SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 represents a specific kind of desktop build: one that leans heavily on processor throughput while providing a modern, capable graphics foundation. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part on the LGA 1700 socket, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The GPU, meanwhile, is a Blackwell 2.0 design built on a 5 nm TSMC process, featuring 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, which yields a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This is a combination where the processor is the clear performance leader, often outpacing the graphics card in synthetic benchmarks, but the real-world gaming data shows a more balanced story depending on resolution and title.

CPU Analysis

The i7-13700K is a high-core-count processor designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. Its 16 cores and 24 threads are split between performance and efficiency cores, a hallmark of the Raptor Lake architecture. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide substantial on-die storage for data, which helps in both gaming and productivity tasks. The processor’s benchmark scores paint a picture of a dominant multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, it scores 30745 points in the multi-core test, a figure that places it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2116 is also strong, indicating excellent responsiveness for tasks that rely on one or two threads.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a linear progression: 2262 at 2 threads, 4469 at 4 threads, 8193 at 8 threads, 10717 at 16 threads, and 12412 at max threads. This scaling indicates that the processor can effectively utilize its core count, making it suitable for rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks. The Geekbench scores of 19429 multi-core and 2529 single-core reinforce this position. Passmark results are particularly telling for real-world use: an integer math score of 154446 and a floating-point math score of 114867 show high arithmetic capability, while the data compression score of 595292 suggests strong performance in archiving and file management. The processor’s percentile ranking of 89 places it above the vast majority of all CPUs benchmarked, and its average benchmark score of 46881 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. Specifically, it is only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, while being 0.5% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535. This parity indicates that in raw CPU throughput, the i7-13700K is competitive with a range of high-end options from both AMD and Intel, making it a versatile choice for a workstation-class desktop.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5060 is a compact but modern graphics card, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a chip designated GB206. It has 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. The 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The card’s FP32 performance is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 19.18 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. Its clock speeds are set at a base of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2497 MHz. The most distinctive feature is the 8 GB of GDDR7 memory, which is a newer memory type that helps achieve a 448.0 GB/s bandwidth despite the relatively narrow 128-bit bus. This bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB capacity may be a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy titles.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more modest than the CPU’s. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3628, which is a moderate result for a modern card. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 112787, and its Vulkan score is 113321, showing solid compute capability. Passmark G3D score is 20891, and the GPU compute score is 10899. The percentile ranking is 72, which is lower than the CPU’s 89, indicating that this GPU is a mid-range performer relative to the entire GPU market. The nearest rivals show a tight grouping: the AMD Radeon 860M is 0.3% ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is 0.3% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% behind. This suggests that the RTX 5060’s raw compute performance is aligned with last-generation mid-range cards and some integrated graphics solutions, but its modern feature set and memory technology give it an edge in efficiency and API support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance in raw compute power, but the gaming performance tells a nuanced story. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46881 is significantly higher than the GPU’s average of 26331, suggesting the processor is the dominant component in the system. However, the pair’s combined percentile is 81, and the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is often the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, many games run at high frame rates, indicating the CPU is feeding the GPU adequately. For example, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 193.7 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant hits 446.5 FPS. These numbers suggest that the CPU has enough headroom to drive high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p.

The bottleneck shifts to the GPU at 1440p and especially at 4K. For instance, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 58.1 FPS at 1080p to 45.6 FPS at 1440p and 30.2 FPS at 4K. This scaling is typical of a GPU-limited scenario. The 8 GB VRAM is also a potential constraint, as seen in games like Ark: Survival Ascended, which runs at only 29 FPS at 1080p and 9 FPS at 4K. In this case, the game’s high memory requirements and the GPU’s limited VRAM are likely the cause, not the CPU. The pair’s rank by FPS is 1720 out of 3861 pairs, with an average FPS of 129.7 across all tested games. This places the combination in the top half of all pairings, indicating that while the CPU is powerful, the GPU keeps the system from being a top-tier gaming machine, particularly for demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a user who prioritizes CPU performance for productivity but still wants a modern, capable GPU for gaming. The data supports a target audience of content creators and developers who need multi-threaded power. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and the Passmark multithread score of 45887 indicate that video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be handled with ease. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms most systems in these tasks. For gamers, the RTX 5060 is suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as shown by the high frame rates in many titles at those resolutions. The system is less suited for 4K gaming, where the GPU struggles to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles.

Students and small business users who run CPU-intensive applications like data analysis or virtual machines would also benefit. The processor’s support for ECC memory is a specific feature for workstation use, and its dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for flexible building options. The GPU’s modern features, including DirectX 12 Ultimate and support for ray tracing, make it a future-proof choice for gaming, but its 8 GB VRAM is a concern for future titles. This is not a build for a user seeking maximum 4K gaming performance, but rather one seeking a balanced workstation that can handle modern games at reasonable settings.

Benchmark Performance

The i7-13700K delivers benchmark scores that put it in the top 11% of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 is a strong indicator of multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 2116 ensures snappy system response. The Geekbench scores of 19429 multi-core and 2529 single-core corroborate this. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46881 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, with a 0.2% difference from the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and a 0.3% difference from the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. This puts it in a performance tier with some of the best CPUs from the previous generation.

The RTX 5060’s benchmark scores are less impressive. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 and Passmark G3D score of 20891 place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 26331 is within a 1.2% range of its nearest rivals, which are a mix of integrated graphics and older discrete cards. The combined picture is one of a high-performing CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The combined percentile of 81 reflects the CPU’s strength, but the GPU pulls the overall score down. In practice, the system excels at CPU-bound tasks and performs well in games at lower resolutions, but it cannot compete with high-end GPU pairings at 4K.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system is excellent for competitive titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 193.7 FPS, and Valorant at 446.5 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay on high-refresh monitors. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (2116 in Cinebench R23) is key here, as these games are often CPU-bound.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads are ample for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 45887 indicates the CPU has headroom to handle x264 encoding without compromising game performance. The GPU’s NVENC encoder would also offload this task, but the CPU alone has sufficient throughput.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and the Passmark floating-point math score of 114867 provide the necessary power for rendering timelines and applying effects. This is a strong machine for 1080p and 1440p video work.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s high multi-threaded performance will significantly reduce render times in applications like Blender or 3ds Max. The GPU’s 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can also assist with GPU-based rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit the size of scenes.

Software Development: The 24 threads and high integer math score of 154446 allow for fast compilation of large codebases. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking ensures it will outperform most development workstations.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks, but the fast single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, providing high bandwidth for modern SSDs and GPUs. The RTX 5060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its performance level. The system’s PSU requirement is modest, with the GPU’s suggested PSU being 300 W and the CPU’s TDP at 125 W. This leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future.

The most sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU. The CPU is not the bottleneck in gaming at 1440p or 4K, as evidenced by the GPU-limited scaling in games like Cyberpunk 2077. Upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM and higher compute performance would yield significant gains in demanding titles. The CPU has a 5.40 GHz boost clock and is multiplier-unlocked, so it can be overclocked to squeeze out more performance. The motherboard choice will determine whether DDR4 or DDR5 is used, but the CPU supports both. The platform is mature, and the LGA 1700 socket has been used across several generations, so there is a wide range of compatible motherboards available.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The two are nearly identical in performance, with the i7-13700K being only 0.2% behind the Ryzen 9 5900 in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5060?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, achieved with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30.2 FPS at 4K, which is below playable thresholds, while the CPU has sufficient power.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has a suggested PSU of 300 W, which is relatively modest for a modern graphics card.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking to increase performance beyond the 5.40 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair achieves an average of 129.7 FPS across all games in the benchmark suite, ranking 1720 out of 3861 pairs.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, the system delivers high frame rates in esports titles. Valorant runs at 446.5 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 234 FPS. These numbers indicate a top-tier competitive gaming experience at 1080p. For more demanding titles, the performance is still playable. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 58.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52.5 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 168.8 FPS at 1080p. At 1440p, frame rates drop but remain mostly playable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 148.1 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 128.7 FPS. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 45.6 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 42.1 FPS.

At 4K, the GPU struggles. Most games fall below 60 FPS, with many below 40 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a mere 9 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is a clear limitation here. Lighter games like Valorant (304.2 FPS) and CS:GO (175.7 FPS) still run well, but the system is not recommended for 4K gaming in modern AAA titles. The data indicates that the sweet spot for this build is 1080p high-refresh gaming and 1440p at high settings, with the understanding that the most demanding games will require settings adjustments to maintain smooth frame rates. The figures are measured results from the benchmark suite, confirming the system’s strengths and weaknesses across a range of scenarios.