SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a desktop-class combination with a combined percentile rank of 70 across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests in the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing is unusual: a top-decile 16-core CPU with a mid-tier professional mobile-derived GPU, creating a system that excels in multi-threaded CPU workloads but delivers only moderate graphics throughput. There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; the dataIsMeasured field is false, and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty. Therefore, all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores and should be treated as projections, not empirical results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors the build to the LGA 1700 form factor. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between cheaper DDR4 modules or faster DDR5 kits — both are compatible with the socket, though the exact memory bandwidth figures are not provided in the data. The memory controller supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented builds that require data integrity during long compute sessions.

PCIe connectivity is provided by the CPU itself: Gen 5 with 20 Lanes (CPU only). That means the primary PCIe slot can run at Gen 5 speeds for a modern GPU or NVMe drive, while the remaining lanes can be allocated to storage or expansion cards. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, so the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds regardless of the CPU’s Gen 5 capability — a minor bottleneck for data transfer but unlikely to affect gaming performance significantly. The GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics package) with no power connectors and a slot width listed as IGP, meaning it is designed for embedded or portable devices rather than a standard desktop expansion card; in a desktop build, this would require a motherboard with an appropriate embedded or MXM-style slot, though the data does not specify the exact physical mounting.

The CPU’s TDP is 125 watts, which is the thermal design power for sustained loads. There is no suggestedPsu value in the FACT PACK for the GPU, and the GPU’s TDP is 150 watts. Adding these two figures gives a combined 275 watts for CPU and GPU alone, but without a suggested PSU rating, the data does not specify a recommended power supply size. A sensible rule from the numbers alone: the system needs a PSU that comfortably exceeds 275 watts for the core components, plus headroom for motherboard, storage, and fans — but no specific wattage figure is available in the FACT PACK, so this must remain qualitative. Given that the CPU can boost to 5.40 GHz and the GPU boosts to 1680 MHz, peak power draw will exceed the TDP figures, though the data does not quantify that.

A sensible next upgrade from this platform would be a higher-tier GPU, because the CPU is already in the 89th percentile and has ample multi-threaded headroom. The CPU’s benchmark scores — Cinebench R23 multi-core at 38704 and Geekbench multi-core at 18258 — indicate it can drive a more powerful graphics card without becoming the limiting factor in most games. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 would improve memory-bound workloads, though the data does not provide specific bandwidth numbers to quantify the gain. The socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer CPU generations beyond 13th Gen, so a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change; the data does not list that information explicitly, but the socket designation implies a platform limit.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU’s single-thread performance — 3DMark single-thread score of 1137 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 5464 — suggests it can handle high-refresh gaming at low resolutions where CPU speed dominates. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, however, places it at the median of all graphics cards, which indicates moderate 1080p and 1440p capability but not high-end 4K performance.

Estimated frame rates: At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles — the data does not specify exact FPS, but the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS is comparable to desktop mid-range cards. At 1440p ultra, expect frame rates to drop by roughly 30-40% relative to 1080p, based on the pixel throughput difference (the GPU’s pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, which must fill more pixels at higher resolutions). At 4K ultra, the GPU will likely fall below 60 FPS in demanding titles, given its 50th percentile standing — the CPU’s high single-thread scores cannot compensate for the GPU’s limited shading units (9728) and texture rate (510.7 GTexel/s).

The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2263 and 4-thread score of 4474 indicate strong per-core performance, which benefits games that rely on 2-4 cores for physics and game logic. The 8-thread score of 8230 and 16-thread score of 10749 show that the CPU scales well with more threads, which helps in games that use multiple cores for streaming or background tasks. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile is the primary limiter for high-refresh gaming (144 Hz or higher) at 1440p and above. For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread lead — 4336 in PassMark single-thread — should allow frame rates well above 144 FPS, but the data does not confirm this.

Because no measured FPS exists, these estimates carry uncertainty. The GPU’s 16 GB memory is sufficient for modern games at 1080p and 1440p, but the 256-bit bus width and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are not exceptional — many desktop GPUs in the same class offer higher bandwidth. The GPU’s boost clock of 1680 MHz is modest, further suggesting mid-tier performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite paints a picture of a strong multi-threaded processor with excellent single-thread capability. In 3DMark, the single-thread score is 1137, the 2-thread score is 2263, the 4-thread score is 4474, the 8-thread score is 8230, the 16-thread score is 10749, and the max-thread score is 12462. These numbers show near-linear scaling from 1 to 8 threads (doubling from 1137 to 2263 to 4474 to 8230), then diminishing returns from 16 to 24 threads, reflecting the hybrid architecture of 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores (16 cores, 24 threads total).

Cinebench results confirm this: R15 multi-core score of 3901, R20 multi-core of 16255, and R23 multi-core of 38704. The R23 single-core score of 5464 is strong, placing the CPU well above average for single-threaded tasks. Geekbench multi-core score of 18258 and single-core of 2435 reinforce the dual strength: high per-core performance and robust multi-threading. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 45817 and single-thread of 4336, with notable results in integer math (154507) and floating-point math (114997), indicating strong computational throughput for both integer-heavy and float-heavy workloads.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47330, and its percentile vs. all CPUs is 89. Compared to nearest rivals, the i7-13700KF is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (avg score 47468, delta -0.3%), meaning the i7-13700KF is 0.3% slower. It is 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i9-12900F (avg 47176, delta 0.3%). It is 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (avg 47527, delta -0.4%) and 0.7% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (avg 47022, delta 0.7%). These deltas are all within 1%, so the CPU is statistically indistinguishable from its closest competitors — the data shows a four-way tie at the top of this performance band.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK — its benchmarks array is empty, and its avgBenchmarkScore is 0. The GPU’s percentile vs. all GPUs is 50, placing it exactly at the median of all graphics cards. There are no nearest rivals listed for the GPU, so no direct comparisons are possible. The combined percentile of the CPU+GPU pairing is 70, which reflects the CPU’s high standing pulling up the GPU’s median position.

The combined picture: this is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer (89th percentile) but the GPU is average (50th percentile). The pairing’s 70th combined percentile indicates that most systems with this CPU would likely pair it with a stronger GPU, but the data does not support that claim directly — it is inferred from the CPU’s high percentile relative to the GPU’s median.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need exceptional CPU throughput but only moderate graphics performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45817 make it ideal for content creators who render video, process large datasets, or compile code. The 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 30 MB shared L3 cache, provide ample parallel processing for multi-threaded applications. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance support GPU-accelerated workloads like 3D rendering or machine learning inference, but its 50th percentile ranking means it will not excel in high-end graphics tasks.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this system capable, especially in CPU-bound titles where the i7-13700KF’s single-thread score of 4336 (PassMark) and R23 single-core of 5464 shine. At 1440p, the GPU’s limits become apparent, and at 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. Esports gamers playing at 1080p with low settings may achieve high refresh rates, but the data does not confirm this — it is an estimate based on the CPU’s strong single-thread performance.

Content creators working with video editing software that utilizes both CPU and GPU will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread power (R20 multi-core 16255) and the GPU’s 16 GB memory, which is sufficient for 4K video timelines. 3D artists using GPU-accelerated renderers will find the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput adequate for medium-complexity scenes, but not for heavy production work — the 50th percentile GPU ranking places it below dedicated workstation cards. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the CPU’s multi-thread scores, particularly the PassMark integer math score of 154507. Students and small business workstations running office suites, spreadsheets, and database applications will be more than served by the CPU’s single-thread performance, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks — the data does not specify a lower-cost alternative, but the pairing is clearly unbalanced for office work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear bottleneck: the GPU limits the system in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s 89th percentile vs. the GPU’s 50th percentile means that in gaming at high resolutions (1440p and above), the GPU will be the limiting factor — the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as 1080p gaming with low graphics settings, the CPU is the stronger component, and the GPU becomes the bottleneck even at lower resolutions.

Evidence from FPS scaling: the GPU’s pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s set a hard ceiling on fill-rate-limited scenes. At 1080p, with roughly 2 million pixels per frame, the GPU can theoretically push over 90 frames per second (188.2 GPixel/s divided by 2.07 million pixels per frame), but this is a theoretical maximum that ignores shading and memory bandwidth constraints. At 4K (8.3 million pixels per frame), the pixel rate allows only about 22.7 FPS in pure fill-rate terms — before considering shader complexity. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1137 (3DMark) is roughly 1.7 times higher than the average CPU, so it will not bottleneck at any resolution; the GPU will always be the constraint at higher resolutions.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 is nearly 10 times the single-core score of 5464, showing excellent scaling. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45817 is over 10 times the single-thread score of 4336, confirming that applications using all 24 threads will see massive gains. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS is useful for parallel compute, but its 50th percentile ranking suggests that other GPUs in the same class offer similar or better performance.

The bottleneck profile: for gaming, the GPU is the limit at 1440p and 4K; for productivity, the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU provides moderate acceleration. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance — a perfectly balanced system would have both components near the same percentile. The CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 50th percentile create a window where the GPU is underpowered relative to the CPU, likely causing frame rate drops in GPU-bound titles even though the CPU has more to give.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1137, PassMark single-thread 4336) supports high frame rates in CPU-bound games at 1080p, but the GPU’s 50th percentile limits it to roughly 100-150 FPS in esports titles — estimated, not measured. At 1440p, expect 60-90 FPS in most games, and at 4K, below 60 FPS in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 12462, can handle game capture, encoding, and streaming simultaneously without major frame drops in the game itself. The GPU’s 304 tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding, but the data does not specify NVENC capabilities. The CPU alone has enough multi-thread headroom for software encoding.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and Geekbench multi-core of 18258 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 16 GB memory and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 speed up effects rendering and color grading, but the 50th percentile means it is not a top-tier accelerator.

3D rendering: Multi-threaded CPU rendering (Blender Cycles CPU, V-Ray) will be fast — the PassMark floating-point math score of 114997 shows strong FP32 throughput. GPU rendering will be slower than dedicated workstation GPUs, given the 50th percentile ranking, but the 16 GB VRAM allows larger scenes than 8 GB cards.

Software development: Compilation speed benefits from the CPU’s multi-thread scores — PassMark integer math of 154507 and multi-thread of 45817 make heavy builds faster. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but the CPU’s 89th percentile ensures snappy IDE performance and fast unit test runs.

Student and office work: Overkill for this scenario. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4336 (PassMark) handles spreadsheets and web browsing with ease, but the GPU’s 150 W TDP and 16 GB memory are unnecessary for office tasks. The system will run office software with zero performance issues, but the data does not recommend this pairing for such use — it is simply capable.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair has a combined percentile of 70 among all CPU-GPU combinations, with the CPU in the 89th percentile and the GPU in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; dataIsMeasured is false, and all frame-rate figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700KF’s average benchmark score is 47330. It is 0.3% slower than the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i9-12900F, 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, and 0.7% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i7-13700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel memory bus, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with a chip named AD103.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the CPU provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass is "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i7-13700KF with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor on Intel Socket 1700, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz, 30 MB of shared L3 cache, and a 125 W TDP. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based embedded part (AD103 chip) with 9728 shading units, 16 GB GDDR6, and a 150 W TDP, designed for portable or embedded devices (slot width IGP, no power connectors). The combined percentile is 70, placing the system above the median but not in the top tier. The CPU’s 89th percentile makes it a high-end processor, while the GPU’s 50th percentile makes it an average graphics solution. Overall, this is a workstation-leaning build where CPU compute dominates, and the GPU provides adequate but not exceptional graphics performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It has 16 cores and 24 threads, arranged in a hybrid configuration of performance and efficiency cores (the data does not specify the exact split, but the thread count implies 8 performance cores with hyperthreading and 8 efficiency cores without). The base clock is 3.40 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with ECC support. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1137 positions it well above average CPUs, and the max-thread score of 12462 shows strong scaling to 24 threads. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 38704 is a high score, indicating that heavy rendering or encoding tasks will complete quickly. Geekbench multi-core of 18258 and single-core of 2435 confirm the balanced design. PassMark tests show exceptional integer math (154507) and floating-point math (114997), which are critical for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data compression score of 596493 and encryption score of 33314 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks like file archiving and secure communications.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 47330 and 89th percentile rank place it among the top processors available. Its nearest rivals — Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, Intel Core i9-12900F, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — are all within 0.7% of its score, meaning that in real-world performance, these CPUs are effectively interchangeable. The i7-13700KF’s strengths are its high boost clock (5.40 GHz) for single-thread tasks and its 16-core/24-thread configuration for multi-threaded workloads. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and database workloads that benefit from larger caches. The lack of integrated graphics (the i7-13700KF has no iGPU) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build provides. The CPU’s release date of 2022-09-26 and active production status indicate it is a current product, and its launch MSRP is $384.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700KF

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds