SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT represent a pairing of a high-core-count desktop CPU with a high-bandwidth GPU, targeting a specific segment of the enthusiast desktop market. The combined benchmark percentile of 72 places this build in the upper tier of all configurations, but an examination of the individual component scores reveals a notable imbalance: the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative standing, which shapes the system's overall character. The data for this analysis is drawn exclusively from synthetic benchmarks, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF scores in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47330. This places it well above the median, indicating strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance relative to the broader CPU landscape.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The CPU's average score of 47330 is nearly identical to its closest rivals. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900F (47176), 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022), and 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47468). This suggests performance parity with those specific processors.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and average score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks in the 55th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745. This is a mid-pack position, indicating that its average score is lower than its high-end specifications might suggest.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average score of 13745 is very close to its listed rivals. It is 0.5% behind both the AMD Radeon 660M (13812) and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821), and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871). It is 1.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (13543).

Q: What are the core counts and clock speeds of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This configuration provides substantial parallel processing capability for demanding workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are suited for high-resolution textures and data-heavy compute tasks.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination. All discussion of frame rates must be considered as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The relationship between the CPU and GPU in this build is characterized by a significant performance gap. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and average score of 47330 starkly contrast with the GPU's 55th percentile ranking and average score of 13745. This disparity suggests that in a balanced workload, the GPU is the limiting factor, unable to keep pace with the processing power of the CPU. The CPU is capable of feeding instructions far faster than the GPU can render them.

The CPU's multi-threaded strength, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 18258, indicates that it can handle complex game logic, physics calculations, and AI tasks with ease. In contrast, the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 29009 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623, while respectable, place it in a lower performance tier. This imbalance means that in gaming scenarios, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU's rendering capabilities, with the CPU likely idling or underutilized.

For productivity workloads that are heavily threaded and scale well across cores, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary engine. However, the GPU's compute capabilities, with an FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS, can accelerate certain tasks. The bottleneck shifts based on the workload: for gaming, the GPU is the constraint; for pure CPU-bound tasks like data compression, with a Passmark score of 596493, the CPU is the dominant component. The system is not perfectly balanced, with the CPU having significantly more headroom than the GPU can utilize in most scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results are consistently strong across all tests. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 38704 points in multi-core and 5464 points in single-core. The Geekbench results show 18258 for multi-core and 2435 for single-core. The Passmark suite provides a comprehensive view: a multi-thread score of 45817, a single-thread score of 4336, and specialized tests like floating point math at 114997 and integer math at 154507. These scores confirm the CPU's high throughput in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded tasks.

The GPU's benchmark picture is more mixed. Its Passmark G3D score is 29009, but its Passmark DirectX 12 score is only 110, while DirectX 11 is 340 and DirectX 9 is 322. In contrast, its Geekbench Vulkan score is 71068, which is significantly higher than its OpenCL score of 12756. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623. These results indicate that the GPU's performance is highly dependent on the API and workload, with Vulkan showing a particular strength.

The combined picture is one of a high-performing CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU. The system's combined percentile of 72 reflects this blend. The CPU's percentile is 34 points higher than the GPU's, which is a substantial gap. This means that in the aggregate, the system's performance is held back by the GPU. The CPU is capable of performing at a level near the top of the chart, but the GPU's scores keep the overall system from reaching a higher combined percentile.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who require maximum CPU processing power but are willing to accept a more modest GPU. The primary target is a professional or power user who runs CPU-intensive applications such as software compilation, financial modeling, or scientific simulations. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704, make it a formidable workstation processor for developers and researchers.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strength. Applications that rely on multi-core processing for rendering will see significant throughput, and the GPU's 20 GB of VRAM can handle large scenes and high-resolution textures. However, they should be aware that the GPU's compute performance, while capable, is not in the same league as the CPU's processing power.

For gamers, this build is less coherent. A gamer targeting high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p will likely find the GPU to be the limiting factor, as its percentile ranking is modest. The CPU's power will be underutilized in most gaming scenarios. This system is better suited for those who use their PC primarily for productivity and occasionally game, rather than as a dedicated gaming machine. Students in engineering or computer science fields would also benefit from the CPU's performance for simulations and coding tasks.

Gaming Performance

As stated, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the CPU's and GPU's individual benchmark scores. The data clearly shows a disparity. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests it will not be a bottleneck in modern games, providing ample headroom for high frame rates. Its strong single-thread score of 5464 in Cinebench R23 supports this, as many games rely heavily on single-core performance.

