SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-13700KF pairs with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti in a desktop build that places at the 92nd combined percentile. The CPU ranks at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47330, while the GPU ranks at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 131938. The dataIsMeasured flag is false and the measuredFpsUltraByGame table is empty, so no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame-rate discussion is therefore estimated from the available benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is an Ampere-generation part fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process. The GA102 chip contains 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The GPU carries 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz and 21 Gbps effective speed, producing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. Core clocks are listed at 1560 MHz base and 1860 MHz boost. The compute configuration consists of 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores. Pixel throughput is 208.3 GPixel/s, texture throughput is 625.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 40.00 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 40.00 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

In synthetic workloads, the GPU scores 5741 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 174441 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 215633 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores put the card at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest-rival data reinforces this high position: the RTX 3090 Ti's average benchmark score of 131938 is 0.7% above the NVIDIA L4’s 131072, 2.4% below the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation’s 135218, 2.4% below the NVIDIA A10M’s 135230, and 2.6% below the AMD Radeon PRO W6800’s 135396.

For rendering workloads, the key observations are memory volume, memory bandwidth, and dedicated hardware. The 24 GB frame buffer is large enough for substantial scene data, and the 1.01 TB/s bus can feed high-resolution textures without frequent spillover. The 84 RT cores make ray-traced rendering feasible, while the 336 tensor cores provide dedicated matrix-heavy compute capacity. The 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 throughput gives the card a strong baseline for compute-oriented graphics tasks. The 95th percentile ranking means the GPU is positioned near the top of the tracked GPU distribution, so it should remain a high-end rendering part even when compared against newer professional and workstation cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming

The GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and the build’s 92nd combined percentile suggest a configuration aimed at high-refresh gaming. The CPU supports this with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1137 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5464, indicating strong single-thread responsiveness for game logic and frame pacing. The 24 GB memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth give the GPU room for demanding texture sets, while the 84 RT cores allow ray-traced effects to run without abandoning the high-end feature set.

Streaming

Streaming workloads commonly combine a game render loop with concurrent capture, encoding, and broadcast tasks. The Core i7-13700KF’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide a high degree of parallelism, and the benchmark data supports this: the CPU scores 12462 in 3DMark max-threads, 45817 in Passmark multithread, and 38704 in Cinebench R23 multicore. These results indicate substantial CPU headroom for running additional background workloads alongside the game, while the GPU’s high percentile keeps the primary rendering pipeline competitive.

Video Editing

Video editing benefits from both the CPU’s multicore throughput and the GPU’s compute and memory resources. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 16255 and Geekbench multicore score of 18258 show strong processing for export and timeline operations. The GPU adds 24 GB of memory, 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, and 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 compute for effects, color work, and GPU-accelerated previews. The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores also give the system capacity for modern AI-accelerated or ray-traced effects, assuming the software uses those hardware paths.

3D Rendering

For 3D rendering, the CPU and GPU contribute different strengths. The CPU’s 16-core, 24-thread configuration with a Passmark floating-point math score of 114997 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38704 handles scene preparation and CPU-based simulation tasks. The GPU’s 95th percentile position, combined with 24 GB of GDDR6X and 40.00 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, makes it capable of GPU-accelerated rendering. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth is particularly relevant for feeding large render buffers, and the 84 RT cores support ray-traced render loops.

Software Development

Software development workloads often require high single-thread speed for interactive tooling and high multicore throughput for builds and tests. The CPU’s single-thread scores are strong: 1137 in 3DMark single-thread, 2435 in Geekbench single-core, 5464 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 4336 in Passmark single-thread. For parallel compilation, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 10749, the Geekbench multicore score of 18258, and the Passmark integer math score of 154507 indicate meaningful scaling across threads. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support help reduce data movement bottlenecks.

Student and Office Work

For student and general office use, the configuration is far more powerful than typical productivity software requires. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking mean these workloads will not stress the hardware. The CPU’s 24 threads handle multitasking, while the desktop class and ECC memory support listed as true make the platform suitable for work where data accuracy matters. No integrated graphics are listed for the CPU, so the discrete GPU is the display output path.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built by Intel on a 10 nm process. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support listed as true. The CPU has 16 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy is 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the CPU side, and the multiplier is unlocked. No integrated graphics are listed, so the system depends on the discrete GPU for video output.

The CPU benchmark set shows scaling from lightly threaded to fully loaded conditions. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 2263 at 2 threads, 4474 at 4 threads, 8230 at 8 threads, 10749 at 16 threads, and 12462 at max threads. The single-thread 3DMark score is 1137. Cinebench results follow a similar pattern: R15 multicore 3901, R15 single-core 550, R20 multicore 16255, R20 single-core 2294, R23 multicore 38704, and R23 single-core 5464. Geekbench adds a multicore score of 18258 and a single-core score of 2435.

Passmark results cover more specific workloads. The CPU scores 596493 in data compression, 33314 in data encryption, 36700 in extended instructions, 186 in find prime numbers, 114997 in floating-point math, 154507 in integer math, 45817 in multithread, 2650 in physics, 62726 in random string sorting, and 4336 in single-thread tests. The modest find-prime score of 186 shows that not every CPU subtest favors this architecture; the high integer and floating-point scores are more representative of general productivity and compute tasks.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47330, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Nearest-rival comparisons show it is 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, which averages 47468, and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, which averages 47527. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F, which averages 47176, and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, which averages 47022. These small deltas mean the i7-13700KF sits in a cluster of high-end processors with nearly identical average performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

Because no measured FPS scaling data exists, bottleneck conclusions must come from percentile positions and benchmark scores rather than direct frame-rate comparisons. The CPU is at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 92. A six-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles is small enough that neither component is severely out of class relative to the other.

In graphics-heavy workloads, the GPU is likely to be the primary performance driver. The RTX 3090 Ti’s 95th percentile position, 84 RT cores, 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth all point to a strong rendering engine. In such scenarios, the CPU’s single-thread performance must be sufficient to feed the GPU; the 3DMark single-thread score of 1137 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5464 support that expectation.

In multithreaded CPU workloads, such as large builds, heavy compression, or data processing, the CPU becomes the limiting resource. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 12462 is more than five times its 2-thread score of 2263, showing that the processor’s performance depends heavily on thread utilization. Workloads that cannot spread across its 24 threads will leave much of the CPU’s potential unused. The GPU’s high compute scores do not help in those single-thread-limited cases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s exact benchmark results are:

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| 3DMark 16 threads | 10749 |

| 3DMark 2 threads | 2263 |

| 3DMark 4 threads | 4474 |

| 3DMark 8 threads | 8230 |

| 3DMark max threads | 12462 |

| 3DMark single thread | 1137 |

| Cinebench R15 multicore | 3901 |

| Cinebench R15 single-core | 550 |

| Cinebench R20 multicore | 16255 |

| Cinebench R20 single-core | 2294 |

| Cinebench R23 multicore | 38704 |

| Cinebench R23 single-core | 5464 |

| Geekbench multicore | 18258 |

| Geekbench single-core | 2435 |

| Passmark data compression | 596493 |

| Passmark data encryption | 33314 |

| Passmark extended instructions | 36700 |

| Passmark find prime numbers | 186 |

| Passmark floating point math | 114997 |

| Passmark integer math | 154507 |

| Passmark multithread | 45817 |

| Passmark physics | 2650 |

| Passmark random string sorting | 62726 |

| Passmark single-thread | 4336 |

The GPU’s exact benchmark results are:

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 | 5741 |

| Geekbench OpenCL | 174441 |

| Geekbench Vulkan | 215633 |

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47330, with a percentile of 89 among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 131938, with a percentile of 95 among all GPUs. Combined, the build sits at the 92nd percentile. The GPU is closer to the top of its distribution than the CPU is, but both components are comfortably high-end. The combined picture is a desktop system where the graphics subsystem is the standout component and the CPU is strong enough to avoid being an obvious weak point.

Who Should Build It

This build is well matched to users who want a high-end desktop that can handle both demanding CPU and GPU workloads. Gamers with high-refresh displays will find the GPU’s 95th percentile and the CPU’s single-thread scores sufficient for high-frame-rate scenarios, though exact FPS values are not part of the data. The 24 GB memory and 84 RT cores make the card suitable for games with large texture sets and ray-traced effects.

Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will benefit from the combination of 24 CPU threads and a 95th-percentile GPU. The CPU’s 38704 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 45817 Passmark multithread score support heavily parallel export tasks, while the GPU’s 24 GB GDDR6X and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth handle large frame buffers. The 336 tensor cores also provide dedicated compute capacity for AI-assisted creative tools.

Software developers and engineers will get strong single-thread responsiveness plus real multicore throughput. The CPU’s 2435 Geekbench single-core score and 18258 Geekbench multicore score cover both sides of the development workflow. Passmark integer math of 154507 and data encryption of 33314 suggest the CPU can handle code compilation, data processing, and cryptographic workloads without being the bottleneck.

Students and small business workstation users do not need this level of performance for ordinary documents, spreadsheets, or web applications. However, the desktop form factor, 16 CPU cores, 24 threads, and ECC support make the platform appropriate for workstation-class tasks. The GPU is end-of-life from a production standpoint, but its 95th percentile benchmark position means it remains a high-tier component in practice.

Gaming Performance

The following frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores, not from measured game data. The measuredFpsUltraByGame table is empty, so no title-specific ultra-settings values are available.

The GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth indicate that the RTX 3090 Ti should handle demanding resolutions and settings without memory-related bottlenecks. The 24 GB GDDR6X buffer is large even by current high-end standards. The 84 RT cores give the card a dedicated path for ray-traced lighting and reflections, while the 112 ROPs and 208.3 GPixel/s pixel rate support high-resolution rasterization throughput.

The i7-13700KF’s single-thread scores support high-refresh gaming expectations. The CPU scores 1137 in 3DMark single-thread, 2435 in Geekbench single-core, and 5464 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These results indicate that game logic and draw-call processing are unlikely to be severe limits in most scenarios. The CPU’s 24 threads also allow background tasks such as chat, capture, and streaming software to run alongside the game without necessarily starving the render thread. No exact FPS figures can be derived from the available data, but the overall picture is a high-end gaming platform.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build, as indicated by buildClass, that pairs the Intel Core i7-13700KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $384, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 1,999 USD. The combined percentile of 92 places this pairing near the top of the tracked configuration distribution. The CPU contributes a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with an unlocked multiplier, while the GPU contributes a 24 GB Ampere-class card with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. It is a high-tier desktop configuration with a slight skew toward GPU performance.

FAQ

Q: What memory does the Intel Core i7-13700KF support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory support is listed as true.

Q: Does the Core i7-13700KF have integrated graphics?

A: No integrated graphics are listed in the data. The discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What PCIe connectivity does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the CPU side. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 3090 Ti have?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz and 21 Gbps effective speed. Bandwidth is 1.01 TB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47330. It sits 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F, 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

Q: What is the RTX 3090 Ti’s PCIe and power configuration?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 850 W. The card is triple-slot and has dimensions of 336 mm length, 140 mm height, and 61 mm width.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is listed as unlocked, which makes CPU overclocking possible on a compatible Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support listed as true. Storage and expansion can use the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the RTX 3090 Ti runs at PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU TDP is 125 W and the GPU TDP is 450 W, with the GPU’s suggested PSU set at 850 W, indicating the power supply recommendation accounts for a high-power graphics card.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so a sensible near-term performance upgrade on the same socket is overclocking rather than immediately replacing the processor. The GPU is marked end-of-life, but its 95th percentile position means it remains competitive in the current distribution. A future upgrade would likely target a component that changes an identified workload bottleneck: more CPU performance for heavily threaded tasks, or a newer GPU if rendering demands exceed the 24 GB memory capacity of the current card. The platform’s existing PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes and DDR4/DDR5 support leave room for memory and storage changes without disrupting the CPU and GPU pairing.