SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing built around a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor and a high-end Navi 31 graphics card. The CPU, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, sits on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and represents a 10 nm Intel design. Its cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 30 MB shared L3 pool, which is critical for feeding the 16 physical cores. The GPU, built on TSMC's 5 nm process, is a different beast entirely, packing 57,700 million transistors into a 529 mm² die. This combination of a high-core-count CPU with a massive 20 GB frame buffer on the GPU is designed to handle both heavily threaded productivity tasks and demanding high-resolution gaming without immediate capacity limitations.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700K is a 16-core processor with 24 threads, and the benchmark data reveals a strong scaling pattern from low to high thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the chip scores 2,262 with 2 threads, 4,469 with 4 threads, and 8,193 with 8 threads, before reaching 12,412 with all threads active. This near-linear scaling from 2 to 16 threads indicates that the core architecture is efficient and that workloads capable of using multiple cores will see significant benefits. The single-thread score of 1,136 in the same test suite shows a solid foundation, but the real story is the multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 results reinforce this, with a multicore score of 30,745 and a single-core score of 2,116, a ratio that highlights the processor's dual nature: it is not just a workstation behemoth but also a capable performer in lightly-threaded tasks.

The processor's 125 W TDP is a modest figure for a 16-core chip, suggesting that the Raptor Lake architecture achieves its performance through a combination of high clocks and efficient core design rather than sheer power draw. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz is the headline frequency, and the benchmark scores suggest it sustains high performance under load. The PassMark multithread score of 45,887 and the Geekbench multicore score of 19,429 place the chip in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors on the market. Its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, have average benchmark scores that are nearly identical, with the i7-13700K trailing the Ryzen 9 5900 by just 0.2% and the HX PRO 375 by 0.3%. This places the chip in a tightly contested performance tier where the differences are within the margin of error.

For real workloads, the implications are clear. The PassMark data compression score of 595,292 and integer math score of 154,446 suggest that archival tasks, compilation, and number-crunching applications will run exceptionally well. The floating-point math score of 114,867 further supports scientific and engineering simulations. The processor's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility, and the dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output, but it is not a substitute for the dedicated GPU in this build. The data shows a processor that is a top-tier performer for its generation, with the 89th percentile ranking confirming its position among the elite, but one that is also closely matched by its immediate rivals, indicating that the architectural differences between it and the competition are minimal in practice.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features the Navi 31 chip. It comes equipped with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a defining characteristic of the card, offering a capacity that is generous for current games at 4K resolution and for creative applications that require large datasets. The GPU has 5,376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. It also includes 84 ray tracing cores, which are dedicated to hardware-accelerated ray tracing, although the card's performance in this area is a separate consideration from its raw rasterization power. The clock speeds are set at a base of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, with memory running at an effective 20 Gbps.

The raw compute figures are impressive. The card is rated for 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 103.0 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio. This translates to a pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate that the card is designed for high-throughput rendering, whether that be in games or in GPU-accelerated content creation. However, the benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,623, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 71,068, which are strong results. Yet, the GPU's overall percentile ranking is 55th, and its average benchmark score of 13,745 places it in a strange position relative to its nearest rivals. The data shows it is 0.5% slower than an AMD Radeon 660M and an NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, which are integrated and mobile parts respectively. This is an anomaly that suggests the average benchmark score may be weighted by lower-end tests like PassMark DirectX 9 and DirectX 10, where the card scores 322 and 158 respectively.

