SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: A Desktop Powerhouse Pairing

The Intel Core i7-13700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT form a desktop-class pairing that sits in the 88th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a high-performance setup capable of handling demanding workloads. The CPU, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part, and the GPU, an RDNA 2.0 flagship with 16 GB of memory, combine to deliver a system that excels in both compute-heavy tasks and high-resolution gaming. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, with no measured frame rates available for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the individual component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 16 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that balances high single-thread performance with substantial multi-threaded throughput. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, which can boost up to 5.40 GHz, and the CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 30 MB shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency in data-heavy workloads.

Benchmark scores reveal the CPU's strengths. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 38704, while the single-core score is 5464. This multi-core result places the chip in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing that indicates excellent rendering and compilation performance. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear progression: 2263 with 2 threads, 4474 with 4 threads, 8230 with 8 threads, 10749 with 16 threads, and 12462 with max threads. The near-linear scaling from 2 to 8 threads and the continued gains up to max threads demonstrate that the hybrid core design effectively utilizes available threads for parallel workloads.

Geekbench scores of 2435 single-core and 18258 multi-core further corroborate the CPU's balance. The single-core performance is particularly important for older or poorly optimized applications that rely on one or two threads, while the multi-core score ensures that modern games and content creation tools can leverage the full 24-thread capacity. PassMark tests show strong integer math performance at 154507 and floating-point math at 114997, with data compression achieving a score of 596493 and encryption at 33314. These results indicate robust general-purpose computing, making the CPU suitable for database work, scientific simulations, and code compilation.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47468 on average, a mere 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i9-12900F is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is 0.4% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is 0.7% lower. This tight clustering shows the i7-13700KF sits within 1% of several competing high-end parts, meaning real-world differences in CPU-bound tasks will be negligible. For workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, the 38704 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests the CPU can handle long compile times and multi-threaded rendering queues with relative ease, though it is not the absolute fastest in its class.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture is strong. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 47330, while the GPU achieves 50951, and the pairing sits at the 88th combined percentile. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs is slightly higher than the GPU's 86th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting the processor has a marginal edge in relative performance within this pairing.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4079, which is a demanding test that stresses modern graphics features. The Geekbench compute scores are notable: OpenCL results in 187673, Vulkan in 148525, and Metal in 177021. The higher OpenCL score compared to Vulkan suggests the GPU is well-optimized for general compute tasks in OpenCL environments, while Vulkan performance remains strong for gaming. PassMark G3D scores 26732, with DirectX 12 at 113, DirectX 11 at 279, and DirectX 10 at 167; the older DirectX versions show lower scores, which is typical for newer architectures that prioritize modern APIs.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a tight competition. The NVIDIA CMP 50HX scores 51790, just 1.6% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is 1.9% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is 2% lower, and the Intel Arc A550M is 2.4% lower. This indicates the RX 6900 XT performs within roughly 2% of several modern and older high-end cards, meaning it remains competitive despite being an end-of-life product.

The combined picture is one of a system that, while not top-tier in absolute terms, is very close to it. The CPU and GPU both sit in the upper 85th to 89th percentile range, which means the pairing will handle 1440p and 4K gaming well, and it is more than capable for professional workloads like 3D modeling, video encoding, and machine learning inference. The slight CPU advantage in percentile suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI workloads, the processor will not be the limiting factor, while the GPU might be in extreme multi-GPU rendering tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, making this platform suitable for workstations that require data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, allowing for high-bandwidth connections to modern GPUs and NVMe SSDs. However, the RX 6900 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which are still ample for the GPU's bandwidth needs.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 300 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This means a 700 W power supply is the minimum recommended, and users should ensure their PSU has two 8-pin power connectors for the GPU, as well as sufficient headroom for the CPU and other components. The GPU is a triple-slot design, measuring 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, so case compatibility is a consideration; users will need a case with adequate clearance for a large graphics card.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, especially if using DDR4, as moving to DDR5 can improve bandwidth in memory-sensitive tasks. The platform supports both, so users can choose based on budget and availability. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU can support the fastest NVMe SSDs, which would reduce load times and improve data-intensive workloads. The CPU's TDP of 125 W is manageable with a capable air cooler, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though users should ensure their cooling solution can handle the increased heat output. The GPU is end-of-life, so any future GPU upgrade would need to consider the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, which is backwards compatible with PCIe 5.0 cards, meaning a newer GPU would still function at reduced bandwidth. However, given the current GPU's 86th percentile ranking, an upgrade is not urgent unless specific features like newer ray tracing hardware are required.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolution, as the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and high compute throughput can handle demanding textures and effects at these resolutions. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures that even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher, the system will maintain high frame rates. Content creators, particularly those working with video editing, 3D rendering, or motion graphics, will benefit from the CPU's 24 threads and the GPU's compute performance in OpenCL and Vulkan.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the multi-core Cinebench score of 38704, and the data compression score of 596493 indicates fast build and packaging times. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the system capable for simulation and data analysis tasks, such as the PassMark integer and floating-point math scores suggest. Small business workstations that run virtualization, database management, or financial modeling will appreciate the ECC memory support and the high multi-threaded throughput. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest gaming and graphics APIs, making it a future-proof choice for professional visualization.

For gamers specifically, the CPU's single-thread score of 5464 in Cinebench R23 is strong for games that rely on one or two cores, while the multi-core score ensures smooth performance in games that scale well with more threads, such as modern open-world titles. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory are well-suited for high-resolution texture packs and ray tracing, though the RT performance is not the strongest in its class. This system is not aimed at users who need the absolute fastest hardware, but rather those who want a high-performance machine that can handle a wide range of tasks without bottlenecking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced system. The CPU's 89th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile are close, meaning neither component dramatically outstrips the other in general performance. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations, AI inference, or data compression, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will sit partially idle. The PassMark physics score of 2650 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 10749 suggest the CPU can handle complex simulations, but the GPU's compute performance in OpenCL (187673) means it can also accelerate certain parallel tasks.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as 4K gaming or rendering with ray tracing, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 86th percentile is slightly lower than the CPU's 89th, so in scenarios where both are heavily loaded, the GPU is more likely to reach its limit first. However, the difference is small, and the FPS scaling in games will typically see the GPU as the bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions like 1080p. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance will help maintain high frame rates, but the GPU's raw pixel throughput (288.0 GPixel/s) may not be fully utilized if the CPU cannot feed it fast enough, though this is unlikely given the CPU's high scores.

For instance, in a game at 1080p with low settings, the CPU's single-thread score of 1137 in 3DMark will be more important, while at 4K with ultra settings, the GPU's texture rate of 720.0 GTexel/s will dominate. The overall balance suggests that users will not see a significant bottleneck in most applications, but for those pushing extreme frame rates in esports titles, the CPU might slightly trail the GPU, and for 4K gaming, the GPU will be the primary constraint. The combined percentile of 88 reflects this equilibrium, indicating a system where both components contribute meaningfully to overall performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is based on the Navi 21 chip using the RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 26,800 million transistors across a 520 mm² die. It has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units, with 80 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1825 MHz, with a game clock of 2015 MHz and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, with memory clocks at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The GPU's FP32 performance is 23.04 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating strong computing capability for AI and scientific workloads. The pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 720.0 GTexel/s, which are high figures that support smooth rendering at high resolutions. The 80 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the architecture is not as efficient as newer generations; still, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 shows the GPU can handle modern DX12 titles.

For rendering and compute, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 187673 is particularly strong, suggesting the GPU excels in OpenCL-based applications like Blender or GIMP. The Vulkan score of 148525 is also high, which bodes well for games using the Vulkan API, such as Doom Eternal and Wolfenstein. The PassMark G3D score of 26732 places the GPU in the 86th percentile, and its nearest rivals show it is within 2% of cards like the RTX 5070 Ti, meaning real-world performance differences are minimal. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad software compatibility. With a TDP of 300 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W, it is a power-hungry card, but the performance per watt is acceptable for its class. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C, offering modern connectivity options.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the system's overall performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 88, indicating it performs better than 88% of all tested combinations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700KF supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation applications.

Q: What is the GPU's recommended power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is 700 W, and it requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The CPU scores 38704 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is end-of-life, with a production status of "End-of-life."

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part, and the GPU is a RDNA 2.0 flagship with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The pairing achieves an 88th combined percentile, with the CPU at 89th and the GPU at 86th. This places the system in the upper tier of high-performance desktops, suitable for gaming and professional work. The CPU's average benchmark score is 47330, and the GPU's is 50951, showing a slight GPU advantage in raw average scores, but the CPU's percentile is higher, indicating its relative strength among its peers. The system is not the absolute fastest available, but it is within a few percentage points of top-tier rivals, making it a capable and balanced choice for a wide range of applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5464) and the GPU's high pixel rate (288.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (720.0 GTexel/s) suggest that at 1080p, the system will deliver very high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU capable of driving over 144 FPS in esports games. At 1440p, the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM will maintain high settings with smooth performance, likely in the 100-144 FPS range for AAA games. At 4K, the GPU's 86th percentile ranking means it will still achieve playable frame rates, typically 60 FPS or higher in well-optimized titles, though demanding games with heavy ray tracing may see drops.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 113 in PassMark is relatively low compared to its G3D score, which could indicate that DX12 performance is not the card's strongest area, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4079 suggests modern DX12 games will run well. For Vulkan games, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 148525 predicts excellent performance, and OpenCL-based games or applications will benefit from the 187673 score. Overall, the system is estimated to provide an excellent gaming experience at 1440p, with 4K being playable but not always at maximum settings. These are estimates, and actual frame rates will vary by game and driver optimizations.