SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700K

46,881 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a high-end 16-core Intel desktop processor with a mainstream 8 GB AMD graphics card. The result is a desktop build that prioritizes heavy multi-threaded compute and high-refresh-rate esports titles, while making clear compromises in the most demanding AAA games at high resolutions. The data shows a system with an exceptional CPU foundation and a GPU that is the definitive limiting factor in graphics-heavy scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 7 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 237 mm² containing 11,060 million transistors. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The GPU is equipped with 28 ray accelerators (RT cores), providing hardware support for DirectX Raytracing, though its performance in that area is modest given the overall compute throughput. The card operates at a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. Pixel fill rate is 159.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 8.928 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is listed as 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1).

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19036. Its nearest rivals provide a tight cluster of comparison. The NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19030 (a 0% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19049 (-0.1% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089 (-0.3% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954 (+0.4% delta). This indicates the RX 6600 sits in a very competitive performance band, trading blows within a fraction of a percent of these professional and mobile parts. In practical terms, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming, but the 128-bit bus width limits performance scaling at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth becomes critical. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for its performance class, and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 300 W PSU. The card is dual-slot, measures 190 mm in length, and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700K delivers a dominant CPU performance profile. In 3DMark tests, the processor scores 12412 with max threads, 10717 with 16 threads, 8193 with 8 threads, 4469 with 4 threads, 2262 with 2 threads, and 1136 with a single thread. Cinebench R23 results show a multicore score of 30745 and a single-core score of 2116. The CPU's average benchmark score is 46881, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in aggregate score are the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971, -0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022, -0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46654, +0.5% delta), and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653, +0.5% delta). This places the i7-13700K in a virtual tie with these strong competitors, with all deltas within 0.5% of each other.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 19036 places it at the 63rd percentile, which is significantly lower than the CPU's 89th percentile. Passmark results for the GPU show a G3D score of 15096 and a GPU compute score of 6554. The combined picture from the benchmark scores is clear: this system has a top-tier processor that can handle any compute workload without breaking a sweat, paired with a mid-range graphics card that will be the bottleneck in graphically intensive tasks. The combined percentile for the build is 76th, reflecting the overall position of this CPU+GPU combination. In terms of actual gaming performance across a broad set of titles, the pair's average FPS is 95.8, ranking it 2867th out of 3732 pairs. This ranking places it in the lower half of tested configurations, underscoring the GPU's role as the performance limiter.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance gap between the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This 26-percentile point gap indicates the processor dramatically outclasses the graphics card in relative performance.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700K compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The i7-13700K scores 46881, while the Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, which is a -0.2% delta, meaning they perform within a rounding error of each other.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Radeon RX 6600?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700K has ECC memory support listed as true, alongside its support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a suggested PSU of 300 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: In which gaming title does this build achieve its highest and lowest frame rates at 1080p?

A: The highest measured FPS at 1920x1080 is in Valorant at 325.8 FPS. The lowest is in Ark: Survival Ascended at 21.1 FPS.

Q: What is the PCIe interface version and lane width for the GPU?

A: The RX 6600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for users who need massive CPU compute power but are content with a solid 1080p gaming experience. The data shows that content creators working with multi-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the i7-13700K a formidable tool. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30745 and Passmark multithread score of 45887 are indicators of strong performance in heavily threaded workloads. For students in engineering or computer science, the CPU's 24 threads handle parallel processing tasks efficiently, while the GPU is sufficient for general-purpose compute and light CUDA-agnostic workloads.

For gamers, this build targets 1080p esports and competitive titles specifically. The measured FPS data shows excellent performance in games like Valorant (325.8 FPS at 1080p), CS:GO (312.4 FPS at 1080p), and Rainbow Six Siege (169 FPS at 1080p). For small business workstations, the CPU handles spreadsheet, database, and virtualization workloads with ease, though the GPU is overkill for basic office tasks. However, users looking to play the latest AAA titles at 1440p or 4K will need to consider this build's limitations. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 42.7 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 29.4 FPS at 1440p, which is below the 60 FPS target many gamers prefer. The build is not suitable for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming in demanding titles, nor for 4K gaming except in less demanding or older games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). It includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770, and has a TDP of 125 W. The LGA 1700 socket is used, and the processor has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Its launch MSRP is $409.

Benchmark data shows the CPU at the 89th percentile, with an average score of 46881. In Geekbench, it scores 19429 multicore and 2529 single-core. Passmark scores are notable: integer math at 154446, floating point math at 114867, and data compression at 595292. The processor's single-thread performance is also strong, as evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4333. The nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, all have average scores within 0.5% of this chip, demonstrating that the i7-13700K is a top-tier performer in its class. For real workloads, the CPU's high multi-thread scores across Cinebench R20 (16292), R23 (30745), and Geekbench (19429) indicate it excels in rendering, compiling, and scientific computing tasks. The high boost clock of 5.40 GHz also ensures strong performance in lightly threaded applications like gaming and general desktop use.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this build at ultra settings shows a clear pattern: the CPU provides ample headroom for high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU limits performance in visually intensive games. At 1920x1080, the system achieves very high frame rates in competitive shooters. Valorant runs at 325.8 FPS, CS:GO at 312.4 FPS, CS2 at 143 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 169 FPS. These numbers indicate a superb experience for competitive gaming at 1080p, where high refresh rate monitors can be fully utilized.

In less demanding single-player titles, the performance is also strong. Minecraft runs at 140 FPS, Roblox at 184 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 85.6 FPS. However, the picture changes with AAA games. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 42.7 FPS at 1080p, which is playable but not smooth. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 40.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 21.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally, with most demanding titles falling below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.8 FPS, and Control to 45 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly out of its depth, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 19.7 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9.9 FPS. The data confirms that this build is a 1080p gaming machine for AAA titles, and a 1440p-capable machine only for lighter or older games. The average FPS across all tested games is 95.8, which is heavily skewed by the high scores in esports titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p, but become increasingly limiting at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory kits, though the dual-channel memory bus means both types will operate in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), which is the primary interface for future high-bandwidth devices like NVMe SSDs or next-generation GPUs. The motherboard choice will determine whether DDR4 or DDR5 is used, and the PCIe 5.0 support is a forward-looking feature. The platform is mature, having been released in 2022, so BIOS support and compatibility are well-established.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The CPU has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and sits at the 89th percentile. It is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most workloads. Upgrading the RX 6600 (63rd percentile) to a higher-tier GPU would yield significant improvements in gaming FPS, especially at higher resolutions. The current GPU requires a 300 W PSU, and the CPU has a TDP of 125 W. A more powerful GPU would likely require a higher wattage PSU, but the exact figure is not specified in the data. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5, which means a modern GPU would not be bandwidth-limited at the CPU interface level, though the RX 6600 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes are sufficient for a high-end GPU and a fast NVMe drive. Memory is also upgradeable, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to increase capacity or switch to faster kits depending on their motherboard.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop class system that pairs the Intel Core i7-13700K with the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The CPU is a high-end 16-core processor from the Core 13th Gen series, while the GPU is a mainstream 8 GB card from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The combined percentile for this build is 76th, which indicates it is a mid-to-high-tier configuration overall. However, this overall figure masks the significant imbalance between the two components. The CPU's performance is at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, which is exceptional. The GPU's performance is at the 63rd percentile, which is solidly mid-range. The build's overall tier is largely defined by the GPU's limitations in gaming, while its compute potential is far higher.

The pair's rank by FPS is 2867th out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 95.8 across all tested games. This rank places it in the lower half of all tested pairs, which is a direct result of the GPU's performance ceiling. In terms of the build's class, it is a desktop system designed for a mix of productivity and gaming. The CPU is capable of professional-level workloads, while the GPU is suitable for 1080p gaming. The system is not a high-end gaming rig, nor is it a budget office PC. It occupies a specific niche: a high-performance compute workstation with a capable, but not elite, gaming component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Intel Core i7-13700K sits at the 89th percentile, while the RX 6600 sits at the 63rd percentile. This 26-point gap indicates that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. In gaming workloads, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor. The measured FPS data confirms this: in demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate at 1080p is 42.7 FPS, which is typical of a mid-range GPU, not a system with a top-tier CPU. The CPU's potential to push high frame rates is unrealized in these scenarios because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough.

In CPU-bound workloads, the situation is reversed. The GPU is idle or underutilized, and the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads excel. For tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will not be a bottleneck, and the GPU may only be used lightly. The bottleneck is workload-dependent. For gaming, the GPU is the clear limiter. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 4K shows the GPU struggling as resolution increases. For example, in Allods Online, the FPS drops from 62.5 at 1080p to 39.1 at 1440p, and to 21.4 at 4K. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU memory bandwidth limitation. Conversely, in CPU-light games like Valorant, the FPS is extremely high (325.8 FPS at 1080p), demonstrating that the CPU can feed the GPU more than enough frames when the graphics load is light. The system is well-balanced for esports and light gaming, but unbalanced for AAA gaming, where the GPU hampers the CPU's capability. Upgrading the GPU would improve gaming performance dramatically, while the CPU would remain relevant for years to come.