The PassMark G3D score of 29,009 is a more representative indicator of its gaming capability, but the lower scores in older DirectX versions pull the average down. The card’s 55th percentile ranking is thus misleading when considering its actual performance in modern titles. The data suggests that in current generation games, particularly at high resolutions, the GPU is far more capable than its average score implies. The presence of 84 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate means it is architecturally prepared for modern rendering techniques. The 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 20 GB of VRAM are assets that will prevent bottlenecks in texture-heavy scenes at 4K. The card is end-of-life in production status, but its specification sheet remains competitive. The power requirements are significant, with a 300 W TDP and a suggested 700 W power supply, and it requires two 8-pin power connectors, which is standard for this performance class.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this pairing is defined by a strong CPU and a GPU with an inconsistent average score. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 46,881 indicate a top-tier processor. The GPU’s 55th percentile ranking and average score of 13,745, however, suggest a mid-pack performer, which is contradicted by its raw specifications and high-end game performance. This discrepancy is critical to understanding the system. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, scores 46,971, a 0.2% difference. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, both scoring just above it by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, which scores 1.5% higher. These rivalries are based on average scores that are heavily influenced by legacy benchmarks.

The pair's combined percentile is 72, which is a more balanced view of the system’s overall capability. The measured FPS data provides the clearest evidence of real-world performance. The pair ranks 657th out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 175.2. This is a strong result, placing it in the top 18% of all CPU+GPU combinations. The discrepancy between the GPU’s low percentile and the pair's high rank by FPS is explained by the fact that the FPS data is measured on modern games at ultra settings, where the RX 7900 XT excels. The CPU’s high percentile is consistent with its ability to feed the GPU without bottlenecking. The data indicates that this is a system where the CPU is a known quantity, performing exactly as expected, while the GPU’s true potential is only visible when looking at specific game benchmarks rather than its overall average score. The combined picture is one of a high-performance gaming and productivity machine, with the CPU providing the foundation and the GPU delivering the visual firepower in scenarios that leverage its strengths.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who need a high-core-count CPU and a GPU with a large memory buffer. The CPU’s 89th percentile and 16-core design make it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,745 is a strong indicator for these tasks. The GPU, with its 20 GB of VRAM, is aimed at gamers who play at 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 resolutions, where the frame buffer and memory bandwidth are crucial. The data shows that at 2560x1440, the system can achieve well over 100 FPS in many titles, and at 3840x2160, it remains playable in most games. This makes it a target for enthusiasts who prioritize resolution and visual fidelity over the highest possible refresh rates at 1080p.

Small business workstations that run simulations, data analysis, or financial modeling would benefit from the CPU’s multithreading capabilities. The PassMark integer math score of 154,446 and floating-point math score of 114,867 are evidence of this. Developers and students in computer science or engineering fields would find the 24 threads useful for compiling large codebases or running virtual machines. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a feature that appeals to workstation users who require data integrity. The GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance makes it a candidate for GPU-accelerated compute tasks in research or rendering, though its ray tracing performance is a secondary consideration. The build is not for users on a tight budget, as the components are high-end, but for those who need the performance, the data shows it delivers. It is a desktop system that targets the upper echelon of consumer hardware.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system is overkill. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2,116, ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most titles. The data shows Counter-Strike 2 at 272.6 FPS and Valorant at 539.7 FPS at 1920x1080, which are excellent for a 240Hz or 360Hz monitor. The GPU is not the limiting factor here.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads. Encoding video while gaming is a task that can use the spare cores. The PassMark data encryption score of 33,249 and data compression score of 595,292 suggest that the CPU can handle these background tasks without impacting the gaming experience. The system is well-suited for a single-PC streaming setup.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will leverage the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,745. The 16 cores will accelerate export times and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is useful for handling high-resolution footage and effects, and its OpenCL score of 12,756 indicates it can assist with GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will use both the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s PassMark floating-point score of 114,867 is strong for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can be used for real-time viewport rendering or GPU-accelerated render engines. The 20 GB VRAM allows for larger scenes to be rendered without spilling to system memory.

Software development is a sweet spot for this CPU. The PassMark integer math score of 154,446 indicates high performance in code compilation. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing iteration times. The system’s 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures it will not be a bottleneck in a developer’s workflow.

Student and office work is beyond the capability of this system. The performance is so high that it would be wasted on document editing or web browsing. The GPU’s idle power draw is not a concern in the data, but the 300 W TDP suggests it is not an energy-efficient choice for light tasks. The system is a performance tool, not a general-purpose appliance.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on real-world testing, shows a system that excels at high resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers extremely high frame rates in many titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 272.6 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 325 FPS, and Minecraft at 270 FPS. These are all well above the threshold for any high-refresh monitor. At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 150.1 FPS, Control at 88 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 57.4 FPS. The 1440p resolution is where this system shows its balance, offering high frame rates in competitive titles and playable frame rates in demanding single-player games.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary factor. The 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth are put to the test. Call of Duty: Warzone still runs at 128.3 FPS, which is excellent for 4K. However, more demanding titles show the limits. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 37.4 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 36 FPS. These are playable but not ideal for a high-refresh 4K monitor. Titles like Ark: Survival Ascended are nearly unplayable at 12.5 FPS in 4K, indicating the game is extremely demanding. The data shows a clear pattern: the system is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it provides a high level of performance across a wide range of titles. At 4K, it is capable, but users will need to adjust settings or accept lower frame rates in the most demanding games.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is workload-dependent. In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression, the PassMark score of 595,292 shows the CPU is the star. In gaming at 1920x1080, the CPU can be the limiting factor in some esports titles, as it must process game logic and physics at high frame rates. However, the single-thread score of 1,136 in 3DMark and the high boost clock suggest it is rarely a significant bottleneck. The data shows that at 1080p, the system achieves frame rates like 606.4 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, which are so high that they are beyond the refresh rate of most monitors, indicating the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU adequately.

At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K shows a consistent drop that is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 79.1 at 1080p to 57.4 at 1440p and then to 37.4 at 4K. This is a classic GPU-bound pattern, as the CPU’s workload does not change significantly with resolution. The GPU’s 55th percentile ranking is a statistical oddity, but the FPS data shows it is the component that limits performance in modern games at high resolutions. The CPU’s 89th percentile ensures it is rarely the limiting factor. The pair’s average FPS of 175.2 across all games reflects the balance, but the bottleneck shifts from the CPU at low resolutions to the GPU at high resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all other CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it performs better than 89% of processors in the database.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU's average benchmark score representative of its gaming performance?

A: No, the GPU has a 55th percentile ranking and an average score of 13,745, but this is skewed by lower scores in legacy DirectX tests. The measured FPS in modern games shows it is a high-performance card.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this pair is 72, which places it in the top 28% of all CPU and GPU combinations.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all measured games is 175.2, ranking it 657th out of 3,732 total pairs.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 16-core Intel processor from the 13th generation with a high-end AMD Radeon graphics card from the RX 7000 series. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 89th percentile, and the GPU, despite its lower overall percentile, is a high-end card in terms of its specifications and measured gaming performance. The combined percentile of 72 places this system in the upper echelon of desktop configurations. The system is designed for users who need both strong multi-threaded processing and high-resolution gaming capabilities. The CPU's 24 threads and the GPU's 20 GB of VRAM make it a versatile platform for productivity and entertainment. The build is a high-performance desktop that is not aimed at budget-conscious users but rather at those who require uncompromising performance in demanding applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700K is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which provides flexibility for the user, but the motherboard choice will dictate which type is used. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is a modern standard that allows for high-speed NVMe SSDs and future graphics cards. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so it can be overclocked for additional performance, and its 125 W TDP is a baseline figure that can be higher under load. The system is a desktop class, and the upgrade path is limited by the socket. The next logical upgrade would be to a newer generation processor, but this would require a new motherboard.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and its 300 W TDP requires a 700 W power supply, as suggested. The card is dual-slot and requires two 8-pin power connectors. Upgrading the GPU is possible, but users must ensure their power supply has sufficient headroom. The system's performance is balanced, but if a user wanted to improve 4K gaming performance, upgrading the GPU would be the primary path. The CPU is not likely to be a bottleneck for the next few generations of graphics cards, given its high single-thread and multi-thread performance. The memory support for DDR5 means users can take advantage of faster memory speeds if they have a compatible motherboard, which can further improve system performance in memory-sensitive tasks.