4900 MHz, with a TDP of just 35 W, which is remarkably low for a processor with this core count. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB of L3 cache. This configuration is designed for high throughput in multi-threaded applications, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248 and Passmark multithread score of 28211.

The CPU’s single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3282 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3821. This indicates that it can handle tasks that require fast per-core performance, such as gaming and legacy software, without bottlenecking. The benchmark scores show that the i7-13700T is a balanced processor that can handle both productivity and gaming workloads. The Passmark integer math score of 105397 and floating-point math score of 73928 suggest high computational throughput, while the data encryption score of 19230 and extended instructions score of 19306 indicate strong performance in specialized tasks. In real workloads, this CPU will excel at video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering, where the 24 threads can be fully utilized. The low TDP makes it an excellent choice for compact or power-efficient systems, though the unlocked multiplier suggests that overclocking is possible if the cooling solution allows for it.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is based on the Navi 23 chip and the RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 8.928 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 17.86 TFLOPS. These specifications place it as a mid-range graphics card, which is reflected in its 63rd percentile ranking.

The benchmark scores show that the RX 6600 is capable of solid 1080p gaming performance. Its Passmark G3D score of 15096 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 are respectable but not class-leading. The GPU’s pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s indicate that it can handle high frame rates at 1080p, but it will struggle with 1440p or 4K resolutions, especially with high-detail settings. The presence of 28 ray tracing cores means that the GPU can technically support ray tracing, but its performance in such scenarios will be limited due to the overall compute power. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for modern games at 1080p, but it could be a limiting factor for texture-heavy mods or future titles that require more memory. For rendering workloads, the GPU’s compute score of 6554 in Passmark suggests it can handle basic GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not a professional-grade rendering card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3282, ensures that frame pacing is smooth, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile performance means that achieving 144 Hz in demanding titles at 1080p will be challenging. The RX 6600 is better suited for 60-100 FPS gaming at high settings in most titles.

Streaming: The i7-13700T’s 24 threads and Passmark multithread score of 28211 provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting game performance, making it a strong choice for single-PC streaming setups.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23248 is excellent for video editing applications that utilize multi-threading, such as rendering previews and exporting final cuts. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for handling 1080p timelines, but 4K editing may be slower due to the GPU’s limited memory and compute power.

3D rendering: The CPU will be the workhorse in CPU-based rendering, with its high multi-threaded scores, but the GPU’s 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-accelerated renders. However, the RX 6600 is not a professional rendering card, and its performance will be modest compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, along with a Passmark integer math score of 105397, make it an excellent choice for compiling large codebases. The GPU is less relevant for this task, but its compute capabilities can be used for parallel processing tasks.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the CPU’s low 35 W TDP and the GPU’s modest power draw make it an energy-efficient option for a desktop that can handle occasional gaming or content creation alongside productivity work.

Build Overview

This build pairs an Intel Core i7-13700T, a high-end desktop processor, with an AMD Radeon RX 6600, a mid-range desktop graphics card. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread part with a 35 W TDP, designed for power efficiency while delivering top-tier performance, as seen in its 85th percentile ranking. The GPU is a Navi 23-based card with 8 GB of VRAM, aimed at 1080p gaming, and sits at the 63rd percentile. Together, they form a desktop system with a combined percentile of 74, indicating a solidly above-average build, but one that is clearly CPU-dominant. The system is best described as a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU, making it a versatile machine for productivity tasks that can also handle gaming at moderate settings.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over GPU-intensive ones. It suits software developers who need to compile code quickly, thanks to the CPU’s high integer math score of 105397 and 24 threads. Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, but they should be aware that the GPU will be a bottleneck in GPU-accelerated rendering. Gamers who play at 1080p and are comfortable with medium to high settings will find the RX 6600 adequate, but those seeking high-refresh-rate or 1440p gaming should look for a more powerful GPU. Students and small business workstations that require a fast, responsive system for multitasking and office applications will be well-served by the CPU’s single-thread performance, while the low TDP helps keep the system quiet and cool. The system is not well-suited for professional 3D artists or AI researchers who require massive GPU compute power, as the RX 6600’s 8 GB of VRAM and 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are limiting factors.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. Based on the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 15096 and the CPU’s strong single-core performance, the system is expected to handle most modern games at 1080p with high settings, achieving frame rates in the 60-90 range. In less demanding titles like esports games, the frame rate could reach over 100 FPS, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking will cap the maximum performance. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth will be stressed, and frame rates are expected to drop to the 40-60 range on high settings. The CPU will not be the bottleneck; the data shows that the i7-13700T has the single-thread power to drive high frame rates, but the RX 6600’s pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s will limit the final output. Ray tracing performance will be poor, with the 28 ray tracing cores providing minimal acceleration, and users should expect to disable this feature for playable performance. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game, driver, and system configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700T + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700T

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds