SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around a 16-core Raptor Lake processor and an Ampere-generation graphics card. The GPU is a substantial piece of hardware, featuring 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. This bandwidth is critical for feeding the 8704 shading units and 272 texture mapping units at high resolutions. The card’s compute capabilities are anchored by 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, which handle ray tracing and AI workloads respectively. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1440 MHz and boosts to 1710 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s. In terms of raw compute, the RTX 3080 achieves 29.77 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1) operations, making it a versatile workhorse for rendering tasks that require high precision. The benchmark data shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407, which is a strong result for a card in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This score indicates that the card can handle modern DirectX 12 titles with heavy geometry and effects, though the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 100 suggests that in purely rasterized legacy DX12 workloads, the card’s advantage is less pronounced relative to its other metrics. The 10 GB VRAM, while not the largest available, is sufficient for 1440p gaming and many content creation tasks, but the data implies that at 4K with maximum textures, the memory capacity could become a constraint for the most demanding assets. The RT and tensor hardware ensures that features like DLSS and ray-traced reflections are available, though the specific performance gains are not measured in this data set.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture is defined by a CPU that sits in the 89th percentile of all processors and a GPU in the 68th percentile of all graphics cards, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 79. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47330, which places it in a tight competitive cluster. It is a mere 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F and 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, showing that the 13700KF is effectively a performance peer to the previous generation’s flagship and a current-generation mobile powerhouse. The data shows a 0.7% lead over the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and a 0.4% lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. This indicates that in multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads, the 13700KF holds its ground against a wide range of competitors, though the deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning real-world differences are marginal. The CPU’s specific scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and a single-core score of 5464. The single-core result is particularly strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18258 and single-core score of 2435 reinforce this position. For the GPU, the average benchmark score is 23172, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its score, though the rival list includes the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, and AMD Radeon RX 6600M. This is an unusual grouping, suggesting that the average score is pulled down by specific workloads where the RTX 3080’s architecture does not excel, such as the PassMark G2D score of 1054 and the DirectX 10 score of 170. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4407 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423 show that in modern compute and gaming scenarios, the card is capable. The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is the primary driver of overall performance, but the GPU is still a capable partner for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and entry-level 4K.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and cost, though the data does not specify bandwidth figures. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is a forward-looking standard for storage and graphics, though the RTX 3080 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU will not be bottlenecked by the interface, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 connection provides ample bandwidth for the 760.3 GB/s memory throughput. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 700 W. This suggests that a high-quality 700 W power supply is the minimum recommendation, and users with additional drives or heavy overclocking might consider a unit with more headroom, though the data does not specify a maximum. The motherboard socket is actively produced, and the CPU’s production status is active, meaning replacement parts are available. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the weaker link in the pairing, given its lower percentile ranking. However, the CPU’s support for PCIe Gen 5 means that a future GPU upgrade to a PCIe 5.0 card would be theoretically possible, though the specifics of such cards are not in this data. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 also means that a platform migration would not require an immediate memory upgrade if the user already has a compatible DDR4 kit, though DDR5 would be the higher-performance option. The 12-pin power connector on the GPU is a specific requirement, and users should ensure their PSU has the appropriate cable or an adapter.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed towards the CPU, which is the stronger component in this pairing. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 68th percentile indicates that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the system will perform exceptionally well. The PassMark physics score of 2650 and the data compression score of 596493 are indicative of a processor that can handle complex calculations without breaking a sweat. Conversely, the GPU’s lower percentile means that in GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming with ultra settings, the RTX 3080 will be the limiting factor. The PassMark G3D score of 25086 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4407 show that the GPU is capable, but it is not in the top tier of graphics cards. The FPS scaling is not measured in this data, but based on the benchmark scores, the system will likely be CPU-bound at 1080p with lower graphics settings, where the CPU’s high single-thread performance can push frame rates to their maximum. At 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, the GPU will become the bottleneck, as the 10 GB VRAM and the 68th percentile ranking will limit the frame rate. The data also shows that the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 100 is relatively low, which could indicate that in specific DX12 titles, the card does not scale as well as other architectures. This means that for users who play a mix of older DX11 titles and modern DX12 titles, the performance will vary more than the average score suggests. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4336 ensures that even in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will not introduce stutter or frame pacing issues, as it can feed the GPU efficiently.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is a significant frequency advantage for single-threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for gaming and productivity tasks that require frequent data access. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation chips, making it suitable for error-sensitive compute tasks. The benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and a single-core score of 5464. The multi-core score is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, but 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-12900F, indicating that the 13700KF is a direct successor to the 12900F in terms of performance. The single-core performance is a standout, with the 3DMark single-thread score of 1137 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2435, which are top-tier results. For real workloads, this means that the CPU excels in tasks that rely on high clock speeds, such as gaming, spreadsheet calculations, and light video editing. The PassMark integer math score of 154507 and floating point math score of 114997 show that the CPU is a beast for computational tasks, while the extended instructions score of 36700 indicates strong SIMD performance for multimedia and scientific applications. The data compression score of 596493 is particularly high, making this CPU ideal for file archiving and database workloads. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, meaning it can be overclocked, though the data does not provide specific overclocking results. The launch MSRP is $384, which positions it as a high-end desktop part, and its active production status ensures availability.

Who Should Build It

This system is for a user who prioritizes CPU performance above all else. The 89th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for professionals who run multi-threaded workloads, such as software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running simulations, or video editors using multi-core renderers. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 18258 indicate that it can handle 24 threads with ease, making it suitable for 3D rendering, animation, and batch processing. The GPU, while in the 68th percentile, is still a capable card for gaming at 1440p, and the combination of the two means that a user can game and stream simultaneously without a significant performance hit. For gamers at 1080p, the CPU will be the primary driver, allowing for high refresh rates in esports titles. At 1440p, the GPU will be more of a factor, but the system should still deliver high settings at playable frame rates. The system is also suitable for small business workstations that need to handle spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity, where the CPU’s high single-thread speed and large cache will make operations snappy. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s compute power for simulations and coding, while the GPU can handle CAD and light rendering. Content creators who work with 4K video will find the CPU’s multi-core performance beneficial for encoding, and the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM can handle the timeline and effects. The system is not ideal for users who want maximum gaming performance at 4K ultra settings, as the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking suggests that higher-tier cards would be better suited for that task.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The CPU’s high single-thread performance, as evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1137 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5464, suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p, the system will deliver very high frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, likely exceeding 200 FPS on competitive settings. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4407 indicates that it can handle modern AAA titles at 1440p with high settings, with estimated frame rates in the 80-120 FPS range for most games. At 4K, the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 68th percentile ranking will be limiting, with estimated frame rates dropping to 40-60 FPS at ultra settings, requiring DLSS to achieve smoother gameplay. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 is a general indicator of gaming performance, but the specific DirectX 12 score of 100 is low, which could mean that in DX12 titles, the card may not perform as well as its other scores suggest. For ray tracing, the 68 RT cores will provide some acceleration, but the performance is not measured. The CPU’s multi-core performance, with a PassMark multithread score of 45817, ensures that background tasks like Discord or streaming will not impact gaming performance. In summary, the estimated gaming performance is strong at 1080p and 1440p, with the system being a high-refresh-rate machine at the former and a high-settings machine at the latter, but 4K ultra gaming will require compromises.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 47330, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 23172. The combined percentile is 79, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop builds. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 68 RT cores. The system is well-suited for a power user who requires exceptional CPU performance for productivity and compute tasks, while still having a capable GPU for gaming and acceleration. The CPU’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives the builder flexibility, and the PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that the platform is not immediately outdated. The GPU’s suggested PSU of 700 W is a reasonable requirement, and the CPU’s 125 W TDP means that a decent air cooler or liquid cooler is necessary, though the data does not specify cooler requirements. The GPU is end-of-life, which means that its availability may be limited, but its performance is still competitive. The overall tier of this build is high-end, with the CPU being the standout component. The build is a balanced machine for 1440p gaming and serious productivity, but not a top-tier 4K gaming rig.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, indicating that this desktop build outperforms 79% of all recorded systems in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900F?

A: The Core i7-13700KF has an average benchmark score of 47330, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-12900F’s score of 47176.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080?

A: The RTX 3080 features 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the Intel Core i7-13700KF?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which contributes to its strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5464.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the specific bandwidth figures are not provided in the data.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the system is 700 W, which accounts for the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 320 W TDP.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and should be considered approximations.