SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a pairing of Intel’s 13th-generation Core i7-13700K with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 3080, a desktop combination that sits in the upper tier of the benchmark database. The processor holds a strong 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the graphics card rests at the 68th percentile among GPUs, giving the pair a combined 79th percentile score. The measured frame-rate data across dozens of games shows a system that is clearly capable of high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with diminishing returns at 4K, and the CPU’s multi-threaded muscle makes it a legitimate workstation tool alongside its gaming duties.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it carries a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is a hybrid of high core counts and high clocks, which shows up clearly in the benchmark results.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 13700K is a heavy hitter. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 puts it in a class where content creation and rendering tasks will be handled with ease. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 2116 is equally impressive, and that strength in lightly-threaded tasks is confirmed by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2529. For everyday responsiveness, the PassMark single-thread result of 4333 indicates snappy behavior in applications that rely on one or two cores.

The multi-threaded scaling is near-linear in the 3DMark tests: 2-thread score is 2262, 4-thread is 4469, 8-thread is 8193, and 16-thread jumps to 10717, capping at 12412 with max threads. This tells you that the core count is well-utilized as software scales, making it a solid choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 45887 reinforces that, and the PassMark integer math score of 154446 and floating-point math score of 114867 show strong arithmetic throughput for simulation and scientific tasks.

Data-heavy tasks also benefit. The PassMark data compression score of 595292 is high, and data encryption at 33249 is respectable. Extended instruction set performance, measured at 36625, means modern AVX workloads will not be a bottleneck. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 46881, which places it just 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, while sitting 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535. In practical terms, this CPU is essentially dead-even with those rivals in overall synthetic performance, but its specific strength in single-thread tests gives it an edge in gaming and older applications that are not well-optimized for many cores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 land grid array used by 12th and 13th generation Core processors. Memory support is dual-channel for both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility on cost versus performance. The integrated memory controller supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop chip and useful for small workstations where data integrity is critical.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which means a modern graphics card will have full bandwidth, and there is room for a Gen 5 NVMe SSD if the motherboard supports it. The chip includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 as an integrated GPU, which is useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete card, though with the RTX 3080 present it will rarely be used.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible on Z-series motherboards, and the 125 W TDP is manageable for a capable air cooler or a standard 240mm-class liquid cooler. The GPU, however, draws far more power. The RTX 3080 has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested power supply for the system is 700 W. A quality 700 W unit will run this setup, but the 12-pin power connector on the GPU means you need to ensure the PSU includes the appropriate cable or an adapter.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the limiting factor in many scenarios. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 68th percentile means there is headroom in the processor. A future GPU upgrade to a faster card would let the 13700K stretch its legs further in 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the current RTX 3080 is the bottleneck. The platform itself is at the end of its socket generation, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, but the 13700K is strong enough that it will not need replacing for several generations.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pair sits at the 79th combined percentile among all desktop builds in the database, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 13700K’s average benchmark score is 46881, which is 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, and 0.5% above both the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and the Intel Xeon w3-2535.

Q: What is the maximum multi-threaded performance of the CPU?

A: The 3DMark max-thread score is 12412, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 30745, indicating strong scaling across all 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 a bottleneck for this CPU at 1080p?

A: Yes, in many titles at 1080p the GPU limits frame rates, as seen in games like Cyberpunk 2077 where the CPU could push higher than the 72.6 FPS the RTX 3080 delivers at that resolution.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported for error-correcting workloads.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 700 W, which accounts for the RTX 3080’s 320 W TDP and the CPU’s 125 W TDP.

Q: What is the measured average FPS across all games in the database?

A: The pair ranks 961st out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 159.8 at the tested settings.

Who Should Build It

This system targets a specific buyer: someone who wants high-end gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p without sacrificing productivity capability. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and multi-core scores make it a fit for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile code, while the GPU’s 68th percentile is sufficient for smooth high-refresh gaming in most titles.

Gamers at 1440p will find this to be a sweet spot. The measured FPS at 2560x1440 in competitive titles is high, with Counter-Strike 2 hitting 161.7 FPS and Valorant reaching 473.9 FPS. For single-player AAA games, 1440p yields playable frame rates, though 4K is more of a stretch for the most demanding titles.

Content creators working with the Adobe suite or DaVinci Resolve will appreciate the 30745 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for rendering timelines and exporting footage. Software developers compiling large projects will see the 16 cores and 24 threads put to work, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers or data processing tasks.

Students and small business workstations can benefit from the CPU’s single-thread speed for office applications and web browsing, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The system is also well-suited for simulation workloads, given the high floating-point math score of 114867.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is where this pairing shines. The measured FPS in esports titles is exceptional: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 537 FPS, Valorant reaches 544.2 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X delivers 291.7 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the 144 Hz or 240 Hz refresh rates of typical gaming monitors, meaning the CPU and GPU together will not leave performance on the table.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU’s 24 threads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10717 indicates that there is enough headroom for software encoding while maintaining game performance, though GPU encoding via the RTX 3080’s NVENC is also an option. The PassMark multithread score of 45887 supports this, as the CPU can handle both the game and the streaming overlay without significant frame drops.

Video editing is a strong suit. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16292 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19429 mean that timeline scrubbing and export rendering will be responsive. The high data compression score of 595292 also helps with handling large video files and archival tasks.

3D rendering and simulation workloads are well-supported by the CPU’s compute performance. The PassMark floating-point math score of 114867 and integer math score of 154446 indicate that physics simulations and ray tracing calculations in CPU-based renderers will complete quickly. The RTX 3080’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance also accelerates GPU-based renders.

Software development is a practical use case for the 16 cores and 24 threads. Compilation times scale well with the core count, and the 3DMark 8-thread score of 8193 shows that even mid-sized thread counts are efficient. The ECC memory support is a unique bonus for long-running test suites or data integrity in financial modeling.

Student and office work is easily handled. The single-thread scores, particularly the PassMark single-thread result of 4333, ensure snappy application launches and smooth multitasking in word processors and spreadsheets. The system will be overkill for this scenario, but the headroom means it will not need replacement during a multi-year degree program.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is from actual testing at ultra settings across three resolutions, and the figures are reliable. At 1920x1080, this system delivers excellent performance in most games. Esports and lighter titles exceed 200 FPS: Barony hits 204 FPS, Minecraft reaches 240 FPS, Roblox hits 313.2 FPS, and To The Core reaches 244 FPS. Heavier titles are still very playable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 72.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 65.6 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 85.8 FPS.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop but remain respectable for high-refresh gaming. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 152.6 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 161.7 FPS, and Valorant at 473.9 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 52.8 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 47.7 FPS, but these are still playable on a variable refresh rate monitor.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 3080 starts to struggle with the most demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 37.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 29.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11.3 FPS. Lighter games are fine, with Valorant at 378.6 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 218 FPS, but for 4K AAA gaming, this GPU is at its limit. The average FPS across all games is 159.8, which places this pair in the 961st position out of 3732 pairs in the database.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, scores 46971, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 13700K is essentially tied with it. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, also -0.3% relative, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535 both score 46653, putting the 13700K 0.5% ahead. In specific tests, the CPU shows a strong single-thread lead with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2116, which is high compared to its multi-core scaling.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172, placing it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 (-0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 (-0.4%). The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 is its strongest result, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 shows modern API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423 indicates strong compute capability for GPGPU tasks.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is clearly the stronger component. The CPU’s 89th percentile versus the GPU’s 68th percentile means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system performs near the top of the database, while in GPU-bound scenarios, it falls to the upper-mid range. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock and 125 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 8704 shading units, 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, and 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a 320 W TDP and requires a 700 W power supply.

The overall tier of this system is high, given the 79th combined percentile. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 89th percentile, and the GPU is solidly mid-to-upper tier at the 68th percentile. This is a system that was built for high-refresh gaming and serious productivity, not for entry-level tasks. The CPU’s 30745 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 25086 PassMark G3D score together indicate a machine that can handle almost any task a consumer or prosumer throws at it, with the only weakness being 4K gaming on the most demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows which component limits which workload. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at 1080p with low graphical settings, the RTX 3080 is the limiting factor. For example, in Valorant at 1080p, the system delivers 544.2 FPS, which is far beyond what the GPU can process in heavier titles, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 4333 is sufficient to push that high. The CPU is not the bottleneck here; the GPU’s rendering capabilities cap the frame rate.

In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming, the RTX 3080 is the clear bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K runs at 37.8 FPS, which is well below what the CPU is capable of supporting. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it has headroom to drive a faster GPU, but the RTX 3080’s 68th percentile limits the system in these situations.

In productivity workloads, the CPU dominates. The multi-threaded scores, such as the PassMark multithread score of 45887, show that the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU’s compute performance is secondary. The RTX 3080’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 is strong, but for CPU-heavy tasks like compilation or spreadsheet analysis, the GPU is irrelevant.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. At 1080p, the average FPS is high, but the drop to 1440p is significant in many titles, and the drop to 4K is steep. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU that is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU’s performance is consistent regardless of resolution, which is expected. For a balanced upgrade, the next step would be a faster GPU to pair with the 13700K, which would unlock the CPU’s full potential in gaming.