SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop graphics card using the RDNA 3.0 architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process, with a 43 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 200 W. Benchmark data shows a substantial performance disparity: the CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at only the 17th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing represents a desktop build where the processor is a high-end workhorse and the graphics card is an entry-level component, creating a significant imbalance in capability.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700K delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 places it firmly in the high-end desktop segment, while the single-core score of 2116 indicates strong per-thread performance crucial for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The 3DMark results show a clear scaling pattern: 2 threads score 2262, 4 threads score 4469, 8 threads score 8193, and 16 threads score 10717, with the max threads test reaching 12412. This progression demonstrates efficient scaling up to 16 threads, with the remaining 8 threads providing a smaller boost, reflecting the hybrid architecture of 8 performance cores and 8 efficient cores.

In the Geekbench suite, the processor achieves a multicore score of 19429 and a single-core score of 2529. The Passmark suite reinforces this picture: multithread score of 45887, single-thread score of 4333, integer math at 154446, and floating point math at 114867. The data compression score of 595292 and encryption score of 33249 indicate strong capability in data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 36625 suggests solid performance in workloads leveraging modern SIMD instruction sets.

The average benchmark score of 46881 places the i7-13700K at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 with an average score of 46971, just 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47022, 0.3% higher. The Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46653, 0.5% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, also 0.5% lower. These margins are negligible, indicating the i7-13700K is statistically tied with these competing processors in overall CPU performance, despite differences in core counts and architectures. For real workloads, this means the i7-13700K handles video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering with ease, matching or exceeding processors in the same tier.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a modest performer by comparison. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are a base of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. Pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 16.49 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1).

In benchmark tests, the RX 7400 scores 1103 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Passmark suite shows DirectX 9 at 176, DirectX 10 at 59, DirectX 11 at 97, DirectX 12 at 44, and G2D at 1209. The G3D score is 11897, and GPU compute is 5152. The average benchmark score of 2467 places this GPU at the 17th percentile of all GPUs, which is very low. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S with an average score of 2440 (1.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2433 (1.4% higher), the Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2425 (1.8% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M at 2422 (1.9% higher). These rivals are all integrated graphics or very old mobile parts, confirming the RX 7400's position as an entry-level discrete GPU.

For rendering workloads, the 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for basic 3D tasks, but the low DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests modern gaming APIs will be a challenge. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in high-resolution texture streaming. Ray tracing hardware exists with 28 RT cores, but the overall low compute performance means ray-traced effects will likely run at reduced settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a severe bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU's 89th percentile performance versus the GPU's 17th percentile creates a situation where the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU can easily feed frames to the GPU, but the GPU cannot render them fast enough to utilize the CPU's full potential. For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering that use both components, the GPU will constrain output.

The combined percentile of this build is 53, which is near the median of all builds, reflecting the wide gap between the two components. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46881 is roughly 19 times the GPU's average score of 2467, though these numbers are not directly comparable due to different test suites. However, the percentile positions make the imbalance clear: the CPU is in the top 11% of processors, while the GPU is in the bottom 17% of graphics cards.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (595292 in Passmark), or spreadsheet calculations, the system will perform at a high level. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will perform at an entry-level tier. The FPS scaling in games will be limited by the GPU's 17th percentile position, meaning the CPU's headroom will not translate into higher frame rates in most scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build will not achieve high-refresh rates in modern titles. The GPU's 17th percentile position and low DirectX 12 score of 44 indicate that even at 1080p, frame rates will be modest, likely below 60 FPS in demanding games. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4333 in Passmark is irrelevant if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 45887 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 suggest the i7-13700K can handle x264 encoding at high presets without impacting game performance, though the GPU's low compute performance will limit the game's visual quality and frame rate.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 16292 and Geekbench multicore score of 19429 indicate fast rendering and export times. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 5152 GPU compute score can assist with effects, but the low DirectX 12 performance may slow GPU-accelerated timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 30745 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 12412 3DMark max threads score make this a strong CPU rendering workstation for tasks like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 is usable for OpenCL rendering, but its 17th percentile rank means it will be slower than most discrete GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 154446 integer math score and 595292 data compression score indicate fast compilation times, particularly for large C++ or Rust projects. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this build suitable for developers who need serious compute power without gaming.

