SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This build pairs Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake flagship-class CPU with AMD's 12 GB RDNA 2 mid-range GPU, landing at the 80th combined percentile across all tracked desktop configurations. The Core i7-13700K sits in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 6750 XT holds the 71st percentile among all GPUs, creating an asymmetric pairing where the processor substantially outclasses the graphics card in relative standing. The measured FPS data across 53 games shows an average of 127.9 frames per second at 1080p ultra settings, with the pair ranking 1682nd out of 3732 tracked CPU-GPU combinations by average FPS.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with 17,200 million transistors across a 335 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This memory configuration provides ample capacity for modern titles at high resolutions, though the 192-bit bus width limits bandwidth compared to wider-memory rivals.

Compute resources include 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU features 40 ray accelerators (RT cores), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. Pixel rate reaches 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 416.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 13.31 TFLOPS for FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest graphics APIs.

Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 71st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,011. The PassMark G3D score of 20,700 indicates strong DirectX 11 performance, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 9,550 shows moderate compute throughput. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 2,548, reflecting modern API performance. Geekbench scores include 137,249 in Metal, 16,360 in OpenCL, and 98,089 in Vulkan, with the Metal result notably higher than OpenCL, suggesting platform-specific optimization differences.

The nearest rivals reveal a tight competitive cluster. The AMD Radeon R9 M395X scores 25,891 (0.5% higher), the AMD FirePro W7100 scores 25,856 (0.6% higher), the AMD FirePro D700 scores 25,842 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25,740 (1.1% higher). This means the RX 6750 XT effectively trades blows with these older or mobile parts, sitting just 0.5-1.1% below them in average score—a negligible real-world difference. For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM at 432 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for 1440p texture-heavy scenes, but the 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 rate positions it as a mid-tier compute performer rather than a rendering powerhouse.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-13700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory support is included, a feature that may appeal to workstation users seeking data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), offering substantial bandwidth for modern storage and graphics cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output capabilities, useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU.

The CPU's TDP is rated at 125 W, while the RX 6750 XT has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, which provides headroom for the combined system power draw. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. These specifications indicate a mid-tower case with adequate airflow and power delivery will suffice, though the 600 W suggestion leaves limited headroom for aggressive overclocking of both components simultaneously.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform offers several paths. The Socket 1700 supports the Core 13th Gen series, meaning a higher-tier CPU within the same generation could be installed without changing the motherboard. Memory can be upgraded from DDR4 to DDR5 if the motherboard supports both, though this requires a board designed for dual memory standards. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for next-generation GPUs and NVMe storage, though the RX 6750 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which operates comfortably within the available bandwidth. The 600 W suggested PSU may need upgrading if a more power-hungry GPU is installed later, as the combined TDP of the current CPU and GPU (375 W) already consumes a significant portion of that budget.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename), manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Base clock runs at 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel operation, and ECC memory is supported. Released on September 26, 2022, with a launch MSRP of $409, this processor remains in active production.

Benchmark performance is exceptional across the board. The CPU achieves a 3DMark multi-threaded score of 12,412 at max threads, 10,717 at 16 threads, 8,193 at 8 threads, 4,469 at 4 threads, 2,262 at 2 threads, and 1,136 at single thread. Cinebench results show 4,507.5 in R15 multicore and 303 in R15 single-core, 16,292 in R20 multicore and 2,299 in R20 single-core, and 30,745 in R23 multicore with 2,116 in R23 single-core. Geekbench scores reach 19,429 multicore and 2,529 single-core. PassMark results include 45,887 multithread, 4,333 single-thread, 154,446 integer math, 114,867 floating point math, 59,529 data compression, 33,249 data encryption, 36,625 extended instructions, and 62,670 random string sorting.

The average benchmark score of 46,881 places this CPU at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors. The nearest rivals show extremely tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46,971 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47,022 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46,654 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46,653 (0.5% lower). These sub-1% differences mean the i7-13700K is effectively tied with these rivals in overall CPU performance, with the 16-core/24-thread configuration providing strong multi-threaded throughput for content creation, compilation, and scientific workloads.

The single-thread score of 4,333 in PassMark and 1,136 in 3DMark single-thread demonstrate excellent per-core performance, beneficial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The data encryption score of 33,249 indicates strong cryptographic throughput, while the find prime numbers score of 191 and physics score of 2,716 show varied performance across specialized workloads. The 30 MB L3 cache provides ample shared capacity for multi-threaded applications that benefit from data locality.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of tracked desktop configurations. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 71st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700K compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i7-13700K's average benchmark score of 46,881 is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46,971), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47,022), AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46,654), and Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46,653). These differences are negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is also supported, which is unusual for consumer platforms and may benefit workstation users.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RX 6750 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This provides ample capacity for high-resolution gaming and texture-heavy workloads.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 26,011 is within 1.1% of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25,891), AMD FirePro W7100 (25,856), AMD FirePro D700 (25,842), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25,740). The differences are minimal, ranging from 0.5% to 1.1%.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games?

A: The pair achieves an average of 127.9 FPS across all tracked games at 1080p ultra settings, ranking 1682nd out of 3732 CPU-GPU pairs by average FPS. This places it in the upper half of tracked configurations.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i7-13700K includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which provides display output capabilities for basic tasks or troubleshooting without the discrete GPU installed.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates distinct bottleneck patterns depending on the workload. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 71st percentile indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor in most graphics-intensive scenarios. This is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions: at 1080p, many games show CPU-bound behavior where the GPU cannot fully utilize the processor's capabilities, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear constraint.

The measured FPS data illustrates this scaling. In Call of Duty: Warzone, FPS drops from 167.1 at 1080p to 153.2 at 1440p to 127.4 at 4K, showing a relatively modest decline that suggests CPU involvement in maintaining high frame rates. Counter-Strike 2 shows 193.3 at 1080p, 132.2 at 1440p, and 74.5 at 4K, with the 4K figure representing a 61% drop from 1080p, indicating GPU limitation at higher resolutions. Cyberpunk 2077 demonstrates the most extreme scaling: 60.5 at 1080p, 41.7 at 1440p, and 29.9 at 4K, with the 4K result less than half of 1080p, clearly GPU-bound.

In CPU-intensive titles, the bottleneck shifts. Microsoft Flight Simulator achieves 70.3 at 1080p but only drops to 56.8 at 1440p and 38.4 at 4K, suggesting the CPU handles the simulation load while the GPU manages rendering. Red Dead Redemption 2 shows 50.4 at 1080p, 36.6 at 1440p, and 26.1 at 4K, with the 1080p result already below 60 FPS, indicating the GPU struggles even at lower resolutions in demanding titles. The pair's rank of 1682 out of 3732 by average FPS (127.9) places it in the 55th percentile of FPS performance, lower than the combined percentile of 80, confirming that the GPU drags down overall gaming performance relative to the CPU's capability.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower for productivity while maintaining solid 1080p and 1440p gaming capability. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and multi-threaded scores—Cinebench R23 multicore of 30,745 and PassMark multithread of 45,887—make it ideal for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU's 71st percentile and 12 GB VRAM provide enough graphics power for 1080p ultra gaming and moderate 1440p performance, though 4K gaming requires significant settings reductions in demanding titles.

Gamers at 1080p will find this build capable of high refresh rates in most titles, with measured FPS exceeding 144 in games like Counter-Strike 2 (193.3), Valorant (448), and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (232). At 1440p, competitive games remain playable at high refresh rates, with Counter-Strike 2 at 132.2 and Rainbow Six Siege at 152, while single-player titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (41.7) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (36.6) require settings adjustments. Content creators benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 30,745 indicating fast video rendering and 3D scene processing, while the GPU's compute score of 9,550 in PassMark supports GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers benefit from the 16-core/24-thread configuration, with PassMark integer math of 154,446 and data compression of 59,529 indicating efficient compilation and data processing. Students and office workers gain from the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4,333) for responsive application use, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display solution. Small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support and the CPU's 89th percentile ranking for reliability and performance in data-intensive tasks.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The measured FPS data, confirmed as actual measurements, shows the RX 6750 XT's performance across 53 titles at three resolutions with ultra settings. At 1080p, the GPU delivers excellent performance in competitive titles: Valorant reaches 448 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 427.7, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X hits 233.8, and Roblox runs at 252.2. Single-player experiences vary widely, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 60.5, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 50.4, and The Medium at 41.7 representing the most demanding titles, while Assetto Corsa (114.5), Doom (142.8), and Hitman 2 (76.8) show more moderate requirements.

At 1440p, performance drops are noticeable but acceptable for most games. Competitive shooters remain playable: Valorant hits 382, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 294.8, and Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 154.8. Open-world and AAA titles show more significant reductions, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 41.7, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36.6, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 56.8. The 1080p to 1440p scaling varies by game, with Call of Duty: Warzone dropping from 167.1 to 153.2 (8% reduction) while Counter-Strike 2 falls from 193.3 to 132.2 (32% reduction), indicating different CPU-GPU balance points.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck in demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 29.9, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 26.1, and The Medium to 28.0, all below playable thresholds. Less demanding games remain functional: Valorant hits 305, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 173.9, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 127.4. Ark: Survival Ascended is the worst performer at 8.8 FPS, while Allods Online (26.6) and Archeage (24.7) also struggle at 4K. The average FPS across all games of 127.9 at 1080p suggests this build is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with 1440p viable for competitive titles and less demanding single-player games.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core i7-13700K with AMD's Radeon RX 6750 XT, representing a pairing where a high-end CPU (89th percentile) meets a mid-range GPU (71st percentile). The resulting combined percentile of 80 places this configuration in the upper tier of tracked desktop systems, though the FPS-based rank of 1682 out of 3732 (55th percentile) reveals that gaming performance is more modest than the raw component percentiles suggest.

The CPU's launch MSRP was $409, and the GPU's launch MSRP was 549 USD, though pricing discussions are beyond the scope of this analysis. The i7-13700K is an unlocked processor (multiplier unlocked) from the Core 13th Gen series, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads with a 5.40 GHz boost clock. The RX 6750 XT is part of the Radeon RX 6000 series, now end-of-life, with 12 GB GDDR6 memory and a 2600 MHz boost clock. Both components support modern APIs (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4) and PCIe Gen 4 or higher connectivity.

This pairing represents a configuration where the CPU has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades. The i7-13700K's performance is substantially higher than what the RX 6750 XT can utilize in most gaming scenarios, meaning users could install a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking the CPU. However, the current GPU provides solid 1080p gaming and adequate 1440p performance, making this a balanced system for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads like video editing or 3D rendering alongside moderate gaming demands.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 46,881, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Key scores include 3DMark max threads of 12,412, Cinebench R23 multicore of 30,745 and single-core of 2,116, Geekbench multicore of 19,429 and single-core of 2,529, and PassMark multithread of 45,887 with single-thread of 4,333. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26,011, placing it at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. Notable GPU scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 of 2,548, PassMark G3D of 20,700, PassMark GPU compute of 9,550, and Geekbench Vulkan of 98,089.

The combined picture reveals a significant performance gap between the two components. The CPU outperforms 89% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms 71% of all graphics cards—an 18-percentage-point difference that indicates the CPU is the stronger component. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this asymmetry, sitting between the individual CPU and GPU percentiles. The pair's average FPS of 127.9 across 53 games, ranking 1682nd out of 3732 pairs, further confirms that gaming performance is constrained by the GPU rather than the CPU.

In CPU-intensive benchmarks, the i7-13700K shows exceptional scaling from 2 threads (2,262 in 3DMark) to max threads (12,412), representing a 5.5x improvement. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,745 is particularly strong, indicating excellent sustained multi-threaded performance. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20,700 versus its compute score of 9,550 shows a 2.2x difference between graphics and compute workloads, suggesting the card is optimized for rendering rather than general-purpose compute. The Geekbench Metal score of 137,249 versus OpenCL of 16,360 shows a 8.4x difference, indicating significant platform-specific optimization in the Metal API.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build excels in competitive titles, with Valorant at 448 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 427.7, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 233.8, all exceeding 144 Hz refresh rates. At 1440p, Valorant (382) and Rainbow Six Siege X (154.8) remain above 144 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 (132.2) approaches this threshold.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 30,745 indicating strong simultaneous workload capability. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM at 432 GB/s bandwidth supports encoding and rendering without compromising frame rates in most titles.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45,887 and data compression score of 59,529 indicate fast video encoding and file processing. The GPU's compute score of 9,550 supports GPU-accelerated effects, though it is not a top-tier compute performer compared to the CPU's relative strength.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore of 30,745 positions the CPU as a strong renderer for CPU-based workflows. The GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS FP16 provide moderate GPU rendering performance, suitable for occasional rendering tasks rather than professional production workloads.

Software development: PassMark integer math of 154,446 and extended instructions of 36,625 indicate fast code compilation and execution. The 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores support parallel build systems, while the single-thread score of 4,333 ensures responsive IDE performance.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance of 2,529 in Geekbench and 4,333 in PassMark delivers snappy application responsiveness. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a reliable fallback for display output, while the 12 GB GPU VRAM handles any graphics-accelerated productivity tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700K

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds