SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

13,543 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious multi-threaded productivity. The CPU, a 16-core Raptor Lake-S part, sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU, based on RDNA 4.0, holds the 55th percentile among all graphics cards. This discrepancy in percentile rankings is a defining characteristic of the build, suggesting a processor that outclasses its graphics counterpart in raw compute potential, yet the measured frame rates across a wide variety of titles show a highly capable gaming machine.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It packs 16 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that leverages a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores to balance heavy workloads with everyday responsiveness. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.40 GHz, allowing the chip to ramp up quickly for bursty tasks. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for keeping data fed to the cores during complex calculations.

Benchmark data reveals the processor's dual nature. In single-threaded tasks, the 3dmark_single_thread score is 1136, and it achieves 2116 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores are solid for gaming and legacy software. However, the multi-threaded results are where the i7-13700K shows its strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score reaches 30745, while the 3dmark_max_threads score is 12412. PassMark's multithread score of 45887 further underscores this capability. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: from 2 threads (2262) to 4 threads (4469) to 8 threads (8193) and up to 16 threads (10717), the performance scales nearly linearly, indicating excellent core utilization. This makes the CPU a strong candidate for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where all cores are engaged.

The processor's average benchmark score is 46881, which places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46971 (a -0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, scoring 47022 (a -0.3% delta). This means the i7-13700K is effectively neck-and-neck with those competitors, trailing by a fraction of a percent. It is also a hair ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535, both scoring 46653 (a +0.5% delta). The data indicates that while it is a top-tier performer, it does not hold a decisive lead over its closest peers; rather, it sits comfortably within a cluster of high-end processors.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture and uses the Navi 48 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors. The GPU features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 64 dedicated ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are set at a 1660 MHz base, a 2400 MHz game clock, and a 2970 MHz boost clock, which allows for significant performance headroom under load. The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. This large frame buffer and high bandwidth are essential for high-resolution textures and compute-heavy workloads.

In terms of raw throughput, the GPU achieves 48.66 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1) operations. The pixel rate is 380.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 760.3 GTexel/s. These figures suggest a card that is well-balanced for rasterization and compute. Benchmark results show a passmark_g3d score of 26795, which is the most relevant score for gaming performance. The geekbench_vulkan score is 65879, indicating strong API-level performance. However, the GPU's average benchmark score is 13543, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. This is a surprisingly low percentile for a card with such specifications, and the nearestRivals data confirms this: the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (13536, +0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (13515, +0.2%), and NVIDIA P106-090 (13470, +0.5%) are all within a 1% delta. This suggests that the average score is heavily weighted by the lower DirectX 9 and 10 results, which are not indicative of modern gaming performance. The passmark_directx_9 score is 353, and directx_10 is 154, while the directx_11 score is 292 and directx_12 is 78. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 7260 is a more modern and relevant indicator of its actual gaming capability.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is a top-tier performer and a GPU that has a conflicting benchmark profile. The CPU's 89th percentile and the GPU's 55th percentile result in a combined percentile of 72. The pair's rank by FPS across all benchmarked pairs is 930 out of 3732, with an average FPS across games of 161.1. This indicates that while the CPU is a high-end part, the GPU holds the system back from the absolute top tier of gaming performance.

The CPU's nearestRivals show a tight race. The deltaPct values are all under 1%, meaning the i7-13700K is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. The data shows a processor that is a proven workhorse, delivering performance that is on par with the best of the previous generation and competitive with current high-end mobile and desktop parts. For the GPU, the nearestRivals are ancient cards with much lower average scores, which is a statistical anomaly driven by the older API tests. The data shows that the RX 9070 XT's average score is dragged down by legacy benchmarks, but its modern API performance, such as the Steel Nomad score and the measured FPS, tells a different story. The high average FPS of 161.1 across the game suite confirms that the actual gaming experience is far better than the raw percentile suggests.

Who Should Build It

This build is for the user who needs a powerhouse for both productivity and gaming, with a slight priority on the former. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores make it ideal for content creators who edit high-resolution video or render 3D scenes. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 and the PassMark multithread score of 45887 show that it can handle these tasks efficiently. For software developers, the 16 cores and 24 threads will significantly reduce compilation times, and the 30 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases.

For gamers, the target is high-refresh 1440p gaming. The measured FPS data shows that this system can push well over 100 FPS in most esports and AAA titles at 2560x1440, and even achieve high frame rates at 4K in less demanding games. However, the CPU's 89th percentile compared to the GPU's 55th percentile means that in heavily CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive shooters at low resolutions, the system will shine. For small business workstations, the CPU's data encryption and compression scores (PassMark data_encryption at 33249 and data_compression at 595292) indicate strong performance in database and archival tasks. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the compilation speed and multitasking capabilities, though the power requirements might be overkill for a simple office machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This is a key flexibility point, but it also marks the end of a generation. The CPU supports dual-channel memory and includes ECC memory support, which is a boon for workstation stability. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the RX 9070 XT, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The CPU has a 125 W TDP, while the GPU has a 304 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the system is 700 W, which provides enough headroom for the combined power draw.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to focus on the GPU. The CPU is already at the top of its class; upgrading to a higher-core processor would yield minimal gains. The data shows the CPU is within 0.5% of its nearest rivals, so there is little headroom for improvement. A future GPU upgrade would allow the system to better utilize the CPU's potential in gaming, as the current GPU is the primary limiter in many titles. The platform does not support a new CPU generation, so the upgrade path is limited to memory (moving to faster DDR5) and the GPU. The dual-slot GPU with 2x 8-pin power connectors is a standard design, ensuring compatibility with most modern power supplies.

Gaming Performance

The data is measured, not estimated, and the results show a strong gaming system with clear scaling patterns across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is often CPU-bound in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 hits 254 FPS, Valorant reaches 543 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 302 FPS. These high frame rates are aided by the strong single-thread performance of the i7-13700K. In AAA titles at 1080p, the system still performs well: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 75 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 68 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 169.8 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU starts to become the limiting factor. The frame rates drop, but remain very playable. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 168 FPS, Valorant to 496 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege to 198 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 56 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 51 FPS. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient for these resolutions, but the GPU's raw compute power is the bottleneck. At 3840x2160, the system struggles with the most demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 37 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34 FPS. However, less demanding titles still run well: Valorant maintains 396 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 94 FPS. The data shows a clear trend: the system is excellent for high-refresh 1440p gaming and can handle 4K in many titles, but it is not a true 4K ultra-settings machine for the latest AAA releases.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this pair is 72, reflecting a CPU that is in the 89th percentile and a GPU in the 55th percentile.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700K compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971. The deltaPct is -0.2%, meaning the i7-13700K is essentially tied with the Ryzen 9 5900, trailing by a negligible margin.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 9070 XT?

A: The RX 9070 XT has a memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, using 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this entire system?

A: The suggested PSU for a system with the RX 9070 XT is 700 W, which accounts for the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 304 W TDP.

Q: In which game does the system achieve its highest measured frame rate at 1080p?

A: The highest measured frame rate at 1920x1080 is in Valorant, which reaches 543 FPS. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive also achieves a very high 556.2 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700K has ECC memory support, a feature often found in workstation platforms.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class configuration that pairs a high-end 13th Gen Intel Core i7 with a current-generation AMD Radeon RX 9000 series graphics card. The Core i7-13700K is a 16-core processor with a 30 MB L3 cache, designed for demanding multi-threaded workloads. The Radeon RX 9070 XT is a 16 GB graphics card based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, with a 256-bit memory bus and a boost clock of 2970 MHz. The combined percentile of this pair is 72, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all system configurations. The CPU's individual percentile is 89, which is much higher than the GPU's 55th percentile, indicating a processor that has more headroom than the graphics card can currently utilize. The average frame rate across the entire test suite is 161.1 FPS, which is a strong result, but the rank of 930 out of 3732 pairs shows that there are many other configurations with higher total gaming performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming workloads. The CPU, sitting at the 89th percentile, is capable of feeding frames much faster than the GPU can render them. This is evident in the FPS scaling. At 1080p, the system achieves very high frame rates (e.g., 543 FPS in Valorant), which are often limited by the CPU's single-thread speed. As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the frame rates drop significantly (e.g., Valorant goes from 543 to 496 to 396 FPS), showing that the GPU is struggling to keep up with the increased pixel count. In a game like Cyberpunk 2077, the drop is more severe, from 75 FPS at 1080p to 37 FPS at 4K.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The multi-threaded scores are excellent, and the GPU's compute capabilities are secondary. The GPU's passmark_gpu_compute score of 15864 is decent, but the CPU's passmark_multithread score of 45887 shows that the processor is the main driver for rendering and encoding tasks. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: in gaming, the GPU limits the system, while in CPU-intensive tasks such as video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is sufficient but not the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is a strong contender at 1440p. The measured data shows it can hit 198 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and 168 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 2560x1440, which is well above the 144Hz threshold for most monitors. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures high frame rates in esports titles.

For streaming, the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads are a significant asset. The high Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 allows for x264 encoding at high quality without impacting game performance. The GPU can handle the encoding offload if needed, but the CPU is more than capable of handling both tasks simultaneously.

For video editing, the CPU excels. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 10717 and the PassMark integer math score of 154446 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is also useful for GPU-accelerated effects and previews, and the 644.6 GB/s bandwidth helps with high-resolution video playback.

For 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 will result in faster final frame renders compared to lower-core-count CPUs. The GPU's 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute also makes it capable of GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support it, providing a dual-path for production.

For software development, the CPU is the star. The 16 cores and 24 threads will dramatically reduce compilation times, and the 30 MB of L3 cache is beneficial for large codebases. The PassMark data encryption score of 33249 also indicates strong performance for secure build processes.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but highly capable. The fast single-thread performance (PassMark single_thread score of 4333) ensures snappy application responsiveness. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is not needed for standard office tasks, but it allows for running multiple virtual machines or large spreadsheets without issue. The CPU's ECC memory support also adds a layer of data integrity for important academic or business files.