However, the GPU's 55th percentile ranking and its Passmark G3D score of 29009 suggest that it will be the primary determinant of frame rates. In demanding titles, especially at higher resolutions, the GPU's performance will likely fall short of what the CPU can support. The GPU's Vulkan score of 71068 is promising, suggesting that games using this API may perform relatively better.

The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM is a significant asset for gaming at high resolutions with maximum texture quality, but the raw rendering throughput, as indicated by its average benchmark score, is not exceptional. Gamers should expect playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, but they should not expect the GPU to push extremely high refresh rates in the most demanding games. At 4K, the GPU will be stressed, and the CPU's power will be largely irrelevant to the frame rate. The data suggests a system that can handle current games well but may not be future-proof for the most graphically intensive titles.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and uses the Navi 31 chip, which is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. The GPU has 84 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The memory subsystem is a key feature: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of memory and bandwidth, which is beneficial for high-resolution gaming and for loading large datasets in compute workloads. The GPU's clock speeds are listed as a base of 1387 MHz, a boost of 2394 MHz, and a game clock of 2025 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective).

In terms of benchmark scores, the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 is its strongest result, indicating robust performance in that API. The Passmark G3D score of 29009 is moderate, and the DirectX 12 score of 110 is notably low, which may indicate poor optimization for that specific test. The FP32 compute performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, which is a high figure for raw compute tasks. However, the GPU's average benchmark score of 13745 and its 55th percentile ranking suggest that its real-world rendering performance is not as dominant as its specifications suggest. For rendering workloads, the 20 GB VRAM is a clear advantage, allowing for larger scenes and textures without exceeding memory limits.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides flexibility in choosing a memory kit, though the platform is limited to dual-channel memory. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which provides high bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 300 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU is dual-slot and requires two 8-pin power connectors. Its dimensions are 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width, so case compatibility must be checked.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, which can extend its performance lifespan. The GPU is listed as end-of-life, with a successor in the Navi IV generation. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model that better matches the CPU's performance tier. The CPU has significant headroom, and a higher-performing GPU would create a more balanced system, allowing the CPU's full potential to be utilized in gaming and compute tasks. The platform's support for DDR5 memory also offers a future path for increased memory bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i7-13700KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 72. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of all builds. The CPU is a high-end processor with a strong 89th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-range component with a 55th percentile ranking.

The overall tier of the system is defined by this imbalance. It is a system with exceptional CPU horsepower, capable of handling the most demanding multi-threaded workloads. The GPU is adequate for gaming and general graphics tasks, but it is not a top-tier performer. The system is best described as a high-performance workstation that has gaming capabilities, rather than a dedicated high-end gaming rig. The CPU's performance is the defining feature, and the GPU serves as a capable but secondary component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 30 MB shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has a TDP of 125 W.

The benchmark scores for the CPU are consistently high. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 45817 demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The single-thread scores are also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5464 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2435. The Passmark data compression score of 596493 and integer math score of 154507 indicate high throughput in data-intensive tasks.

These scores mean that the CPU excels in real-world workloads that can utilize its many cores and threads. Video editing, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulations will all perform exceptionally well. The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz also ensures strong performance in lightly-threaded tasks, such as older games or single-threaded applications. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking confirms its position as a top-tier processor for both productivity and general use.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 5464 in Cinebench R23 can support high frame rates, but the GPU's moderate Passmark G3D score of 29009 will likely cap performance. Gamers should expect solid frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU may struggle to maintain extremely high refresh rates in the most demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704, are more than sufficient for software encoding while gaming. This eliminates the need for a dedicated streaming encoder, as the CPU can handle the encoding workload without significantly impacting game performance.

Video Editing: The CPU is a powerhouse for video editing, with high scores in multi-threaded tests like Passmark multi-thread (45817) and floating point math (114997). The GPU's 20 GB of VRAM is beneficial for effects and color grading, but the CPU will be the primary driver for timeline scrubbing and export times.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, this system will be very fast, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 indicating quick render times. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance is capable, but its 55th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software Development: The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the Passmark integer math score of 154507, makes it ideal for compiling large codebases. The large L3 cache of 30 MB also helps with frequently accessed data, speeding up the development workflow.

Student and Office Work: For general office tasks, the system is massively over-powered. The CPU's single-thread performance is excellent for quick application launches and web browsing. However, the data suggests this is an enthusiast or professional tool rather than a typical office machine.