SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM form a desktop pairing that is defined by a stark contrast in capability. The processor is a high-end, 16-core powerhouse that ranks in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card is a modest, entry-level Ampere part that sits in the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This combination creates a system where the CPU is the dominant force, and the GPU is the primary limiter for graphical workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this specific combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. Therefore, the following FPS estimates are derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The data indicates that the RTX 3050 OEM, with an average benchmark score of 15199, is the decisive factor in gaming performance. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (score 15171, deltaPct 0.2) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (score 15290, deltaPct -0.6), are all within a 1% performance band, suggesting the RTX 3050 OEM delivers frame rates comparable to these previous-generation and entry-level current cards.

Given this GPU's class, gamers should expect playable performance at 1080p resolution with settings adjusted. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for modern game assets at this resolution. The core clock boosts to 1755 MHz, and with 2304 shading units, the card can handle DirectX 12 Ultimate titles, but it will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates at maximum settings. The CPU, scoring 38704 in Cinebench R23 multicore, is far more capable than the GPU and will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. For esports and less demanding titles, the i7-13700KF's high single-thread performance (5464 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the GPU will still cap the maximum FPS. At 1440p or 4K, the RTX 3050 OEM will be even more stressed, and the performance gap between this GPU and the CPU will widen further. The estimated frame rates are thus heavily constrained by the GPU, making it the target for any gaming performance upgrades.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. This socket also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the memory bus is dual-channel. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for storage and future GPUs, though the current GPU only uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, while the GPU has a 130 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W. This suggests a system with a combined power draw that is manageable for a mid-range power supply, but the exact wattage is not specified in the data.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU. The RTX 3050 OEM is the clear weak link, and its end-of-life production status indicates that it is not a long-term investment. The CPU, with its 89th percentile ranking, has significant headroom to support a much stronger graphics card. A user could replace the RTX 3050 OEM with a higher-tier GPU without needing to upgrade the processor or platform, as the i7-13700KF's 16 cores and 24 threads are sufficient for high-end gaming and productivity for years to come. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is an unusual feature for a consumer desktop CPU and could be relevant for specific workstation tasks. The upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU, and invest in a new GPU to balance the system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which explains its strong single-thread performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is well-suited for both gaming and productivity tasks.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3dmark scores progress from 1137 (single-thread) to 12462 (max threads), indicating good multi-threading scaling. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 38704 is exceptionally high, placing the CPU in the 89th percentile. This is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F (score 47176) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (score 47022), but 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (score 47468). These deltas are small, but they show that the i7-13700KF is competitive with the previous generation's flagship and current high-end mobile parts.

For real workloads, the Passmark scores are revealing. The CPU scores 154507 in integer math and 114997 in floating point math, indicating strong general-purpose number crunching. The data encryption score of 33314 and compression score of 596493 show that it can handle data-intensive tasks efficiently. The single-thread score of 4336 in Passmark is solid, ensuring responsive performance in everyday applications. The CPU's average benchmark score is 47330, and its percentile vs all CPUs is 89, confirming that this is a top-tier processor that will not be a bottleneck for most applications, including gaming, content creation, and software development.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is fundamentally unbalanced, with the CPU's capability far exceeding the GPU's. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 57th percentile ranking creates a scenario where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the CPU can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames, meaning the RTX 3050 OEM will be at 100% utilization while the CPU idles. The FPS scaling will be directly tied to the GPU's performance, and any increase in resolution or graphical settings will only stress the GPU further.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU's power is fully utilized, and the GPU plays a minimal role. The Passmark data shows the CPU's strength in multithreaded tasks (45817 in multithread), which would dominate in these scenarios. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU, and the GPU's lower performance is irrelevant. The 3dmark scores show a clear progression from 2 threads (2263) to 16 threads (10749), indicating that the CPU can effectively use all its cores for parallel workloads.

The data suggests that for a balanced system, the GPU would need to be significantly upgraded. The RTX 3050 OEM is a bottleneck for the CPU in gaming, but the CPU is a bottleneck for the GPU in terms of potential. The system's combined percentile is 73, which reflects the lower GPU score dragging down the overall average. This imbalance is the defining characteristic of the build, and users should be aware that they are paying for CPU headroom that is currently unused in gaming scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is an Ampere architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process, with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a base clock of 1515 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz. It includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, which enable ray tracing and DLSS features, though the card's raw performance limits their effectiveness.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is average for its class. The Passmark G3D score is 11857, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 60740, placing the GPU in the 57th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (score 15171, deltaPct 0.2) and the AMD Radeon 680M (score 15270, deltaPct -0.5) are essentially tied with it. The FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but not for high-refresh or high-resolution workloads. The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s, which are modest figures.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is a limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where larger textures require more bandwidth. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current games at 1080p, but it may be a constraint in future titles or with high-resolution texture packs. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring broad software compatibility. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a slight reduction from the full x16, but this has a minimal impact on performance. The RTX 3050 OEM is an end-of-life product, and its performance is firmly in the entry-level segment, suitable for budget gaming or as a display adapter for productivity tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance limitation of this build?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the primary limitation. Its average benchmark score of 15199 places it in the 57th percentile, while the CPU is in the 89th percentile, making the GPU the bottleneck for any graphics-intensive workload.

Q: Can this system handle modern games at 1080p?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p, and the CPU's high single-thread score (5464 in Cinebench R23) ensures smooth frame delivery. However, users will likely need to adjust settings from "Ultra" to "High" or "Medium" to maintain playable frame rates.

Q: Is the CPU overkill for the GPU?

A: Yes, the data clearly shows an imbalance. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 57th percentile means the CPU has significant headroom that is unused in gaming. This is a good pairing for CPU-intensive tasks, but not for gaming.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this system?

A: The most logical upgrade is the GPU. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, is a long-term performer. A user can replace the RTX 3050 OEM with a higher-tier GPU without needing to change the Intel Socket 1700 platform, as the CPU will not bottleneck a faster card.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700KF has ECC memory support, which is a feature typically found in workstation processors. This, combined with its high multicore score, makes it suitable for professional applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is listed as "End-of-life," meaning it is no longer in production. This suggests that it is a legacy part, and users should be aware that driver support and availability may diminish over time.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 47330. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F (score 47176) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (score 47022), but 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (score 47468). These differences are minor, indicating the i7-13700KF is competitive with these parts.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideally suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming. The Intel Core i7-13700KF, with its 89th percentile ranking and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38704, is a powerful tool for content creators, software developers, and engineers. Video editors will benefit from the CPU's high multithreaded performance, and 3D renderers will see fast export times. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads are also excellent for software compilation and data analysis.

For gamers, this build is less ideal. The RTX 3050 OEM is a 57th percentile GPU, which is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, but it is not a high-refresh or high-resolution card. This pairing is not for gamers seeking maximum FPS; it is for professionals who need a powerful CPU and only require basic graphics capability. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis will find the CPU's responsiveness excellent, but they may not need the full CPU power. The build is a good foundation for a workstation that can be upgraded later with a better GPU, but it is not a balanced gaming PC out of the box.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i7-13700KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a high-end 13th Gen Raptor Lake part with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU is an entry-level Ampere card with 8 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, which is above average, but it masks the significant disparity between the two components.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 47330, placing it in the 89th percentile, while the GPU's average score is 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile. This is a system with a top-tier processor and a budget graphics card. The overall tier is "mid-range" due to the GPU, but the CPU's capability is "high-end." The build class is desktop, and it is designed for a user who values CPU performance above all else. The system is a capable workstation for CPU-bound tasks, but it is a modest gaming machine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive. In Cinebench R23, it scores 38704 in multicore and 5464 in single-core. The Geekbench multicore score is 18258, and the single-core score is 2435. The Passmark multithread score is 45817, and the single-thread score is 4336. These scores place the CPU in the 89th percentile, and its average benchmark score is 47330. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, has an average score of 47468, which is only 0.3% higher.

The GPU's scores are more modest. The Passmark G3D score is 11857, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 60740. The average benchmark score is 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, has an average score of 15171, which is 0.2% lower. The combined picture is one of a powerful CPU that is held back by a weak GPU. The system's combined percentile of 73 reflects the GPU's drag on the overall performance. The data indicates that this is a CPU-centric build, and the GPU is a secondary consideration.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not well-supported by the data. The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM will limit frame rates, and the GPU will be the bottleneck. The CPU's high single-thread score (5464 in Cinebench R23) ensures it is not the issue, but the GPU cannot deliver the high FPS needed for a high-refresh monitor.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 596493 shows strong encoding performance. The GPU's NVENC encoder is not specified, but the CPU alone can handle x264 encoding without impacting game performance significantly.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38704 is excellent for rendering and exporting video. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for GPU-accelerated effects in editing software, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse. The system will handle 4K video editing with ease, though the GPU may slow down previews with heavy effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's high core count and 89th percentile ranking make it a great choice for CPU-based rendering. The Cinebench R23 score of 38704 indicates fast render times in applications like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray. The GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-based rendering will be slower, but it is still capable for entry-level work.

Software Development: The CPU is a developer's dream. The high single-thread performance (4336 in Passmark) ensures fast compilation of single-threaded tasks, and the 16 cores handle parallel builds efficiently. The Passmark integer math score of 154507 is excellent for code compilation and data processing. The GPU is adequate for running multiple monitors and basic GUI acceleration.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's power is wasted on web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheet analysis. The GPU is more than sufficient for these tasks. The system will be responsive and fast, but the user would be paying for CPU performance they do not need. The ECC memory support is a unique feature that could be useful for students in engineering or scientific fields.