SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700KF

47,330 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor with a 4 GB entry-level graphics card, resulting in a build whose CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs while the GPU sits at the 35th percentile. The combined percentile is 62, which reflects a clear mismatch: the processor is a top-tier performer while the graphics card is a low-tier model. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is a Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It contains 16 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The L3 cache is 30 MB shared, with 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, includes ECC support, and provides 20 PCIe Gen5 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, making it a candidate for overclocking, and it has no integrated graphics. Its launch MSRP is $384.

Benchmark scores place the CPU in the top 11% of all processors (89th percentile). In Cinebench R23, it scores 38,704 in multi-core and 5,464 in single-core. Geekbench returns 18,258 multi-core and 2,435 single-core. PassMark’s multithread score is 45,817, with a single-thread score of 4,336. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show 10,749 for 16 threads, 8,230 for 8 threads, 4,474 for 4 threads, 2,263 for 2 threads, and 1,137 for single-thread. These numbers indicate that the CPU scales well with thread count, delivering nearly linear gains from 2 to 16 threads, which is typical for a high-core-count desktop part.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within a fraction of a percent: the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (delta −0.3%), Intel Core i9-12900F (delta +0.3%), AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (delta −0.4%), and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (delta +0.7%). This places the i7-13700KF in the same performance tier as these top-end desktop and mobile processors. For real workloads, the CPU will handle heavy multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The single-thread scores are also high enough for responsive everyday use and lightly threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance. The dual-channel memory controller and 30 MB L3 cache reduce memory latency, which benefits gaming and productivity. The PCIe Gen5 support (20 lanes from the CPU) provides ample bandwidth for future high-end GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, while the GPU’s suggested PSU is 250 W; a standard 250 W power supply would be sufficient for the GPU but the CPU itself may require a higher-rated PSU if combined with a more demanding graphics card. The GPU is a single-slot, low-profile design that draws no external power, making it a low-impact component.

A sensible upgrade from this pairing would be to replace the RX 6400 with a stronger GPU, since the CPU is not the limiting factor. The 13700KF is a capable processor that can keep up with modern high-end graphics cards, so users who later install a higher-tier GPU can expect a substantial performance jump without needing to change the CPU or platform. The unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking, which could further extend the CPU’s lifespan.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance is high enough to drive high frame rates in many games, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will limit resolution and quality. At 1080p, the GPU’s 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 and 128 GB/s bandwidth are far below what modern titles require for high refresh rates, so the estimated FPS will be low. The CPU can easily feed the GPU, but the GPU is the bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU has 24 threads and strong multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi 38,704), so software encoding is feasible. The GPU lacks dedicated encoding hardware (no tensor cores, no specific encoder mention), but its low TDP means it won’t interfere with CPU resources. Streaming at high quality with game capture would likely be CPU-bound, which the 13700KF can handle.

Video editing: The CPU’s 16 cores/24 threads and 30 MB L3 cache give excellent multi-threaded performance for rendering timelines. PassMark integer math 154,507 and floating point math 114,697 indicate strong computational throughput. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 128 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for heavy effects or 4K editing, but the CPU can handle proxy editing and light effects. Video encoding and decoding are not specified in the GPU specs, so they should be treated as unknown.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core 38,704 and Geekbench multi-core 18,258 show the CPU is a workhorse for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 and 12 ray accelerators (RT cores) are far too weak for real-time ray tracing or GPU rendering; any GPU-accelerated renderer would be heavily limited by the 4 GB frame buffer and 64-bit memory bus.

Software development: The CPU’s high core count and strong integer performance (PassMark integer math 154,507) make it ideal for compilation, code analysis, and running multiple containers. The GPU’s G2D score of 722 is modest but sufficient for 2D UI. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking ensures it can handle heavy developer workloads without stutter.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for word processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks, but it provides plenty of headroom for future tasks. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is enough for basic desktop acceleration and video playback. The system will be responsive for everyday use, but the CPU’s power is wasted on light tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 89th percentile versus the GPU’s 35th percentile creates a severe bottleneck. In any workload that depends on GPU performance—gaming, GPU-accelerated rendering, or compute—the RX 6400 will be the limiting factor. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so all display output must go through the GPU, which further stresses the GPU. In CPU-bound tasks (e.g., code compilation, video encoding, spreadsheet calculations), the CPU will dominate, and the GPU will have little influence. The combined percentile of 62 reflects this imbalance: the system as a whole performs at the 62nd percentile, but the CPU is far above that and the GPU far below.

Because no measured FPS data exists, we can only estimate frame rates from benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 and PassMark G3D 7673 are typical of entry-level cards, indicating that 1080p gaming will likely be limited to low settings. The CPU’s high thread scores (e.g., 3DMark max threads 12,462) indicate that CPU-heavy scenes (e.g., large physics simulations) will not be the bottleneck. The GPU will limit frame rates in nearly every game, while the CPU will be idle or underutilized.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a Navi 24 chip built on TSMC’s 6 nm process, with 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 ray accelerators. Its base clock is 1923 MHz, boost clock 2321 MHz, and game clock 2039 MHz. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 3.565 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 1x DisplayPort 1.4a. The card is single-slot, has no power connectors, and its suggested PSU is 250 W. Its launch MSRP is 159 USD.

Benchmark scores are low: PassMark G3D 7673, 3DMark Steel Nomad 176, Geekbench OpenCL 32011, and Vulkan 16372. The GPU’s percentile is 35, placing it below most discrete GPUs. The nearest rivals are the GTX 770M (delta 0%), RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (delta 0.1%), FirePro W4100 (delta 0.2%), and Quadro K4000M (delta 0.3%) – all are within a fraction of a percent, so the RX 6400 is effectively at the same performance tier as those legacy cards. The 128 GB/s bandwidth and 64-bit bus severely limit the GPU’s ability to handle modern textures and high resolutions. The 4 GB VRAM is also a constraint for current games, which often require 6 GB or more at 1080p with high detail.

The RT cores (12) exist, but the GPU’s overall compute is too low for practical ray tracing. The FP32 performance is roughly one-third of a typical mid-range card. The GPU’s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p at low settings, but not for 1440p or above.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for users who need the CPU’s multi-threaded power but do not require strong graphics performance. That includes:

Software developers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or do data processing. The CPU’s 16-core/24-thread architecture and high integer math scores (154,507) are ideal, while the GPU is only needed for basic display output.
Students and office workers who run productivity suites, web browsers, and occasionally light image editing. The CPU’s overkill, but the system is quiet and low-power (GPU 53 W TDP) and will last for years.
Small business workstations that run accounting software, databases, or server-side applications. The CPU’s ECC memory support and PCIe Gen5 lanes are useful for data integrity and expansion.
Gamers who play older or esports titles at 1080p with low settings. The CPU will prevent stutters, but the GPU will cap frame rates. A better GPU would be the first upgrade.

The build is not suitable for 3D rendering, video editing, or AAA gaming at 1440p or above, because the GPU is too weak.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU perform relative to its nearest rivals?

A: It is within 0.7% of the average benchmark scores of the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, Intel Core i9-12900F, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Its own percentile is 89.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RX 6400 has 4 GB GDDR6 memory, a 64-bit bus, and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing capabilities?

A: Yes, it includes 12 ray cores, but the overall performance is low, so ray tracing is impractical for most games.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 250 W. The CPU TDP is 125 W, so a system with a stronger GPU would need a higher-rated PSU.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-13700KF supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No. The dataset contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame-rate estimates are derived from benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs an Intel Core i7-13700KF with an AMD Radeon RX 6400. The CPU is a high-end Raptor Lake processor with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU is a low-end RDNA 2 card with 4 GB VRAM. The combined percentile is 62, which places the system in the middle of the performance distribution. The CPU is at the 89th percentile, the GPU at the 35th percentile, making this a CPU-heavy configuration. The build is best suited for productivity, software development, and office tasks, rather than graphics-intensive gaming or rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47,330, with a percentile of 89. Its key scores include Cinebench R23 38,704 multi-core and 5,464 single-core, Geekbench 18,258 multi-core and 2,435 single-core, and PassMark multithread 45,817. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 6,001, with a percentile of 35. Its notable scores include PassMark G3D 7,673, Geekbench OpenCL 32,011, and 3DMark Steel Nomad 176. The combined percentile of 62 indicates that the system as a whole is above average, but the GPU pulls it down. In tasks that rely on the CPU (e.g., code compilation, 3D rendering with CPU), the system will perform at the CPU’s 89th-percentile level. In tasks that rely on the GPU (e.g., gaming, GPU compute), the system will be at the GPU’s 35th-percentile level. The gap between the two is substantial, and the system’s overall performance is limited by the GPU in most real-world scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700KF

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds