SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's Turing-architecture workstation GPU. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 67th percentile among all graphics cards, yielding a combined 78th percentile system. No measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and PassMark single-thread score of 4333 indicate strong per-core performance, which typically drives high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. However, the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140 suggest this card is not optimized for modern gaming APIs. Estimated 1080p and 1440p gaming at high refresh rates would be limited primarily by the GPU, which sits only 1% above the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in average benchmark score.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcast workloads. The 3DMark max-threads score of 12412 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 indicate the processor can handle encoding tasks without crippling game performance. The GPU lacks dedicated NVENC hardware that would accelerate streaming; its Tensor cores (384) are present but the Turing architecture's encoder capabilities are not reflected in the benchmark data.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 45887 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19429 position it well for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for 4K video scrubbing and effects processing. The OpenCL score of 78999 suggests reasonable compute acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects. This combination would handle professional video workloads where the CPU handles encoding and the GPU manages real-time previews.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16292 and R15 multi-core score of 4507.5 indicate strong CPU-based rendering throughput. The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 of 22.30 TFLOPS provide capable compute for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising in compatible applications. However, the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 is modest relative to its workstation positioning.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 595292 and random string sorting score of 62670 indicate rapid compilation and code processing. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce memory latency for iterative builds. The 24 threads allow parallel compilation across multiple modules. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 16 GB VRAM supports large model training and inference tasks that developers may run locally.

Student and office work: The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2262 and 4-thread score of 4469 show responsive performance for everyday applications. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display solution, though the discrete GPU handles all rendering. The 125 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU mean this system demands more power than typical office machines. For students running engineering software or data analysis, the CPU's multi-core strength and the GPU's compute capabilities would be beneficial.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the dominant component in this pairing, ranking at the 89th percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile. This 22-percentile gap means most workloads will be GPU-limited, particularly in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46881 versus the GPU's 21629 amplifies this disparity.

In multi-threaded productivity workloads, the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU's compute capabilities. The 16-core configuration with 3DMark 16-thread score of 10717 shows that the processor can maintain high throughput across many simultaneous tasks. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15616 suggests it can handle mid-range graphics workloads, but it will bottleneck the CPU in frame generation.

The GPU's nearest rival comparison reveals its modest positioning: it is 1% slower than the GTX 1060 6 GB and only 1.2% faster than the RTX A4000 Mobile. This indicates the GPU is the limiting factor for any workload that depends on graphics throughput, while the CPU would remain underutilized. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, the GPU has negligible impact, and the system performs near the CPU's full potential.

FPS scaling estimates suggest that lowering resolution or graphical settings would not unlock significantly higher frame rates because the GPU's raw throughput is the constraint. The CPU could drive substantially more frames if paired with a stronger GPU. Conversely, the GPU cannot deliver frame rates that stress the CPU's single-thread capabilities in most titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so the following figures are estimates based solely on benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140 indicate weak API-specific performance, while the DirectX 10 score of 113 and DirectX 9 score of 195 suggest better compatibility with older titles.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimated frame rates would likely fall below 60 FPS in modern AAA titles, given the GPU's benchmark proximity to the GTX 1060 6 GB. The CPU's single-thread performance would not be the constraint; the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits pixel and vertex processing. The 64 ROPs and 348.5 GTexel/s texture rate provide moderate fill rates, but the 59 DirectX 12 score suggests poor modern API utilization.

At 1440p, estimated performance would drop further, with frame rates potentially halving from 1080p results due to the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becoming a limiting factor. The 256-bit memory bus and 14 Gbps effective memory speed are adequate for 1080p but insufficient for high-resolution textures. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support high-refresh monitors, but the GPU likely cannot drive them at high settings in demanding titles.

Esports and older titles would perform better. The DirectX 9 score of 195 and DirectX 10 score of 113 indicate that legacy games, which rely on simpler rendering paths, could achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's high single-thread score would ensure consistent frame pacing in these scenarios. However, any modern game using DirectX 12 or Vulkan would expose the GPU's weaknesses.

Who Should Build It

Professional workstation users in engineering, architecture, and scientific visualization would benefit from this pairing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports large models and textures, while the CPU's 16 cores handle simulation and analysis. The 48 RT cores enable ray-traced rendering in CAD and DCC applications, and the 384 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and inference.

Content creators working with 4K video or complex motion graphics would find the CPU's multi-thread performance and the GPU's memory capacity valuable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 ensures fast exports, while the 16 GB VRAM prevents out-of-memory errors in large compositing projects. The GPU's OpenCL score of 78999 supports GPU-accelerated effects in editing suites.

Developers building machine learning models or running data processing workloads would use the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 33249 and extended instructions score of 36625 for cryptographic and SIMD operations. The GPU's tensor cores accelerate model training, and the 16 GB memory accommodates substantial batch sizes.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings could use this system, but the GPU's benchmark position suggests it is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The CPU would be wasted in this scenario. Users seeking gaming performance at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU's percentile ranking indicates it is below the threshold for those resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 46881 places it at the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 with an average score of 46971, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the i7-13700K is essentially tied with that processor. It also sits within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535, both scoring 46654 and 46653 respectively. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, a -0.3% delta.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 21629 places it at the 67th percentile. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB with an average score of 21856, a -1% delta. The RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379 (1.2% slower), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237 (1.8% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153 (2.3% slower). The GPU's position among these rivals confirms its mid-range classification.

The combined percentile of 78 reflects the CPU's strong showing pulling up the GPU's weaker position. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 45887 and single-thread score of 4333 demonstrate balanced performance across thread counts. The 3DMark scores scale from 2262 (2-thread) to 12412 (max-thread), showing good scaling across core counts.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 uses the TU104 chip on a 12 nm TSMC process, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This memory configuration provides substantial capacity for professional workloads but modest bandwidth compared to modern cards.

The GPU contains 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The base clock of 1620 MHz and boost clock of 1815 MHz produce a pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate solid compute capabilities. The 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores provide dedicated AI and ray tracing hardware.

Benchmark results paint a mixed picture. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 and OpenCL score of 78999 show strong compute performance. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are poor: DirectX 12 at 59, DirectX 11 at 140, DirectX 10 at 113, and DirectX 9 at 195. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 and GPU compute score of 6525 confirm the card's compute-oriented focus over gaming-oriented performance.

The GPU's 230 W TDP and dual-slot design require a 550 W PSU. Power delivery uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface may limit performance on newer platforms, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support provides backward compatibility. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern API requirements.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, reflecting the CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 67th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, while the Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, a delta of -0.2%, making them effectively equivalent.

Q: What memory capacity and bandwidth does the GPU provide?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700K supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types via a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU's position relative to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, which is 1% lower than the GTX 1060 6 GB's 21856, placing them in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What are the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core counts?

A: The GPU has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core i7-13700K, a 16-core Raptor Lake processor, with NVIDIA's Quadro RTX 5000, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU. The CPU is from the Core 13th Gen series, released on 2022-09-26, while the GPU was released on 2018-08-12 and is now end-of-life. The system's combined percentile of 78 places it in the upper-midrange tier, with the CPU providing the majority of the performance.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 46881 make it a strong desktop processor. The GPU's 67th percentile ranking and average score of 21629 indicate it is a mid-range card despite its workstation branding. The combination targets professional users who need CPU-intensive computing with moderate GPU acceleration, rather than gamers seeking high frame rates.

The buildClass is desktop, confirming this is a stationary, full-power system. The power requirements are substantial: the CPU has a 125 W TDP, the GPU has a 230 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The GPU's dual-slot form factor and 267 mm length require a mid-tower or larger case. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor professional setups.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K features 16 cores and 24 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in the Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The 10 nm process node from Intel produces a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache.

The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and R20 multi-core score of 16292 show robust rendering capability. The Geekbench multi-core score of 19429 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45887 confirm broad workload performance. The 3DMark max-threads score of 12412 indicates consistent scaling across all 24 threads.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2116 and Geekbench single-core score of 2529 place it among the top desktop processors. The PassMark single-thread score of 4333 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 support high-frequency workloads. The 2-thread 3DMark score of 2262 shows that even with just two threads, the boost clock of 5.40 GHz delivers excellent responsiveness.

The CPU's memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The launch MSRP is $409. The CPU's nearest rivals are within 0.5% in average score, indicating that performance differences between top desktop processors are minimal.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing builders to choose based on cost and performance preferences. The dual-channel memory bus delivers adequate bandwidth for the 16-core processor.

The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The 230 W GPU TDP and 125 W CPU TDP suggest a total system power draw that the 550 W suggested PSU can handle. The GPU's power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) are standard and compatible with most modern PSUs. The end-of-life status of the GPU means upgrades are the primary path forward.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and benchmark scores indicate it can support much stronger graphics cards. Replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a modern GPU would shift the system's bottleneck from the GPU to the CPU, which is already well-positioned. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future GPUs. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules could improve memory-bound workloads, given the dual-channel support. The platform's active production status ensures continued driver and BIOS support.