SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: A Workstation-Class Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop flagship CPU with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based Quadro RTX 5000 GPU, creating a desktop build that sits at the 78th percentile overall among all combined CPU+GPU configurations. The CPU delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and dedicated RT and tensor hardware, though its underlying architecture dates to 2018. The benchmark data reveals a system with significant compute capability but one where the GPU's age shows in certain modern workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the Turing architecture using the TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boosts to 1815 MHz, which is competitive for its generation but notably lower than modern counterparts.

The compute configuration includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. For specialized workloads, the Quadro RTX 5000 packs 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference respectively. Peak FP32 performance reaches 11.15 TFLOPS, while FP16 throughput doubles to 22.30 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s, figures that reflect the GPU's mid-range position in the Turing workstation stack.

Benchmark scores show a GPU that performs respectably but not spectacularly. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (which scores 21856, a delta of -1%). The RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% ahead with a score of 21379, while the AMD Radeon HD 8970M and RX Vega M GL trail by 1.8% and 2.3% respectively. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 indicate solid compute capability for OpenCL-based rendering workloads.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature — it allows large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside entirely in GPU memory, avoiding PCIe transfers. The RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering in applications that support it, and the tensor cores enable AI-accelerated denoising and upscaling. However, the FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards, and the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that the GPU struggles with the latest graphics API features, potentially limiting performance in newer rendering engines that rely heavily on DX12 Ultimate features.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported — a key feature for workstation stability. PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

The CPU's TDP is rated at 125 W, while the GPU's TDP is 230 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. This leaves considerable headroom for additional components. The power connectors on the GPU are 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin, which is a modest requirement that most quality power supplies can handle. The combined TDP of 355 W means that the suggested 550 W PSU provides roughly 55% headroom for other system components like storage, cooling, and motherboard power draw.

A sensible upgrade path would focus on the GPU first, as the CPU still holds an 89th percentile rank among all CPUs. The Quadro RTX 5000's successor, Workstation Ampere, represents a significant architectural leap. However, the current GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth remain relevant for many workloads. The CPU's socket support for DDR5 means a memory upgrade could improve bandwidth-sensitive tasks, though the dual-channel configuration already provides solid throughput. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that future GPU upgrades will not be bottlenecked by the platform, making this a forward-compatible foundation for years to come.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The build sits at the 78th percentile among all combined CPU+GPU configurations, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF has an average benchmark score of 47330, which is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F (47176) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H by 0.3% (47468) and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 by 0.4% (47527).

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 5000 includes 48 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing acceleration, along with 384 tensor cores for AI workloads.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF features 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and closest competitor?

A: The GPU ranks at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB as its nearest rival (1% difference in average score).

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU wattage is 550 W, which provides adequate headroom given the GPU's 230 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i7-13700KF and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is skewed heavily toward CPU performance. The CPU ranks at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This 22-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads.

In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 596493), encryption (33314), and floating-point math (114997), the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide exceptional throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and Geekbench multi-core score of 18258 confirm that the CPU can handle heavily threaded workloads without breaking a sweat. In these scenarios, the GPU is rarely the bottleneck.

However, in GPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering with ray tracing, the Quadro RTX 5000's 48 RT cores and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit overall throughput. The PassMark G3D score of 15616, while respectable, places the GPU in the lower half of the performance distribution relative to the CPU. The DirectX 12 score of 59 further suggests that modern graphics APIs may not be fully optimized for this older architecture.

For gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 1137 in 3DMark and 4336 in PassMark single-thread tests indicate strong per-core performance that can feed modern GPUs effectively. However, the GPU's age means it will likely be the bottleneck at higher resolutions, particularly with ray tracing enabled. The 16 GB VRAM helps at high resolutions, but the raw compute throughput limits frame rates.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores. The data indicates that this system would be a competent but not exceptional gaming platform.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10749 and single-thread score of 1137 suggest strong gaming performance, as modern games benefit from both high single-thread performance and multiple cores. The PassMark single-thread score of 4336 reinforces this assessment. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616, however, places it in the range of a mid-range graphics card from several generations ago.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the system would likely deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU. At 1440p, the GPU would become more of a limiting factor, with frame rates dropping noticeably in demanding titles. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM helps with texture loading, but the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance would struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern AAA games.

Ray tracing performance would be modest at best, as the 48 RT cores are from the first generation of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and lack the efficiency of newer architectures. The DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests that games utilizing advanced DX12 features may see reduced performance compared to newer GPUs.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to measured performance

This build targets professionals and enthusiasts who need strong CPU compute performance with workstation-grade GPU features. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM make this suitable for several specific use cases.

Content creators working with video editing and color grading would benefit from the CPU's high multi-threaded performance — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and PassMark multithread score of 45817 indicate excellent rendering and encoding capability. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM allows for smooth timeline scrubbing with high-resolution footage, though the GPU's compute performance may limit effects-heavy workflows.

3D artists and architects using applications that leverage the GPU's RT cores and tensor cores would find value in the Quadro RTX 5000's professional feature set. The 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible software, and the 384 tensor cores support AI-accelerated rendering features. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly beneficial for large scenes and high-resolution textures.

Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with PassMark data compression score of 596493 indicating fast build times. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compilation tasks.

Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like financial modeling, scientific computing, or database management would benefit from the CPU's 89th percentile performance. The GPU's professional drivers and 16 GB VRAM support multi-monitor setups and specialized visualization tools.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 16 cores and 24 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in Intel's hybrid architecture. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz under load, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial cache allocation helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support adding workstation credibility.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5464 and multi-core score of 38704 demonstrate strong performance across the board. The Geekbench single-core score of 2435 and multi-core score of 18258 reinforce this assessment. The 3DMark scores scale predictably with thread count: 2263 for 2 threads, 4474 for 4 threads, 8230 for 8 threads, 10749 for 16 threads, and 12462 for max threads.

Real-world workload implications are clear. Video encoding and 3D rendering tasks that scale with core count will see near-linear improvements up to 16 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 154507 and floating-point math score of 114997 indicate strong general-purpose compute capability. Data compression (596493) and encryption (33314) scores suggest the CPU handles these tasks efficiently, making it suitable for file servers and security applications.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of desktop processors, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (0.3% ahead) and Intel Core i9-12900F (0.3% behind). This performance level means the CPU will not be a bottleneck for most applications for several years.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining a high-end 13th-generation Intel Core processor with a professional workstation GPU. The CPU, with its 89th percentile ranking, is clearly the stronger component, while the GPU's 67th percentile ranking reflects its age — the Quadro RTX 5000 was released in 2018 and is now end-of-life.

The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper quartile of all builds in the benchmark database. This means it outperforms roughly 78% of all recorded configurations, putting it in the "high-performance desktop" tier. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance makes this an excellent workstation for CPU-intensive tasks, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and professional feature set add value for specific GPU-accelerated workloads.

The build class is explicitly desktop, meaning it's designed for stationary operation with full-size components. The CPU's 125 W TDP and GPU's 230 W TDP require adequate cooling and a 550 W PSU, which is a modest requirement for the performance level offered. The dual-slot GPU with 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors fits in most mid-tower cases.

Overall, this pairing represents a CPU-forward system where the processor provides exceptional compute capability, and the GPU offers professional features like ECC memory support, RT cores, and large VRAM capacity, albeit with raw performance that lags behind the CPU's capabilities.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 47330, with a percentile ranking of 89 among all CPUs. Key benchmark results include a 3DMark max-thread score of 12462, Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704, Geekbench multi-core score of 18258, and PassMark multithread score of 45817. Single-threaded performance is equally strong, with 3DMark single-thread scoring 1137, Cinebench R23 single-core at 5464, and Geekbench single-core at 2435.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 21629, with a percentile ranking of 67 among all GPUs. Notable results include a PassMark G3D score of 15616, Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999, Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309, and PassMark GPU compute score of 6525. The DirectX scores reveal the GPU's age, with DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59.

The combined picture shows a system with exceptional CPU performance that is held back by the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms 89% of all CPUs, while the GPU's 67th percentile ranking means it outperforms 67% of all GPUs. This disparity creates a system that excels in CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data processing, and video encoding, but is merely adequate in GPU-bound workloads like gaming and 3D rendering.

The combined percentile of 78 reflects this asymmetry — the system is better than average but not outstanding, with the GPU being the clear limiting factor. For users whose workloads are primarily CPU-bound, this system delivers exceptional value. For those needing strong GPU performance, the Quadro RTX 5000's age shows, and a newer GPU would be a more balanced choice.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1137, PassMark single-thread of 4336) can drive high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU's 67th percentile ranking limits overall FPS. Estimated performance would be playable at 1080p with high settings, but 1440p and 4K would see frame rates drop below high-refresh thresholds, particularly with ray tracing enabled.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 45817 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 indicate the CPU can handle x264 encoding without impacting game performance. The GPU's NVENC capabilities, while not explicitly scored, are part of the Turing architecture's feature set.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance excels in video encoding and rendering, with PassMark data compression score of 596493 and floating-point math score of 114997 supporting fast export times. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM allows for smooth editing of high-resolution footage, though effects-heavy timelines may strain the GPU's compute performance.

3D rendering: The combination of CPU rendering (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704) and GPU rendering (Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999) provides flexibility. The GPU's 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible engines, while the 16 GB VRAM handles large scenes. However, the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU-based rendering.

Software development: The CPU's high multi-threaded performance (PassMark integer math score of 154507) ensures fast compilation times for large codebases. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds, and the 16 cores handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4336) handles document processing and web browsing effortlessly, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports multiple monitors. However, the power requirements (125 W CPU + 230 W GPU) and component costs make this an impractical choice for basic productivity use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700KF

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds