SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 80th percentile among all combined CPU and GPU configurations. The processor is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a 125 W TDP, while the graphics card is an RDNA 2.0-based Navi 22 chip with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. Benchmark data shows the CPU achieving an average score of 47330, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 26011 places it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. This significant gap in percentile ranking is the defining characteristic of this build, indicating a processor-heavy configuration where the CPU is the dominant component. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear imbalance in this pairing, with the CPU being the substantially stronger component. The processor's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 71st percentile means that in most gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, the RX 6750 XT will be the limiting factor. The CPU has enough headroom to drive the GPU to its maximum output, but the GPU will typically reach its performance ceiling before the processor does. This is not necessarily a negative, as it means the CPU will rarely be the cause of frame drops or stuttering, but it does mean the system's overall gaming performance is capped by the graphics card.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics calculations, data compression, and software compilation, the i7-13700KF can operate at full capacity without waiting on the GPU. The PassMark physics score of 2650 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 10749 demonstrate strong multi-threaded processing capability. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming at max settings, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20700 is respectable but falls well short of the CPU's capabilities, meaning the system will exhibit classic GPU-limited behavior: frame rates will be consistent but will not scale beyond what the RX 6750 XT can produce.

The FPS scaling between resolutions also points to the GPU as the primary constraint. At lower resolutions, the CPU's high single-thread score of 4336 in PassMark and 5464 in Cinebench R23 would allow for higher frame rates, as the CPU can process game logic quickly. As resolution increases, the GPU's workload becomes heavier, and its 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance will determine the final frame rate. The processor's performance headroom is so large that it is unlikely to cause any bottleneck even with the most demanding game physics or AI computations, making the GPU the sole limiting factor in all graphics scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1137 and PassMark single-thread score of 4336 ensure that frame pacing and minimum frame rates will be stable, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle the data throughput of modern titles. At 1440p, the GPU's 71st percentile ranking will likely limit maximum refresh rates, making 1080p the sweet spot for hitting high FPS targets.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads of the i7-13700KF provide ample parallel processing power for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 indicates that the CPU can handle both game logic and streaming encoding without significant performance degradation. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means software encoding on the CPU would be preferable, a task the processor's 24 threads are well-equipped to handle.

Video editing: Multi-threaded performance is excellent for video rendering and export, with the Geekbench multi-core score of 18258 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45817 indicating rapid timeline processing and effect application. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timeline scrubbing and preview, though its 26.62 TFLOPS FP16 performance means GPU-accelerated effects will be moderate in speed. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache aids in large file operations during editing.

3D rendering: The CPU will be the primary workhorse in CPU-based renderers, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16255 and R15 multi-core score of 3901 showing strong performance in ray-tracing workloads that leverage all cores. The GPU's 40 ray accelerators provide some ray-traced rendering capability, but its RDNA 2.0 architecture is not as efficient as dedicated RT hardware, making the CPU the better choice for final frame rendering.

Software development: The 8 performance cores and 16 efficiency cores of the Raptor Lake architecture allow for fast compilation times, supported by a PassMark integer math score of 154507 and data compression score of 596493. The processor's 24 threads enable parallel builds across multiple modules, and the ECC memory support is a benefit for long-running validation and testing tasks where data integrity is critical.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively over-provisioned for standard productivity tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4336 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the multi-thread capabilities mean background tasks like antivirus scans or system indexing will not cause noticeable slowdowns. The GPU is unnecessary for this workload but provides ample headroom for any future graphics needs, such as CAD software or data visualization.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration is split between performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact distribution, the 16 cores and 24 threads indicate a hybrid layout where some cores provide higher clock speeds and others focus on energy efficiency. The base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, demonstrating a significant frequency range for both single-threaded and all-core workloads.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, such as database operations or scientific simulations. The PassMark data encryption score of 33314 and extended instructions score of 36700 highlight the CPU's ability to handle cryptographic and SIMD workloads efficiently. The find prime numbers score of 186 is relatively low, but this is a niche test that does not represent typical usage.

Benchmark results show a well-rounded processor with outstanding multi-threading. The 3DMark max threads score of 12462 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 place it above most peer processors. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H with an average score of 47468 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i9-12900F at 47176 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 at 47527 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47022 (0.7% lower). This indicates the i7-13700KF sits in a tight performance band with other high-end processors, making it competitive with both newer and older flagship models.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides high-speed connectivity for modern SSDs and graphics cards, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible. The 125 W TDP is the base power draw, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking to increase performance beyond stock levels, though the FACT PACK does not provide specific overclocking results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports the Core 13th Gen series, and the i7-13700KF is an active production part. The socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the FACT PACK does not clarify whether both memory types can be used simultaneously; typically they cannot, so builders must choose one at the time of motherboard selection. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this platform.

PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes is available for the fastest storage devices, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the Gen 5 slot. The 125 W TDP of the CPU and 250 W TDP of the GPU combine for a suggested PSU rating of 600 W, which provides reasonable headroom for the entire system. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, so the PSU must have these available.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model, as the CPU has significant headroom. The processor's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 71st percentile means that a GPU upgrade would yield immediate performance gains in graphics-bound tasks. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that any modern GPU will be fully utilized. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules would benefit memory-intensive workloads, though the FACT PACK does not specify the maximum supported memory capacity.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which could extend its useful life before a platform change. However, the LGA 1700 socket is platform-specific, and future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard if moving to a different socket generation. The GPU, being end-of-life, is the more likely candidate for a near-term upgrade, and its replacement would be the simplest way to boost the system's overall performance tier.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47330 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors. Its closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H at 47468, which is 0.3% faster, while the Intel Core i9-12900F at 47176 is 0.3% slower. This puts the i7-13700KF in a performance class with modern high-end mobile parts and previous-generation desktop flagships.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 26011 places it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25891 (0.5% slower), followed by the AMD FirePro W7100 at 25856 (0.6% slower) and the AMD FirePro D700 at 25842 (0.7% slower). Interestingly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25740 is 1.1% slower, indicating that this desktop GPU is slightly faster than a high-end mobile solution.

The combined percentile of 80 reflects the average of the CPU and GPU positions, but this number masks the significant gap between the two components. The CPU's strong scores in Cinebench R23 multi-core (38704) and Geekbench multi-core (18258) contrast with the GPU's more modest results in 3DMark Steel Nomad (2548) and PassMark G3D (20700). This indicates a system that excels in processor-heavy tasks but is more modest in pure graphics performance. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 45817 is particularly strong, while the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 9550 is moderate, suggesting the system is better suited for CPU-intensive rendering and less for GPU-accelerated compute.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is based on the Navi 22 chip, built on a 7 nm process by TSMC with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The RDNA 2.0 architecture features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU has 40 ray accelerators for ray-traced effects, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores for AI workloads, meaning tasks like DLSS would rely on the GPU's standard compute units.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. This capacity is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K textures, but the 192-bit bus width can limit performance in memory-heavy scenarios compared to wider-bus competitors. The base clock is 2150 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, showing a relatively high frequency range that helps compensate for the narrower bus.

The GPU's pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS and FP16 of 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1). These numbers indicate solid 1080p and good 1440p gaming performance, though not top-tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 and PassMark G3D score of 20700 place it comfortably in the mid-range of desktop GPUs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 98089 and OpenCL score of 16360 show better performance in cross-platform APIs, which is beneficial for non-gaming compute tasks.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern game engines and graphics APIs. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting high refresh rate monitors and multi-display setups. The dual-slot design with a 267 mm length and 110 mm height makes it compatible with most mid-tower cases, and the 250 W TDP with a suggested 600 W PSU is manageable for most power supplies.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, placing this configuration in the top 20% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How much faster is the i7-13700KF compared to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900F?

A: The i7-13700KF has an average benchmark score of 47330, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-12900F's score of 47176.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile?

A: The RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26011, which is 1.1% higher than the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile's score of 25740.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK indicates that ECC memory is supported by the Intel Core i7-13700KF.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while its base clock is 3.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the suggested power supply rating for this system?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 600 W, based on the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 250 W TDP.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's 13th Gen Core i7 processor with AMD's Radeon RX 6000 series graphics card. The pairing represents a CPU-focused configuration, where the processor's 89th percentile ranking dominates the GPU's 71st percentile position. The overall combined percentile of 80 indicates a strong system, but one that is clearly limited by its graphics component in GPU-bound scenarios.

The CPU is an active production part with an unlocked multiplier, making it suitable for overclocking, while the GPU is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in production. The CPU was released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $384, and the GPU was released on 2022-03-02 with a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The processor has a 125 W TDP, and the GPU has a 250 W TDP, with a suggested system PSU of 600 W.

This build is best characterized as a workstation-leaning gaming system. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide exceptional multi-threaded performance for content creation and productivity tasks, while the GPU offers solid 1080p and acceptable 1440p gaming performance. The imbalance in component strength means that users will get more value from CPU-heavy workloads than from pure gaming performance.

Who Should Build It

The primary target for this build is the content creator who also games. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45817 make it ideal for video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, making this a versatile system for a single user who needs both productivity and entertainment.

Gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming will find this system well-suited, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark score of 4336) ensures high minimum frame rates, while the GPU can push high FPS at 1080p. For 1440p gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but it can still deliver playable frame rates at high settings, just not maximum refresh rates.

Software developers and engineers will benefit from the 24 threads and 30 MB of L3 cache, which accelerate compilation and code analysis tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build and test processes. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with the fastest NVMe SSDs, reducing load times for large projects.

Students and small business users will find this configuration overkill, but it provides headroom for years of future software requirements. The system can handle everything from office productivity to data analysis without any performance concerns. However, the power draw and component costs suggest this is better suited for professionals and enthusiasts rather than budget-conscious users.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores, specifically the CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 71st percentile ranking.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this system should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4336 ensures that the processor can keep up with the GPU's output, and the GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for modern games at this resolution. Estimated frame rates would likely range from 100 to 160 FPS in competitive shooters and from 60 to 100 FPS in AAA titles, depending on the game's optimization.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM are adequate, but the overall compute performance caps frame rates lower. Estimates suggest 60 to 90 FPS in most games at high settings, with some demanding titles dropping to 45 to 60 FPS at ultra settings. The CPU will not be a bottleneck at this resolution, as its performance headroom is ample.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 71st percentile ranking will struggle, with estimated frame rates of 30 to 45 FPS in AAA titles at high settings. The 12 GB VRAM may also be insufficient for the highest texture quality in some games. This resolution is not recommended for this GPU, and users should either lower settings or resolution to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's performance at 4K remains strong, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations.