SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7400 — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines a high-end 16-core desktop processor from Intel's 13th generation with a low-power entry-level GPU from AMD's RX 7000 series, creating a desktop build with a stark performance gap between CPU and graphics capabilities. The Intel Core i7-13700KF sits in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 ranks in just the 17th percentile among all GPUs, placing the combined system in the 53rd percentile overall. This is a configuration where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics card, and the benchmark data reveals significant implications for gaming, productivity, and content creation workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. The chip operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, with a thermal design power of 125 W. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus, includes ECC memory support, and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The die measures 257 mm², and the processor was released on September 26, 2022, with a launch MSRP of $384.

The benchmark data shows a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the i7-13700KF scores 38,704 in multi-core and 5,464 in single-core tests. The 3DMark results scale from 1,137 in single-thread to 12,462 in max-threads, with intermediate scores of 2,263 for 2 threads, 4,474 for 4 threads, 8,230 for 8 threads, and 10,749 for 16 threads. This scaling pattern demonstrates strong thread scaling efficiency, where each doubling of thread count produces substantial gains, though with diminishing returns as thread count approaches the physical core limit.

Geekbench scores of 18,258 multi-core and 2,435 single-core reinforce the processor's dual character: it delivers high per-core performance for latency-sensitive applications and massive parallel throughput for heavily threaded workloads. PassMark results further characterize the chip's strengths, with 154,507 in integer math, 114,997 in floating-point math, and 596,493 in data compression. The processor's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors, and its average benchmark score of 47,330 positions it within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-12900F (47,176) and 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47,468).

For real workloads, this CPU excels in scenarios that leverage multiple cores: software compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing all benefit from the 16-core/24-thread configuration. The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures that single-threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy games also receive excellent responsiveness. The 30 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency in data-intensive workloads, and the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility in memory selection.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47,330 places it in the 89th percentile of all processors, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H at 47,468 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 at 47,527 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47,022 (0.7% lower). The Intel Core i9-12900F trails at 47,176, making the i7-13700KF 0.3% faster than that predecessor. These margins are remarkably tight, indicating that the i7-13700KF sits in a highly competitive performance band where no single processor holds a decisive advantage.

The GPU presents a starkly different picture. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 achieves an average benchmark score of 2,467, placing it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S at 2,440 (1.1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2,433 (1.4% slower), the Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2,425 (1.8% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M at 2,422 (1.9% slower). This places the RX 7400 in territory typically occupied by integrated graphics solutions rather than dedicated graphics cards, which is notable given its "Radeon RX 7000 series" branding.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1,103, while PassMark results show 11,897 in G3D, 5,152 in GPU compute, and modest DirectX scores of 176 for DX9, 97 for DX11, 59 for DX10, and 44 for DX12. These DirectX scores are particularly illuminating — they suggest the GPU's performance varies significantly across API generations, with its best showing in legacy DX9 workloads and its weakest in modern DX12. The g2d score of 1,209 indicates competent 2D desktop acceleration but nothing more.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU operates in the top 11% of all processors while the GPU operates in the bottom 17% of all graphics cards. The overall system percentile of 53 reflects this massive imbalance, dragging what would otherwise be an elite-level processor down to a mid-tier overall position.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the i7-13700KF and RX 7400 creates a pronounced bottleneck situation. In CPU-bound workloads — productivity, rendering, compilation, data processing — the system performs at an elite level, with the processor's 89th percentile ranking delivering results comparable to the nearest rivals within 0.7%. However, in GPU-bound workloads such as modern gaming at high resolutions or graphics rendering, the RX 7400's 17th percentile ranking becomes the limiting factor.

The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 12,462 versus the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 illustrates the magnitude of this imbalance. In gaming scenarios, the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning frame rates will be dictated almost entirely by the graphics card. The PassMark physics score of 2,650 and the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 44 further underscore this divide — the processor is ready to handle complex physics calculations and game logic, but the GPU will struggle to translate that into visual output at modern graphics settings.

For non-gaming applications, the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. Tasks like video encoding benefit from the CPU's 16 cores and high boost clocks, while GPU-accelerated rendering or compute would be severely constrained by the RX 7400's 5,152 GPU compute score. The data suggests that this build's optimal use cases are CPU-intensive productivity tasks where the GPU plays a minimal role, or light gaming at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU's limitations are less exposed.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound and who require only modest graphics capability. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the i7-13700KF's 16 cores and 24 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,704 indicating strong parallel compilation performance. Data analysts and scientists running computations would appreciate the 154,507 integer math score and 114,997 floating-point math score, which suggest rapid number-crunching for simulations and statistical models.

Students and small business users running office applications, spreadsheet analysis, and web-based tools would find the CPU's 89th percentile single-thread performance more than adequate for daily tasks, though the GPU provides no meaningful acceleration for modern graphics workloads. Content creators working primarily with audio or text-based production would also fit this profile, as these tasks rely on CPU throughput rather than GPU acceleration.

Enthusiasts who game at 1080p with low to medium settings, or who play esports titles that favor CPU performance, might find this pairing workable, but the GPU's 17th percentile ranking means frame rates will be limited. The system is not well-suited for 4K gaming, high-refresh-rate AAA titles, or GPU-accelerated rendering workflows like 3D animation or machine learning training, where the RX 7400's modest compute capabilities would create severe bottlenecks.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 and PassMark G3D score of 11,897, gaming performance would be expected to be modest at best. The RX 7400's DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests that modern AAA titles using DX12 would present significant challenges, potentially requiring low resolutions and minimal settings to achieve playable frame rates. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for 1080p textures, but the low compute throughput limits overall rendering capability.

The CPU's exceptional gaming-relevant performance — with 3DMark single-thread score of 1,137 and 2-thread score of 2,263 — means that in CPU-limited scenarios such as competitive esports titles at low settings, the system could deliver high frame rates if the GPU can keep up. However, the GPU's passmark_directx_9 score of 176 and passmark_directx_11 score of 97 suggest that even older titles may not achieve high frame rates at maximum settings. Estimated 1080p gaming would likely range from playable frame rates in lightweight titles at low settings to sub-30 FPS in demanding AAA games at medium or high settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which represents the final generation for this socket in Intel's desktop lineup. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, giving builders the option to use either memory type depending on availability and preference. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The RX 7400 has a TDP of 43 W and a suggested PSU rating of 200 W, leaving substantial headroom with any standard desktop power supply. The GPU uses a single 6-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it has significant headroom to drive higher-end graphics cards. The PCIe Gen 5 connectivity and 20 CPU lanes ensure that even the most demanding GPUs would have sufficient bandwidth. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 (or higher-speed DDR5 modules) could also improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, given the CPU's dual-channel memory support. The 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier provide overclocking potential, though the stock performance already places the CPU near the top of its class.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700KF compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i7-13700KF scores 47,330, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47,468), 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-12900F (47,176), 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47,527), and 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47,022).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 ranks in the 17th percentile among all GPUs, meaning approximately 83% of GPUs perform better. Its average benchmark score is 2,467, placing it near the AMD Radeon 8040S (2,440) and NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2,433).

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe configuration?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes from the processor.

Q: What are the GPU's power requirements?

A: The RX 7400 has a TDP of 43 W and a suggested PSU rating of 200 W. It uses a single 6-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance in 3DMark?

A: The CPU scores 1,137 in single-thread, 2,263 in 2-thread, 4,474 in 4-thread, 8,230 in 8-thread, 10,749 in 16-thread, and 12,462 in max-threads, showing strong scaling up to 8 threads with diminishing gains beyond that.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700KF, a 16-core Raptor Lake processor in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, a 43 W RDNA 3.0 GPU in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile of 53 reflects the enormous performance gap between components. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47,330 places it among the top-tier desktop processors, while the GPU's average score of 2,467 places it in entry-level territory comparable to integrated graphics solutions. This pairing is fundamentally imbalanced, with the processor capable of feeding far more graphical work than the GPU can handle, resulting in a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but underwhelms in graphics-intensive applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is limited by the GPU. The RX 7400's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103 and DirectX 12 score of 44 suggest frame rates will be constrained, likely requiring low settings at 1080p for esports titles. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,137 ensures no CPU-side bottleneck, but the GPU cannot deliver high-refresh output in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,704, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's low performance means the gaming side of the stream would be limited to undemanding titles at modest settings.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with PassMark data compression score of 596,493 and floating-point math score of 114,997 accelerating timeline operations and encoding. However, GPU-accelerated effects and color grading would be slow due to the RX 7400's 5,152 GPU compute score.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would benefit from the i7-13700KF's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16,255 and R23 score of 38,704, delivering competitive render times. GPU-based rendering would be severely constrained by the RX 7400's modest compute capabilities.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU's 154,507 integer math score accelerates compilation, while the high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4,336) ensures responsive tooling. The GPU plays a minimal role in most development workflows.

Student and office work: The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures snappy performance in document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The GPU's 1,209 g2d score provides adequate 2D acceleration for desktop interfaces, making this a capable, if overpowered for its graphics, productivity machine.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," using a 6 nm process from TSMC. The chip, designated Navi 33, contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1,452 MHz, a boost clock of 2,300 MHz, and a game clock of 2,200 MHz, with memory clocked at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It includes 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS and FP16 of 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores reveal a GPU that performs well below its specifications might suggest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 and PassMark G3D score of 11,897 place it in the 17th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon 8040S (1.1% slower) and NVIDIA GeForce 710M (1.4% slower). The DirectX scores show a peculiar pattern: DX9 scores 176, DX11 scores 97, DX10 scores 59, and DX12 scores 44, suggesting the GPU's performance degrades with more modern APIs. The GPU compute score of 5,152 indicates limited compute capability, making this unsuitable for GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning. With a TDP of just 43 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, this GPU is clearly designed for low-power systems, but its benchmark performance places it in the domain of integrated graphics rather than discrete graphics solutions.