SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is a high-percentile desktop combination: the CPU sits in the 89th percentile against all processors in the database, the GPU lands in the 88th percentile against all graphics cards, and the pairing as a whole ranks in the 89th percentile. Both parts are 2022 releases built on mature platforms — Raptor Lake on Intel's 10 nm node and RDNA 2.0 on TSMC's 7 nm node — and the benchmark data shows a balanced, top-tier performer for multi-threaded work and high-resolution gaming alike. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database; all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with a hybrid arrangement reflected in its thread count and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz off a 3.40 GHz base. Intel's Socket 1700 part carries 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core plus a shared 30 MB L3 cache, and the 257 mm² die is fabbed on Intel's 10 nm process. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, includes ECC memory support, offers 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, and ships with an unlocked multiplier. Its TDP is 125 W. The launch MSRP was $384.

The benchmark profile tells a clear story: near-flagship multi-thread throughput with genuinely elite single-thread speed. The single-thread results — 1137 in 3DMark single-thread, 550 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 2294 in R20, 5464 in R23, 2435 in Geekbench single-core, and 4336 in PassMark single-thread — indicate that lightly threaded applications, older game engines, and latency-sensitive tools run at effectively top-tier speed. That matters because many games and most office software still lean on a handful of fast cores, and a 5.40 GHz boost clock with strong per-core throughput covers that case without compromise.

Scaling is where the data gets interesting. The 3DMark CPU thread sweep goes 2263 at 2 threads, 4474 at 4 threads, 8230 at 8 threads, 10749 at 16 threads, and 12462 at maximum threads. The jump from 8 to 24 threads is roughly 51 percent, which is healthy for a hybrid design and shows the efficiency cores are contributing real throughput rather than sitting idle. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 38704 and Geekbench multi-core at 18258 sit comfortably in enthusiast territory — enough for sustained renders, compilations, and encodes. PassMark multithread at 45817 confirms it, while the auxPassMark sub-scores map directly to real workloads: data compression at 596493, data encryption at 33314, extended instructions at 36700, integer math at 154507, floating point at 114997, physics at 2650, and string sorting at 62726.

Against its nearest rivals, the i7-13700KF is essentially dead-even. It leads the Intel Core i9-12900F by 0.3 percent and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 by 0.7 percent, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H by 0.3 percent and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 by 0.4 percent. In practical terms, a buyer choosing among these parts is choosing on platform features, not performance.

Benchmark Performance

The aggregate numbers: the CPU averages 47330 across its benchmark suite (89th percentile), the GPU averages 58392 (88th percentile), and the combination ranks in the 89th percentile. Both components independently sit in the same high band, which is the statistical signature of a well-matched build — neither side drags the other's percentile down.

On the CPU side, the full spread runs from 186 (prime number search) to 45817 (PassMark multithread), with the Cinebench ladder — 3901 R15 multi, 16255 R20 multi, 38704 R23 multi — showing consistent scaling across generations of the same test. Single-core results of 550/2294/5464 across R15/R20/R23 track the multi-core scores proportionally, meaning there is no single-thread sacrifice for the multi-thread headline.

On the GPU side, PassMark G3D at 28070 anchors the graphics score, with API-specific results of 164 in DirectX 10, 300 in DirectX 11, 114 in DirectX 12, and 303 in DirectX 9. Compute is covered by 14199 in PassMark GPU compute plus Geekbench results of 222653 in Metal, 205998 in OpenCL, and 165212 in Vulkan. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 is the most modern heavy-load indicator here, and it places the card firmly in upper-enthusiast territory for a DX12 raster workload.

The combined picture is a machine that lands in roughly the top tenth of the database on both sides of the CPU-GPU divide — a genuinely high-end desktop, not a specialist one.

GPU Analysis

The RX 6950 XT is the top end of the Radeon RX 6000 series: the Navi 21 die on TSMC 7 nm, 26,800 million transistors across 520 mm² at 51.5M transistors per mm². It is a big, dense monolithic die, and the specifications read accordingly: 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, 128 render output units, and 80 ray tracing cores on RDNA 2.0. Clocks run 1860 MHz base, 2100 MHz game, and 2310 MHz boost.

Memory is a strength. The card carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), producing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering and content work, that capacity plus bandwidth means large textures, high-resolution timeline scrubbing, and hefty scene files fit without spilling to system memory — the Geekbench compute scores (222653 Metal, 205998 OpenCL, 165212 Vulkan) reflect that headroom in GPU-accelerated workloads.

Raw throughput figures: 23.65 TFLOPS FP32, 47.31 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 rate, 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 739.2 GTexel/s texture rate. The 80 RT cores deliver hardware ray tracing, though RDNA 2.0's RT implementation is a generation older than its successors; the Steel Nomad score of 4235 suggests heavy DX12 loads remain very playable but that the card's clearest strength is conventional rasterization. There are no tensor cores listed, so the card relies on AMD's shader-based approaches rather than dedicated matrix hardware for upscaling-type workloads.

Against rivals, it is a statistical tie across the board: within 0.2 percent of the NVIDIA P102-100, 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Arc A570M, 0.5 percent behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710, and 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM. The launch MSRP was 1,099 USD. The card is end-of-life as a production item, drawing 335 W through two 8-pin connectors, occupying a triple-slot footprint, and measuring 267 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 50 mm wide — case clearance matters.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a high-refresh gamer and content creator who wants one machine for both. The 89th-percentile CPU with 24 threads handles video editing, code compilation, and 3D rendering; the 88th-percentile GPU with 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth drives high-resolution, high-detail gaming and GPU rendering. Game developers benefit directly: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and Geekbench multi-core of 18258 make shader compilation and engine builds quick, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 165212 supports modern API development.

Streamers get a natural fit — the 16-core CPU can encode and run the game simultaneously without the thread sweep (8230 at 8 threads up to 12462 at max) collapsing. Video editors working in 4K will appreciate the VRAM capacity and the OpenCL compute score of 205998. Students in engineering, CS, or digital media programs get a machine that outlasts a degree program. Small businesses doing CAD-adjacent visualization, batch media processing, or local data work benefit from the ECC-capable platform and the PassMark data-compression score of 596493. What this build is not: a laptop-class efficiency play or an entry-level system — it is a desktop in the top tenth of the database on both axes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700 with a dual-channel memory controller supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders a choice between carrying over existing DDR4 kits or adopting DDR5. ECC support is present. CPU-provided connectivity is 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 — relevant for future storage and add-in cards — while the RX 6950 XT itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x16.

Power planning is straightforward from the data: a 125 W CPU TDP plus a 335 W GPU TDP, with AMD suggesting a 700 W PSU for the graphics card alone. A sensible next upgrade on the graphics side would be a successor-generation card — the FACT PACK lists the successor die family as Navi III — which would slot into the same PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. On the CPU side, Socket 1700 keeps the board compatible with other Raptor Lake-family processors, and the unlocked multiplier means the installed chip itself has tuning headroom before any swap is needed. The card's triple-slot, 267 mm footprint is the main physical constraint to check against a future case or card change.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With the GPU in the 88th percentile and a PassMark G3D score of 28070, high-detail play at high resolutions is the card's home turf, while the CPU's single-thread scores (2435 Geekbench, 4336 PassMark) keep frame delivery from stalling in esports titles. As stated, no measured FPS data exists for this pairing; these are estimates from benchmark scores.

Streaming. The 3DMark thread scaling from 8230 at 8 threads to 12462 at max threads shows there is substantial throughput beyond what a game typically consumes, which is exactly the headroom a concurrent encoder needs.

Video editing. A 38704 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline exports, and the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM at 576.0 GB/s plus a 205998 OpenCL score accelerates playback and effects in GPU-aware editors.

3D rendering. CPU renders exploit all 24 threads (PassMark multithread 45817; R23 multi 38704), while GPU renderers draw on the 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 figure and the Vulkan compute result of 165212.

Software development. Geekbench multi-core at 18258 and extended instructions at 36700 make large builds and containerized workloads fast; single-core at 2435 keeps IDEs and interpreters responsive.

Student and office work. For everything from spreadsheets to light local data analysis, the integer math (154507), string sorting (62726), and encryption (33314) PassMark results indicate a machine that will feel instant for years.

Gaming Performance

This database contains no measured FPS rows for the i7-13700KF and RX 6950 XT combination — the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false — so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay. With that caveat: the RX 6950 XT's 88th-percentile standing, its 4235 Steel Nomad DX12 score, and its API results (300 in DirectX 11, 114 in DirectX 12) support the expectation of high-detail play at demanding resolutions with high frame rates in rasterized titles. The 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth mean maximum texture settings at high resolution should not hit a memory wall. Ray tracing performance is harder to extrapolate — the 80 RT cores are present, but RDNA 2.0's first-generation RT hardware suggests turning RT settings down one notch from maximum in heavy titles. On the CPU side, single-thread scores in the elite band mean the processor will not be the limiter in the vast majority of engine types. Treat all of this as score-derived expectation, not measurement.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-13700KF compare to its closest rivals?

A: It is within a fraction of a percent of all four nearest rivals: 0.3 percent ahead of the Core i9-12900F, 0.7 percent ahead of the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, 0.3 percent behind the Core Ultra X9 378H, and 0.4 percent behind the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. Performance is effectively a tie; platform should decide.

Q: How much memory can the GPU handle in games and rendering?

A: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth — ample for high-detail textures at high resolutions and for GPU rendering scenes.

Q: What PSU is recommended?

A: AMD suggests a 700 W unit for the RX 6950 XT, which draws 335 W through two 8-pin connectors; the CPU adds a 125 W TDP on top of that.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes — the RX 6950 XT has 80 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. There are no tensor cores listed, however.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable, and what memory does it take?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, the socket is Intel 1700, and the memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel, with ECC support.

Q: Are there measured frame rates for this pairing?

A: No. The database holds no measured FPS rows for this CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores.

Q: Is the graphics card still in production?

A: No — the RX 6950 XT is listed as end-of-life, though it remains an 88th-percentile performer in the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing is statistically balanced: 89th percentile CPU, 88th percentile GPU, 89th percentile combined. Neither component meaning starves the other by percentile, and the delta between their nearest-rival margins — the CPU's worst-case gap is 0.7 percent, the GPU's is 0.5 percent — reinforces that they occupy the same performance band.

Where each side limits: in lightly threaded games, the GPU is the ceiling, since the CPU's single-thread scores (1137 3DMark single-thread, 5464 R23 single-core) are elite while the GPU sits merely high-end. In heavily multi-threaded production work — the 12462 max-thread 3DMark result and 45817 PassMark multithread — the CPU is demonstrably not the constraint, and throughput is bounded by the GPU's compute scores when the workload offloads (14199 PassMark GPU compute, 165212 Geekbench Vulkan). Because no measured FPS scaling data exists for this exact combination, bottleneck analysis at specific resolutions cannot be anchored to frame-rate deltas; the percentile symmetry is the strongest available evidence that the build is well matched at its class.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing — buildClass is desktop — combining Intel's 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake flagship-tier i7 with AMD's top RX 6000-series Navi 21 card. Its overall tier is unambiguous from the data: 89th percentile combined, with both components individually in the 88th–89th percentile range and each within one percentage point of its nearest named rivals. The platform offers DDR4/DDR5 flexibility, PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, an unlocked multiplier, and ECC capability; the GPU brings 16 GB of fast GDDR6, 23.65 TFLOPS of FP32, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. It is a top-tenth machine in this database — balanced, high-throughput, and credible across gaming, creation, and development workloads, with the single caveat that its gaming frame rates are estimated from scores, not measured for this exact pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700KF

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds