SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT — Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake flagship-class desktop processor with AMD's mid-range RDNA 2 graphics card, targeting a balanced 1080p and 1440p gaming and productivity desktop. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards, giving the system an overall combined percentile of 80. The benchmark data shows a strong asymmetry: the processor is a high-end multi-threading workhorse, while the graphics card is a competent but firmly mid-range part. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, not measured gameplay data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, drawing a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, and it features an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results place this chip firmly in high-end desktop territory. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 38704, while the single-core score is 5464. The multi-core result indicates exceptional sustained throughput for heavily threaded workloads, while the single-core figure demonstrates strong per-thread performance for latency-sensitive tasks. The Geekbench scores corroborate this: 18258 multi-core and 2435 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a progression from 1137 single-thread, 2263 at 2 threads, 4474 at 4 threads, 8230 at 8 threads, 10749 at 16 threads, and 12462 at max threads. This scaling curve shows near-linear gains up to 8 threads, with diminishing but still significant returns beyond that, typical of a hybrid architecture mixing performance and efficiency cores.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's dual nature. The multi-thread score is 45817, while single-thread is 4336. Integer math hits 154507, floating-point math reaches 114997, and extended instructions score 36700. Data compression scores 596493, data encryption 33314, and random string sorting 62726. The find prime numbers score is 186, and physics is 2650. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 47330, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it trails the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H by 0.3% (47468 vs 47330), beats the Intel Core i9-12900F by 0.3% (47176), trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 by 0.4% (47527), and beats the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 by 0.7% (47022). This tight clustering shows the i7-13700KF is competitively positioned within a narrow performance band at the top end of the desktop CPU market.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 suggests the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with substantial headroom. The single-core score of 5464 in the same test indicates responsive day-to-day operation and strong gaming performance where per-core speed matters. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10749 versus the max-thread score of 12462 shows that even beyond 16 threads, the processor extracts additional performance, meaning heavily threaded applications that scale past 16 threads will see benefits.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16461 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804, combined with the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 5464 in Cinebench R23, suggest a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and playable 1440p in most titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 6600 XT should deliver smooth frame rates in competitive shooters and esports titles, where the CPU's single-thread score of 1137 in 3DMark and 4336 in PassMark single-thread will keep frame pacing consistent. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2048 shading units provide adequate throughput for 1080p ultra, though the 128-bit bus width may limit performance in memory-heavy scenes. At 1440p, expect lower frame rates as the GPU becomes the limiting factor; the 70th percentile GPU ranking indicates it sits below the top tier, so demanding AAA titles at 1440p ultra will likely require settings adjustments to maintain high refresh rates. Ray tracing workloads will be modest, with 32 RT cores present but the overall GPU horsepower limiting ray-traced effects to lower resolutions or reduced quality presets. These are estimates only; actual FPS will vary by title and settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13700KF scores 47330 average, which trails the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H by 0.3% (47468), beats the Intel Core i9-12900F by 0.3% (47176), trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 by 0.4% (47527), and beats the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 by 0.7% (47022).

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The RX 6600 XT features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700KF supports ECC memory, alongside both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RX 6600 XT sits at the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24442. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, which scores 24277 (0.7% lower).

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700KF supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Q: What is the power supply recommendation for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6600 XT is 450 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 160 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: What are the CPU's clock speeds?

A: The base clock is 3.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear performance hierarchy between these two components. The CPU, at the 89th percentile, vastly outclasses the GPU, which sits at the 70th percentile. In gaming workloads at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck; the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5464, 3DMark single-thread 1137) is more than sufficient to feed the GPU's frame output. The PassMark G3D score of 16461 for the GPU versus the CPU's PassMark multi-thread of 45817 highlights the disparity in raw compute capacity.

At higher resolutions like 1440p, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, as the pixel throughput demands (165.7 GPixel/s pixel rate) will be saturated before the CPU's thread scheduling becomes a factor. For productivity and compute workloads, the balance shifts entirely: the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads will dominate tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, while the GPU's 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance will handle GPU-accelerated tasks but won't match the CPU's multi-threaded throughput. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this mixed profile — the system is well-balanced for gaming where the GPU is the limiting factor, but CPU-bound workloads will see the GPU sitting idle more often.

The FPS scaling evidence, based on the 3DMark thread scaling from 2 threads (2263) to max threads (12462), shows the CPU has ample headroom for gaming workloads that typically use fewer than 16 threads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804, however, places it in a performance class where 1080p high-refresh gaming is achievable, but 1440p ultra on demanding titles will strain the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 47330, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its best showing is in Cinebench R23 multi-core at 38704, followed by Geekbench multi-core at 18258 and Cinebench R20 multi-core at 16255. Single-thread performance is equally solid: Cinebench R23 single-core at 5464, Geekbench single-core at 2435, and Cinebench R20 single-core at 2294. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 45817 and a single-thread score of 4336, with strong results in integer math (154507) and floating-point math (114997).

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24442, placing it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its best result comes from Geekbench Metal at 88720, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 80503 and Geekbench Vulkan at 72417. The PassMark G3D score is 16461, with a GPU compute score of 7520. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1804. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, scores 24277, a delta of 0.7%, meaning the RX 6600 XT is essentially tied with that card in average benchmark performance. The Intel Arc A350M scores 24647 (0.8% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 24236 (0.8% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170 (1.1% lower). This clustering around the 24400-24600 mark indicates the RX 6600 XT is positioned in a dense competitive segment.

Combined, the CPU at 89th percentile and GPU at 70th percentile produce a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks while offering competent but not class-leading graphics performance. The overall combined percentile of 80 reflects a desktop build where the processor is the star component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system should drive high refresh rates in esports and competitive titles, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5464) and the GPU's 2048 shading units with 165.7 GPixel/s pixel rate. Frame rates will be GPU-limited in most scenarios, but the CPU will not be a bottleneck.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 45817 and data compression score of 596493. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means streaming will rely on CPU encoding, which the 125 W TDP processor can handle.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38704 and Geekbench multi-core of 18258 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will help with effects and preview rendering, though it is not a top-tier compute card.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 12462 and PassMark floating-point math of 114997. GPU-accelerated rendering will be moderate, limited by the RX 6600 XT's 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 32 RT cores.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread score of 45817 in PassMark and 38704 in Cinebench R23, with the 30 MB of shared L3 cache aiding repetitive workloads. The GPU is adequate for UI rendering and light compute.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4336 in PassMark and 5464 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity applications. The GPU's 912 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop workloads without issue, and the 70th percentile GPU ranking is more than sufficient for office tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors, where the RX 6600 XT's performance class (70th percentile GPU) aligns with competitive and esports titles. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures no CPU-side stutters in those scenarios. Content creators who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads — video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation — will find the 16-core processor exceptional, with the GPU serving as a secondary accelerator. Developers working with large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache for parallel builds, while the GPU handles multiple monitors and IDE rendering. Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance for everyday tasks, though the GPU is overkill for pure office work; the system is better suited for mixed-use environments where occasional gaming or GPU compute is needed. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests this is a mature platform, while the CPU remains active production, making this a reasonable pairing for builders who want a strong CPU foundation with a modest GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700KF, a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, a Navi 23-based RDNA 2.0 graphics card. The CPU is a high-end desktop part at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range card at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 80 indicates an above-average system overall, with the CPU carrying the performance weight. The CPU's launch MSRP was $384, and the GPU's launch MSRP was 379 USD. The system is best described as a CPU-centric desktop build where the processor provides top-tier multi-threaded performance, and the GPU offers competent 1080p gaming and general graphics acceleration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory as an option. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and its 125 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for most air or liquid coolers. The GPU suggests a 450 W PSU, but the CPU's 125 W TDP combined with the GPU's 160 W TDP means a quality 450 W unit is the minimum; a larger PSU would be a sensible upgrade for overclocking or adding peripherals. The GPU is end-of-life, so the first logical upgrade path is the graphics card — moving to a higher-percentile GPU (above the 70th percentile) would alleviate the current GPU bottleneck in gaming. The CPU, being active production and at the 89th percentile, has no immediate upgrade need within the same socket; a next-generation platform change would be required to exceed its performance substantially. Memory bandwidth is a potential upgrade: moving from DDR4 to DDR5 (if the motherboard supports it) could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the FACT PACK does not quantify the difference. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage and expansion, while the 20 CPU lanes allow for multiple high-speed devices.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the Navi 23 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are 1968 MHz base, 2359 MHz game, and 2589 MHz boost, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The compute throughput is 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.21 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the GPU at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24442. In DirectX 12, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 1804. PassMark results show DirectX 9 at 194, DirectX 10 at 109, DirectX 11 at 163, and DirectX 12 at 61, indicating the card performs best under older DirectX versions relative to its peers. The Geekbench compute scores are notably higher: 88720 in Metal, 80503 in OpenCL, and 72417 in Vulkan, suggesting strong compute performance in API-agnostic workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 16461 and G2D score of 912 round out the picture. The 70th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range tier, with nearest rivals including the GTX 1630 (0.7% lower), Arc A350M (0.8% higher), GTX 780 Ti (0.8% lower), and RTX 2080 SUPER (1.1% lower). For rendering workloads, the 32 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits heavy ray-traced scenes. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p ultra textures but may become a constraint at 1440p with high-resolution texture packs. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest, and the 128-bit bus width means memory bandwidth is a potential bottleneck in bandwidth-intensive rendering tasks. The dual-slot cooler, 190 mm length, and single 8-pin power connector (160 W TDP, 450 W suggested PSU) make it a straightforward installation in most desktop cases.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700KF

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds