SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT pairing represents a high-end desktop combination where a 16-core Raptor Lake processor meets a 16 GB RDNA 2 graphics card, placing the build at the 89th percentile overall. The CPU holds the 89th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile against all GPUs, indicating a closely matched duo that excels in both multi-threaded productivity and high-resolution rasterization. The data in this analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark scores, and it is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark results rather than direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, and uses Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It contains 16 cores and 24 threads, which breaks down into a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core split. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W, making it a power-efficient flagship for its generation. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache, which is substantial for reducing memory latency in multi-threaded workloads. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and the CPU includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop part and appeals to workstation users. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity. An integrated UHD Graphics 770 unit is present, offering a fallback display output or hardware encoding support without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales strongly with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,136 in single-thread, 2,262 in 2-threads, 4,469 in 4-threads, 8,193 in 8-threads, 10,717 in 16-threads, and 12,412 in max-threads, showing near-linear scaling up to 16 threads and then a moderate increase to 24 threads. This pattern suggests that the efficiency cores contribute meaningfully to heavy parallel workloads, though the performance cores carry the bulk of the load. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore hits 4,507.5, R20 multicore reaches 16,292, and R23 multicore scores 30,745, while single-core scores are 303, 2,299, and 2,116 respectively. The R23 single-core score of 2,116 is competitive for a 13th-generation part, indicating strong per-thread performance for legacy applications and lightly threaded games. Geekbench shows 19,429 in multicore and 2,529 in single-core, aligning with other results. PassMark tests further illustrate the CPU’s character: integer math scores 154,446, floating-point math 114,867, and extended instructions 36,625, while data compression reaches 595,292 and encryption hits 33,249. The average benchmark score is 46,881, placing it at the 89th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 at 46,971 (0.2% higher), the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at 47,022 (0.3% higher), the Ryzen 9 7845HX at 46,654 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 at 46,653 (0.5% lower). This indicates the i7-13700K sits in a tight performance band with those competitors, within half a percent either way, making it a balanced choice rather than an outlier.

For real workloads, the high multi-threaded scores suggest strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where all 24 threads can be utilized. The single-thread scores ensure responsive everyday use and solid performance in games that rely on a few fast cores. The 30 MB shared L3 cache benefits workloads with large data sets, such as database queries or physics simulations, while the DDR5 support (if paired with appropriate memory) can further improve bandwidth-sensitive tasks. The 125 W TDP means cooling requirements are moderate, but the boost clock of 5.40 GHz demands a capable cooler for sustained all-core loads, as the data shows high multi-thread scores that will generate significant heat.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46,881 places it at the 89th percentile, meaning it outperforms 89% of all CPUs in the database, a strong result for a desktop processor released in late 2022. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% in average score, showing that the i7-13700K is not a class leader but is firmly in the upper tier of available processors. The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, has an average benchmark score of 58,392 and sits at the 88th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are similarly close: the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58,528 (0.2% higher), the Intel Arc A570M at 58,239 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 (0.5% lower). This places the GPU in a crowded performance segment where small deltas separate products, but the RX 6950 XT’s 88th percentile confirms it is a high-end part for its generation.

Looking at individual GPU benchmarks, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,235, which is a modern DirectX 12 test that stresses ray tracing and advanced features. Geekbench scores are notably high: Metal reaches 222,653, OpenCL 205,998, and Vulkan 165,212, indicating strong compute performance across different APIs, which is relevant for content creation and scientific workloads. PassMark results show a G3D score of 28,070, a G2D score of 1,063, and a GPU compute score of 14,199. DirectX 11 and 9 scores are 300 and 303 respectively, while DirectX 12 and 10 are lower at 114 and 164, which is unusual but may reflect driver optimizations or test variations. The combined picture is a CPU that excels in multi-threaded productivity and a GPU that delivers high rasterization and compute throughput, though the DirectX 12 PassMark score is lower than expected, suggesting that the GPU’s strength lies in older API compatibility and general compute rather than the latest DirectX 12 features in that specific benchmark.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 89, matching the CPU’s individual percentile and slightly exceeding the GPU’s, indicating that the CPU is the more dominant component in this build. For real workloads, the CPU’s 30,745 Cinebench R23 multicore score means it can handle 4K video editing timelines and complex 3D scenes, while the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance support high-resolution texture rendering and GPU-accelerated effects. The data shows a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, though the CPU has a slight edge in percentile position.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-13700K and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is close, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile, but the nature of bottlenecks depends on the workload. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or data compression, the i7-13700K’s PassMark physics score of 2,716 and integer math score of 154,446 will be the limiting factor, while the GPU remains underutilized. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming with ultra settings, the RX 6950 XT’s 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the constraint, especially at 4K where pixel throughput is taxed. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,136 in 3DMark suggests it can feed the GPU in most games, but the GPU’s 88th percentile means that at 1080p with lower graphical settings, the CPU could become the bottleneck if the frame rate exceeds what the GPU can render.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect because no measured FPS data exists for this combination, but the benchmark scores provide clues. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 8,193 and max-thread score of 12,412 indicate strong multi-core performance, which is beneficial for games that use multiple threads for AI, physics, and streaming. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,235 is a modern DX12 benchmark, and its PassMark G3D score of 28,070 is high, but the lower DirectX 12 score of 114 in PassMark suggests that the GPU may not excel in all DX12 workloads. In practice, the CPU is likely to keep up with the GPU at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the GPU is the primary driver, but at 1080p with a high-refresh monitor, the CPU’s single-thread performance could limit maximum frame rates. The data implies that for esports titles at low settings, the CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock and 1,136 single-thread score would be the ceiling, while for AAA games at ultra settings, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and bandwidth would dictate performance.

The power draw also affects balance. The CPU has a 125 W TDP, and the GPU has a 335 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This means the system can pull substantial power under load, and the CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost will require adequate cooling to sustain that clock, which in turn affects sustained frame rates in long gaming sessions. The data does not provide power consumption figures beyond TDP, but the combination suggests a system that needs a robust power supply and cooling solution rather than a modest one.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for NVMe SSDs and GPUs, though the RX 6950 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds without bottlenecking. The platform’s memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 means that users upgrading from an older system can reuse DDR4 memory to save costs, or migrate to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the FACT PACK does not specify bandwidth figures for the CPU. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use, allowing error-correcting memory in a desktop socket, which is rare and valuable for data integrity in scientific or financial computations.

The GPU’s upgrade path is limited by its end-of-life production status, as the Radeon RX 6000 series is being succeeded by Navi III, according to the FACT PACK. However, the RX 6950 XT’s 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth remain relevant for current games, and its PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface is compatible with modern motherboards. The suggested PSU of 700 W provides headroom for the 125 W CPU and 335 W GPU, but a future upgrade to a more power-hungry GPU would require a higher-rated power supply, which the data does not specify. The CPU’s socket 1700 is shared with other 12th and 13th generation parts, but the FACT PACK does not list specific motherboard chipset compatibility, so the upgrade path within the same socket is uncertain but likely possible with a BIOS update.

A sensible next upgrade for this system, based on the data, would be to add more memory or faster memory, given the dual-channel support and the CPU’s high multi-threaded scores that benefit from bandwidth. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a newer generation with higher ray tracing performance would address the RX 6950 XT’s lower DirectX 12 scores, though the CPU would still hold its own. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 335 W TDP mean that the 700 W PSU has some headroom, but not for extreme overclocking, as the multiplier is unlocked on the CPU, allowing for manual tuning if the cooling solution permits. The data shows that the platform is mature and stable, with the CPU’s active production status ensuring driver and BIOS support.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,136 and boost clock of 5.40 GHz suggest strong per-core performance for driving high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures. However, the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates are estimates, and the GPU’s 88th percentile indicates it can handle 1440p high-refresh gaming, but 4K ultra settings may push it to the limit.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and high multi-threaded scores, such as 12,412 in 3DMark max-threads and 30,745 in Cinebench R23, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, as the i7-13700K can handle both the game and the stream encoder without significant frame drops. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also offers a hardware encoder as a fallback, though the discrete GPU handles the main rendering.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 595,292 and floating-point math score of 114,867 indicate strong performance in codec operations and effects processing, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 205,998 accelerates render previews and exports. This combination can handle 4K multi-track timelines, with the CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache aiding in scrubbing large files.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,745 is excellent for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D, and the GPU’s FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large scenes without out-of-memory errors, making this a viable mid-range rendering workstation.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 154,446 and extended instructions score of 36,625 show strong performance in compilation and code analysis, while the 24 threads handle parallel build systems. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes enable fast NVMe storage for source code repositories.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,333 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsing, office suites, and programming IDEs, while the GPU is overkill for these tasks but provides headroom for occasional light gaming or data visualization. The 125 W TDP means power consumption is moderate for a desktop, and the integrated graphics can handle basic display tasks if needed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,136 and 8-thread score of 8,193 indicate it can handle modern game engines that use multiple cores, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4,235 and PassMark G3D score of 28,070 suggest strong rasterization performance. Based on these scores, at 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU is likely to be the bottleneck in CPU-intensive games, potentially limiting frame rates to around 120-150 FPS in esports titles, though these are estimates. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a factor, and the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth should support high frame rates in most AAA games, perhaps 90-120 FPS at ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 23.65 TFLOPS is sufficient for 60 FPS in many titles, but the lower DirectX 12 PassMark score of 114 suggests that games heavily optimized for DX12 may see reduced performance compared to older APIs. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.40 GHz helps maintain high frame rates in less demanding scenes, but the overall gaming performance is expected to be strong, especially at 1440p, where the balance between CPU and GPU is optimal. These figures are qualitative estimates and should be treated as such, as no measured FPS data validates them.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 21 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. It has 5,120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 80 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed, indicating no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. The clocks are 1,860 MHz base, 2,100 MHz game, and 2,310 MHz boost, with memory running at 2,250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s across a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The pixel rate is 295.7 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 739.2 GTexel/s, and the FP32 performance is 23.65 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The TDP is 335 W, requiring a suggested PSU of 700 W, and it uses a triple-slot cooler with two 8-pin power connectors.

Benchmark scores show a GPU that is strong in compute and rasterization. The Geekbench Metal score of 222,653 and OpenCL score of 205,998 are high, indicating excellent performance in GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding and machine learning inference, though the lack of tensor cores means it relies on general compute. The Vulkan score of 165,212 is lower but still respectable, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,235 shows capable modern API performance. PassMark results are mixed: G3D at 28,070 is high, but DirectX 12 at 114 and DirectX 10 at 164 are low, which may reflect driver issues or test anomalies. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 58,392 places it at the 88th percentile, with nearest rivals within 0.5%, showing it is a competitive high-end part. For rendering, the FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM allow for complex scenes and high-resolution textures, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures fast data transfer, but the lack of tensor cores means AI-based features like DLSS are not supported, limiting its appeal for those who rely on such upscaling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core count and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, meaning it outperforms 89% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700K has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a desktop processor.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 700 W, with the GPU having a TDP of 335 W.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this exact build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is end-of-life, with a successor named Navi III, according to the FACT PACK.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets enthusiasts and professionals who need high multi-threaded performance and strong rasterization without requiring the latest ray tracing hardware. Gamers at 1440p will find the sweet spot, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 1,136 and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM support high-refresh gaming with ultra settings, and the 88th GPU percentile ensures smooth frame rates in most titles. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,745 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 205,998, enabling fast rendering and effects processing. Software developers will appreciate the 24 threads for parallel builds and the ECC memory support for data integrity, while the 5.40 GHz boost clock keeps compilation times low. Students and small business workstation users can leverage the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,333 for everyday tasks, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display needs. The build is less suited for those who prioritize ray tracing or AI-accelerated features, as the GPU lacks tensor cores and its DirectX 12 PassMark score is low, but for traditional gaming and compute workloads, it is a capable choice.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT form a desktop-class build that sits at the 89th percentile overall, indicating a high-end system for its generation. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, an average benchmark score of 46,881, and a 125 W TDP, dominates multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU, with 16 GB VRAM, 23.65 TFLOPS, and an average score of 58,392 at the 88th percentile, excels in rasterization and compute. The pairing is balanced, with the CPU slightly ahead in percentile, and the platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC memory, making it versatile for gaming and professional use. The GPU’s end-of-life status and the CPU’s active production status suggest that this is a mature build, and the 700 W PSU recommendation provides adequate power for the 125 W CPU and 335 W GPU. Overall, this is a powerful desktop configuration for users who need high frame rates at 1440p or solid performance in rendering and development, with the caveat that ray tracing and AI features are not its strengths.