Student and office work: The CPU is massively overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU's G2D score of 1209 is adequate for 2D desktop acceleration and video playback. The 8 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for office displays. This build is far more powerful than needed for these tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and future expansion. The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer chips and beneficial for workstation reliability. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and its 125 W TDP is manageable for most mid-range air coolers.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The RX 7400 has a 43 W TDP and requires only a single 6-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. This leaves enormous headroom for a more powerful GPU. The most sensible next upgrade would be replacing the RX 7400 with a higher-tier graphics card, as the CPU's 89th percentile performance can easily support a GPU in the 80th percentile or higher without bottlenecking.

The platform's DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure it remains relevant for several years. The CPU's production status is active, and it was released on 2022-09-26. The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for this class. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB L2 per core, and 80 KB L1 per core provide substantial cache for latency-sensitive workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 53, placing it near the median of all desktop builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 has an average score of 46971, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-13700K's 46881, making them statistically equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile position and what does it mean?

A: The RX 7400 is at the 17th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms only about 17% of graphics cards, putting it in the entry-level tier.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 28 ray tracing cores, but given its overall 17th percentile performance, ray-traced workloads will likely run at low settings and resolutions.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-13700K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, which is very low and leaves ample room for a future GPU upgrade.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who prioritize CPU compute power and have minimal GPU requirements. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 154446 integer math score and 595292 data compression score. Data analysts and researchers running CPU-bound simulations will appreciate the 30745 Cinebench R23 multicore score. Students in engineering or computer science fields need the CPU's multi-threading for academic projects but may not game heavily. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications are well served, though the CPU is overkill for these tasks. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-rendered video or 3D animation will see fast export times, but GPU-accelerated effects will be limited. Gamers at 1080p with low settings expectations can get playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but this is not a gaming-focused build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build consisting of the Intel Core i7-13700K processor and the AMD Radeon RX 7400 graphics card. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread part from the Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, with a 125 W TDP. The GPU is an entry-level RDNA 3.0 part with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 43 W TDP. The overall tier, based on the combined 53rd percentile, is mid-range, but this is misleading because the individual components are at opposite extremes: the CPU is in the top 11% while the GPU is in the bottom 17%. The build's class is desktop, and it represents a workstation-oriented configuration where the GPU is sufficient for display output and basic acceleration, but the CPU provides the primary computing power.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 46881, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 30745 and single-core is 2116. The 3DMark max threads score is 12412, and Geekbench multicore is 19429. The GPU's average benchmark score is 2467, placing it at the 17th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103, and Passmark G3D is 11897. The combined picture is a system with exceptional processor capability and minimal graphics capability. In CPU-bound tasks, this build will perform at the 89th percentile, rivaling processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 which scores 46971 (0.2% higher). In GPU-bound tasks, it will perform at the 17th percentile, competing with integrated graphics like the Intel HD Graphics 610 which scores 2425 (1.8% higher). The disparity is so large that the system's overall capability is determined almost entirely by the workload type.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. Given the GPU's 17th percentile position and its low DirectX 12 score of 44, gaming performance will be limited. At 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA titles will likely run below 30 FPS. At 720p or with low to medium settings, frame rates may reach 30-60 FPS in less demanding games. The GPU's DirectX 9 score of 176 and DirectX 11 score of 97 suggest older titles will run more smoothly. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 are low compared to mid-range GPUs. The CPU's strong single-core performance (4333 in Passmark) will not help if the GPU is the bottleneck. For esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, which are CPU-light and GPU-light, frame rates could be acceptable, but for graphically intensive modern games, this build is not suitable for gaming beyond casual or low-settings play. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 is indicative of a GPU that struggles with DX12 workloads, which are standard in current games.